Trump rigging midterms

[Horseman 2,560]

1 hour ago, Ron_Artest said:

The statement was made that statistically voter fraud is non existent.  You presenting one example proves that point.

What were talking about is the need to eliminate mail in ballots because you can't have a free and fair election with it.  That's complete BS.  I invite you to counter that if you like but a single story of Michigan city council member ain't gonna cut it.  You'd be wise to just sit this one out.

You see what we were talking about is.....

The guy thats wrong and confused has to summarize it for everyone else. 

[Ron_Artest 1,675]

1 hour ago, Meglamaniac said:

Your TDS aside, no one else said anything about 2020.

Tim=Your opinion is wrong. Statistically voter fraud is non-existent. 

Gutter=Well if you have any evidence you can share.  But truth is it doesn't exist.

Anyone see 2020 in here, nope, I shared, you tried moving the goalposts to 2020, now run along and skyscream some more about Trump

The thread is about how mail in voting makes an election fraudulent.

You can either provide evidence that it does.

Or the other statement was that the fraud is stastiscally significant.

You can Providence that shows it is.

One story about a primary doesn't do that, I'm sorry.

So again you can try harder or just yawn.

[Meglamaniac 598]

1 minute ago, Ron_Artest said:

The thread is about how mail in voting makes an election fraudulent.

You can either provide evidence that it does.

Or the other statement was that the fraud is stastiscally significant.

You can Providence that shows it is.

One story about a primary doesn't do that, I'm sorry.

So again you can try harder or just yawn.

Statistically voter fraud is non-existent. 

 

Well if you have any evidence you can share.  But truth is it doesn't exist.

 

proven wrong again and again, maybe next time think before you try to move the goalposts

Now hurry back to skyscreaming about Trump

[Ron_Artest 1,675]

23 minutes ago, Strike said:

This is crap.  The link i.posted was of a local candidate stuffing a ballot box to ensure his win.  In a district where two others were just indicted for similar tactics in a previous election. That was VERY statistically significant.

I'm guessing you never took a stat class in your life.  When looked at this at a national level, how many districts does this happen?

[Meglamaniac 598]

Just now, Ron_Artest said:

I'm guessing you never took a stat class in your life.  When looked at this at a national level, how many districts does this happen?

more than non existent

hth

[Strike 5,691]

2 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

I'm guessing you never took a stat class in your life.  When looked at this at a national level, how many districts does this happen?

 I've said for years that I care about voter fraud in.local elections a lot more than national.  There are a hell of a lot more local elections than national.  You keep moving the goal posts.  It gets tiring.

[Ron_Artest 1,675]

Just now, Meglamaniac said:

more than non existent

hth

Let me explain.

If something happens .001%, that means it exists, but not in a frequency where it's significant.  Make sense?

So while voter fraud has happened in isolated incidents over many years, it's usually not significant to the outcome of the election.

When Donald Trump says that we need to stop mail in ballots because you can't have a free election with it, the next question is show me the evidence in a statistically significant manner.

You can't.  And that's where we are.

Hope this helps.

[Ron_Artest 1,675]

1 minute ago, Strike said:

 I've said for years that I care about voter fraud in.local elections a lot more than national.  There are a hell of a lot more local elections than national.  You keep moving the goal posts.  It gets tiring.

Try and stick to the topic of the thread, no moving goal posts.

Do you agree with Trump that mail in voting makes all elections fraudulent?

[Meglamaniac 598]

1 minute ago, Ron_Artest said:

Let me explain.

If something happens .001%, that means it exists, but not in a frequency where it's significant.  Make sense?

So while voter fraud has happened in isolated incidents over many years, it's usually not significant to the outcome of the election.

When Donald Trump says that we need to stop mail in ballots because you can't have a free election with it, the next question is show me the evidence in a statistically significant manner.

You can't.  And that's where we are.

Hope this helps.

let me explain, you're wrong and no amount of typing on your part is going to change that

[Ron_Artest 1,675]

1 minute ago, Meglamaniac said:

let me explain, you're wrong and no amount of typing on your part is going to change that

Ok, if I'm wrong I accept that, but you need to prove it.  Show me the stats that show that mail in ballots make elections fraudulent.

[TimHauck 3,008]

8 minutes ago, Strike said:

 I've said for years that I care about voter fraud in.local elections a lot more than national.  There are a hell of a lot more local elections than national.  You keep moving the goal posts.  It gets tiring.

So share the stats.  Because 1 city out of thousands isn’t statistically significant 

[Meglamaniac 598]

4 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

Ok, if I'm wrong I accept that, but you need to prove it.  Show me the stats that show that mail in ballots make elections fraudulent.

I already provided a link that proves voter fraud does exist, end of story, you said it doesn't exist, YOUR WORDS THAT YOU TYPED and I proved it does

Everything else is you twisting in the wind to be not wrong

Well if you have any evidence you can share.  But truth is it doesn't exist.

 

[Meglamaniac 598]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

So share the stats.  Because 1 city out of thousands isn’t statistically significant 

Well if you have any evidence you can share.  But truth is it doesn't exist.

[Ron_Artest 1,675]

2 minutes ago, Meglamaniac said:

I already provided a link that proves voter fraud does exist, end of story, you said it doesn't exist, YOUR WORDS THAT YOU TYPED and I proved it does

Everything else is you twisting in the wind to be not wrong

Well if you have any evidence you can share.  But truth is it doesn't exist.

 

Ok I get it, you're confused.

When I said it doesn't exist, I was referring to the statistical significance, not any voter fraud.

I agree there has been voter fraud, obviously, but it's not significant and certainly has not influenced the outcomes of national elections.

Would you agree with that?

[TimHauck 3,008]

10 minutes ago, Meglamaniac said:

I already provided a link that proves voter fraud does exist, end of story, you said it doesn't exist, YOUR WORDS THAT YOU TYPED and I proved it does

Everything else is you twisting in the wind to be not wrong

Well if you have any evidence you can share.  But truth is it doesn't exist.

 

You left out the “statistically,” part, why are you being intentionally misleading?

[Meglamaniac 598]

11 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

Ok I get it, you're confused.

When I said it doesn't exist, I was referring to the statistical significance, not any voter fraud.

I agree there has been voter fraud, obviously, but it's not significant and certainly has not influenced the outcomes of national elections.

Would you agree with that?

Im not cunfused at all, you were wrong

[Ron_Artest 1,675]

Just now, Meglamaniac said:

Im not cunfused at all, you were wrong

No you're confused.  It's pretty clear what I meant to anyone being fair.

[Meglamaniac 598]

5 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

You left out the “statistically,” part, why are you being intentionally misleading?

you know why TimHack, cause they didnt say statistacally, I litterally posted what they posted , its right there in my post

I'm not being misleading about anything, sorry youre to dense to see that

[Meglamaniac 598]

Just now, Ron_Artest said:

No you're confused.  It's pretty clear what I meant to anyone being fair.

no im really not, no matter how many time you post it

best if you just move back to skyscreaming cause here you were WRONG

[Strike 5,691]

27 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

Try and stick to the topic of the thread, no moving goal posts.

Do you agree with Trump that mail in voting makes all elections fraudulent?

No. Let's finish with your moving the goalposts.  When did Trump say he only wanted to change voting for national elections ONLY, which is idiotic since most elections have a local and national component.  But I'll let you enoighten me on how this thread is only about national elections.

[Strike 5,691]

23 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

So share the stats.  Because 1 city out of thousands isn’t statistically significant 

It is to that city.  You guys are trapped.  I proved that lax security can allow elections to be stolen.  Keep trying to move the goal posts and deflect. That's the only thing you and the 10 times banned aliases are good at, and you're still not very good at it.

[TimHauck 3,008]

Just now, Strike said:

I proved that lax security can allow elections to be stolen. 

Who said it couldn’t, goalpost mover?

[Tree of Knowledge 1,925]

The 2020 election was stolen due to mail in voting and non existent internal controls in contested states and the usual blue state suspects.  That is undeniable 

[TimHauck 3,008]

13 minutes ago, Meglamaniac said:

you know why TimHack, cause they didnt say statistacally, I litterally posted what they posted , its right there in my post

I'm not being misleading about anything, sorry youre to dense to see that

That post was directly in response to one talking about evidence of it being statistically significant.

You’re being intentionally misleading, it’s okay you can admit it.

[Meglamaniac 598]

24 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

You left out the “statistically,” part, why are you being intentionally misleading?

I now see why you are asking this, it wasn't meant to be misleading

statistically significant and non-existent are very different things

 

[Ron_Artest 1,675]

19 minutes ago, Strike said:

No. Let's finish with your moving the goalposts.  When did Trump say he only wanted to change voting for national elections ONLY, which is idiotic since most elections have a local and national component.  But I'll let you enoighten me on how this thread is only about national elections.

Well we can start with the title of the thread.  Midterms.  So that is what we're talking about.

It's also a fair assumption given Trump's history of claiming he lost the 2020 election due to fraud from mail in ballots.  It would be foolish to think that Trump cares about and/or questions the integrity of local town council elections.

[Ron_Artest 1,675]

27 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Who said it couldn’t, goalpost mover?

Exactly.  Strike with the hilarious self own

[Hardcore troubadour 15,534]

The best way to rig an election would be no ID and mail in ballots.  

[jonnyutah 319]

3 hours ago, Strike said:

ROFLMAO.  And the goalposts move.  How shocking!!!!

That was so textbook. Hahaha. It is just instinctual for them. 

[TimHauck 3,008]

4 minutes ago, jonnyutah said:

That was so textbook. Hahaha. It is just instinctual for them. 

Did you see Strike then immediately move the goalposts himself?  Textbook.

[Strike 5,691]

18 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Did you see Strike then immediately move the goalposts himself?  Textbook.

Except I didn't.  But I get it.  You and GutterBanned got cornered so now you're flailing with all your might to try to avoid admitting it.  

[Ron_Artest 1,675]

3 minutes ago, Strike said:

Except I didn't.  But I get it.  You and GutterBanned got cornered so now you're flailing with all your might to try to avoid admitting it.  

Look at the thread title bruh.

[jonnyutah 319]

16 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Did you see Strike then immediately move the goalposts himself?  Textbook.

No. I didnt.

I did see a bunch of people that dont understand what "statistically" means. 

"Statistically voter fraud exists." Is a 100% true statement.

"Statistically voter fraud is non existent" is a 100% false statement. 

 

[TimHauck 3,008]

1 hour ago, Strike said:

 I proved that lax security can allow elections to be stolen. 

 

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Who said it couldn’t, goalpost mover?

Bump

[Ron_Artest 1,675]

21 minutes ago, jonnyutah said:

No. I didnt.

I did see a bunch of people that dont understand what "statistically" means. 

"Statistically voter fraud exists." Is a 100% true statement.

"Statistically voter fraud is non existent" is a 100% false statement. 

 

Now do statistically significant 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,206]

36 minutes ago, jonnyutah said:

No. I didnt.

I did see a bunch of people that dont understand what "statistically" means. 

"Statistically voter fraud exists." Is a 100% true statement.

"Statistically voter fraud is non existent" is a 100% false statement. 

I mean, c'mon.  It's patently obvious so I'm not sure why they just don't admit they're wrong.

[TimHauck 3,008]

1 hour ago, jonnyutah said:

No. I didnt.

I did see a bunch of people that dont understand what "statistically" means. 

"Statistically voter fraud exists." Is a 100% true statement.

"Statistically voter fraud is non existent" is a 100% false statement. 

 

Because you’re blind to your obvious bias.

He claimed he proved elections can be stolen when no one said otherwise.

Lol at the semantic gymnastics here. “0.000000001% is still a statistic!”

[thegeneral 3,301]

Mail in works amazing.

Here’s how it works in a well run place: You get a text your ballot is on the way, you get a ballot in mail a couple days later, you fill it out and sign it when you have time,  you tear off a tracking code, you mail it back. The state texts you when it is received.

It’s that easy. Figure it out dipshit states. 

[seafoam1 3,190]

9 hours ago, Ron_Artest said:

Trying to ban absentee ballots.

Not a dictator though right?

Who would vote for a pedo like this if he wasn't a pedo himself? 

 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,534]

People can’t get an ID but they can get a smart phone. Liberals are so fockin stupid.