easilyscan 951 Posted August 14 Interesting. Thanks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,028 Posted August 14 Strike thinks the civilians deserved it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mark Davis 403 Posted August 14 Those bombs saved a lot of lives when doing the accounting for what an invasion of mainland Japan would have looked like. The threat of the Russians being a part of a land invasion helped tighten the screws a bit more as well. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iam90sbaby 2,659 Posted August 14 We could’ve been the first nation in world history to conquer the entire world with just the threat of violence and we didn’t. Major L. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 6,682 Posted August 14 6 hours ago, Mark Davis said: Those bombs saved a lot of lives when doing the accounting for what an invasion of mainland Japan would have looked like. The threat of the Russians being a part of a land invasion helped tighten the screws a bit more as well. Never get in a land war in Asia Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 6,682 Posted August 14 On 8/14/2025 at 1:13 AM, iam90sbaby said: We could’ve been the first nation in world history to conquer the entire world with just the threat of violence and we didn’t. Major L. If squishy were President he’d have dropped the 1st one on Florida to teach the japs a lesson 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBayXXXVII 2,593 Posted August 14 No civilian "deserved" anything... but something had to be done. I think the biggest problems of the defending side of wars is that attacking the person in charge isn't the main objective. Japan attacked us... let's go into Tokyo and destroy their Capitol. We should have went after Hirohito. Let them know that they, personally, are the target. Putin went into Ukraine, I understand Ukraine has to defend themselves, but they got so much help from other countries, send a bomber to take out Moscow. Fock Putin. Send a message right up his a$$. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheNewGirl 1,540 Posted August 14 17 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said: No civilian "deserved" anything... but something had to be done. I think the biggest problems of the defending side of wars is that attacking the person in charge isn't the main objective. Japan attacked us... let's go into Tokyo and destroy their Capitol. We should have went after Hirohito. Let them know that they, personally, are the target. Putin went into Ukraine, I understand Ukraine has to defend themselves, but they got so much help from other countries, send a bomber to take out Moscow. Fock Putin. Send a message right up his a$$. Didn't they go after Hiroshima and Nagasaki because they were big education, military and industrial centers? the goal was destruction of military centers, not people specifically. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBayXXXVII 2,593 Posted August 14 14 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said: Didn't they go after Hiroshima and Nagasaki because they were big education, military and industrial centers? the goal was destruction of military centers, not people specifically. Oh yes, I understand why those targets were selected from a strategic standpoint. I have no doubt that a big part of the reason why the war ended just 1 month later, was this attack. I just think that if you dropped one of those on Tokyo instead, and took out Hirohito, the other bomb wouldn't have been necessary. It also sends a message to war mongering leaders, that they might be the target, not their facilities which can be rebuilt. Pre-WW2, I doubt any country had safeguards in place to protect their leaders from an atomic bomb. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gepetto 1,389 Posted August 15 14 hours ago, TBayXXXVII said: Oh yes, I understand why those targets were selected from a strategic standpoint. I have no doubt that a big part of the reason why the war ended just 1 month later, was this attack. I just think that if you dropped one of those on Tokyo instead, and took out Hirohito, the other bomb wouldn't have been necessary. It also sends a message to war mongering leaders, that they might be the target, not their facilities which can be rebuilt. Pre-WW2, I doubt any country had safeguards in place to protect their leaders from an atomic bomb. The video stated Tokyo was not bombed because it had already been bombed for months and was severely damaged and they wanted to drop the Atomic bomb on an untouched city to clearly gauge the Atomic bombs' devastating effects. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBayXXXVII 2,593 Posted August 15 5 hours ago, Gepetto said: The video stated Tokyo was not bombed because it had already been bombed for months and was severely damaged and they wanted to drop the Atomic bomb on an untouched city to clearly gauge the Atomic bombs' devastating effects. Like I said, I understand the strategy behind what they did, I just think a louder message would've been to target Hirohito himself. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tree of Knowledge 1,957 Posted August 15 23 hours ago, edjr said: If squishy were President he’d have dropped the 1st one on Florida to teach them a lesson It would have to be north Florida. No way would he irradiate South Beach and Key West. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 1,914 Posted August 15 1 hour ago, Tree of Knowledge said: Key West. @weepaws likes to get freaky there Share this post Link to post Share on other sites