Chelsea Clinton got $84 Million from USAID?!?!

[Hardcore troubadour 14,910]

Imagine simping for the Clintons at this point. How did they get so rich? lol. 

[Horseman 2,353]

18 hours ago, The Girlfriend said:

My source is Wendy’s.

Makes sense.  How do you know Tim' s wife?

[Horseman 2,353]

44 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Imagine simping for the Clintons at this point. How did they get so rich? lol. 

And likely the most to suffer from the Epstein list despite what the effeminates want to say.   

[The Girlfriend 208]

2 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Makes sense.  How do you know Tim' s wife?

Different Wendy’s.

[TrailGuy 552]

On 2/6/2025 at 1:50 PM, jerryskids said:

These guys don't understand how large computer systems work.  Multi-user operating systems like Unix or Linux have a variety of access privileges (read/write/execute) at different levels of hierarchy.  To be able to do anything with the computers, Musk's teams would have needed to have been provided some level of admin privileges.  

We don't know what level of admin privileges DOGE had, but the Leftist cult is being given the marching orders that Musk and young engineers$#@! have downloaded all of our personal information, presumably to use as part of Musk's plan to take over the government.  But Righties are the ones chasing boogeymen with USAID.   

A young ally of Elon Musk and former Treasury Department appointee was accidentally given the ability to make changes to a sensitive payment database, an error that a civil servant said in a court filing was quickly corrected.

Career civil servants at the Treasury Department, including Joseph Gioeli, the deputy commissioner at the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, provided sworn statements in response to a lawsuit challenging the access Mr. Musk’s government efficiency team gained to sensitive federal payment systems.

The filings offer a more detailed recounting of the Treasury decision to grant Tom Krause, a Silicon Valley software executive, and Marko Elez, a 25-year-old former employee of X, entry to the payment systems, which distribute more than $5 trillion a year on behalf of the government. The Treasury Department and White House have repeatedly said that Mr. Elez and Mr. Krause were given only “read-only” access to the data, which includes Americans’ bank account and Social Security numbers.

In a court filing, however, Mr. Gioeli said that Treasury staff discovered on Feb. 6 that Mr. Elez had been given “read/write permissions instead of read-only” to one of the payment databases the day before. Mr. Gioeli said that Treasury staff revoked his additional access and are investigating the incident.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/11/us/elon-musk-treasury-data-x-employee.html

[TBayXXXVII 2,480]

On 2/7/2025 at 2:25 PM, Hardcore troubadour said:

Imagine simping for the Clintons at this point. How did they get so rich? lol. 

ThEy WrOtE a BoOk!!!

[seafoam1 2,798]

2 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

ThEy WrOtE a BoOk!!!

That's Bernie Sander's line. Seems they all wrote books and made 100s of millions from them.

[jerryskids 6,550]

21 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

A young ally of Elon Musk and former Treasury Department appointee was accidentally given the ability to make changes to a sensitive payment database, an error that a civil servant said in a court filing was quickly corrected.

Career civil servants at the Treasury Department, including Joseph Gioeli, the deputy commissioner at the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, provided sworn statements in response to a lawsuit challenging the access Mr. Musk’s government efficiency team gained to sensitive federal payment systems.

The filings offer a more detailed recounting of the Treasury decision to grant Tom Krause, a Silicon Valley software executive, and Marko Elez, a 25-year-old former employee of X, entry to the payment systems, which distribute more than $5 trillion a year on behalf of the government. The Treasury Department and White House have repeatedly said that Mr. Elez and Mr. Krause were given only “read-only” access to the data, which includes Americans’ bank account and Social Security numbers.

In a court filing, however, Mr. Gioeli said that Treasury staff discovered on Feb. 6 that Mr. Elez had been given “read/write permissions instead of read-only” to one of the payment databases the day before. Mr. Gioeli said that Treasury staff revoked his additional access and are investigating the incident.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/11/us/elon-musk-treasury-data-x-employee.html

That changes nothing I wrote.

Also, an accident that was quickly corrected doesn't exactly sound like a grand plan to take over the government.  Has Elon sold your highly valuable personal information yet, lemming?   

[TrailGuy 552]

On 2/6/2025 at 2:42 PM, jerryskids said:

I'm going to try to help you parse this, since you keep posting it as the ultimate authority, but it won't help.

First, it's a little odd that Wired has not one not two but three sources that nobody else has.  It's like the 3 Wired tech bros connected with the Musk tech bros, on Discord or maybe a lightly trafficked FF website, and the Musk tech bros were like "bro, check it out, we've got many admin privileges!"

Second, presuming the sources indeed know something, check out that last paragragh.  "many" admin privileges, what is that exactly?  "Typically"?  Is typically what "many" means?  As I pointed out earlier, there are a vast array of admin privileges.  But our 3 Wired tech bros have speculated on what "many" is.

Third, the lead author of this piece, Vittoria, has another article I might like entitled "The Young, Inexperienced Engineers Aiding Elon Musk's Government Takeover."  Government takeover?  Ima guess Vittoria doesn't like Musk.  Or seemingly, young men.

Court documents show wired was right, and so was I, and you were wrong.

[TrailGuy 552]

14 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

That changes nothing I wrote.

Also, an accident that was quickly corrected doesn't exactly sound like a grand plan to take over the government.  Has Elon sold your highly valuable personal information yet, lemming?   

Oh it was just an accident, sure.  right.

Still happened and we don't know what was updated.

Transparency 

[Mike Honcho 5,085]

1 minute ago, TrailGuy said:

Oh it was just an accident, sure.  right.

Still happened and we don't know what was updated.

Transparency 

I'm not going to weigh in whether it was an accident or not, but just wanted to note when a Dem is involved, many on the right often accuse others of being dense for believing it was a simple mistake or accident. 

[jonmx 2,424]

31 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

That changes nothing I wrote.

Also, an accident that was quickly corrected doesn't exactly sound like a grand plan to take over the government.  Has Elon sold your highly valuable personal information yet, lemming?   

It is a waste of time engaging these retards. Such disingenious retarded lying turds.  Who the fuk cares if one guy was mistakenly given write assess by one of their IT guys.   He probably did not even know he had it since he has no reason to modify anything.  They are auditing not making payments.   It is complete nonsense.  Every one of these retard leftists care more about protecting the corrupt and abusive authoritarian state.  Seriously, fuk everyone of these dipshitz. 

[jerryskids 6,550]

14 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

Court documents show wired was right, and so was I, and you were wrong.

Of course Wired was right.  They had "many" privileges.  That "typically" means blah blah blah.  They committed to nothing.

You weren't anything except a lemming.  You didn't understand the above, you still don't understand how such systems work, and you just parroted what the MSDNC told you to.

Don't you have work to do as a finance VP of a billion dollar healthcare-adjacent corporation?

[jerryskids 6,550]

14 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

I'm not going to weigh in whether it was an accident or not, but just wanted to note when a Dem is involved, many on the right often accuse others of being dense for believing it was a simple mistake or accident. 

What do you think he did in his brief time?  Transfer the Treasury to his offshore account?  Put his face on the $20 bill? (that would be funny actually)

[Mike Honcho 5,085]

1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

What do you think he did in his brief time?  Transfer the Treasury to his offshore account?  Put his face on the $20 bill? (that would be funny actually)

 

18 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

I'm not going to weigh in whether it was an accident or not, but just wanted to note when a Dem is involved, many on the right often accuse others of being dense for believing it was a simple mistake or accident. 

You having short-term memory loss and forgot I wrote that, it wasn't that long of a sentence?    

[jerryskids 6,550]

5 minutes ago, jonmx said:

It is a waste of time engaging these retards. Such disingenious retarded lying turds.  Who the fuk cares if one guy was mistakenly given write assess by one of their IT guys.   He probably did not even know he had it since he has no reason to modify anything.  They are auditing not making payments.   It is complete nonsense.  Every one of these retard leftists care more about protecting the corrupt and abusive authoritarian state.  Seriously, fuk everyone of these dipshitz. 

Yep.  But Jon, he's young?$#@!

 

[jerryskids 6,550]

Just now, Mike Honcho said:

 

You having short-term memory loss and forgot I wrote that, it wasn't that long of a sentence?    

Doh!  

[Strike 5,182]

19 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

I'm not going to weigh in whether it was an accident or not, but just wanted to note when a Dem is involved, many on the right often accuse others of being dense for believing it was a simple mistake or accident. 

I'm curious what you thought of HItlery hosting an e-mail server with an insecure certificate in her basement, storing classified documents on it.  That was much more egregious.  Did you condemn it at the time? 

[TrailGuy 552]

7 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Of course Wired was right.  They had "many" privileges.  That "typically" means blah blah blah.  They committed to nothing.

You weren't anything except a lemming.  You didn't understand the above, you still don't understand how such systems work, and you just parroted what the MSDNC told you to.

Don't you have work to do as a finance VP of a billion dollar healthcare-adjacent corporation?

Of course a MAGA will never admit where they were wrong.

[TrailGuy 552]

11 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

What do you think he did in his brief time?  Transfer the Treasury to his offshore account?  Put his face on the $20 bill? (that would be funny actually)

Paid himself $30M...

[Hardcore troubadour 14,910]

1 hour ago, TBayXXXVII said:

ThEy WrOtE a BoOk!!!

Don’t forget the speeches to Russia!  Goldman Sachs and the Banks. 

[jerryskids 6,550]

16 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

Of course a MAGA will never admit where they were wrong.

What was I wrong about?

[TrailGuy 552]

21 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

What was I wrong about?

You suggested Wired was wrong in their reporting.  Court records show they were right.

[Mike Honcho 5,085]

8 minutes ago, Strike said:

I'm curious what you thought of HItlery hosting an e-mail server with an insecure certificate in her basement, storing classified documents on it.  That was much more egregious.  Did you condemn it at the time? 

1. "I'm curious what you thought" - sure you are  

2. "storing classified documents" - That is incorrect, she received and sent some classified information in emails, (Most emails were retroactively deemed to contain classified information by the U.S. agencies from which the information originated.), she was not storing classified documents(there is a big difference) on her server.  

3. I don't really remember what I said about this issue at the time, maybe something along the lines that I agreed that it was a "mistake" to have done that without knowing if it was allowed.  If I said anything it was probably something like the people on the right were blowing up the issue to much more than it was, by misstating the facts. For instance saying she was "storing classified documents" on her server, she deleted all her emails, etc. Coincidentally - the deleting of emails was stated as a mistake by the IT guy and I definitely remember people on the right rolling their eyes at that claim. Today though they are embracing the mistake claim with regards to DOGE---the entire point of my post.

Regardless, today I acknowledge it was a mistake to add a domain to her husbands server/Clinton Foundation server for convenience. Whatever convenience she gained(if any) didn't outweigh her responsibilities as SoS and the proper handling of emails/electronic records.  And while I doubt she had much of a clue about the technical side of things, it does seem clear she did try to work within the guidelines and restrictions of classified information. On the other hand, her staff should have investigated thoroughly what needed to be done to have a home server (when she requested i)t that was up to standards(and they would have found out it wasn't allowed) and then followed proper protocol. 

Now, while we are on the subject of egregious concerns of national security and the condemnation of it, on a much more recent subject, how many posts did you make condemning Trump for housing CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS in his bathroom, let's say I'm curious. 

[Strike 5,182]

3 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

1. "I'm curious what you thought" - sure you are  

2. "storing classified documents" - That is incorrect, she received and sent some classified information in emails, (Most emails were retroactively deemed to contain classified information by the U.S. agencies from which the information originated.), she was not storing classified documents(there is a big difference) on her server.  

3. I don't really remember what I said about this issue at the time, maybe something along the lines that I agreed that it was a "mistake" to have done that without knowing if it was allowed.  If I said anything it was probably something like the people on the right were blowing up the issue to much more than it was, by misstating the facts. For instance saying she was "storing classified documents" on her server, she deleted all her emails, etc. Coincidentally - the deleting of emails was stated as a mistake by the IT guy and I definitely remember people on the right rolling their eyes at that claim. Today though they are embracing the mistake claim with regards to DOGE---the entire point of my post.

Regardless, today I acknowledge it was a mistake to add a domain to her husbands server/Clinton Foundation server for convenience. Whatever convenience she gained(if any) didn't outweigh her responsibilities as SoS and the proper handling of emails/electronic records.  And while I doubt she had much of a clue about the technical side of things, it does seem clear she did try to work within the guidelines and restrictions of classified information. On the other hand, her staff should have investigated thoroughly what needed to be done to have a home server (when she requested i)t that was up to standards(and they would have found out it wasn't allowed) and then followed proper protocol. 

Now, while we are on the subject of egregious concerns of national security and the condemnation of it, on a much more recent subject, how many posts did you make condemning Trump for housing CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS in his bathroom, let's say I'm curious. 

Uh, no.  You're either willfully misstating what happened in the Clinton e-mail case or are ignorant.  Either way, having a server connected to the Internet with an insecure certificate hosting sensitive government information is 1000 times worse than what is being discussed here, assuming Musk and his team actually had some high level of access to these systems.  What Clinton did was criminal and I still can't believe she didn't get prosecuted.  But that's the double standard that exists in Washington, and why the establishment hates Trump so much.

[Mike Honcho 5,085]

4 minutes ago, Strike said:

Uh, no.  You're either willfully misstating what happened in the Clinton e-mail case or are ignorant.  Either way, having a server connected to the Internet with an insecure certificate hosting sensitive government information is 1000 times worse than what is being discussed here, assuming Musk and his team actually had some high level of access to these systems.  What Clinton did was criminal and I still can't believe she didn't get prosecuted.  But that's the double standard that exists in Washington, and why the establishment hates Trump so much.

 

Quote

Now, while we are on the subject of egregious concerns of national security and the condemnation of it, on a much more recent subject, how many posts did you make condemning Trump for housing CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS in his bathroom, let's say I'm curious. 

[jerryskids 6,550]

3 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

You suggested Wired was wrong in their reporting.  Court records show they were right.

Suggested?  I suggested that Vittoria, the author, seems to not like Elon or young tech bros, if they work with/for Elon.  I also suggested that she didn't have any concrete info and was taking "many" and building it up to sound as bad as possible.  This was accurate.

As such, I implied a wait and see approach.  Now we know that they briefly were mistakenly given write access to certain systems, and that that was quickly removed.  Any changes, like if they changed the wording on the paper money to "In Musk We Trust," can be identified and rectified.

HTH

[Hardcore troubadour 14,910]

Chelsea Clinton in charge of millions of tax dollars. Ridiculous. Keep defending it shitlibs. 

[Strike 5,182]

56 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Now, while we are on the subject of egregious concerns of national security and the condemnation of it, on a much more recent subject, how many posts did you make condemning Trump for housing CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS in his bathroom, let's say I'm curious. 

My only posts on that topic would have been condemning the government for going after him.  For several reasons:

1)  That was a manufactured case, part of the lawfare to try to prevent him from running for President again.  The Biden administration directed the national archives to pretend they gave a sh*t about those documents. 

2)  I mean, seriously, you think they send the FBI to raid Obama at the break of day?  That was so orchestrated it's ridiculous.

3)  The President has the power to declassify anything he focking wants.  Whether Trump had done that or not who knows.  The case wasn't adjudicated so we'll never know all the facts.  We do know that Trump denied wrongdoing.  In Clinton's case, while there are some disputed facts, that facts that are not in dispute should have landed her in prison for at least a decade.  But, double standards and all that.

So let's think about this.  Biden is caught red handed with classified documents that he wasn't allowed to legally possess, stored in his garage next to his Corvette as well as several other locations.  The government acknowledges all of this and that he broke the law but didn't prosecute him because he was too old and feeble to be prosecuted.  I've never heard of that reasoning for not prosecuting a defendant before, but that's what happened in this case.   Did they raid Biden's offices?  Nope.  They let his attorney negotiate when he handed over the documents.  So convenient.  No chance of them hiding any evidence that way.  But in Trump's case they raided his home at the break of dawn.  Yeah, sure, legit.  I HOPE you don't really think that case was valid.

[Mike Honcho 5,085]

3 hours ago, Strike said:

My only posts on that topic would have been condemning the government for going after him.  For several reasons:

1)  That was a manufactured case, part of the lawfare to try to prevent him from running for President again.  The Biden administration directed the national archives to pretend they gave a sh*t about those documents. 

2)  I mean, seriously, you think they send the FBI to raid Obama at the break of day?  That was so orchestrated it's ridiculous.

3)  The President has the power to declassify anything he focking wants.  Whether Trump had done that or not who knows.  The case wasn't adjudicated so we'll never know all the facts.  We do know that Trump denied wrongdoing.  In Clinton's case, while there are some disputed facts, that facts that are not in dispute should have landed her in prison for at least a decade.  But, double standards and all that.

So let's think about this.  Biden is caught red handed with classified documents that he wasn't allowed to legally possess, stored in his garage next to his Corvette as well as several other locations.  The government acknowledges all of this and that he broke the law but didn't prosecute him because he was too old and feeble to be prosecuted.  I've never heard of that reasoning for not prosecuting a defendant before, but that's what happened in this case.   Did they raid Biden's offices?  Nope.  They let his attorney negotiate when he handed over the documents.  So convenient.  No chance of them hiding any evidence that way.  But in Trump's case they raided his home at the break of dawn.  Yeah, sure, legit.  I HOPE you don't really think that case was valid.

You clearly consume way too much right-wing media if this is how you perceive what the events that transpired. For example, you complain about the the raid on Trump's house and contrast it to how Biden got to negotiate the search on his, but you conveniently disregard that Trump and his attorneys were given multiple chances to negotiate the search, ignored supoena's, and had his lawyers lie to the feds, just to mention a few.  You ignore all of that and act as if both situations were equal. 

Sorry, but if you need to delude yourself so much to believe these things, don't expect me to take you seriously. 

 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,910]

3 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

You clearly consume way too much right-wing media if this is how you perceive what the events that transpired. For example, you complain about the the raid on Trump's house and contrast it to how Biden got to negotiate the search on his, but you conveniently disregard that Trump and his attorneys were given multiple chances to negotiate the search, ignored supoena's, and had his lawyers lie to the feds, just to mention a few.  You ignore all of that and act as if both situations were equal. 

Sorry, but if you need to delude yourself so much to believe these things, don't expect me to take you seriously. 

 

And you leave out that Biden never had authorization to possess his documents. Period. But he’s supposed to get credit for returning them?

[Strike 5,182]

48 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

You clearly consume way too much right-wing media if this is how you perceive what the events that transpired. For example, you complain about the the raid on Trump's house and contrast it to how Biden got to negotiate the search on his, but you conveniently disregard that Trump and his attorneys were given multiple chances to negotiate the search, ignored supoena's, and had his lawyers lie to the feds, just to mention a few.  You ignore all of that and act as if both situations were equal. 

Sorry, but if you need to delude yourself so much to believe these things, don't expect me to take you seriously. 

 

As HT noted, you completely skipped the part where Biden wasn't legally allowed to possess the classified documents he possessed.  As soon as the government became aware that he even MIGHT have had them they should have raided any place they thought they might be.   At least Trump didn't keep classified documents in the garage next to his Corvette.  FFS.

[Mike Honcho 5,085]

16 minutes ago, Strike said:

As HT noted, you completely skipped the part where Biden wasn't legally allowed to possess the classified documents he possessed.  As soon as the government became aware that he even MIGHT have had them they should have raided any place they thought they might be.   At least Trump didn't keep classified documents in the garage next to his Corvette.  FFS.

Biden could have kept those classified documents up his ass, that was irrelevant to the conversation or the question I asked you "how many posts did you make condemning Trump for housing CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS in his bathroom, let's say I'm curious?" What's relevant to the raid or not was did they follow protocol once the documents were discovered. 

So in regards to your that, one person ordered his staff to search his own house, discovered they classified documents and contacted the appropriate agencies to work out the surrender of them; the other person had classified documents that were discovered by the national archives because they were missing from what should have been delivered.  They then spent 18 months negotiating the return of those documents before the raid occurred.  According to you, the government should have raided his house as soon as they became aware they he might have them. 

Trump stored those documents in an unlocked bathroom in  resort, so the next to his Vette in a lock garage, isn't really the OMG you want to make believe it is. 

[jerryskids 6,550]

16 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Biden could have kept those classified documents up his ass, that was irrelevant to the conversation or the question I asked you "how many posts did you make condemning Trump for housing CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS in his bathroom, let's say I'm curious?" What's relevant to the raid or not was did they follow protocol once the documents were discovered. 

So in regards to your that, one person ordered his staff to search his own house, discovered they classified documents and contacted the appropriate agencies to work out the surrender of them; the other person had classified documents that were discovered by the national archives because they were missing from what should have been delivered.  They then spent 18 months negotiating the return of those documents before the raid occurred.  According to you, the government should have raided his house as soon as they became aware they he might have them. 

Trump stored those documents in an unlocked bathroom in  resort, so the next to his Vette in a lock garage, isn't really the OMG you want to make believe it is. 

Biden shouldn't have had those docs, since he wasn't POTUS at the time.  Also he had no brain function during his presidency.  Just saying.   

[Strike 5,182]

2 hours ago, Mike Honcho said:

Biden could have kept those classified documents up his ass, that was irrelevant to the conversation or the question I asked you "how many posts did you make condemning Trump for housing CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS in his bathroom, let's say I'm curious?" What's relevant to the raid or not was did they follow protocol once the documents were discovered. 

So in regards to your that, one person ordered his staff to search his own house, discovered they classified documents and contacted the appropriate agencies to work out the surrender of them; the other person had classified documents that were discovered by the national archives because they were missing from what should have been delivered.  They then spent 18 months negotiating the return of those documents before the raid occurred.  According to you, the government should have raided his house as soon as they became aware they he might have them. 

Trump stored those documents in an unlocked bathroom in  resort, so the next to his Vette in a lock garage, isn't really the OMG you want to make believe it is. 

You're repeating talking points.  The Biden facts are verified.  Take a deep breath Honcho.  You're hyperventilating.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,828]

1 minute ago, Strike said:

You're repeating talking points.  The Biden facts are verified.  Take a deep breath Honcho.  You're hyperventilating.

Hyperventilating is a feature of the left. It's default mode. 

Technically, the mode is called "Teenage Girl".

[KSB2424 3,148]

I've been posting on this here forearm for 20 years and the one thing Dems, Repubs, Libertarian or Green seem to of all agreed upon was that corruption, extreme waste, fraud, etc. was bad for business. Not only that but all of the Geeks over the years argued about "social" polices but most were for balanced budgets and fiscal responsibility.  

Now, finally in 2025 there is a deep dive in government waste and fraud and some of you are losing your minds, clutching pearls and throwing hissy fits.  This is what we needed and at one point in your life (pre Orange Man Bad) you wanted too. But you are blinded by the orange light.

Government is bloated, its been bloated for decades and this correction is overdue.  Yes, there will be collateral damage but ripping off band aids to expose bacteria does take some good skin and hairs with it.  Still needs to be done to get rid of the infection before it continues to spread.

This is a glorious time and well overdue. 

[Mike Honcho 5,085]

37 minutes ago, Strike said:

You're repeating talking points.  The Biden facts are verified.  Take a deep breath Honcho.  You're hyperventilating.

This is the definition of throwing the gun..and in this case it went straight up and came back and coldcocked you. 

[jbycho 580]

1 minute ago, Mike Honcho said:

This is the definition of throwing the gun..and in this case it went straight up and came back and coldcocked you. 

[Mike Honcho 5,085]

26 minutes ago, KSB2424 said:

I've been posting on this here forearm for 20 years and the one thing Dems, Repubs, Libertarian or Green seem to of all agreed upon was that corruption, extreme waste, fraud, etc. was bad for business. Not only that but all of the Geeks over the years argued about "social" polices but most were for balanced budgets and fiscal responsibility.  

Now, finally in 2025 there is a deep dive in government waste and fraud and some of you are losing your minds, clutching pearls and throwing hissy fits.  This is what we needed and at one point in your life (pre Orange Man Bad) you wanted too. But you are blinded by the orange light.

Government is bloated, its been bloated for decades and this correction is overdue.  Yes, there will be collateral damage but ripping off band aids to expose bacteria does take some good skin and hairs with it.  Still needs to be done to get rid of the infection before it continues to spread.

This is a glorious time and well overdue. 

If you want to lecture about govt fraud, maybe choose a thread that doesn't start with the claim that the govt gave Chelsea Clinton $84M. Maybe choose a thread that actually lists actual govt fraud.  And I would love for you to explain how people mocking and laughing at people who believed that Clinton claim is people "losing your minds, clutching pearls and throwing hissy fits".  I would say you are blinded by your faith in Trump that anything that you see that isn't abject fawning you decide is a case of OMB or TDS.  

I'm wouldn't say glorious, but watching a bunch of people see a tweet with a chart and start screaming that tax payers are giving Chelsea $84 is hilarious.