VIOLENCE is a Feature of the Left, not an Exception

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,068]

Occupy Wallstreet, George Floyd, Summer of Love, Immigration and No Kings to name a few.  Let's not forget the cops that were ambushed and killed in Dallas by Antifa/BLM in 2016 too.

The list goes on, but don't for one moment believe the left when they say the want peace - they want nothing of the sort.  All of the examples and many more just show you that VIOLENCE is their game.  Burning cities, assaults, murders and looting are their calling cards and not a single person can call that "peaceful". 

Of this, there is no debate and it is irrefutable.

[TimHauck 2,787]

Occupy Wall Street was violent?

[HellToupee 1,742]

The gotcha guy is out in full force today

[seafoam1 2,966]

Why are liberals so dumb? I just don't get it. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,068]

42 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Why are liberals so dumb? I just don't get it. 

Dumb and violent - not a good combination

[squistion 2,162]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Occupy Wall Street was violent?

For the most part it wasn't.

Quote

The Occupy Wall Street movement was primarily non-violent in its core principles and actions. While there were instances of clashes with law enforcement and some instances of vandalism or property damage, the movement largely emphasized non-violent civil disobedience and direct action.

 

And I don't believe that the "No Kings" marches should be on this list either, so far I haven't seen any acts of violence at the protests today (that may change, but I doubt it).

 

 

[weepaws 3,173]

1 hour ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Occupy Wallstreet, George Floyd, Summer of Love, Immigration and No Kings to name a few.  Let's not forget the cops that were ambushed and killed in Dallas by Antifa/BLM in 2016 too.

The list goes on, but don't for one moment believe the left when they say the want peace - they want nothing of the sort.  All of the examples and many more just show you that VIOLENCE is their game.  Burning cities, assaults, murders and looting are their calling cards and not a single person can call that "peaceful". 

Of this, there is no debate and it is irrefutable.

And yet in trumps America crime continues to march on, and getting stronger.   Winning fools. 

[League Champion 1,909]

2 hours ago, weepaws said:

And yet in trumps America crime continues to march on, and getting stronger.   Winning fools. 

And how many lunatics murdered people in the name of Jesus? 

The Bible Bangers 

[Ron_Artest 1,388]

You created this thread on a day where a Republican murdered a Democrat senator and tried to murder another.  He had a hit list of Democrats to murder.

[squistion 2,162]

4 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

You created this thread on a day where a Republican murdered a Democrat senator and tried to murder another.  He had a hit list of Democrats to murder.

Yes.

"Despite serving under Democratic governors, Boelter last registered to vote in 2022 as a Republican, according to the New York Post." 

[TimHauck 2,787]

9 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

You created this thread on a day where a Republican murdered a Democrat senator and tried to murder another.  He had a hit list of Democrats to murder.

Yeah but he said he was going to let it play out!  For a whole 10 minutes.  And then was wrong

[League Champion 1,909]

Is anyone denying that Liberals are violent by nature? It's part of the Mental Illness that's called Liberalism 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,068]

1 minute ago, League Champion said:

Is anyone denying that Liberals are violent by nature? It's part of the Mental Illness that's called Liberalism 

Exactly.  They think one dead equates to what they've been doing over the last decade. 

The cope and mental illness is very strong with them.

[League Champion 1,909]

Liberals are acting up in LA. The live streams are getting rowdy 

[TimHauck 2,787]

I don’t recall League Champion posting for a while, did Max O get banned, @Blue Horseshoe ?

[League Champion 1,909]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

I don’t recall League Champion posting for a while, did Max O get banned, @Blue Horseshoe ?

Word is that you reported him. Don't act like you don't know.  

[TimHauck 2,787]

Just now, League Champion said:

Word is that you reported him. Don't act like you don't know.  

Nope. Maybe a tranny did it

[League Champion 1,909]

Just now, TimHauck said:

Nope. Maybe a tranny did it

And stop sending DMs threatening people 

[seafoam1 2,966]

It's all the liberals has left. They can't come close to matching the intelligence of the conservatives, so, they loot and burn and kill. 

[TimHauck 2,787]

2 hours ago, League Champion said:

And stop sending DMs threatening people 

Lol

[Grace Under Pressure 104]

Your guy did this. Own it with an ounce of accountability for once in your life. Cowards. 

[seafoam1 2,966]

11 minutes ago, Grace Under Pressure said:

Your guy did this. Own it with an ounce of accountability for once in your life. Cowards. 

Liberals are committing violence across America. You own it. 

Actually, you don't have to, because you are just a tag along.

[iam90sbaby 2,599]

9 hours ago, HellToupee said:

The gotcha guy is out in full force today

He just hasn’t been the same since he had to move away from the train station

[The Real timschochet 6,703]

Just for the record: every SERIOUS study of this question shows the opposite: 

https://ccjs.umd.edu/feature/umd-led-study-shows-disparities-violence-among-extremist-groups

The majority of political violence in this country, by FAR, comes from the right not the left. 
Not that I care. Violence is awful no matter who does it and normal people on the right or left are not responsible- nobody is except the idiots who commit the violence. But @EternalShinyAndChrome’s claim, which he has made many times in this forum, is completely false. 

[seafoam1 2,966]

Liberal extreme violent reactions when they don't get their way, is commonly known. It's embedded in their little minds by their angry cult leaders.  

[Engorgeous George 2,314]

5 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

Just for the record: every SERIOUS study of this question shows the opposite: 

https://ccjs.umd.edu/feature/umd-led-study-shows-disparities-violence-among-extremist-groups

The majority of political violence in this country, by FAR, comes from the right not the left. 
Not that I care. Violence is awful no matter who does it and normal people on the right or left are not responsible- nobody is except the idiots who commit the violence. But @EternalShinyAndChrome’s claim, which he has made many times in this forum, is completely false. 

What makes a study SERIOUS, that it reaches the conclusion you wish it to?

How does one study represent every study?

What if the study is conducted by folks with an agenda and that agenda found its way into the data supposedly being analyzed.  Say the data was coded using standards which would exclude left leaning violence like arrest and prosecution figures.  See lone wolf violence is likely to lead to arrest and prosecution while mob violence, the type which occurs at large sdcale protests allows most of the perpetrators to escape into the crowd.  In the study you cite there is that potential.  If you read the study rather than the article describing the abstract you might have found the data criterion which allows for exactly that.  I include that criterion here ...

To be included in the database, individuals have to meet at least one of the following criteria: arrested or indicted for illegal ideologically motivated offenses, killed because of their ideological activities, identified as a current or former member of a designated terrorist organization, or associated with an organization whose leader or founder was indicted for violent ideologically motivated offenses. Individuals meeting one or more of these criteria must also have been radicalized (primarily or entirely) within the United States and have a clear link between their criminal behavior and their ideological motive. Data were coded in several stages involving three waves of coding by a team of research assistants and full-time staff. The codebook is available at (39).

 

As usual in your zeal you have so massively overstated your case as to really have no case.  I personally believe the propensity for violence, an extension for a propensity to intolerance and poor impulse control to be more or less equally distributed across the political spectrum, though I have no univeresity studies to support what is only my subjective belief.  Of course I do not state my subjective beliefs as estqablish 'the record" as you do for yours supported by shoddy social science research by folks with a clear agenda.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,322]

The left/ democrats normalized political violence years ago. It’s embedded as part of their strategy now, coordinated and funded. 

[League Champion 1,909]

6 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

The majority of political violence in this country, by FAR, comes from the right not the left. 

 Where have you been the last 50 years? 

[BrahmaBulls 726]

I wonder if it ever occurred to schochet that the University of Maryland could have a liberal biased study?

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,068]

1 minute ago, BrahmaBulls said:

I wonder if it ever occurred to schochet that the University of Maryland could have a liberal biased study?

Highly doubtful.  His history is littered with finding any suspect study that supports his position and then claim it as the defacto standard.

[The Real timschochet 6,703]

1 hour ago, Engorgeous George said:

What makes a study SERIOUS, that it reaches the conclusion you wish it to?

How does one study represent every study?

What if the study is conducted by folks with an agenda and that agenda found its way into the data supposedly being analyzed.  Say the data was coded using standards which would exclude left leaning violence like arrest and prosecution figures.  See lone wolf violence is likely to lead to arrest and prosecution while mob violence, the type which occurs at large sdcale protests allows most of the perpetrators to escape into the crowd.  In the study you cite there is that potential.  If you read the study rather than the article describing the abstract you might have found the data criterion which allows for exactly that.  I include that criterion here ...

To be included in the database, individuals have to meet at least one of the following criteria: arrested or indicted for illegal ideologically motivated offenses, killed because of their ideological activities, identified as a current or former member of a designated terrorist organization, or associated with an organization whose leader or founder was indicted for violent ideologically motivated offenses. Individuals meeting one or more of these criteria must also have been radicalized (primarily or entirely) within the United States and have a clear link between their criminal behavior and their ideological motive. Data were coded in several stages involving three waves of coding by a team of research assistants and full-time staff. The codebook is available at (39).

 

As usual in your zeal you have so massively overstated your case as to really have no case.  I personally believe the propensity for violence, an extension for a propensity to intolerance and poor impulse control to be more or less equally distributed across the political spectrum, though I have no univeresity studies to support what is only my subjective belief.  Of course I do not state my subjective beliefs as estqablish 'the record" as you do for yours supported by shoddy social science research by folks with a clear agenda.

What’s hilarious about your critique is that @EternalShinyAndChrome has made his claim many times and has never provided any kind of evidence at all. That’s why I used the word serious. You have to the best of my knowledge never criticized Eternal for making such a claim without providing any evidence. Yet the minute I offer actual evidence to the contrary you immediately attack it. 

It’s not like the study I produced is the only one out there. There are plenty of others. I don’t find them shoddy nor evidence of an agenda as you claim. But if either of those points are true then there should be evidence that points in the other direction. You’re welcome to provide it, since Eternal won’t. 

[The Real timschochet 6,703]

10 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Highly doubtful.  His history is littered with finding any suspect study that supports his position and then claim it as the defacto standard.

I’m sure, since this is your claim in a thread you started, you can provide studies or statistical evidence to support it, and the fact that you haven’t done so up to this point is merely an oversight. 

[seafoam1 2,966]

14 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Highly doubtful.  His history is littered with finding any suspect study that supports his position and then claim it as the defacto standard.

Right? Seriously how hard is it these days to go online, and find somebody that agrees with you on x? Or to find some liberal slanted "study" that "proves" your point. Everyone knows this is simply a moron technique of debating. 

How can liberals continue with the same stupid methods of arguing? 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,068]

2 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I’m sure, since this is your claim in a thread you started, you can provide studies or statistical evidence to support it, and the fact that you haven’t done so up to this point is merely an oversight. 

My studies include Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Castro, Kims of NK and many more.  I win. 

[BrahmaBulls 726]

15 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Highly doubtful.  His history is littered with finding any suspect study that supports his position and then claim it as the defacto standard.

Tim is not a serious poster.  Remember his stance on Jussie Smollett, for example?   Do you remember him claiming how mentally fit Biden was for months and months?  He cannot think for himself and follows what the media feeds him.

[The Real timschochet 6,703]

3 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

My studies include Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Castro, Kims of NK and many more.  I win. 

@Engorgeous George I welcome you to offer an opinion on this response. TIA

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,068]

3 minutes ago, BrahmaBulls said:

Tim is not a serious poster.  Remember his stance on Jussie Smollett, for example?   Do you remember him claiming how mentally fit Biden was for months and months?  He cannot think for himself and follows what the media feeds him.

I remember those as if it was yesterday. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,068]

5 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

@Engorgeous George I welcome you to offer an opinion on this response. TIA

I also forgot to include Antifa/BLM in my original post.  The Brown Shirts of the Democrat Party.

[TimHauck 2,787]

23 minutes ago, BrahmaBulls said:

Tim is not a serious poster.  Remember his stance on Jussie Smollett, for example?   Do you remember him claiming how mentally fit Biden was for months and months?  He cannot think for himself and follows what the media feeds him.

Do you ever actually the discuss the subject at hand, or do you just go around talking down to people?

[BrahmaBulls 726]

Just now, TimHauck said:

Do you ever actually the discuss the subject at hand, or do you just go around talking down to people?

You’re a weird dude.