BudBro 185 Posted 9 hours ago https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/fda-covid-shots-killed-least-10-children-stronger-vax-rules-coming https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/vaccine-stocks-drop-after-fda-memo-links-covid-shots-childrens-deaths Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FrancieFootball 233 Posted 7 hours ago That's 0.00025 percent of 4 million worldwide who would die annually without vaccinations. https://www.cdc.gov/global-immunization/fast-facts/index.html#:~:text=Vaccines save lives.,save nearly 19 million lives. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 735 Posted 7 hours ago Ah, add it to the Deep State cover up list! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,945 Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, FrancieFootball said: That's 0.00025 percent of 4 million worldwide who would die annually without vaccinations. https://www.cdc.gov/global-immunization/fast-facts/index.html#:~:text=Vaccines save lives.,save nearly 19 million lives. Stupid Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 6,954 Posted 4 hours ago proud to say my child never and will never have one 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nobody 2,910 Posted 4 hours ago 3 hours ago, FrancieFootball said: That's 0.00025 percent of 4 million worldwide who would die annually without vaccinations. https://www.cdc.gov/global-immunization/fast-facts/index.html#:~:text=Vaccines save lives.,save nearly 19 million lives. Negative. Kids didn't need it at all. Strong correlation to age established early on. Killed them for no reason, and people with common sense said it at the time. More bad decisions by the wokie crew. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maximum Overkill 2,553 Posted 3 hours ago 4 hours ago, FrancieFootball said: That's 0.00025 percent of 4 million worldwide who would die annually without vaccinations. https://www.cdc.gov/global-immunization/fast-facts/index.html#:~:text=Vaccines save lives.,save nearly 19 million lives. I hope estrogen and Vaseline is ok, for your sake Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,353 Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, nobody said: Negative. Kids didn't need it at all. Strong correlation to age established early on. Killed them for no reason, and people with common sense said it at the time. More bad decisions by the wokie crew. I agree the risk/reward ratio for the vax for kids was not nearly as clear as for adults and of course the elderly (which I said all along), but “at all” is a strong phrase. If they were obese or had other risk factors there was risk of Covid to kids. Here is Prasad’s letter: I like Prasad, but he is conflating a few different arguments here. He asks if the vaccines “killed more healthy children than they saved,” but he doesn’t say how many of the 10 were actually healthy (I’m obviously not discounting their deaths but as I said above, if they weren’t healthy than they had a higher risk from Covid than healthy kids). He then starts talking about mandates, but to my knowledge (correct me if I’m wrong), really the only kids that would have been mandated to get the vax would have been 17 year olds entering college. One tidbit in the letter I found interesting is that they said they analyzed 96 VAERS cases but only found 10 they could determine to have been caused by the vax (but said maybe it is an undercount). Which is interesting considering most of the idiots citing VAERS deaths think you should multiply by some insane number and concluded the vaccines have killed like 2 million people or whatever. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dogcows 1,159 Posted 1 hour ago 5 hours ago, FrancieFootball said: That's 0.00025 percent of 4 million worldwide who would die annually without vaccinations. https://www.cdc.gov/global-immunization/fast-facts/index.html#:~:text=Vaccines save lives.,save nearly 19 million lives. Also, they have not released the data to back up their claim. So they might be completely full of . Unbelievable for the FDA to have abandoned data and science in favor of politics. It used to be a trusted agency, and now it will be used by crazy old men to kill kids. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dogcows 1,159 Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, nobody said: Negative. Kids didn't need it at all. Strong correlation to age established early on. Killed them for no reason, and people with common sense said it at the time. More bad decisions by the wokie crew. No. This study showed that COVID-19 was the most deadly among infectious and respiratory diseases for children. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2800816 Quote In summary, we found that COVID-19 is now a leading cause of death for CYP aged 0-19 years in the US, and the top (first) leading cause of death among infectious and respiratory diseases. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FrancieFootball 233 Posted 1 hour ago 10 minutes ago, dogcows said: Also, they have not released the data to back up their claim. So they might be completely full of . Unbelievable for the FDA to have abandoned data and science in favor of politics. It used to be a trusted agency, and now it will be used by crazy old men to kill kids. Ol' Croaky has no medical expertise and a worm in his brain. Blaming autism on Tylenol is as dumb as it gets. Cult beliefs over common sense and thoroughly researched science. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites