Charlie Kirk was just shot

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,425]

5 minutes ago, weepaws said:

Racist always deny being a racist, and you can’t stop doing so now, those that feel judge, are those that judge.  Shame on you. 

Moron idiot retard. You are all of these. I don’t deny anything. I say prove it. I don’t judge anyone. You’re the piece of garbage in here that judges more than anyone else on the bored 

amen pedo lover 

[HellToupee 2,005]

Well look at this ….

 

A report from the Washington Postindicates alleged Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson used the Discord platform Thursday to tell his friends, “It was me.”

According to the Post, Robinson messaged his friends “about two hours before officials said [he] was taken into custody.”

The message said: “Hey guys, I have bad news for you all. It was me at UVU yesterday. im sorry for all of this.”

A member of the group of individuals who allegedly received the message from Robinson took a screen shot of it and shared it with the Washington Post. 

In addition to Robinson’s alleged admission, Breitbart News reported that FBI deputy director Dan Bongino spoke to FOX News’ Bill Hemmer Monday, saying, “People knew in advance” of the Kirk assassination suspect’s plan.

Bongino observed, “There appear to have been multiple warning signs. There were people in [the suspect’s] network — friends and family — who had stated that he had become more political…I believe some of his co-workers stated that he had kind of detached himself when the topic of politics came up and walked away from them.

[weepaws 3,251]

4 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

Moron idiot retard. You are all of these. I don’t deny anything. I say prove it. I don’t judge anyone. You’re the piece of garbage in here that judges more than anyone else on the bored 

amen pedo lover 

So you don’t deny being a racist, this good, at least you admit it.  People that feel judged, are those that judge. 

[jonnyutah 434]

14 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

It’s not from the Spotify list, I agree it’s well known. But Bella Ciao is also in Far Cry 6, a video game. These video games are about manichean post-apocalyptic fantasy universes where it’s single heroes fighting against monsters essentially. It’s completely outside of normal life, kid wouldn’t know Mussolini or Franco from his elbow.

Sigh...you arent listening. I didnt say that is where the song came from. I said that is how it was linked to groypers. 

It seems you are making the mistake of confusing terminally online gamer with being a groyper. You dont think reddit is loaded with left wing terminally online gamers? 

[SaintsInDome2006 486]

10 minutes ago, jonnyutah said:

Sigh...you arent listening. I didnt say that is where the song came from. I said that is how it was linked to groypers. 

It seems you are making the mistake of confusing terminally online gamer with being a groyper. You dont think reddit is loaded with left wing terminally online gamers? 

I am reading carefully & respectfully. And I saw where it was connected via Spotify (& I agree with you) but it’s also been connected to Far Cry as it’s in the game.

I agree with your second point, I don’t want to fall into the same mistake I’m accusing others of. Yes he could be terminally online gaming & be a leftist. I agree that’s also possible. 

[TimHauck 3,119]

1 hour ago, jonnyutah said:

Dont become a timron

Dont pick out one little thing. Take the statements added together. 

Look at loomers tweet and read the comments. Like 99% of the comments disagreeing with her. How influential could that tweet have been?

The fuentes thing makes no sense either. 

And i dont know specifically what video raiders posted, but i am guessing I know the video where he says they still agree on a lot and welcome to the conservative movement. 

You think thats a win. See look there is a gay conservative! That is the simplistic thinking the ron and hauck are always engaging in. 

But it makes no sense with more...

See there is a gay conservative and look at Charlie being tolerant of him...therefore a gay conservative could have totally shot Charlie because he isnt... right enough? 

That pretzel should taste bad. 

You see this from both sides, but it is far worse from the left. 

Hortman was killed and she was lefty. So the starting assumption should be she was targeted by somebody on the right. But see at least in that case you have the killer himself saying Walz wanted him to kill her. He was a Walz appointee, he had flyers for a left wing movement, and Hortman had just voted with the right on a problematic issue for somebody that was very sympathetic to africa. 

I honestly dont think that evidence is enough, but at least it is something. 

Even Depape at least lived in a school bus parked in front of gypsy taubs house and has three kids with her. Taub is a notoriuous left wing radical complete with all the requisite paraphernalia hanging at her house. Again still not very compelling to say he was left wing, but at least that is something. I mean a relationship where you have three kids together is different than having conservative parents. Even the left admits that Depape was a recent shift to right wing conspiracy theories and he was lefty prior. 

Kirk's killer has what? A crazy granny that swears he didnt do it, but then also swears nobody in the family was lefty?

The groyper stuff is even weaker than that. 

There just isnt any kind of good evidence pointing to this guy being right wing and tons pointing to him being left wing. 

You have to start with a prior of him being right wing to even be still vocal about the whole thing. 

Ah man I thought you were smart enough to not try to use the “appointed by Walz” thing as evidence.  Guess you’re not.

I noticed you didn’t say anything about trannies here.  I’ve acknowledged it’s likely Robinson was a lib, although even that I would not call “confirmed.”  What is the “tons of evidence” that he’s a leftist?  He didn’t like Kirk, may not have liked fascists, and might be gay?

Speaking of being gay, I still think that’s just as likely maybe moreso than he was dating a tranny.  It’s definitely not confirmed that the roommate/boyfriend/whatever was a tranny.

 

[jonnyutah 434]

Here is an article from vanity fair. Not saying read the whole thing, but if you ctrl f for groyper you will see how weak of a connection it is. 

This is honestly one of the better misinformation campaigns out there. Gotta hand it to whoever started this. 

 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,704]

2 hours ago, Ron_Artest said:

Protesting should be illegal?  You're not an American.  You just live here.

Protesting little kids? Why do you always come down on the side that harms children? 

[SaintsInDome2006 486]

8 minutes ago, jonnyutah said:

 

Here is an article from vanity fair. Not saying read the whole thing, but if you ctrl f for groyper you will see how weak of a connection it is. 

Ok the pic where he’s dressed as the Pepe meme. The alternative explanation is it’s just a coincidence?

[jonnyutah 434]

4 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Ah man I thought you were smart enough to not try to use the “appointed by Walz” thing as evidence.  Guess you’re not.

I noticed you didn’t say anything about trannies here.  I’ve acknowledged it’s likely Robinson was a lib, although even that I would not call “confirmed.”  What is the “tons of evidence” that he’s a leftist?  He didn’t like Kirk, may not have liked fascists, and might be gay?

Speaking of being gay, I still think that’s just as likely maybe moreso than he was dating a tranny.  It’s definitely not confirmed that the roommate/boyfriend/whatever was a tranny.

 

@SaintsInDome2006 just an fyi this is why I make fun of hauck for grabbing onto little things just to try and get a gotcha. Look at this reply to my post. Refuses to look at the list of things or what I was saying iverall regarding Boelter. Grabs one little thing about saying "appointed by walz" instead of "appointment remewed by Walz" and then pulls down his pants for everybody to laugh at him. 

[TimHauck 3,119]

2 minutes ago, jonnyutah said:

@SaintsInDome2006 just an fyi this is why I make fun of hauck for grabbing onto little things just to try and get a gotcha. Look at this reply to my post. Refuses to look at the list of things or what I was saying iverall regarding Boelter. Grabs one little thing about saying "appointed by walz" instead of "appointment remewed by Walz" and then pulls down his pants for everybody to laugh at him. 

Why the F would “appointment renewed by Walz” be any different than “appointed by Walz”?  Talk about nitpicking.

Also we already had this conversation.  The totality of the evidence points overwhelmingly to Boelter being a Republican.

[jonnyutah 434]

Just now, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Ok the pic where’s dressed as the Pepe meme. The alternative explanation is it’s just a coincidence?

He isnt though. That's the slav squat. They even make fun of this in the movie a working man that just came out a bit ago. 

That was a meme well before they made the pepe version.

If he was trying to be pepe, why did he wear a newsie cap instead of just having his hood up?

[SaintsInDome2006 486]

Just now, jonnyutah said:

He isnt though. That's the slav squat. They even make fun of this in the movie a working man that just came out a bit ago. 

That was a meme well before they made the pepe version.

If he was trying to be pepe, why did he wear a newsie cap instead of just having his hood up?

Ok thank you, fresh information for me. 

[jonnyutah 434]

9 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Why the F would “appointment renewed by Walz” be any different than “appointed by Walz”?  Talk about nitpicking.

Also we already had this conversation.  The totality of the evidence points overwhelmingly to Boelter being a Republican.

Lol. I thought that is what you were nitpicking about since it made no sense to pull out that one little tidbit. 

 

So you dont even have a reason? You just pulled it out for fun? Thats even worse. 

[TimHauck 3,119]

9 minutes ago, jonnyutah said:

Lol. I thought that is what you were nitpicking about since it made no sense to pull out that one little tidbit. 

 

So you dont even have a reason? You just pulled it out for fun? Thats even worse. 

No I was referring to our previous conversation, when you did not include “appointed by Walz” among your “evidence,” and I commented about how at least you were smart enough not to do that.  But apparently you’re not smart enough not to do that.

[Maximum Overkill 2,272]

36 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Why the F would “appointment renewed by Walz” be any different than “appointed by Walz”?  Talk about nitpicking.

Also we already had this conversation.  The totality of the evidence points overwhelmingly to Boelter being a Republican.

More proof that Liberals are crazy. JD was right. 

 

[jerryskids 6,959]

10 hours ago, Ron_Artest said:

Feel free to bring up one of those Kirk quotes and show me the context

Quote

“We made a huge mistake when we passed the Civil Rights Act in the 1960s.” Same event (America Fest), Dec. 2023. 

The clear implication without context is that Charlie wants the coloreds to use different water fountains.

There is no video from the reference you cut and pasted, but here is a shorter one where he repeats it.

https://rumble.com/v4pvgc6-jeremy-carl-its-okay-to-be-white.html?e9s=src_v1_cbl%2Csrc_v1_ucp_a

It is an 11 minute interview with a guy who wrote a book about anti-white racism.  I'd suggest listening to the whole thing because it is short, but he says the above quote just after the 8:00 mark.  He adds, "the Civil Rights Act created a beast, and that beast has turned into an anti-white weapon."  

At the 9:25 mark, after saying that the liberal media won't cover this, he states "if you have unapologetic, ferocious anti-white racism, then young whites are going to find some very radical political positions, and I don't want that."

Unfortunately, he is correct on this.  Also, it's clear that he's OK sharing the bus with the negroes.

You can put your head in the sand regarding anti-white racism if you want, that's your choice.  But that quote without context is crap.

[nobody 2,779]

2 hours ago, Ron_Artest said:

By the time Biden assumed office in Jan 2021, things were already opening up.  Shut down the country?  It was the states you moron.

What the hell?  Much of the country (including states even!) was shut down well into 2022.  Biden was elected in 2020.

[SaintsInDome2006 486]

4 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

He adds, "the Civil Rights Act created a beast, and that beast has turned into an anti-white weapon."  

Is this the one where he calls for the repeal of the 1964 CRA?

[nobody 2,779]

2 hours ago, MDC said:

Most of the state lockdowns ran from Spring 2020 - 2021 under Trump first and then Biden. Neither admin forced any states to shut down. The only people forced to get a jab were federal workers and contractors. Our military has had to get vaccines for things like the flu for years.

I still don’t see what this has to do with DEI pilots or the fact that our HHS chief is a former heroin addict with no medical background whatsoever.

But I can tell you’re mad, so go ahead and vent. 

The point is you were decrying about who was heading HHS and said the covid mistake wasn't a justification.  You brought it up.  You tied it in.

And every time I see your team decides to have an opinion on Covid, I'm probably going to remind you that you guys had the biggest fock up in history and probably shouldn't have opinions on anything for awhile.

[squistion 2,368]

 

[jerryskids 6,959]

16 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Is this the one where he calls for the repeal of the 1964 CRA?

It's not the original; I just posted that there is no video of the original.  We're dipping our toes into "you don't read my posts" territory again.

[SaintsInDome2006 486]

1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

It's not the original; I just posted that there is no video of the original.  We're dipping our toes into "you don't read my posts" territory again.

FWIW I posted a full Kirk debate at Cambridge in another thread. I’ll bow out of this, I was just curious. I’ve seen some spots of Kirk debating now, & while he’s an autodidact & I respect that a good deal of his bases appear to be pop conservatism. He says some awfully wrong things historically. I’ll leave it there, I was just curious.

[TimHauck 3,119]

34 minutes ago, nobody said:

What the hell?  Much of the country (including states even!) was shut down well into 2022.  Biden was elected in 2020.

2022?  No it wasn’t.   Cool revisionist history though 

[TimHauck 3,119]

1 hour ago, HellToupee said:

Well look at this ….

 

A report from the Washington Postindicates alleged Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson used the Discord platform Thursday to tell his friends, “It was me.”

According to the Post, Robinson messaged his friends “about two hours before officials said [he] was taken into custody.”

The message said: “Hey guys, I have bad news for you all. It was me at UVU yesterday. im sorry for all of this.”

A member of the group of individuals who allegedly received the message from Robinson took a screen shot of it and shared it with the Washington Post. 

In addition to Robinson’s alleged admission, Breitbart News reported that FBI deputy director Dan Bongino spoke to FOX News’ Bill Hemmer Monday, saying, “People knew in advance” of the Kirk assassination suspect’s plan.

Bongino observed, “There appear to have been multiple warning signs. There were people in [the suspect’s] network — friends and family — who had stated that he had become more political…I believe some of his co-workers stated that he had kind of detached himself when the topic of politics came up and walked away from them.

Wait, even Bongino is doing the “he became more political” thing without saying what side?  That’s not helping prove he was a leftist…

[Strike 5,838]

27 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

FWIW I posted a full Kirk debate at Cambridge in another thread. I’ll bow out of this, I was just curious. I’ve seen some spots of Kirk debating now, & while he’s an autodidact & I respect that a good deal of his bases appear to be pop conservatism. He says some awfully wrong things historically. I’ll leave it there, I was just curious.

If you were so curious why didn't you read Jerry's post which would have clearly answered your questions?

[Strike 5,838]

6 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Wait, even Bongino is doing the “he became more political” thing without saying what side?  That’s not helping prove he was a leftist…

Are you seriously still suggesting he wasn't aligned politically with the left?

[SaintsInDome2006 486]

2 minutes ago, Strike said:

If you were so curious why didn't you read Jerry's post which would have clearly answered your questions?

I did. He’s talking about the origin of Kirk’s quote about the CRA, I don’t think I’ve seen where he said it was not available, I take it it’s further up. Also glad to discuss now.

[SaintsInDome2006 486]

1 hour ago, jerryskids said:

The clear implication without context is that Charlie wants the coloreds to use different water fountains.

There is no video from the reference you cut and pasted, but here is a shorter one where he repeats it

There’s also this.

[TimHauck 3,119]

7 minutes ago, Strike said:

Are you seriously still suggesting he wasn't aligned politically with the left?

Seems the most likely, but I wouldn’t call it definite.  I’ll ask you the same question I asked @jonnyutah, what is the legitimate evidence he was a leftist?  So far, I’ve got:

-Didn’t like Charlie Kirk

-May not have liked fascists (the bullet writing could have also been a troll comment, like some of the other ones)

-May have been gay

[SaintsInDome2006 486]

And there’s also this on Kirk, King & the 64 CRA.

Quite a bit of him repeating it actually.

[Strike 5,838]

3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Seems the most likely, but I wouldn’t call it definite.  I’ll ask you the same question I asked @jonnyutah, what is the legitimate evidence he was a leftist?  So far, I’ve got:

-Didn’t like Charlie Kirk

-May not have liked fascists (the bullet writing could have also been a troll comment, like some of the other ones)

-May have been gay

I have no desire to get into such an idiotic discussion with you.

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,425]

6 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

There’s also this.

Nope not going to allow that one. Cause it’s zero context once again. He explained it when he said it and I posted it today. 

[MDC 7,652]

1 hour ago, nobody said:

The point is you were decrying about who was heading HHS and said the covid mistake wasn't a justification.  You brought it up.  You tied it in.

And every time I see your team decides to have an opinion on Covid, I'm probably going to remind you that you guys had the biggest fock up in history and probably shouldn't have opinions on anything for awhile.

I didn’t bring Covid up. That was RaiderHaters’ wutabout. I did bring RFKJ up. Seemed relevant, since the POTUS complaining about DEI pilots also put Crackhead Rob in charge of HHS.

So much for muh qualifications.  

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,425]

4 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

And there’s also this on Kirk, King & the 64 CRA.

Quite a bit of him repeating it actually.

Bro you’re a good guy stop using X. You’re exactly who he is talking about. At least once a week he explained what he meant by that. 

[TimHauck 3,119]

4 minutes ago, Strike said:

I have no desire to get into such an idiotic discussion with you.

I’ll take that as you got nothing else, troll.

[SaintsInDome2006 486]

1 minute ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

Nope not going to allow that one. Cause it’s zero context once again. He explained it when he said it and I posted it today. 

I agree, too short.

FYI this is the transcript on Kirk’s page at Runble.
 

Ok I’ll go look for it, thanks

[jonnyutah 434]

10 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Seems the most likely, but I wouldn’t call it definite.  I’ll ask you the same question I asked @jonnyutah, what is the legitimate evidence he was a leftist?  So far, I’ve got:

-Didn’t like Charlie Kirk

-May not have liked fascists (the bullet writing could have also been a troll comment, like some of the other ones)

-May have been gay

Lol

"Please post more evidence than what has been provided in this thread! Also i will ignore alll of it and say the sourcing is bad."

-tim

[jonnyutah 434]

"but granny is reliable"

-tim

[TimHauck 3,119]

1 minute ago, jonnyutah said:

Lol

"Please post more evidence than what has been provided in this thread! Also i will ignore alll of it and say the sourcing is bad."

-tim

What’s missing from my list other than the anonymous claim he was dating a tranny?