It's not just Honcho. You should see Twitter.......like verified news people saying the same thing. I am dumbfounded.
The purpose of a DNA test is to PROVE you are in fact Native American. Enough to change your freaking ethnicity on your college / law / teaching records. Enough to say your parents were bigoted against due to being Native American.
The test comes out and it says Warren is actually less Native American than the average Caucasian American. Less than 1% and probably less than 1% of 1%. Statistically Insignificant is an understatement.
No reasonable person in their right mind can even attempt to spin this without looking like a complete idiot.
God damnnn...they get everything wrong in the favor of liberals.
Correction: Due to a math error, a story about Elizabeth Warren misstated the ancestry percentage of a potential 10th generation relative. It should be 1/1,024, the Globe said in its correction. That would put the percentage at .097.
Warren “had her ethnicity changed from white to Native American at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, where she taught from 1987 to 1995, and at Harvard University Law School, where she was a tenured faculty member starting in 1995.”
So I googled and was reminded. So she's less than one percent OF one percent Native American but changed her ethnicity at Law School and spoke of how her parents had to elope due to Native American bigotry.
What in the actual Fock?
Warren spiked the football alright, just in the wrong endzone.
I do consider NPR to be a biased news source. They are, however, not nearly as bad as foxnews or cnn. I found it interesting because of the amount of people that said this would backfire for the Dems. It doesnt look that way.
Agreed. Your post was interesting. Just shows me that those asking for more time already have their mind made up based on emotion/party over evidence (or the complete lack thereof).
Thats court of public opinion for you. Thank God the criminal system is the complete opposite. I would hope a job interview would follow the latter over the former. If not were setting a horrible precedent.
If the FBI comes back and says "we did a complete investigation including interviewing all of the named witnesses, accuser, alleged perpetrator, and conclude that nothing happened between Ford and Kav" ...
How many Dems will vote for Kav?
Will the media and left stop calling him a rapist?
FBI wouldnt do that. They dont make conclusions, they are simply going to those four peoples (Ford named at the party who have ALREADY given statements under perjury) to say it again to them. Then type a report saying that and email it to the Senate Committee.
In the meantime some crazy left wing woman will make up by Tuesday that she went to Yale and saw Judge Kavanaugh dry humping sheep while looking at kid pron. (heehee)