Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
squistion

Trump deploying the National Guard to the streets of Washington D.C

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

They definitely deserve to be taken to task about that. Have at it.

They also didn’t spend years cultivating the belief that the leadership of the Democratic Party drank kid’s blood that they harvest through a global cabal and communicate via coded messages in email.

They didn’t put podcasters in charge of our highest IC and law enforcing agencies who just last year bragged about how they would release all this information, hold press conferences with binders of make believe files that were to be released any day now!! insist that because the files were not being released that obviously the people in power doing this were guilty, etc…

This is a classic case of chickens coming home to roost.

Donald then has the audacity to tell these people who lapped this stuff up to forget about it and they are stupid. It’s hilarious to me, no clue how it gets away with this type of stuff. 

:doh::lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

They definitely deserve to be taken to task about that. Have at it.

They also didn’t spend years cultivating the belief that the leadership of the Democratic Party drank kid’s blood that they harvest through a global cabal and communicate via coded messages in email.

They didn’t put podcasters in charge of our highest IC and law enforcing agencies who just last year bragged about how they would release all this information, hold press conferences with binders of make believe files that were to be released any day now!! insist that because the files were not being released that obviously the people in power doing this were guilty, etc…

This is a classic case of chickens coming home to roost.

Donald then has the audacity to tell these people who lapped this stuff up to forget about it and they are stupid. It’s hilarious to me, no clue how it gets away with this type of stuff. 

Jeez, I think you ripped the goalposts out of the ground and started swinging them around wildly. :lol: 

Here, I'll answer for you.  Occam's Razor says there is no there there.  Because if there were, it sure as sh1t would have been released.

But, you and the other Lefties here like being gaslit by the latest shiny object the media tells you is the importantest!  The reality is that the only way Trump is taken down at this point is (1) a bad economy, or (2) a really bad scandal, like they're trying to gin up with Epstein and him.  Despite what TimS said above, the economy is doing fine.  That leaves a scandal.

Hey look, a butterfly!

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Jeez, I think you ripped the goalposts out of the ground and started swinging them around wildly. :lol: 

Here, I'll answer for you.  Occam's Razor says there is no there there.  Because if there were, it sure as sh1t would have been released.

But, you and the other Lefties here like being gaslit by the latest shiny object the media tells you is the importantest!  The reality is that the only way Trump is taken down at this point is (1) a bad economy, or (2) a really bad scandal, like they're trying to gin up with Epstein and him.  Despite what TimS said above, the economy is doing fine.  That leaves a scandal.

Hey look, a butterfly!

Now speaking of goalposts your original ask was why didn’t Biden release this. I guess what you were really trying to say was they would have released them if there was something about Trump in them.

I didn’t comment if I think Trump is guilty or if this would bring him down.

To guilt…He’s certainly acting very guilty. He’s definitely a huge lifelong creep and loved partying with this other creep. He’s transactional about everything he does, it’s very odd he would take this PR hit for no reason. Best case IMO is that he’s just embarrassed about any mention of him in these even stuff that, while he was hanging with some unsavory people, is more creepy…not a crime. Worst case who knows but way worse than that.

To the idea this would bring him down…agree that there won’t be some smoking gun type revelation and nothing ultimately comes of this.

Again this is of Trump’s doing…so fock him and let him take all the smoke 😂

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Now speaking of goalposts your original ask was why didn’t Biden release this. I guess what you were really trying to say was they would have released them if there was something about Trump in them.

I didn’t comment if I think Trump is guilty or if this would bring him down.

To guilt…He’s certainly acting very guilty. He’s definitely a huge lifelong creep and loved partying with this other creep. He’s transactional about everything he does, it’s very odd he would take this PR hit for no reason. Best case IMO is that he’s just embarrassed about any mention of him in these even stuff that, while he was hanging with some unsavory people, is more creepy…not a crime. Worst case who knows but way worse than that.

To the idea this would bring him down…agree that there won’t be some smoking gun type revelation and nothing ultimately comes of this.

Again this is of Trump’s doing…so fock him and let him take all the smoke 😂

 

You sure type a lot of werds to not address the bolded.  :dunno: 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jerryskids said:

You sure type a lot of werds to not address the bolded.  :dunno: 

I thought I answered you twice now even though you changed it up. First, they should be taken to task for not releasing it. I assume Trump isn’t in it in any meaningful way…except for the fact he is acting so guilty 😂.

Why do you think he is doing that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I try and stay away from all mainstream news, but aren't they reviewing the files, called for subpoenas, have had Gislane (sp) testified, etc? 

Has anyone thought that perhaps they haven't been released yet because of how far and wide this will reach, on both sides at all levels of govt, and perhaps even across other countries? Wasn't Prince Andrew focking involved at some point? Focking Kim Jong Un could be on there. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TheNewGirl said:

 

Has anyone thought that perhaps they haven't been released yet because of how far and wide this will reach, on both sides at all levels of govt, and perhaps even across other countries? Wasn't Prince Andrew focking involved at some point? Focking Kim Jong Un could be on there. 

 

That has been mentioned here many times in the recent past. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, SUXBNME said:

That has been mentioned here many times in the recent past. :)

Meh, I don't read every thread. 

How you been, cat focker? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

I thought I answered you twice now even though you changed it up. First, they should be taken to task for not releasing it. I assume Trump isn’t in it in any meaningful way…except for the fact he is acting so guilty 😂.

Why do you think he is doing that?

Taken to task?  That's not the question.  Although you kinda answered it with the part about Trump not being in it in any meaningful way.

As for your last question:  just a guess, but Trump gets really defensive in dumb ways.  Like with Stormy, where he went to trial insisting he hadn't done anything with her.  Really?  Just say, "look, I shtupped her and gave her money to shut up".  Instead it became a question about whether or not he slept with her, and he didn't come off well with that.

Also I think he may be disingenuous with his story about "breaking up" with Epstein.  He had a story about Epstein "stealing" one of his employees... an underage girl.  My guess is that Trump had at least a pretty good suspicion what that girl would be doing with Epstein.  If true, it's bad but not as bad as the people who actually took advantage of those girls, and he did end his relationship with Epstein.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

Meh, I don't read every thread. 

How you been, cat focker? 

Decent, I suppose.  You? 

I'm loving this summer weather so far, though. :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, SUXBNME said:

Decent, I suppose.  You? 

I'm loving this summer weather so far, though. :thumbsup:

Heat wave this weekend. 100 plus. 🤮 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jerryskids said:

Taken to task?  That's not the question.  Although you kinda answered it with the part about Trump not being in it in any meaningful way.

As for your last question:  just a guess, but Trump gets really defensive in dumb ways.  Like with Stormy, where he went to trial insisting he hadn't done anything with her.  Really?  Just say, "look, I shtupped her and gave her money to shut up".  Instead it became a question about whether or not he slept with her, and he didn't come off well with that.

Also I think he may be disingenuous with his story about "breaking up" with Epstein.  He had a story about Epstein "stealing" one of his employees... an underage girl.  My guess is that Trump had at least a pretty good suspicion what that girl would be doing with Epstein.  If true, it's bad but not as bad as the people who actually took advantage of those girls, and he did end his relationship with Epstein.

Right he flat out lied repeatedly about Stormy. He still says he didn’t. 

He is lying about his Epstein relationship, The originally story, repeated by many people here was Trump booted Epstein out because he found out he was a creep. Some even said Trump went to the cops in Florida 😂

Trump himself blew up that story.

Trump said he knew Epstein liked em young but was just a terrific guy. He’s been very odd with his comments about Maxwell.

Would it be any shock that Trump was a creep with some 17 year old 30 years ago? Let’s be honest. 

So if Trump wants to act like it’s now no big deal to not release this stuff with these circumstances and then thinks telling people to forget about it doesn’t make him look suspicious as hell…well not sure what to say.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

Heat wave this weekend. 100 plus. 🤮 

Not a single over 100 in July, and after monday mid 90s to mid 80s for the rest of the week. Loving it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, SUXBNME said:

Not a single over 100 in July, and after monday mid 90s to mid 80s for the rest of the week. Loving it

I'd be loving it too if my AC hadn't taken a sh!t. It's hot as balls here. :(

 

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, 5-Points said:

I'd be loving it too if my AC hadn't taken a sh!t. It's hot as balls here. :(

 

Speaking of balls, I'll be calling you within the next hour, I think.   

Balls :wub:

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, seafoam1 said:

How many threads did you start over the last 4 years demanding biden open up some make believe Epstein files? 

 

That fagot Hauck is still tagging me?

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, SUXBNME said:

Speaking of balls, I'll be calling you within the next hour, I think.   

Balls :wub:

Mine are sticking to my knee. :cry:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, jerryskids said:

Have you or anyone else answered why Team Biden and Harris had these files and never released or leaked all of this bad stuff on Trump?  :dunno: 

Probably because there were people on their team implicated too.

This is also a red herring because Biden’s appointees didn’t say over and over that they would release them, that’s why it looks worse now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, 5-Points said:

Mine are sticking to my knee. :cry:

 

You have kat named "knee"? :huh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, thegeneral said:

Big Balls probably deserved a beating for being a little dooshbag, but not if he was just driving around. He was of course still being a dooshbag as it is his natural state, but these criminals would not know that and were just being scumbag lowlifes.

This should have of course not happen and those little fockers should be in prison and shame on them for bringing Big Balls back into the public’s eye and making him a sympathetic figure. I hope Big Balls gets his justice.

Trump will fock it up of course but say he fixed it like no one has ever seen! We have seen this movie.

The story is that he wasn’t the target, supposedly he was defending a woman being carjacked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, BrahmaBulls said:

That fagot Hauck is still tagging me?

My trick is to just tell the truth about these liberal dopes and soon they will put you on ignore. 

It's so nice when they don't respond to my calling them out on their idiotic posts. They think they are "getting" me. But I simply call them out and leave it at that.

timHack is just a turd. Such a disgusting person. But so are most if not all of these liberals. They are so f'n stupid. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

The story is that he wasn’t the target, supposedly he was defending a woman being carjacked.

Which may be true and he should be given the benefit of the doubt, like many of us did with the story that Jussie Smolette gave until all the facts surfaced. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, squistion said:

Which may be true and he should be given the benefit of the doubt, like many of us did with the story that Jussie Smolette gave until all the facts surfaced. 

Here's another dimwit you definitely want to have him put you on ignore. Getting responses from these dopes only makes you lose faith in people in general. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, squistion said:

Which may be true and he should be given the benefit of the doubt, like many of us did with the story that Jussie Smolette gave until all the facts surfaced. 

Yeah, just like that.  :lol: 

Also, I see you changed the title after I pointed out the blatant bias of PBS with their "federal takeover" pap.  Your welcome for correcting you, and PBS.  :thumbsup: 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/8/2025 at 4:35 PM, jerryskids said:

"Federal takeover..." yeah, that's an unbiased headline.

And PBS wonders why they are being defunded.  It's a conundrum wrapped in an enigma.  :dunno: 

“We have tremendous power at the White House to run places when we have to.  We could run DC.”

 

“Takeover” sounds like an accurate description of this suggestion IMO.  And this video was from a month ago, this isn’t a new idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TimHauck said:

“We have tremendous power at the White House to run places if we have to.  We could run DC.”

 

“Takeover” sounds like an accurate description of this suggestion IMO.  And this video was from a month ago, this isn’t a new idea.

Great news, DC is a place where everyone should be safe. Liberals love violence and hate. It's time to clean up these liberal run DEI cities. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The original PBS headline was not biased. 

Here again from the OP where they quote Trump. He is literally talking about taking "Federal control" of DC or in other words a "takeover"

“If D.C. doesn’t get its act together, and quickly, we will have no choice but to take Federal control of the City, and run this City how it should be run, and put criminals on notice that they’re not going to get away with it anymore,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social."

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, TimHauck said:

“We have tremendous power at the White House to run places when we have to.  We could run DC.”

 

“Takeover” sounds like an accurate description of this suggestion IMO.  And this video was from a month ago, this isn’t a new idea.

 

49 minutes ago, squistion said:

The original PBS headline was not biased. 

Here again from the OP where they quote Trump. He is literally talking about taking "Federal control" of DC or in other words a "takeover"

“If D.C. doesn’t get its act together, and quickly, we will have no choice but to take Federal control of the City, and run this City how it should be run, and put criminals on notice that they’re not going to get away with it anymore,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social."

It's funny how you Lefties take Trump's word as gospel when it fits your OMB agenda, and otherwise call him a liar.

How's that takeover of LA coming?  Squissy, do you have ICE officers living in your one-bedroom apartment?  :lol: 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

 

It's funny how you Lefties take Trump's word as gospel when it fits your OMB agenda, and otherwise call him a liar.

How's that takeover of LA coming?  Squissy, do you have ICE officers living in your one-bedroom apartment?  :lol: 

The title of the article is Trump “threatens” takeover.  Do you disagree with that description?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

The boyo class here at the GC are coming out pro crime

pro crime, pro abortion, pro castration for kids, pro grooming, pro homo, pro tranny, anti-science and anti-american to boot.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

pro crime, pro abortion, pro castration for kids, pro grooming, pro homo, pro tranny, anti-science and anti-american to boot.

100% FACT!! 

And as far as anti-american, they will say they are pro American, but's it's their new sick, deformed idea of what America should be. Which is made up of all the other crap that you outlined that they believe in. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

100% FACT!! 

And as far as anti-american, they will say they are pro American, but's it's their new sick, deformed idea of what America should be. Which is made up of all the other crap that you outlined that they believe in. 

Well, their sick idea of america is basically Communism with extra degeneracy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

You have a problem with homos? 

This is what he pulls out of that list. 😆

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

You have a problem with homos? 

Rhetorical question. 😁

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×