Charlie Kirk was just shot

[Horseman 2,667]

8 hours ago, thegeneral said:

I don’t care who this shitbag affiliated with. He’s a lunatic, crazy person.

These Groyper weirdos I just heard about. They seem real neat.

Lame.  Even for you. 

[TimHauck 3,105]

8 hours ago, thegeneral said:

They used to hate Charlie Kirk when he was totally lame…he was totally cool again. They had a vote in the basement of Comey Pizza.

 @iam90sbaby seems to be telling on himself a bit there. If he thinks they all changed their mind and don’t hate him anymore he’s admitting they’re just a bunch of sheep that will do what they’re told.

[TimHauck 3,105]

9 hours ago, iam90sbaby said:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Asmongold/s/ofJ1tUDS1W

 

On 1/23/2025 at 10:14 AM, Horseman said:

100% Nazi Hitler.  Reddit said so.  

 

[supermike80 2,021]

8 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Yes you are.  Below was your second post in this thread.  Then you of course had the weird rant talking about how in response to the shooting you were going to make sure not to vote for anyone that supports LGBTQ.

 

Jesus youre dim.  I can say what i think it is and still not care.

Why so divisive?  Do you just look for an internet battle?

Chill dude. Seriously 

[Frozenbeernuts 2,285]

On 9/10/2025 at 2:33 PM, iam90sbaby said:

Fake as fock. You spew your rhetoric everyday and call people Nazis. The shooter thought he was killing a nazi not just a normal guy with a family, because of your people. 

Spot on. I preach unity, but this has been brewing for a while. This is what happens when people are radicalized. I'm not even solely referring to the shooter because who knows what really went into him doing it.

I'm talking about all of the people celebrating and flaunting that they are happy Kirk got shot.

When I say unity, we need to come together to condemn this type of stuff and end the promotion of radicals. The far left gets no quarter. There is no saving them. Calling people who voted for Trump Nazis has never been acceptable, yet unsurprisingly here we are.

[BirdGang 398]

47 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Big debate in my neighborhood (fairly diverse, I’d estimate about 60% Trump voters) Facebook page.  Most posts usually get like 4 or 5 comments, up to about 60 on posts talking about how the HOA originally decided not to lower the flag at the clubhouse to half staff for Kirk (no posts from me). I think they eventually did it though

Trailer parks can be unpredictable. 

[TimHauck 3,105]

11 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

Jesus youre dim.  I can say what i think it is and still not care.

Why so divisive?  Do you just look for an internet battle?

Chill dude. Seriously 

“Why so divisive?” says the guy blaming it on the left immediately before any evidence comes out.

LOL, you’re a fraud.

[supermike80 2,021]

3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

“Why so divisive?” says the guy blaming it on the left immediately before any evidence comes out.

LOL, you’re a fraud.

Ok buddy. You win.  I hope this makes you feel better

[TimHauck 3,105]

Just now, supermike80 said:

Ok buddy. You win.  I hope this makes you feel better

I just hope one day that you will open your eyes to your hypocrisy.

[supermike80 2,021]

Just now, TimHauck said:

I just hope one day that you will open your eyes to your hypocrisy.

I said you win. And you keep going.

[BrahmaBulls 834]

28 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

Jesus youre dim.  I can say what i think it is and still not care.

Why so divisive?  Do you just look for an internet battle?

Chill dude. Seriously 

Hauck is sho nuff.  Of course he's just looking for an internet fight.

[Gladiators 2,020]

14 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I just hope one day that you will open your eyes to your hypocrisy.

Coming from the guy who only calls out one side all day every day, but claims to be in the middle. Maybe open your eyes to your hypocrisy.

[TimHauck 3,105]

6 minutes ago, BrahmaBulls said:

Hauck is sho nuff.  Of course he's just looking for an internet fight.

I’m not him, we posted at the same time on the main board.  I just didn’t post in the GC until 2020.

But you’re god damn right I’m going to call out hypocrisy when I see it.

[TimHauck 3,105]

Just now, Gladiators said:

Coming from the guy who only calls out one side all day every day. Maybe open your eyes to your hypocrisy.

I’ve called out both sides including in this thread.   Yes, I call out the right here more often because 1) there are more righty posters here, and 2) the particular righty posters here are more insufferable than a typical righty person in general 

[Gladiators 2,020]

9 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I’ve called out both sides including in this thread.   Yes, I call out the right here more often because 1) there are more righty posters here, and 2) the particular righty posters here are more insufferable than a typical righty person in general 

Your calling out of the left vs right is about a 1:50 ratio at best. And your calling out of the left isn’t nearly the same. You will insufferably quote or @ the people on the right until you get a response. The left, it’s a one quote and done.

It’s okay to admit you’re a hypocrite.

[Maximum Overkill 2,241]

8 hours ago, TimHauck said:

you were going to make sure not to vote for anyone that supports LGBTQ

Fact. 

I will NEVER vote for anyone who is in favor of turning little Kids into the opposite sex, addresses a Man as a Woman, thinks a crossdresser is woman, wants Diks in Girls bathrooms or pretends these people aren't bat shitt crazy. 

This is the identity of the entire Democrat party and it's disgusting. 

[TimHauck 3,105]

8 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Fact. 

I will NEVER vote for anyone who is in favor of turning little Kids into the opposite sex, addresses a Man as a Woman, thinks a crossdresser is woman, wants Diks in Girls bathrooms or pretends these people aren't bat shitt crazy. 

This is the identity of the entire Democrat party and it's disgusting. 

You are welcome to do so, but there’s no point in bringing it up in a thread about Charlie Kirk unless you think it had something to do with his murder.

[Tree of Knowledge 2,017]

19 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I’ve called out both sides including in this thread.   Yes, I call out the right here more often because 1) there are more righty posters here, and 2) the particular righty posters here are more insufferable than a typical righty person in general 

You are spreading false information to make you feel better.  Work to fix problems, not fix blame

[TimHauck 3,105]

25 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Work to fix problems, not fix blame

I’ve done that on this forum also.  Thanks for the reminder though to bump my Start with Hello thread which is next week to help combat bullying.  Of course monsters like @Cdub100 have stated we need more bullying, not less.

It’s okay, you can admit you were wrong.  Be better.

[Maximum Overkill 2,241]

Just now, TimHauck said:

I’ve done that also on this forum

No you haven't. Start by admitting the truth about your Party. Their entire existence is based on Gender Identity and violence. 

The first step in healing is admitting the problem. 

[TimHauck 3,105]

24 minutes ago, Gladiators said:

Your calling out of the left vs right is about a 1:50 ratio at best. And your calling out of the left isn’t nearly the same. You will insufferably quote or @ the people on the right until you get a response. The left, it’s a one quote and done.

It’s okay to admit you’re a hypocrite.

There are probably 5x more righty than lefty posters here, and the righty posters here are about 10x more insufferable than a typical conservative I encounter in the real world.

So yeah, 50:1 sounds about right.

[Gladiators 2,020]

Just now, TimHauck said:

There are probably 5x more righty than lefty posters here, and the righty posters here are about 10x more insufferable than a typical conservative I encounter in the real world.

So yeah, 50:1 sounds about right.

So you’re also a liar.

[BrahmaBulls 834]

35 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I’ve called out both sides including in this thread.   Yes, I call out the right here more often because 1) there are more righty posters here, and 2) the particular righty posters here are more insufferable than a typical righty person in general 

100% sho

[Maximum Overkill 2,241]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

There are probably 5x more righty than lefty posters here, and the righty posters here are about 10x more insufferable than a typical conservative I encounter in the real world.

So yeah, 50:1 sounds about right.

You're full of shitt, you NEVER call out your own party and never will. Hell, you still don't understand why Kamala lost, you don't get it. 

[avoiding injuries 1,635]

2 minutes ago, BrahmaBulls said:

100% sho

That’s the stay at home dad, right? Yeah, no chance he isn’t here posting under an alias after the other place got shut down. 

[Tree of Knowledge 2,017]

9 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I’ve done that also on this forum also.  Thanks for the reminder though to bump my Start with Hello thread which is next week to help combat bullying.  Of course monsters like @Cdub100 have stated we need more bullying, not less.

It’s okay, you can admit you were wrong.  Be better.

This simply isn’t true.  You only fan the flames with your partisanship and blind loyalty to your party. Enough with your blatant falsehoods. Build bridges, don’t burn them.  Be like Charlie.  

[TimHauck 3,105]

2 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

This simply isn’t true.  You only fan the flames with your partisanship and blind loyalty to your party. Enough with your blatant falsehoods. Build bridges, don’t burn them.  Be like Charlie.  

He didn’t deserve to be killed for it, but Charlie didn’t build bridges.

[5-Points 3,674]

12 hours ago, jonnyutah said:

"Charlie was someone who was willing to debate and downplay the death of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police"

Floyd was objectively a scumbag. 

And he died of an OD.

[TimHauck 3,105]

8 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said:

That’s the stay at home dad, right? Yeah, no chance he isn’t here posting under an alias after the other place got shut down. 

He posted here.  No clue his occupation or if he also posted at FBG, I never posted there 

[Tree of Knowledge 2,017]

8 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

He didn’t deserve to be killed for it, but Charlie didn’t build bridges.

Even Charlie couldn’t fix evil and stupid.  

[Strike 5,825]

36 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

You are welcome to do so, but there’s no point in bringing it up in a thread about Charlie Kirk unless you think it had something to do with his murder.

Says the guy who brought up the Minnesota Dem murders in this thread.  Not sure what they had to do with Kirk's murder either but you derailed this thread to talk about them for pages IIRC.

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,415]

26 minutes ago, BrahmaBulls said:

100% sho

Not even close. Sho never had 1000 links 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,415]

17 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

He didn’t deserve to be killed for it, but Charlie didn’t build bridges.

He would defend people like you and let you talk all you want. He never pushed your people away 

[jonnyutah 412]

7 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

He would defend people like you and let you talk all you want. He never pushed your people away 

Oh no, he would definitely have told sho to stfu and had security get rid of him. Sho would get up there and argue with him then 45 minutes later he would get back up there and bring up the same points again and refuse to give up the microphone. Security would eventually have to carry him away all the while sho screaming about hypcorisy and that he won. 

[TimHauck 3,105]

20 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

He would defend people like you and let you talk all you want. He never pushed your people away 

That’s not “building bridges” IMO.  He was for free speech, but he didn’t really want to change his own mind about anything, he wanted to change others’ minds, and if he realized they wouldn’t, gotcha them and then post a clip to social media for his followers to laugh at them.  

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,415]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

That’s not “building bridges” IMO.  He was for free speech, but he didn’t really want to change his own mind about anything, he wanted to change others’ minds, and if he realized they wouldn’t, gotcha them and then post a clip to social media for his followers to laugh at them.  

thats where you are wrong, cause I have seen him change his mind at least twice

and when people act like trash his followers should laugh at them

[TimHauck 3,105]

55 minutes ago, Strike said:

Says the guy who brought up the Minnesota Dem murders in this thread.  Not sure what they had to do with Kirk's murder either but you derailed this thread to talk about them for pages IIRC.

Those murders are absolutely relevant to this thread.

1) They were politically motivated, and a US Senator made light of them, but there was little outrage about that from righties.

2) It proves people like @5-Points wrong who claimed 99.9% of political violence is committed by the left.    It also shows the hypocrisy since people said stuff in here like of course he was killed by a leftist because it’s Charlie Kirk, yet tried to find any reason to blame the MN shootings of 2 Democrats on a leftist.  The fact that to this day people continue to deny the overwhelming evidence that Boelter was a righty (even though I know some here don’t really believe that and are just trolling) is insane to me, and is further proof of the blind partisanship on both sides.

[TimHauck 3,105]

7 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

thats where you are wrong, cause I have seen him change his mind at least twice

and when people act like trash his followers should laugh at them

About what?  Well it is possible he was in the process of changing his mind about Israel…

I’ll acknowledge that “hate” wouldn’t be the first word I’d use to describe some of the things he said.   But “divisive” for sure.

[HellToupee 1,985]

 Dodgers Pitcher Blake Treinen honored Charlie Kirk last night by writing his name on his hat  with two crosses.

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,415]

5 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

About what?  Well it is possible he was in the process of changing his mind about Israel…

I’ll acknowledge that “hate” wouldn’t be the first word I’d use to describe some of the things he said.   But “divisive” for sure.

he was challenging Israel, thats one, he also changed after he learned more about ESL.  And it was a deaf student that changed his thoughts