Jump to content


Member Since 22 Sep 2002
Offline Last Active Yesterday, 10:49 PM

#6286032 Trump is absolutely right about Sweden

Posted by KSB2424 on 15 August 2018 - 09:03 AM

I dont understand the left logic whatsoever on immigration.   What EXACTLY is the Democratic Stance?

You gotta have immigration laws, strong borders, with also clear paths for legally coming here (the right way).

The left doesnt want to help these people in their own country (isolationism) but wants to bring them to their own country instead.  


#6282279 The poster above you - Name who you think his favorite 3 people are.

Posted by KSB2424 on 09 August 2018 - 06:44 AM

Magic Johnson
Ric Flair
Pete Rose

#6272805 Trump/Cohen audio. No thread :dunno:

Posted by KSB2424 on 25 July 2018 - 09:00 AM

Do attorneys normally secretly tape their own clients?

Seems weird.  :dunno:

#6271554 Uh oh...stand your ground controversy...

Posted by KSB2424 on 23 July 2018 - 07:08 PM

it is murder

What I meant to imply is that EVEN with stand your ground in play that warrants self defense, this jackhole still should be charged with something.  Has to be something, even in Florida.  Gah.

#6267934 2018 Edex Cup British Open - TEAMS

Posted by KSB2424 on 18 July 2018 - 09:42 AM

All the teams look even to me with the exception of cbfalcon.  His stands out......as terrible.  

#6266874 What would be appropriate action towards Russia?

Posted by KSB2424 on 17 July 2018 - 08:05 AM

So our obviously infallible intelligence agencies were right about Iraq after all.


Do you know the saying "I can kick my dog, but you can't kick my dog"?


Or like when you can pick on your brother but as soon as somebody else picks on your brother you kick their ass as thats family?


That's akin to exactly the opposite of what Trump did yesterday.  If he wants to challenge the UNITED STATES intelligence community so be it, but it better be when he's HERE and in front of them.  And surly not when he's abroad standing next to a Russian Dictator.

#6266252 How exactly did the Russian rig the election?

Posted by KSB2424 on 16 July 2018 - 01:16 PM


I'm so glad you came into this discussion with honest questions and an earnest desire to take an unbiased look at the evidence before coming to a conclusion.   Really, astute observation there, buddy.    :thumbsup:


I was agreeing with your NPR link.


Fake news does have an effect.  I've been saying if regarding the U.S. media for a decade now.  I'm finally glad it took Russia creating fake Facebook accounts for some of you to acknowledge it.  :thumbsup:

#6266192 How exactly did the Russian rig the election?

Posted by KSB2424 on 16 July 2018 - 12:25 PM

The whole idea that Russia interfered is pure comedy. Find me one person that changed their vote because of 'Russian interference'. They never contacted me. Who gives a flying ###### about spreading propaganda. We do the same in other countries elections.

Overblown bullshit is all this is and NOTHING of substance will come out of it. Slotard, jacking off in the corner, hoping something will happen to Trump is simply his pipe dream.


I agree that if this is about Russian twitter bots spreading lies on the internet. Big freaking whoop.  Twitter is a global platform and the internet is full of B.S.   Totally agree.


IF Russian "spies" hacked into U.S. intelligence servers and are using the internet to steal government secrets or the like.  Now I  have a BIG problem with that.



#6266119 Are you a breast man?

Posted by KSB2424 on 16 July 2018 - 11:35 AM

Thighs :wub:


Yup.  Thighs are the tender meat.  Skin is tight and the flesh is a little pinker/darker.


Yummy.  :wub:

#6265988 How exactly did the Russian rig the election?

Posted by KSB2424 on 16 July 2018 - 10:20 AM

Pardon my ignorance as I've checked out recently on politics for the most part.  Here is what I (think) I know.


There were Russian "bots" or fake accounts on Twitter, tweeting things like information and anti Hillary stuff.


1.  So nothing about the actual ELECTION process was compromised.  As in voting booths, how votes are tallied, so on and so forth..... is this correct?


2.  Isn't Twitter a global social network?


There has to be something huge I am missing here.  Did Russian spies STEAL information from confidential government servers and then post them on Twitter?


Just trying to get caught up here on the facts so far as we know them.

#6265099 CNN is fake news. I don't take questions from CNN

Posted by KSB2424 on 14 July 2018 - 10:56 PM

So Jake Tapper is the Chief Washington Correspondence for CNN.  I follow him on Twitter.  Every single day he tweets about Trump in a negative way.  Actually, that was being nice.  He straight trashes the POTUS every day all day.  Which is fine....but youre supposed to be the journalist hired to be the CHIEF WASHINGTON CORRESPONDENCE.

This would be akin to a NBA Official whos an admitted LeBron hater, who trashes LeBron every day on social media YET is permitted to referee a game in the NBA Finals.

How are we to believe you are calling a fair game?

We cant.  Which is why CNN is fake news thing is....is a thing.

#6265058 A Question Only The Geek Club can Answer.

Posted by KSB2424 on 14 July 2018 - 09:02 PM

One in the Pink; Five in the Spine

#6265053 A Question Only The Geek Club can Answer.

Posted by KSB2424 on 14 July 2018 - 08:47 PM

The Ike Turner

Doggy Pound

Brokeback Attack

#6263087 THIS is why Pappa John is Gone?

Posted by KSB2424 on 12 July 2018 - 10:50 AM

See this is the problem.  Here, at the Geek Club is the only place I've actually seen or heard of the actual CONTEXT the word was used in by this Papa John dude.   This changes my whole opinion on the story.   I just assumed he used the word in anger or talking about an employee or something.


Again, this is why you cannot trust reporting of stories in the media.


Deliberately leaving out details or context in an effort to make the story bigger than it is.....is just as bad as lying outright.  :thumbsdown:

#6258805 Bigotry and Hypocrisy

Posted by KSB2424 on 05 July 2018 - 03:58 PM

Not that I have the authority to speak on behalf of "THE LEFT", but here are my thoughts:

Those that promote racism, sexism or other 'bad' values should not be allowed an open platform with no pushback, as they threaten to normalize their rhetoric. It should be made clear that those stances are not acceptable anywhere, but especially in a country that prides itself as a melting pot/liberty for all/all men are created equal place.

Even I agree that it can go to far though, and there is no official authority on who or what should get the Nazi treatment.

Nazis should get the Nazi treatment and fock whomever says otherwise.

Some 'conservative' speakers are just Nazis in disguise looking to recruit and embolden their base. Others are getting dragged along as collateral damage, but only because their platforms have been hijacked by the douchebags with no internal housecleaning.

I don't think THE LEFT ever had a platform of tolerance for all opinions. They promote tolerance of individuality, and that the rights of American should extend to everyone regardless of race, sexuality, gender or economic status.


Who get's to determine this?  What are the thresholds?  If you didn't vote for Obama does that make you "racist"?   If you voted for Trump does that make you "sexist"?   If you are for tougher immigration laws does that make you a "Nazi"?  Who gets to define who is and who isn't all these things? 


The reason I ask is because those terms are thrown around so much at so little of things that they're watered down.  The whole Boy who Cried Wolf thingy.


A lot of what's protested against isn't freakin' KKK marches.   It's a comedian or speaker at a campus.  It's a freaking fast food restaurant who's closed on Sundays.  It's a press secretary doing her job.   None of that hardly passes the smell test of what you're alluding too.