thegeneral 3,390 Posted Tuesday at 11:25 PM 2 minutes ago, Horseman said: For the court of public opinion maybe, but, that's not the type of investigation that I was suggesting. Many times these types of things need public opinion to happen. Without the media and public clamoring for it, nothing will happen. Release the info. Release the money transfers in particular: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 474 Posted Tuesday at 11:25 PM 14 minutes ago, Horseman said: Context. He actually didn't. It is a joke. He attached the Vanity Unfair cover and article (if you bother to read, instead of getting your news from Twitter) and he did the opposite of what the letter says. It has Epstein’s name pasted all over it, not Clinton's. Look Dershowitz should be investigated, along with Prince Andrew and Clinton. They're all named by witnesses and victims (unlike Trump). But this letter isn't any sort of proof of anything. I get it, it’s a good point. But it merely transforms the letter into a commiserating with Epstein being treated supposedly unfairly. Do you know what happened on all this, with Vanity Fair & the Farmer sisters? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,683 Posted Tuesday at 11:27 PM 1 minute ago, SaintsInDome2006 said: I get it, it’s a good point. But it merely transforms the letter into a commiserating with Epstein being treated supposedly unfairly. Do you know what happened on all this, with Vanity Fair & the Farmer sisters? Duh. Thus the joke. JFC. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,648 Posted Tuesday at 11:30 PM Remember when Don insisted he’s not “weird”? This letter won’t help! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,683 Posted Tuesday at 11:33 PM 2 minutes ago, thegeneral said: Many times these types of things need public opinion to happen. Without the media and public clamoring for it, nothing will happen. Release the info. Release the money transfers in particular: The effect of clamoring for it is distinctly different than the effect of actually releasing it. But you're on to something. If anything of value still exists the court of public opinion would be outraged why nothing was done to these pedos walking amongst us. If there is dirt on Trump why didn't Biden go after him? If there is dirt on Prince Andrew and Clinton why doesn't Trump go after them? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 474 Posted Tuesday at 11:33 PM 5 minutes ago, Horseman said: Duh. Thus the joke. JFC. I understand the joke. I’m asking if you understand what happened at VF? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,390 Posted Tuesday at 11:37 PM 2 minutes ago, Horseman said: The effect of clamoring for it is distinctly different than the effect of actually releasing it. But you're on to something. If anything of value still exists the court of public opinion would be outraged why nothing was done to these pedos walking amongst us. If there is dirt on Trump why didn't Biden go after him? If there is dirt on Prince Andrew and Clinton why doesn't Trump go after them? Remove Trump from this. Him, Clinton, The King of England, Mr. Rogers, etc…fry em all if they are guilty Release the info. Why would anyone be against this. It should be what everyone wants. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 474 Posted Tuesday at 11:40 PM 5 minutes ago, Horseman said: The effect of clamoring for it is distinctly different than the effect of actually releasing it. But you're on to something. If anything of value still exists the court of public opinion would be outraged why nothing was done to these pedos walking amongst us. If there is dirt on Trump why didn't Biden go after him? If there is dirt on Prince Andrew and Clinton why doesn't Trump go after them? I think we forget how serious this issue is. Supposedly one reason the FBI & CIA hid material on Kennedy’s murder was they were worried people would say just that, why didn’t you do something to stop it? Then the next administration hid it, then the next. I don’t want to argue about JFK, point is there’s a lot of self interest here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,683 Posted Tuesday at 11:49 PM 7 minutes ago, thegeneral said: Remove Trump from this. Him, Clinton, The King of England, Mr. Rogers, etc…fry em all if they are guilty Release the info. Why would anyone be against this. It should be what everyone wants. 4 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said: I think we forget how serious this issue is. Supposedly one reason the FBI & CIA hid material on Kennedy’s murder was they were worried people would say just that, why didn’t you do something to stop it? Then the next administration hid it, then the next. I don’t want to argue about JFK, point is there’s a lot of self interest here. I don't see how anything still damning to very powerful people still exists. But if it does those very powerful people do not want it out and that spans across democrat and republican presidents including Trump. What you and I want doesn't matter. You better get used to the fact that you're never going to find out. Now back to But Trump!!!! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,390 Posted Tuesday at 11:55 PM 3 minutes ago, Horseman said: I don't see how anything still damning to very powerful people still exists. But if it does those very powerful people do not want it out and that spans across democrat and republican presidents including Trump. What you and I want doesn't matter. You better get used to the fact that you're never going to find out. Now back to But Trump!!!! It’s great you think that. You know how we find out right? Congress needs like 2 Republicans that’s it. Maybe it’s nothing maybe it’s not, Why would you oppose this and not think people blocking this are pieces of crap? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,683 Posted Tuesday at 11:57 PM Just now, thegeneral said: It’s great you think that. You know how we find out right? Congress needs like 2 Republicans that’s it. Maybe it’s nothing maybe it’s not, Why would you oppose this and not think people blocking this are pieces of crap? That's what they want you to think. I don't oppose it. But like I already said, it doesn't matter what you or I think. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,390 Posted Wednesday at 12:00 AM 1 minute ago, Horseman said: That's what they want you to think. I don't oppose it. But like I already said, it doesn't matter what you or I think. Release the files. Oppose people who block tit. It’s that simple. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fnord 2,370 Posted Wednesday at 12:00 AM 1 hour ago, SaintsInDome2006 said: Laughing, darkly. The man signs his name disguised as a mock pubic area on a drawing of the outline a pubescent girl’s naked body, with the signature stating he and an infamous pedophile-trafficker share a ‘wonderful secret.’ The conservative POV here is it’s beyond vile & repulsive. The conservative philosophy says people like this are disqualified from office. I don’t expect anything from posters here, it’s not necessary. I wonder if someone like a Carolyn Leavitt just decides they can’t take it anymore one day. We’ll see. Boebert, Mace, and MTG are having none of it. Good for them standing up to this. Mace exited a meeting with some of the alleged victims yesterday in tears, refusing to speak to reporters. She later stated she had a panic attack during the meeting. Murkowski and Collins also banging the drum. Trump knows he can't attack them for it, at least publicly. I want every fothermucker that took part to burn. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,683 Posted Wednesday at 12:02 AM 1 minute ago, thegeneral said: Release the files. Oppose people who block tit. It’s that simple. It doesn't matter what you think. It's that simple. The world isn't always fair. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,683 Posted Wednesday at 12:04 AM Alleged victims. They have free will, supposedly. Everyone is listening. Name names. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,390 Posted Wednesday at 12:05 AM Just now, Horseman said: It doesn't matter what you think. It's that simple. The world isn't always fair. You can acknowledge that it’s bullshit to oppose blocking these. If like 5 districts voted differently this would be a moot point and they’d have the votes without any Republicans. Who know what other parliamentary crap they could pull at that point. I think we’ll find out as eventually the House will get there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,683 Posted Wednesday at 12:13 AM 1 minute ago, thegeneral said: You can acknowledge that it’s bullshit to oppose blocking these. If like 5 districts voted differently this would be a moot point and they’d have the votes without any Republicans. Who know what other parliamentary crap they could pull at that point. I think we’ll find out as eventually the House will get there. Great. I see you're back to playing politics. Biden had 4 years, 2 with a democratic senate and house. NOTHING while pedos run free. Then Trump runs on it as a campaign promise. NOTHING Round and round we go. Victims are outraged, but, I don't hear any of them saying Trump raped me. Or Prince Andrew raped me. NOTHING Like I said. You better come to grips with the fact you may never find out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,390 Posted Wednesday at 12:32 AM 26 minutes ago, Horseman said: Great. I see you're back to playing politics. Biden had 4 years, 2 with a democratic senate and house. NOTHING while pedos run free. Then Trump runs on it as a campaign promise. NOTHING Round and round we go. Victims are outraged, but, I don't hear any of them saying Trump raped me. Or Prince Andrew raped me. NOTHING Like I said. You better come to grips with the fact you may never find out. It would have been great to have it all released then. A miss by them. I don't recall people actively blocking it. If they were fock them. Who knows what this stuff is if anything but if you are against seeing it made public that’s really odd. Don’t you think? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,700 Posted Wednesday at 02:02 AM Trump ran on it as a campaign promise? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,851 Posted Wednesday at 02:10 AM It's not my signature! It's not my language! Haven't even thought about meeting with the victims. Bro is guilty AF Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,851 Posted Wednesday at 02:17 AM Senator Wyden writes letter to Bessent asking the Treasury to release info on Epstein financial transactions. https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/letter_from_senator_wyden_to_secretary_bessent_on_epstein_documentspdf.pdf Not holding my breath. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,700 Posted Wednesday at 02:39 AM 36 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: Trump ran on it as a campaign promise? Hello? Anyone? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sandy Loam 291 Posted Wednesday at 03:06 AM Handwriting expert confirms Trump's signature on Epstein birthday card. https://news.sky.com/story/handwriting-expert-says-donald-trump-signature-on-epstein-birthday-book-is-absolutely-his-despite-his-denials-13427738 Trump is a liar. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Grace Under Pressure 132 Posted Wednesday at 09:46 AM MAGA still defending Trump on this? Gullible and dumb. Terrible combination. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,851 Posted Wednesday at 10:17 AM 7 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said: Hello? Anyone? Donald Trump promises to release Jeffrey Epstein 'client list' if he wins the US election https://share.google/wcKuSjMNN3aYYyJ7W So stupid. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,851 Posted Wednesday at 10:17 AM 31 minutes ago, Grace Under Pressure said: MAGA still defending Trump on this? Gullible and dumb. Terrible combination. Imagine defending child rapists. Ooof. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,851 Posted Wednesday at 10:33 AM In an 8–4 party-line vote Tuesday, Republicans on the House Rules Committee shot down a bid to put the Epstein Files Transparency Act—which would compel the Justice Department to release all unclassified records related to Jeffrey Epstein—to a floor vote. Here is the name of every Republican who voted to block the Epstein Files Transparency Act on Tuesday. Virginia Foxx—North Carolina Michelle Fischbach—Minnesota Ralph Norman—South Carolina Chip Roy—Texas Nicholas Langworthy—New York Austin Scott—Georgia H. Morgan Griffith—Virginia Brian Jack—Georgia Let the record show Republicans are blocking the release of the Epstein files. Republicans are protecting child rapists. You voted for this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,700 Posted Wednesday at 10:40 AM 22 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: Donald Trump promises to release Jeffrey Epstein 'client list' if he wins the US election https://share.google/wcKuSjMNN3aYYyJ7W So stupid. I only asked a question. Don’t get all worked up. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maximum Overkill 2,265 Posted Wednesday at 10:49 AM 15 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: In an 8–4 party-line vote Tuesday, Republicans on the House Rules Committee shot down a bid to put the Epstein Files Transparency Act—which would compel the Justice Department to release all unclassified records related to Jeffrey Epstein—to a floor vote. Here is the name of every Republican who voted to block the Epstein Files Transparency Act on Tuesday. Virginia Foxx—North Carolina Michelle Fischbach—Minnesota Ralph Norman—South Carolina Chip Roy—Texas Nicholas Langworthy—New York Austin Scott—Georgia H. Morgan Griffith—Virginia Brian Jack—Georgia Let the record show Republicans are blocking the release of the Epstein files. Republicans are protecting child rapists. You voted for this. Hey Greta, if Trump was in the Epstein Files then don't you think Biden would of released them during his term??? You're stupid 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,851 Posted Wednesday at 10:53 AM 4 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said: Hey Greta, if Trump was in the Epstein Files then don't you think Biden would of released them during his term??? You're stupid You voted to protect child rapists. Say it. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,851 Posted Wednesday at 10:54 AM https://www.thebulwark.com/p/donald-trump-hearts-jeffrey-epstein?utm_source=bluesky&utm_medium=The%2BBulwark&utm_campaign=publer Good but long read. This sh1t is gross and everyone involved needs to be exposed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maximum Overkill 2,265 Posted Wednesday at 10:55 AM 1 minute ago, Ron_Artest said: You voted to protect child rapists. Say it. You never answered my Question Greta. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maximum Overkill 2,265 Posted Wednesday at 11:01 AM 7 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: You voted to protect child rapists. Say it. Hey Greta, if Trump was in the Epstein Files then don't you think Biden would of released them during his term??? ANSWER THE QUESTION GRETA! You're stupid Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,851 Posted Wednesday at 11:13 AM 10 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said: Hey Greta, if Trump was in the Epstein Files then don't you think Biden would of released them during his term??? ANSWER THE QUESTION GRETA! You're stupid Enough about Biden. Did he try, was it blocked, was he protecting Clinton? I have no idea. I wish Biden released everything. Bottom line is Trump is blocking the release. You support trump. You support child rapists. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maximum Overkill 2,265 Posted Wednesday at 11:27 AM 13 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: I have no idea. I Win Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Meglamaniac 711 Posted Wednesday at 11:55 AM Did they get him yet? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zsasz 377 Posted Wednesday at 12:10 PM 1 hour ago, Maximum Overkill said: Hey Greta, if Trump was in the Epstein Files then don't you think Biden would of released them during his term??? You're stupid The Pedo-Protector speaks with his usual BIDEN DERANGEMENT SYNDROME. Be a man, at least admit that you dont care that Trump is a Pedo. But to try and defend this after your all out assault on Biden makes you phonier than red hair on a Chinaman. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BrahmaBulls 849 Posted Wednesday at 12:33 PM 1 hour ago, Ron_Artest said: You voted to protect child rapists. Say it. Do you ever look in the mirror and self-reflect on how big of low life loser you are? 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
