Maximum Overkill 1,822 Posted May 2 Dynasty players please help me out. I should be in a position to draft either one. I love the insane talent and upside of Hunter but am worried about volume and potential defensive snaps. Thomas could easily limit his TDs. On the other hand I don't love Tet but do see a path to insane targets, probably 140+ year one. There's absolutely no competition. Which way are you leaning as a Dynasty play and why? Thanks Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBayXXXVII 2,499 Posted May 2 28 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said: Dynasty players please help me out. I should be in a position to draft either one. I love the insane talent and upside of Hunter but am worried about volume and potential defensive snaps. Thomas could easily limit his TDs. On the other hand I don't love Tet but do see a path to insane targets, probably 140+ year one. There's absolutely no competition. Which way are you leaning as a Dynasty play and why? Thanks If you think McMillan is going to be good, I'd go with him first mainly because less exposure to injury and a more assurance of role/opportunity. He's a safer pick. I also think the situation in Carolina is safer. They have a better HC, better (younger) QB, and better run game. Also less competition for touches. Hunter has to compete with Thomas who's shown is a baller and isn't going anywhere, any time soon. In Carolina, Theilen is a good compliment (and old), and Legget is "a guy". Neither are going to command targets like McMillan. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Showboat 252 Posted May 2 Agree, McMillan is probably the "safer" pick. But if you really want to swing for the fences along with a greater chance to strike out, go with Hunter (though if you get IDP points, Hunter is probably a no-brainer). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nobody 2,615 Posted May 2 15 hours ago, LaChup said: Hampton And Trayveon for that matter Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Football Guru 222 Posted May 2 6 hours ago, Maximum Overkill said: Dynasty players please help me out. I should be in a position to draft either one. I love the insane talent and upside of Hunter but am worried about volume and potential defensive snaps. Thomas could easily limit his TDs. On the other hand I don't love Tet but do see a path to insane targets, probably 140+ year one. There's absolutely no competition. Which way are you leaning as a Dynasty play and why? Thanks I thought McMillan's film was as good as any player's I have seen in years, certainly at the receiver position. I think he belongs in the Marvin Harrison Jr./Nabers conversation. Hunter has much work to do to be a technically sound receiver. A part of me hopes I can land both in the one rookie draft where I have 1.02 and 1.04. With that said (and my perspective changes regularly), I am now leaning Hunter over McMillan. If Hunter develops, he could be the OBJ 2.0. No matter how high I think McMillan's ceiling as an individual talent, I don't see his high being as high in Carolina as Hunter's highs could be in Jacksonville. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maximum Overkill 1,822 Posted May 3 16 hours ago, nobody said: And Trayveon for that matter Both will be gone. I have 3 and 5. Jeanty is going 1, Hampton, Traveon. It's between the 2 WRS Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Showboat 252 Posted May 6 Still early, but right now I'd take Harvey over Traveon. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JagFan 152 Posted May 6 On 5/3/2025 at 7:21 AM, Maximum Overkill said: Both will be gone. I have 3 and 5. Jeanty is going 1, Hampton, Traveon. It's between the 2 WRS I’d package that 3 and 5 to move back to the fourth round and take Sanders. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maximum Overkill 1,822 Posted May 6 2 hours ago, JagFan said: I’d package that 3 and 5 to move back to the fourth round and take Sanders. I did Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WhiteWonder 2,688 Posted May 9 On 5/2/2025 at 4:40 PM, The Football Guru said: I thought McMillan's film was as good as any player's I have seen in years, certainly at the receiver position. I think he belongs in the Marvin Harrison Jr./Nabers conversation. Hunter has much work to do to be a technically sound receiver. A part of me hopes I can land both in the one rookie draft where I have 1.02 and 1.04. With that said (and my perspective changes regularly), I am now leaning Hunter over McMillan. If Hunter develops, he could be the OBJ 2.0. No matter how high I think McMillan's ceiling as an individual talent, I don't see his high being as high in Carolina as Hunter's highs could be in Jacksonville. Interested to hear more. I never got Malik Nabers vibes from Tet McMillan... like at all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nobody 2,615 Posted May 9 Tet actually reminds me of MHJ. Overrated route running making a living on running through sub-optimally executed zones, schemed up traffic to get defenders lost in the chaos, and relying on the ability to fight through small and weak college DBs to make catches. Both overrated in the exact same way. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LaChup 232 Posted May 10 I can see Tet being like Calvin Johnson. Two years after he retired. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maximum Overkill 1,822 Posted May 10 15 hours ago, WhiteWonder said: Interested to hear more. I never got Malik Nabers vibes from Tet McMillan... like at all. I agree. I see more of a big bodied possession receiver. Tet's skillset isn't even close to Nabers. They are world's apart as far as talent goes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nobody 2,615 Posted May 10 I think he meant that he's putting Tet in the same tier of quality prospect as Malik/MHJ, so he must think Tet is "generational." That's an unfortunate opinion for his fantasy teams, but, hey, those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. It's even the same type of mistake. If Hunter was playing receiver full time, he's clearly the better prospect. And I mean clearly. Head and shoulders better than Tet. It's just murky on how the time share will effect his snap count on offense in my perspective. I mean what if they only play him 70% of the snaps on offense? I happen to think that's best case if he's moonlighting on defense which also brings up his injury risk. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nobody 2,615 Posted May 10 The list of JAGs that were high picks that couldn't separate is long and undistinguished. It jumps off the screen to me. Not sure why people keep falling for it. MHJ, Quentin Johnson, N'Keal Harry (the poster boy for this archetype), Corey Davis, Corey Coleman, Laquan Treadwell, etc. MHJ was tied for the worst average separation of any wide receiver with at least 45 targets. That's why he had a disappointing year. NFL teams throw to open receivers. They don't rely on big bodies catching a ball with a DB all over them. This shift has been around ever since they started calling secondary play tighter. As you watch Tet's games, ignore the zone plays. Any decent receiver can be productive running through wide open college zones. Watch the plays against man. The dude can't get away from DBs unless it's on a hitch or a comeback. He ain't becoming more than a JAG on hitches. It's as clear as day. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maximum Overkill 1,822 Posted May 10 5 hours ago, nobody said: I think he meant that he's putting Tet in the same tier of quality prospect as Malik/MHJ, so he must think Tet is "generational." That's an unfortunate opinion for his fantasy teams, but, hey, those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Exactly. I understand that there's an argument to be made that he's the WR1 in this draft, but that being said it's a horrible WR class. Being WR1 in this draft isn't saying much but you gotta pick him if you need a WR. I was lucky that the guy in front of me took Tet at 1.04 so I could take Travis Hunter at 1.05. I feel like that's an upside steal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LaChup 232 Posted May 11 Egbuka is the best receiver in this class. Just like Malik was the receiver to get last year over MHJ. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maximum Overkill 1,822 Posted May 11 1 hour ago, LaChup said: Egbuka is the best receiver in this class Except the landing spot sucks, for now at least. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nobody 2,615 Posted May 12 Dynasty though... egbuka Redraft, I'm not high on any receiver. Although no one seems to be talking about Kyle Williams in New England. People won't catch on to him until late August I bet. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kcBlitzkrieg 29 Posted May 13 On 5/10/2025 at 7:16 AM, Maximum Overkill said: I agree. I see more of a big bodied possession receiver. Tet's skillset isn't even close to Nabers. They are world's apart as far as talent goes. 100% Tet ceiling is more Mike Evans Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
