America on Fire: Kamala Harris’s Dangerous Approach to Radical Liberal Violence and Civil Unrest

[Maximum Overkill 1,998]

https://americafirstpolicy.com/issues/america-on-fire-vice-president-kamala-harriss-dangerous-approach-to-radical-liberal-violence-and-civil-unrest

 

Vice President Kamala Harris: In Her Own Words

Instead of unequivocally condemning the violence and civil unrest, then-Senator Kamala Harris doubled down on the anti-police rhetoric that fueled much of the ongoing violence across the Nation, tacitly justifying the actions of the rioters.

• Harris encouraged Americans by posting a tweet to give money to help bail out the looters, rioters, and violent protesters that caused untold damage in Minneapolis and elsewhere during the unrest of 2020. “If you’re able to, chip in now to the @MNFreedomFund to help post bail for those protesting on the ground in Minnesota.”
• Harris referenced the BLM Riots as a “movement,” noting that “They (protestors) are not going to stop, this is a movement.”
• During a radio interview in June of 2020, Harris praised the “defund the police” movement stating, “The idea that putting more cops on the street makes us safer, is wrong.”
• Harris doubled down on this misguided approach to public safety when she said, “It is old, tired, wrong, status quo thinking to think you get more safety by putting more police officers on the street.”
• In her first solo speech in 2020 as Democrat vice presidential nominee, Harris vowed to stand with the protesters in Kenosha, Wisconsin, stating, “People are rightfully angry and exhausted...it’s no wonder people are taking to the streets. And I support them.” She made this statement while businesses within the city of Kenosha burned to the ground.

An America First Solution to Liberal violence and Civil Unrest

An America First approach to protecting our Nation’s communities from radical liberal violence and civil unrest 

[Voltaire 5,316]

This is why I endorse Kamala Harris for the Democratic Nomination for President in 2028. 

Probably.

Frankly, I'd rather see Joe Biden win the Democratic nomination in 2028.

[Frozenbeernuts 2,264]

Meanwhile in the UK people are being arrested for tweets. Liberals would say this is OK, and they always tell us we can't yell fire in a theater. That's their entire argument for getting rid of free speech

https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1865672607888183603?s=19

[squistion 2,203]

31 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Meanwhile in the UK people are being arrested for tweets. Liberals would say this is OK, and they always tell us we can't yell fire in a theater. That's their entire argument for getting rid of free speech

https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1865672607888183603?s=19

That is the UK. Liberals would not say this is OK here as it would obviously be deemed unconstitutional. Encouraging people to riot is not the same as yelling fire in a theatre. Please.

[avoiding injuries 1,586]

Wait until Penny is acquitted tomorrow…or pardoned in January. There’s going to be some glass door breaking sales. 

[seafoam1 3,031]

5 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said:

Wait until Penny is acquitted tomorrow…or pardoned in January. There’s going to be some glass door breaking sales. 

So true. When fair justice is delivered, the liberals go steal stuff then burn things down. 

[supermike80 1,913]

She lost right?

[Frozenbeernuts 2,264]

9 minutes ago, squistion said:

That is the UK. Liberals would not say this is OK here as it would obviously be deemed unconstitutional. Encouraging people to riot is not the same as yelling fire in a theatre. Please.

This is what Kamala Harris' regime would have been angling toward. They are doing this in the UK and in Canada. If we elect liberals again, this is what we have to look forward to.

[squistion 2,203]

6 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said:

Wait until Penny is acquitted tomorrow…or pardoned in January. There’s going to be some glass door breaking sales. 

Doubtful.

[Strike 5,553]

Just now, supermike80 said:

She lost right?

Depends who you ask. 

[squistion 2,203]

Just now, Frozenbeernuts said:

This is what Kamala Harris' regime would have been angling toward. They are doing this in the UK and in Canada. If we elect liberals again, this is what we have to look forward to.

Nope. You have no evidence from anything she or Democrats have said to indicate that. 

[Patented Phil 1,469]

11 minutes ago, squistion said:

Encouraging people to riot is not the same as yelling fire in a theatre. Please.

It’s worse

[seafoam1 3,031]

Wow. The squiddy is taking a beating again. Why does that dude keep coming back. Must be really lonely. 

[Frozenbeernuts 2,264]

20 minutes ago, squistion said:

Nope. You have no evidence from anything she or Democrats have said to indicate that. 

Except when John Kerry, Tim Walz, Hilary Clinton said we need to restrict speech. I guess just wait until they actually remove free speech and then point to that as the evidence, huh? No wonder the libs lost with how you think lol

[Frozenbeernuts 2,264]

22 minutes ago, squistion said:

Nope. You have no evidence from anything she or Democrats have said to indicate that. 

Lol

https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=3addb3f1ad5146cd&sxsrf=ADLYWIJwFewH66TqwqnG410PL0Yx9TttbA:1733682162364&q=tim+walz+free+speech+doesn't+cover+misinformation&udm=7&fbs=AEQNm0DuFpLV-TMOLcYa37tHqXXpDgSCmMRpiuihAMjGqNYlx32DxfsxInim9pGLTCx5e4jfYbQdmWvzSdrKMivFBhJe6V2v7406HU8Y45azbVQ1YOq3LS7TfgcpzI7_w4fTIK_MERoxogYkjiMcfqMMEm9draP1jeOAlWIjXWVoRC1d2Gnloy-DYSjtu_DcPa3Vry8k2s169_Uaf6_m9-bRmDzI_QWv6-w9BdkRh9KO8vP9YrPiiwg&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiTucOr5ZiKAxVywvACHQ0sDZQQtKgLegQIHBAB&biw=384&bih=653&dpr=2.81#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:989e8b58,vid:e-JL5Szxnzk,st:0

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,107]

4 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Lol

https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=3addb3f1ad5146cd&sxsrf=ADLYWIJwFewH66TqwqnG410PL0Yx9TttbA:1733682162364&q=tim+walz+free+speech+doesn't+cover+misinformation&udm=7&fbs=AEQNm0DuFpLV-TMOLcYa37tHqXXpDgSCmMRpiuihAMjGqNYlx32DxfsxInim9pGLTCx5e4jfYbQdmWvzSdrKMivFBhJe6V2v7406HU8Y45azbVQ1YOq3LS7TfgcpzI7_w4fTIK_MERoxogYkjiMcfqMMEm9draP1jeOAlWIjXWVoRC1d2Gnloy-DYSjtu_DcPa3Vry8k2s169_Uaf6_m9-bRmDzI_QWv6-w9BdkRh9KO8vP9YrPiiwg&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiTucOr5ZiKAxVywvACHQ0sDZQQtKgLegQIHBAB&biw=384&bih=653&dpr=2.81#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:989e8b58,vid:e-JL5Szxnzk,st:0

Squiz is a propaganda glory-hole slurping wh0re.  The more propaganda, the tastier it is for him.  Just deny actual truth and facts and keep shouting "no proof!". 

[Frozenbeernuts 2,264]

2 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Squiz is a propaganda glory-hole slurping wh0re.  The more propaganda, the tastier it is for him.  Just deny actual truth and facts and keep shouting "no proof!". 

The fact that liberals want to take away freedom is speech is a fact. They have said it multiple times. Then their voters just pretend like it never happened. Then it they actually did succeed in removing speech, liberal voters would defend it and pretend like they never said it wouldn't happen in the US.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,107]

1 minute ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

The fact that liberals want to take away freedom is speech is a fact. They have said it multiple times. Then their voters just pretend like it never happened. Then it they actually did succeed in removing speech, liberal voters would defend it and pretend like they never said it wouldn't happen in the US.

Yep.  They are All on record saying it.  In fact, the latest SCOTUS that doesn't know what a woman is even called the 1st amendment "troubling". 

GTFO, squiz, you propaganda slurping retard.

[IGotWorms 4,058]

Hey retard, election’s over. She lost. Your guy won

[jbycho 754]

43 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Hey retard, election’s over. She lost. Your guy won

Retard huh? 

[seafoam1 3,031]

3 hours ago, IGotWorms said:

Hey retard.

Dang. Check this guy out....

[jerryskids 6,800]

8 hours ago, jbycho said:

Retard huh? 

 

5 hours ago, seafoam1 said:

Dang. Check this guy out....

Do you think you are fooling anyone by posting with two different aliases?   

[jbycho 754]

1 hour ago, jerryskids said:

 

Do you think you are fooling anyone by posting with two different aliases?   

Is this supposed to be some sort of cutdown or something? Seriously. What does that even mean? I don't care who you think I am. You can call me PickleMcFluflu for all I care. Just don't make it disgusting.  

But, seriously, what is your actual point? And how does it relate to the topic of the thread?  Do you also go into Reddit threads that are focused on lawn mowers and post about soap? You must be a real hoot at parties. So edgy.  

 

[RLLD 4,231]

19 hours ago, IGotWorms said:

Hey retard, election’s over. She lost. Your guy won

Luckily.    These leftists need to be extruded from the Democrat party.  The best way to enable that is to shine bright light on them.   The radicalization of the Dem party needs to stop now.