Trump says Rachel Maddow is "the enemy of the people"

[squistion 1,947]

Almost sounds like a a threat, don't it? Is he hinting that he may try to have her taken off the air?

https://www.newsbreak.com/news/3776965676753-enemy-of-the-people-trump-rages-at-rachel-maddow-in-middle-of-the-night-attack?noAds=1&_f=app_share&s=i2

'Enemy of the people!' Trump rages at Rachel Maddow in middle of the night attack

Hours after Donald Trump took to his Truth Social account to celebrate the confirmation of embattled Fox News personality Pete Hegseth to be the next secretary of defense despite allegations of sexual assault and public drunkenness, he returned to attack MSNBC's Rachel Maddow.

The popular Maddow, a frequent critic of the president dating back to his first term that ended in 2020, recently returned to full-time nightly duty on the network to the delight of her fans.

[...]

Based on Trump's late-night post, he's not happy that she will be back to plague him five nights a week.

On Truth Social he launched an attack aimed at Maddow, her network, and CNN.

"Wow! Rachel Maddow has horrible ratings. She’ll be off the air very soon. MSNBC IS CLOSE TO DEATH. CNN HAS REACHED THE BOTTOM. This is a good thing," he wrote before adding, " They are the Enemy of the people!"

 

[Death 300]

I'm going to borrow this for my autocracy thread.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,927]

They are the enemy of the people. Not she is the enemy of the people.  Even though she is one of the most dishonest people at the propaganda networks. Just like squishy is here. 

[edjr 6,578]

mor trump threads!!!

[Hardcore troubadour 14,927]

She’s definitely the enemy of the boners 

[seafoam1 2,799]

Maddow is as ugly as she is stupid. Only a liberal could watch that crap. I did enjoy the kids in cages fake weeping bit she did though. Funnier than any SNL skit ever done. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,832]

Well, let's face it Maddow is absolutely an enemy of the people, just like the rest of the liberal propaganda networks and acolytes like squiztard.  That is irrefutable and undeniable.

We, the people, need to work and push these wanna' be Marxists and Communists out of government and wherever else these cockroaches are breeding.

[Maximum Overkill 1,739]

MACHO RADDOW  

[easilyscan 858]

The MSNBC primetime host told CNN on Monday that she was “worried about the country broadly if we put someone in power who is openly avowing that he plans to build camps to hold millions of people, and to ‘root out’ what he’s described in subhuman terms as his ‘enemy from within.'”

Maddow added: “For that matter, what convinces you that these massive camps he’s planning are only for migrants? So, yes, I’m worried about me — but only as much as I’m worried about all of us.”

Nothing more than a manly looking drama queen. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,832]

2 minutes ago, easilyscan said:

The MSNBC primetime host told CNN on Monday that she was “worried about the country broadly if we put someone in power who is openly avowing that he plans to build camps to hold millions of people, and to ‘root out’ what he’s described in subhuman terms as his ‘enemy from within.'”

Maddow added: “For that matter, what convinces you that these massive camps he’s planning are only for migrants? So, yes, I’m worried about me — but only as much as I’m worried about all of us.”

Nothing more than a manly looking drama queen. 

What she's saying is literally what a propagandist would say.  Make no mistake, if Maddow and her crew got enough power then they would no doubt start lining people up against the wall.

These are wanna' be Marxists and Communists.

[Horseman 2,357]

6 minutes ago, easilyscan said:

The MSNBC primetime host told CNN on Monday that she was “worried about the country broadly if we put someone in power who is openly avowing that he plans to build camps to hold millions of people, and to ‘root out’ what he’s described in subhuman terms as his ‘enemy from within.'”

Maddow added: “For that matter, what convinces you that these massive camps he’s planning are only for migrants? So, yes, I’m worried about me — but only as much as I’m worried about all of us.”

Nothing more than a manly looking drama queen. 

Tim should just tell her it's not happening. She's been fooled.  

[squistion 1,947]

5 minutes ago, easilyscan said:

The MSNBC primetime host told CNN on Monday that she was “worried about the country broadly if we put someone in power who is openly avowing that he plans to build camps to hold millions of people, and to ‘root out’ what he’s described in subhuman terms as his ‘enemy from within.'”

Maddow added: “For that matter, what convinces you that these massive camps he’s planning are only for migrants? So, yes, I’m worried about me — but only as much as I’m worried about all of us.”

Nothing more than a manly looking drama queen. 

Her concerns are legitimate as I think he views her as being among his "political enemies"

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/aug/30/trump-interview-jail-political-opponents-glenn-beck

Donald Trump vows to lock up political enemies if he returns to White House

Donald Trump says he will lock up his political enemies if he is president again.

In an interview on Tuesday, the rightwing broadcaster Glenn Beck raised Trump’s famous campaign-trail vow to “lock up” Hillary Clinton, his opponent in 2016, a promise Trump did not fulfill in office.

Beck said: “Do you regret not locking [Clinton] up? And if you’re president again, will you lock people up?”

Trump said: “The answer is you have no choice, because they’re doing it to us.”

[...]

[CaptainObvious1 324]

Something both sides should be able to agree on

[Death 300]

So much for MAGAturds being all about free speech - as long as it's what they and their beloved Clownzo want to hear.

[seafoam1 2,799]

16 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

What she's saying is literally what a propagandist would say.  Make no mistake, if Maddow and her crew got enough power then they would no doubt start lining people up against the wall.

These are wanna' be Marxists and Communists.

How do liberals just buy into that farcical crap? Ok, if liberals want a different policy that's stuff like spending or fema or something, fine, express their thoughts all they want even though they are flat out wrong in the type of things they crave. But this over the top dumbassery that they watch and repeat over and over is the same thing as them all wearing stupid signs for all to see. 

The only liberals I can take seriously are the ones that keep their mouths shut at all times and offer no thoughts on anything.. 

[Maximum Overkill 1,739]

6 minutes ago, Death said:

MAGAturds

And you're a Pedocrat  

MACHO RADDOW, say it 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,832]

4 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

How do liberals just buy into that farcical crap? Ok, if liberals want a different policy that's stuff like spending or fema or something, fine, express your their thoughts all they want even though they are flat out wrong in the type things they crave. But this over the top dumbassery that they watch and repeat over and over is the same thing as them all wearing stupid signs for all to see. 

The only liberals I can take seriously are the ones that keep their mouths shut at all times and offer no thoughts on anything.. 

The liberal mind is easy to indoctrinate and control.  By definition, liberals are weak.  That's why most cults are filled with liberals. Scientology.  The People's Temple and many more.  They're all like little communes (aka "communists").

[CaptainObvious1 324]

8 minutes ago, Death said:

So much for MAGAturds being all about free speech - as long as it's what they and their beloved Clownzo want to hear.

Serious discussion guy here

[Death 300]

6 minutes ago, CaptainObvious1 said:

Serious discussion guy here

Do you not support free-speech rights for MSNBC, CNN and Rachel Maddow?

[seafoam1 2,799]

7 minutes ago, CaptainObvious1 said:

Serious discussion guy here

He's equivalent to a female child in meltdown mode. 8 years now full of it and counting. 

[CaptainObvious1 324]

Just now, Death said:

Do you not support free-speech rights for MSNBC, CNN and Rachel Maddow?

No, I'm not taking anything you say seriously when you sound like a 7 year-old throwing a fit.  Especially when you turn around and claim you want a serious discussion.  You're a troll.  You've admitted it.  Everyone here knows it.

[Maximum Overkill 1,739]

1 minute ago, Death said:

Do you not support free-speech rights for MSNBC, CNN and Rachel Maddow?

Pedocrat says what?  

[seafoam1 2,799]

Pimpledoosh supports hate speech now. Shocking. 

[Gepetto 1,288]

1 minute ago, Death said:

Do you not support free-speech rights for MSNBC, CNN and Rachel Maddow?

Her mouth should be limited as was Alex Jones.

[easilyscan 858]

20 minutes ago, squistion said:

Her concerns are legitimate as I think he views her as being among his "political enemies"

When I see her handcuffed and taken to some type of internment camp, I'll believe it to be legitimate.

[Patented Phil 1,469]

SquidTard triggered.  Again.

[jerryskids 6,559]

Imagine reading the OP and thinking Trump is going to arrest Maddow.  I don't know whether I should  or  

[Hardcore troubadour 14,927]

22 minutes ago, Death said:

So much for MAGAturds being all about free speech - as long as it's what they and their beloved Clownzo want to hear.

Obama had journalists locked up. You were ok with it.  

[Death 300]

5 minutes ago, Gepetto said:

Her mouth should be limited as was Alex Jones.

How was his mouth limited?

He freely spouted his Sandy Hook conspiracy nonsense and got his ass kicked in court, and he later admitted that he was wrong. 

He's still free to say whatever he wants, and if Maddow has opened herself to legal exposure for what she says, people are free to file a lawsuit against her as well.

 

[Death 300]

5 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Obama had journalists locked up. You were ok with it.  

This discussion is about free speech, and I'm all for free speech. I'm not for locking up journalists for doing their jobs.

So, again, are you for free-speech rights for CNN, MSNBC and Rachel Maddow?

Just answer the question.

 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,927]

1 minute ago, Death said:

This discussion is about free speech, and I'm all for free speech. I'm not for locking up journalists for doing their jobs.

So, again, are you for free-speech rights for CNN, MSNBC and Rachel Maddow?

Just answer the question.

 

I was against Obama jailing journalists. 

[The Real timschochet 6,410]

Well if nothing else this should boost MSNBC’s ratings. 

[Strike 5,186]

1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

Well if nothing else this should boost MSNBC’s ratings. 

Can't get much worse

[The Real timschochet 6,410]

Just now, Strike said:

Can't get much worse

They have to compete with CNN as the main voice of reason these days. But CNN appears to be abandoning that role so I expect MSNBC to do much better in the months to come. 

[Maximum Overkill 1,739]

4 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Well if nothing else this should boost MSNBC’s ratings. 

I'm sure that would make you very happy  

[Strike 5,186]

1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

They have to compete with CNN as the main voice of reason these days. But CNN appears to be abandoning that role so I expect MSNBC to do much better in the months to come. 

Yeah THAT'S why their ratings suck

[seafoam1 2,799]

1 minute ago, Strike said:

Yeah THAT'S why their ratings suck

And the people have chosen Fox. I'm sure Timmy has a special opinion for that though.

[The Real timschochet 6,410]

3 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

I'm sure that would make you very happy  

Oh I don’t really care. Never understood why anyone would care about this. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,832]

4 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

They have to compete with CNN as the main voice of reason these days. But CNN appears to be abandoning that role so I expect MSNBC to do much better in the months to come. 

CNN a long time ago, maybe.  MSNBC never but both now are voices of Liberal Tokyo Rose.  When students read and talk about "propaganda" in the future, CNN, MSNBC will be at the top of the example list.

Sorry, Tim.  You're on the wrong side of history yet again.

[The Real timschochet 6,410]

Just now, seafoam1 said:

And the people have chosen Fox. I'm sure Timmy has a special opinion for that though.

Reason doesn’t sell, never has. Anger, populism, nativism sells. Conspiracy theories sell. Fox will always do great.