Elon says that Trump is in the Epstein files.

[Fnord 2,351]

23 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

I’m guessing Jon is disgusted by Trump and the Republicans act here. Just doesn’t want to post that.

He made a single nasty post about libs this afternoon in the Kirk thread. 

[seafoam1 3,239]

16 minutes ago, Fnord said:

He made a single nasty post about libs this afternoon in the Kirk thread. 

 check out the female liberal gossip going on. 

[jerryskids 6,944]

2 hours ago, TimHauck said:

You’re saying the rational answer is there is nothing damning against Trump?  Maybe, but then what’s the rational answer for why he is refusing to release the rest now?

Not maybe, yes. Don't be a chicken shiot, man up to your unbiased moderate ways and resolve the Team Biden dilemma.  In fact I think you were the weak sauce guy I mentioned, although I don't recall for sure.

The rational answer for not releasing "the rest" is that any names would instantly have their lives ruined without the data being vetted or them having their day in court (which is why grand jury testimony is by default sealed).  Add to that, a lot of those names are likely hella powerful and influential.

I'd ask you to take an L here, but you'll just refuse to, and probably bump your Strike thread for the 3rd time today.  Because you are much better at trying to dish out L's than you are accepting your own.

HTH

[Meglamaniac 687]

4 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Not maybe, yes. Don't be a chicken shiot, man up to your unbiased moderate ways and resolve the Team Biden dilemma.  In fact I think you were the weak sauce guy I mentioned, although I don't recall for sure.

The rational answer for not releasing "the rest" is that any names would instantly have their lives ruined without the data being vetted or them having their day in court (which is why grand jury testimony is by default sealed).  Add to that, a lot of those names are likely hella powerful and influential.

I'd ask you to take an L here, but you'll just refuse to, and probably bump your Strike thread for the 3rd time today.  Because you are much better at trying to dish out L's than you are accepting your own.

HTH

He's a lying POS plain and simple

[thegeneral 3,377]

6 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Not maybe, yes. Don't be a chicken shiot, man up to your unbiased moderate ways and resolve the Team Biden dilemma.  In fact I think you were the weak sauce guy I mentioned, although I don't recall for sure.

The rational answer for not releasing "the rest" is that any names would instantly have their lives ruined without the data being vetted or them having their day in court (which is why grand jury testimony is by default sealed).  Add to that, a lot of those names are likely hella powerful and influential.

I'd ask you to take an L here, but you'll just refuse to, and probably bump your Strike thread for the 3rd time today.  Because you are much better at trying to dish out L's than you are accepting your own.

HTH

I thought DOJ said the case was now closed. 

[TimHauck 3,081]

3 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Not maybe, yes. Don't be a chicken shiot, man up to your unbiased moderate ways and resolve the Team Biden dilemma.  In fact I think you were the weak sauce guy I mentioned, although I don't recall for sure.

The rational answer for not releasing "the rest" is that any names would instantly have their lives ruined without the data being vetted or them having their day in court (which is why grand jury testimony is by default sealed.  Add to that, a lot of those names are likely hella powerful and influential.

I'd ask you to take an L here, but you'll just refuse to, and probably bump your Strike thread for the 3rd time today.  Because you are much better at trying to dish out L's than you are accepting your own.

HTH

Wouldn’t the reasons you list here for not releasing them now also apply to during Biden though?

So are you saying the naked lady card is fake?  Since it originally came from Epstein’s estate, do we know for sure when the government first saw it?

[jerryskids 6,944]

2 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

I thought DOJ said the case was now closed. 

That doesn't stop people's lives being ruined.

[jerryskids 6,944]

2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Wouldn’t the reasons you list here for not releasing them now also apply to during Biden though?

So are you saying the naked lady card is fake?  Since it originally came from Epstein’s estate, do we know for sure when the government first saw it?

No, as I said earlier today, the US government is perfectly able to leak info about Trump (were he implicated) and not leaking the rest of it.

If you are talking about why they didn't just release the whole thing, then yes, same as Trump.  I don't recall you being moderately concerned about it during the Biden* years though.

[thegeneral 3,377]

1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

That doesn't stop people's lives being ruined.

Sorry but isn’t there a little more than should be done here? Two people were arrested here. 

[thegeneral 3,377]

Just now, jerryskids said:

No, as I said earlier today, the US government is perfectly able to leak info about Trump (were he implicated) and not leaking the rest of it.

If you are talking about why they didn't just release the whole thing, then yes, same as Trump.  I don't recall you being moderately concerned about it during the Biden* years though.

They did release the whole thing.

[jerryskids 6,944]

Just now, thegeneral said:

Sorry but isn’t there a little more than should be done here? Two people were arrested here. 

Instead of wasting my time with a question, why don't you tell me what should be done here and why?

[jerryskids 6,944]

1 minute ago, thegeneral said:

They did release the whole thing.

What now?

[thegeneral 3,377]

1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

Instead of wasting my time with a question, why don't you tell me what should be done here and why?

IMO continue to investigate. Release the financial records to start. Let people dig into those.

I asked you though. 

[thegeneral 3,377]

Just now, jerryskids said:

What now?

We are talking about the birthday book, right?

[jerryskids 6,944]

Just now, thegeneral said:

IMO continue to investigate. Release the financial records to start. Let people dig into those.

I asked you though. 

How does this not lead to the ruination of lives?

[jerryskids 6,944]

1 minute ago, thegeneral said:

We are talking about the birthday book, right?

I wasn't.  But I addressed that earlier today; go back and read about how you are chasing the MSDNC butterfly.

[thegeneral 3,377]

Just now, jerryskids said:

How does this not lead to the ruination of lives?

If you were wiring large amounts of money to Jeff probably best to explain yourself. 

[thegeneral 3,377]

1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

I wasn't.  But I addressed that earlier today; go back and read about how you are chasing the MSDNC butterfly.

My bad.

Trump is lying his ass off about this letter. It’s really dumb of him and makes him look very guilty.

[Ron_Artest 1,823]

So the answer is we don't want to ruin the lives of people connected to a child rapist?

[TimHauck 3,081]

6 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

No, as I said earlier today, the US government is perfectly able to leak info about Trump (were he implicated) and not leaking the rest of it.

If you are talking about why they didn't just release the whole thing, then yes, same as Trump.  I don't recall you being moderately concerned about it during the Biden* years though.

I wasn’t.   I figured they didn’t have enough to charge other people criminally and that most of the people implicated were probably old and no longer relevant, I did not think Trump was one of them.   But his actions have made me question that thinking, and as I stated previously I believe including to you, I’m more annoyed by the hypocrisy.  Multiple cabinet members said they would release them, then there was the binder fiasco.  This admin was supposed to be better than Biden, so saying “BUT BIDEN” isn’t a good defense.

I missed your post earlier about the birthday card.  So you think it’s fake because of handwriting analysis from the Daily Wire, got it.  Not surprising considering your blind allegiance to whatever the IDF says.  But from what I’ve seen it looks like Trump’s signature has multiple variations, there was at least one other example shared that looked the same as that one.