SaintsInDome2006 501 Posted 12 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Strike said: Pretty sure there are laws against pointing guns at people in public places regardless of carry laws/status. I said if we watched the speech with the scope. Apologies, if not clear. He had his grandfather’s scope. Thats legal right, so long as you say he didn’t point the gun at someone? For instance could he have shouldered the Mauser, been in the audience, listened politely, & left? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,869 Posted 12 hours ago 1 minute ago, SaintsInDome2006 said: I said if we watched the speech with the scope. Apologies, if not clear. He had his grandfather’s scope. Thats legal right, so long as you say he didn’t point the gun at someone? For instance could he have shouldered the Mauser, been in the audience, listened politely, & left? The scope is attached to the gun. To look through the scope he would have to point the gun at Kirk. If you're suggesting he could remove the scope and look through it at Kirk I agree with you, that would be legal. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 501 Posted 12 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Strike said: The scope is attached to the gun. To look through the scope he would have to point the gun at Kirk. If you're suggesting he could remove the scope and look through it at Kirk I agree with you, that would be legal. Ok thanks. I thought some point Robinson said he had gotten the scope from his uncle so I thought it was detachable. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 3,266 Posted 12 hours ago 11 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said: Ok thanks. I thought some point Robinson said he had gotten the scope from his uncle so I thought it was detachable. Mixing up guns with monoculars again I see. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 6,974 Posted 9 hours ago 4 hours ago, The Real timschochet said: There is nothing wrong with this statement and I actually appreciate it. But why did you reserve it for a guy criticizing Trump and MAGA? Why didn’t you respond to the ten days of statements from literally hundreds on the right, both here and in the public arena, blaming liberals for Charlie Kirk’s murder? Because he blamed Trump and MAGA for the shooting. Is this a trick question? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 7,151 Posted 8 hours ago 1 hour ago, jerryskids said: Because he blamed Trump and MAGA for the shooting. Is this a trick question? It wasn’t. Maybe you didn’t understand it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,149 Posted 6 hours ago 3 hours ago, jerryskids said: Because he blamed Trump and MAGA for the shooting. Is this a trick question? I think his question is basically, do you think that this statement: 8 hours ago, jerryskids said: I taught my children at a young age that they were responsible for their own behavior and reactions. …also means that you think people are incorrect when they say “the left” was responsible for Kirk’s death? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,903 Posted 6 hours ago 1 minute ago, TimHauck said: I think his question is basically, do you think that this statement: …also means that you think people are incorrect when they say “the left” was responsible for Kirk’s death? Nice one. Skids got squashed Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WhiteWonder 2,861 Posted 5 hours ago On 9/11/2025 at 11:44 AM, squistion said: then I posted condolences from Trump and Kamala Harris why would you need to do this? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
