Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
RaiderHaters Revenge

DEI only helps white women. 😂 what a scam

Recommended Posts

Just more evidence that the Democrat party (leadership), is all about STILL, using black people to further their own wealth while keeping the black community down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Just more evidence that the Democrat party (leadership), is all about STILL, using black people to further their own wealth while keeping the black community down.

Sure are. They use them as a shield.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Just more evidence that the Democrat party (leadership), is all about STILL, using black people to further their own wealth while keeping the black community down.

They will never let the black man actually leave their plantations. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

 

I have said this for years. There are 2 parts to DEI. The first is to give people of color the chance for a job over any white person. The second is to give white women that chance over white men. In DEI white men come last no matter what.  Here is the deal with that. It allows companies to cheat at their DEI representation. They can hire white women and claim it to be a DEI hire while not even having to dip into the POC pool of employees if they do not want to. In the situation I have explained here before where I was told to hire someone that "did not look like me" they hired a white woman. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do liberals with stroke pretend to give a crap about blacks? To gain their vote and to gain control.

Why don't liberals with stroke actually follow through with their DEI plans to hire more minorities? Because they despite them. This is the party that formed the KKK. This was the party of slavery. It's the same party.

Conservatives are just like whatever, don't give them my job because of their race, but if they beat me on merit fair and Square, so be it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have time to watch the video, but from my understanding:

78% of all DEI jobs go to white women
75% of DEI contracts go to white women (let's be real, most of these contracts are likely just headed by white women in name only)

Blacks don't care if you get rid of DEI or affirmative action. Do you hear us complaining that it's gone? No.
DEI helped white women, latinos, asians and gays: blacks were the least positively affected by DEI. 

ETA,
But DEI would likely still be around if they didn't make the face of DEI blacks. DEI was thrown out because people believed it was helping blacks. If they knew it was helping white women, we'd still have DEI.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, peenie said:

I don't have time to watch the video, but from my understanding:

78% of all DEI jobs go to white women
75% of DEI contracts go to white women (let's be real, most of these contracts are likely just headed by white women in name only)

Blacks don't care if you get rid of DEI or affirmative action. Do you hear us complaining that it's gone? No.
DEI helped white women, latinos, asians and gays: blacks were the least positively affected by DEI. 

ETA,
But DEI would likely still be around if they didn't make the face of DEI blacks. DEI was thrown out because people believed it was helping blacks. If they knew it was helping white women, we'd still have DEI.

Wrong. We don't want people without merit being helped. So many standards have been lowered in the world to let women without the proper merit into positions.

It's also a double edge sword. By making these exemptions, it convinced women that they need lower standards in order to fit into the world. It's a wicked way to control society.

Not all women, but a good chunk of women are not meant to work in the workforce like men are. For example, I want my wife to be creative all day. Take care of a few extra chores and dinner. She should live as stress free of a life as possible. I was designed designed deal with that stuff because I'm a man. It's really simple.

Again not all women since there are always exceptions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason DEI helped White women is because they could read and write.

 

If you want to be helped by affirmative action, you should be able to read and write at a 5th grade level.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/24/2025 at 4:16 PM, Tree of Knowledge said:

They will never let the black man actually leave their plantations. 

Yep.  The Democrats simply moved black people from physical plantations to virtual ones. 

The Democrat party never gave up its racism. It's alive and well.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, peenie said:

I don't have time to watch the video, but from my understanding:

78% of all DEI jobs go to white women
75% of DEI contracts go to white women (let's be real, most of these contracts are likely just headed by white women in name only)

Blacks don't care if you get rid of DEI or affirmative action. Do you hear us complaining that it's gone? No.
DEI helped white women, latinos, asians and gays: blacks were the least positively affected by DEI. 

ETA,
But DEI would likely still be around if they didn't make the face of DEI blacks. DEI was thrown out because people believed it was helping blacks. If they knew it was helping white women, we'd still have DEI.

"DEI helped white women, latinos, asians and gays: blacks were the least positively affected by DEI." DEI helped white men the least and it is not even close. DEI was invented to punish white men and reward all others.  Blacks and people of color were certainly positively effected and to say that blacks are not complaining about DEI being removed is not correct either. I spend a lot of time on LinkedIn and I see it daily.  How it is not fair. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Not all women, but a good chunk of women are not meant to work in the workforce like men are. For example, I want my wife to be creative all day. Take care of a few extra chores and dinner. She should live as stress free of a life as possible. I was designed designed deal with that stuff because I'm a man. It's really simple.

Again not all women since there are always exceptions.

This is really true!! :cry:  :wub: :cry:  

I don't want to work, I would much rather clean the house and shop for the best meals and clothes and cook and take care of the children. Working sucks!!!!!!!! The problem is that without a husband or a person to finance that lifestyle it's impossible. And, if your husband (or boyfriend in my case, which was dumb, I know) leaves you, you're in a real pickle if you don't have your own career or income. I learned this the hard way. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, peenie said:

This is really true!! :cry:  :wub: :cry:  

I don't want to work, I would much rather clean the house and shop for the best meals and clothes and cook and take care of the children. Working sucks!!!!!!!! The problem is that without a husband or a person to finance that lifestyle it's impossible. And, if your husband (or boyfriend in my case, which was dumb, I know) leaves you, you're in a real pickle if you don't have your own career or income. I learned this the hard way. 

This was a key factor in the feminist debates of the 1970's.   You see society is a result of our inherent evolutionary success factors, not some construct of white men.  When left alone, people naturally fall into those evolutionary roles.  Feminists understood this and did not want women to want to choose to be at home, they wanted to instead compel them to take on the more male roles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, RLLD said:

This was a key factor in the feminist debates of the 1970's.   You see society is a result of our inherent evolutionary success factors, not some construct of white men.  When left alone, people naturally fall into those evolutionary roles.  Feminists understood this and did not want women to want to choose to be at home, they wanted to instead compel them to take on the more male roles.

But I think that came from men having the freedom to leave their families in the United States. In France, the men stay with their families and the society accepts mistresses. In Japan (back in the day) society accepted concubines, in Arab and African cultures multiples wives are accepted...
Not to mention, women have always worked, just middle and upper-class women could stay at home (slaves, serfs, maids, domestics).
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, peenie said:

But I think that came from men having the freedom to leave their families in the United States. In France, the men stay with their families and the society accepts mistresses. In Japan (back in the day) society accepted concubines, in Arab and African cultures multiples wives are accepted...
Not to mention, women have always worked, just middle and upper-class women could stay at home (slaves, serfs, maids, domestics).
 

In the most egalitarian societies in Europe the distinctions between the sexes was amplified, which shocked the social scientists.  They were baffled as they assumed women would surge in areas such as STEM....instead their evolutionary programming took over and they restored the normal nature of people which has allowed us to be so successful as a species.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, peenie said:

This is really true!! :cry:  :wub: :cry:  

I don't want to work, I would much rather clean the house and shop for the best meals and clothes and cook and take care of the children. Working sucks!!!!!!!! The problem is that without a husband or a person to finance that lifestyle it's impossible. And, if your husband (or boyfriend in my case, which was dumb, I know) leaves you, you're in a real pickle if you don't have your own career or income. I learned this the hard way. 

The other unfortunate part is that the divine feminine has been cut out of society. Women are naturally intuitive. They should have the time to explore this area of their minds and bodies without having to worry about same stresses that we do.

The feeling that you should be taken care of and not working is natural. It's actually funny how my wife wasn't happy at first that I wanted her staying home with our son, but now she can't imagine going to work a real job. I will go get a second one if I have to or work 7 days a week before we get to that point.

Also no judgement for any women who are working or any guys whose wives are working. I get it.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

The other unfortunate part is that the divine feminine has been cut out of society. Women are naturally intuitive. They should have the time to explore this area of their minds and bodies without having to worry about same stresses that we do.

The feeling that you should be taken care of and not working is natural. It's actually funny how my wife wasn't happy at first that I wanted her staying home with our son, but now she can't imagine going to work a real job. I will go get a second one if I have to or work 7 days a week before we get to that point.

Also no judgement for any women who are working or any guys whose wives are working. I get it.

 When you are done raising your son and your wife decides she wants to leave, you are going to end up paying more because she did not have a job outside the house. While YOU provide, YOU get focked in the divorce. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, kilroy69 said:

 When you are done raising your son and your wife decides she wants to leave, you are going to end up paying more because she did not have a job outside the house. While YOU provide, YOU get focked in the divorce. 

I am divorced and this is how it played out. That's an entirely separate issue that shouldn't happen in a proper society.

It's also tough to have women not working when the divorce rate is 50%+. It all intertwines to create a dysfunctional society.

In a relationship where divorce isn't even an option and will never be, my current marriage, it makes a lot more sense.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope more voices rise to point pout how corrupt DEI was and is/  It is great to see this kind of awareness being raised.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, HB Localboy said:

The reason DEI helped White women is because they could read and write.

 

So you're saying Patrick Ewing coming out of college would have been screwed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, HB Localboy said:

The reason DEI helped White women is because they could read and write.

 

If you want to be helped by affirmative action, you should be able to read and write at a 5th grade level.  

The reason why DEI helped white women is because the corporate world was able to cheat by using them as DEI hires in place of people of color. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

The other unfortunate part is that the divine feminine has been cut out of society. Women are naturally intuitive. They should have the time to explore this area of their minds and bodies without having to worry about same stresses that we do.

The feeling that you should be taken care of and not working is natural. It's actually funny how my wife wasn't happy at first that I wanted her staying home with our son, but now she can't imagine going to work a real job. I will go get a second one if I have to or work 7 days a week before we get to that point.

Also no judgement for any women who are working or any guys whose wives are working. I get it.

You are music to my ears! You were raised right! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, peenie said:

You are music to my ears! You were raised right! 

Women have rights damnit!! Abort a child today to support it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, kilroy69 said:

The reason why DEI helped white women is because the corporate world was able to cheat by using them as DEI hires in place of people of color. 

Same thing in college, except they bring in Indians and claim they are POC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Btw, I support my white sisters and I'm glad they got jobs by any means necessary. Just because they used DEI did not mean they weren't qualified. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, peenie said:

Btw, I support my white sisters and I'm glad they got jobs by any means necessary. Just because they used DEI did not mean they weren't qualified. 

Getting a job because of a dei hiring absolutely means there was, at least 1, more deserving candidate if not multiple that were not given the job.  

You should learn how to address topics and be smarter about how you stand up for certain people. 

And are you adopted into a white family? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, jbycho said:

Getting a job because of a dei hiring absolutely means there was, at least 1, deserving candidate if not multiple. 

You should learn how to address topics and be smarter about how you stand up for certain people. 

Orrrr, you can mind your business. I take up for whomever I want. 

Diversity does not mean unqualified. A handicapped veteran can be DEI, an elderly person can be DEI, a person of color can be DEI, a gay or trans person can be DEI. Just because they are not white male doesn't mean they are unqualified. Get that through your thick skull. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, peenie said:

Orrrr, you can mind your business. I take up for whomever I want. 

Diversity does not mean unqualified. A handicapped veteran can be DEI, an elderly person can be DEI, a person of color can be DEI, a gay or trans person can be DEI. Just because they are not white male doesn't mean they are unqualified. Get that through your thick skull. 

If that is why you are hired, it means you are LESS qualified yet still chosen over others who deserve the job more. 

And you are the one who keeps bringing up white race. You are an extreme racist. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DEI principal in Columbus Ohio middle school stops police from investigating bomb threat at the school.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/27/2025 at 3:34 PM, peenie said:

Btw, I support my white sisters and I'm glad they got jobs by any means necessary. Just because they used DEI did not mean they weren't qualified. 

Ok. So a program that was put in place to help people of color was hijacked by white women and they took the jobs that POC were meant to have. You think white women are oppressed? On average they make 300k more than black women and 500k more than your hispanic sisters in a carreer. White women have been able to benefit from white men throughout history and then they get to turn around and claim they are part of a protected class? I am so white I glow in the dark but I can clearly see how this seems a little focked up. Supporting this literally only hurts people that look like you. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×