Starbucks to lay off 1,000

[supermike80 1,910]

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/starbucks-to-lay-off-1100-employees-this-week-as-ceo-aims-to-deliver-on-turnaround-135518008.html

 

I wonder how many will be profiled on CNN, ABC, NBC, Politico, PBS, Newsweek, MSNBC??

[thegeneral 3,209]

Trump’s economy. 

[jbycho 754]

1 minute ago, thegeneral said:

Trump’s economy. 

Don't worry. Now that you were laid off you can sell your nose ring collection. There are lots of other gays out there that still have jobs.

[Alias Detective 1,400]

Been in the works with their new CEO.  Has everything to do with old school wokeness being removed in favor of efficiency and profit.

[jerryskids 6,794]

Looks like they had a glut of people in "corporate support" positions.  Perhaps a few DEI folks?  Also some pretend corporate finance execs?

Quote

As of last September, Starbucks employed around 361,000 workers globally and 211,000 in the US. A majority of staff are in-store employees who will not be impacted by this layoff.

Rather, the layoffs will affect those in Starbucks' 16,000 corporate support roles. Employees who work in roasting, manufacturing, warehousing, and distribution operations, which are also considered corporate support, will not be impacted.

 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,348]

lets see if the lefties lose their minds over layoffs of people who are useless here

 

[thegeneral 3,209]

29 minutes ago, jbycho said:

Don't worry. Now that you were laid off you can sell your nose ring collection. There are lots of other gays out there that still have jobs.

Is your buttplug biz is booming on Etsy, dipshit!

[Hawkeye21 2,399]

OH NO!!!!!!

[thegeneral 3,209]

13 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

lets see if the lefties lose their minds over layoffs of people who are useless here

 

Every time a company had layoffs last year there were like 3 threads about Biden’s Economy

[Mike Honcho 5,270]

Well, now that that they don't let the homeless use the bathrooms, probably don't need as many people to clean them(the bathrooms, not the homeless). 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,348]

22 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Every time a company had layoffs last year there were like 3 threads about Biden’s Economy

I never went into them

I don't care if people get laid off, work harder be better, find a diff job etc

 

 

[Alias Detective 1,400]

28 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Every time a company had layoffs last year there were like 3 threads about Biden’s Economy

[thegeneral 3,209]

6 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

I never went into them

I don't care if people get laid off, work harder be better, find a diff job etc

 

 

Then why worry about people “losing their minds” about this?

[TheNewGirl 1,490]

No outrage, they aren't federal workers. 

Seems like people are only outraged about federal lay offs. 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,348]

1 minute ago, thegeneral said:

Then why worry about people “losing their minds” about this?

I don't worry about that, I find it funny and hypocritical

 

[thegeneral 3,209]

2 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

I don't worry about that, I find it funny and hypocritical

 

Welcome to the internet!

[thegeneral 3,209]

13 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

No outrage, they aren't federal workers. 

Seems like people are only outraged about federal lay offs. 

I assume the Starbucks people are upset they lost their jobs. Is that the outrage people are taking about?

[squistion 2,198]

14 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

No outrage, they aren't federal workers. 

Seems like people are only outraged about federal lay offs. 

I think there is a difference with a career civil service employee who has been there for years (in some cases decades) being let go only because they are not a Republican or Trump loyalist and a barista at the local Starbucks. 

[TheNewGirl 1,490]

10 minutes ago, squistion said:

I think there is a difference with a career civil service employee who has been there for years (in some cases decades) being let go only because they are not a Republican or Trump loyalist and a barista at the local Starbucks. 

We know that they are being laid off because they didn't vote for Trump? 

[squistion 2,198]

Just now, TheNewGirl said:

We know that they are being laid off because they didn't vote for Trump? 

Not for certain but what I have seen Republicans and known Trump supporters seem to be making the cut, while Democrats or appointees by prior a Democrat POTUS have not. 

[supermike80 1,910]

1 minute ago, squistion said:

Not for certain but what I have seen Republicans and known Trump supporters seem to be making the cut, while Democrats or appointees by prior a Democrat POTUS have not. 

How do you know the political leanings of the 1000 starbucks employees laid off?   

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,348]

4 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

We know that they are being laid off because they didn't vote for Trump? 

thats prob what MSNBC is telling the tards

there is no way its actually happening

 

[TheNewGirl 1,490]

2 minutes ago, squistion said:

Not for certain but what I have seen Republicans and known Trump supporters seem to be making the cut, while Democrats or appointees by prior a Democrat POTUS have not. 

Then you can't say that all of these federal workers are being let go because of their political affiliation; you don't know. 

So I go and lose my job of 30 plus years with a large financial firm, but no one feels bad. I just need to "work harder" or "go get a new job." 

But these federal employees it's just.....different? 

[supermike80 1,910]

4 minutes ago, squistion said:

Not for certain but what I have seen Republicans and known Trump supporters seem to be making the cut, while Democrats or appointees by prior a Democrat POTUS have not. 

This is so weird cause in this article, it doesn't mention their political affiliations?  You know more Squish?  Please enlighten us!

https://www.yahoo.com/news/musk-federal-workers-haven-t-125140160.html

[HellToupee 1,775]

 

19 minutes ago, squistion said:

and a barista at the local Starbucks. 

Did you even read the story?

“As of last September, Starbucks employed around 361,000 workers globally and 211,000 in the US. A majority of staff are in-store employees who will not be impacted by this layoff.

Rather, the layoffs will affect those in Starbucks' 16,000 corporate support roles. Employees who work in roasting, manufacturing, warehousing, and distribution operations, which are also considered corporate support, will not be impacted.”

[supermike80 1,910]

1 minute ago, TheNewGirl said:

Then you can't say that all of these federal workers are being let go because of their political affiliation; you don't know. 

So I go and lose my job of 30 plus years with a large financial firm, but no one feels bad. I just need to "work harder" or "go get a new job." 

But these federal employees it's just.....different? 

He's literally griping about political appointees being shown the door.  Which is what every new administration does.  But it's only bad if the other side does it.

Ugh

[HellToupee 1,775]

2 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

So I go and lose my job of 30 plus years with a large financial firm, but no one feels bad. I just need to "work harder" or "go get a new job." 

The last administration told miners to learn to code

[TrailGuy 554]

1 minute ago, TheNewGirl said:

Then you can't say that all of these federal workers are being let go because of their political affiliation; you don't know. 

So I go and lose my job of 30 plus years with a large financial firm, but no one feels bad. I just need to "work harder" or "go get a new job." 

But these federal employees it's just.....different? 

I think you are misplacing your hatred.  The Republicans are the party of "just work harder" and "pull yourself up by your bootstraps" and "probably DEI anyway".  It's liberals that have empathy.

I'm assuming you are female which means you are a DEI hire anyway.

[squistion 2,198]

5 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

How do you know the political leanings of the 1000 starbucks employees laid off?   

Didn't say that I did and I doubt that politics played into the mix of the barista's laid off. 

[supermike80 1,910]

Just now, squistion said:

Didn't say that I did and I doubt that politics played into the mix of the barista's laid off. 

How can you doubt it?  What evidence do you have?  You're quick to judge the federal layoffs, with absolutely no evidence, yet you can't do it here.

 

[Strike 5,539]

2 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

I think you are misplacing your hatred.  The Republicans are the party of "just work harder" and "pull yourself up by your bootstraps" and "probably DEI anyway".  It's liberals that have empathy.

I'm assuming you are female which means you are a DEI hire anyway.

"Learn to code!!!"

EMPATHY!!!!!

[jbycho 754]

2 minutes ago, squistion said:

Didn't say that I did and I doubt that politics played into the mix of the barista's laid off. 

Learn to code. 

[supermike80 1,910]

Just now, Strike said:

"Learn to code!!!"

EMPATHY!!!!!

Weird....I am willing to bet liberals running companies have laid off people.   I'm not gonna look it up, but I am pretty sure that's the case.  I guess at least those folks out of a job were laid off with empathy

[TrailGuy 554]

What is the point of this thread?  Are you magas trying to justify Musk's dismantling of the govt?  Starbucks lays people off therefore it's OK that the govt does?  Libs don't care about starbucks so why should maga care about federal employees?

I don't quite get the angle here?

[squistion 2,198]

2 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

What is the point of this thread?  Are you magas trying to justify Musk's dismantling of the govt?  Starbucks lays people off therefore it's OK that the govt does?  Libs don't care about starbucks so why should maga care about federal employees?

I don't quite get the angle here?

Who the hell knows? Definite logic fail here in this attempted analogy. 

[jbycho 754]

25 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

What is the point of this thread?  Are you magas trying to justify Musk's dismantling of the govt?  Starbucks lays people off therefore it's OK that the govt does?  Libs don't care about starbucks so why should maga care about federal employees?

I don't quite get the angle here?

So all government employees should have their jobs guaranteed for life no matter what they do or don't do. And should never have to answer for what they do on a daily basis. 

Oh you poor liberals. 

[TrailGuy 554]

Just now, jbycho said:

So all government employees should have their jobs guaranteed for life no matter what they do or don't do. And should never have to answer for what they do on a daily basis. 

Oh you poor liberals. 

Didn't say that.  It's all about the process, justification and humanity.

These cuts are not to save money.

[supermike80 1,910]

31 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

What is the point of this thread?  Are you magas trying to justify Musk's dismantling of the govt?  Starbucks lays people off therefore it's OK that the govt does?  Libs don't care about starbucks so why should maga care about federal employees?

I don't quite get the angle here?

Ugh...Are you guys just slow witted or something?  I have seen numerous interviews and stories about the poor federal workers laid off, but none by your beloved media for these.  Why is your media only focusing on the federal jobs?  Do they have some sort of agenda to do so?

[weepaws 3,191]

2 hours ago, supermike80 said:

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/starbucks-to-lay-off-1100-employees-this-week-as-ceo-aims-to-deliver-on-turnaround-135518008.html

 

I wonder how many will be profiled on CNN, ABC, NBC, Politico, PBS, Newsweek, MSNBC??

Trump doesn’t seem to want to change the economy.   

[supermike80 1,910]

1 minute ago, weepaws said:

Trump doesn’t seem to want to change the economy.   

Based on what?