RLLD

I absolutely answered, why pretend like this? What do you get out of it?

I answered, and rather clearly....and with linkage.....pretending that did not happen serves no purpose other than to misrepresent what transpired as if you cannot discuss the point forthrightly.

Keeping in line with your clear lack of intellect, throwing in the argument from authority shows how incapable you are. Your lack of comprehension and unwillingness to forthrightly discuss the point shows your fear of that point.

Not so long as you remain. I would dare not challenge the level of unabashed stupidity you espouse on the regular. All in all its good, you show us what the worst can look like.

All good, I do not see an issue with this. I also did not see any issue with prior elections were contested. Pretending this was some kind of move to steal power is a weak.....weak.....argument to trot out. If you are trying to sell this to normal, rational people.....you might not find any buyers. Maybe head over to Columbia University, this seem like the kind of trite nonsense those morons would gobble up. If I might, and take this with a grain of salt if you must.....but.....consider.....stopping this maneuver to paint Trump as some sort of villain or threat.....its not working. None of these smears are working. So,.......consider going back to simply highlighting policy prescriptions and such, that is your best chance to beat the guy....the more you try to portray him with these extravagant notions, the less normal people will gravitate toward you.....

Mike Pence said many things, some I agree with and some are misused to construe what transpired into political weaponry. I am confident that no matter what is provided, you will perceive it as negatively as possible to feed your need to hate the man, instead of the outcomes. I get that, and I think there are a fair number of you out there. You would rather see the country burn than allow someone you disagree with be elected. I am not really with you all and how you think, but I get that you feel strongly about it. Believing something, as you do, does not make it true.

You know very well how its untrue, but you want to insist that Trump organized some specific action and he did not. Those who broke the law were held to it, as they should have been; another example of the system working. This insistence to pretend its all about Trump just one work on rational people, but hey, clearly that is not going to stop the Democrats....this lawfare shows they are going to see their perversion of our systems through to the end..... Maybe they let their militants in Hamas loose or something, they seem to really love rapists and murderers over there in Democrat circles

Except that is not true. I get why you want to believe that, but that was not the case at all. Now, if we want to end the dramatics and politically-motivated lies then we can get back to some simple common sense and stop regurgitating the media-driven propaganda.

I am stuck on her conflicting depiction as to what transpired. One is true, one is not. Regardless, her lies have no bearing on the case......which makes her sacrificing her credibility interesting.....

I tend to agree. This guy has tentacles into the Trump-cadre, I mean his daughter is tightly integrated into that klan of politicallu corrupt shock troops..... he cannot be the guy that dismisses the Trump case, legality and fairness be damnned. Hell, even Fareed is calling this charade out now, and he focking detests Trump....but this lawfare is increasingly tough for people to pretend to justify...

Agree. I think Cohen mostly just checks a box, he is the prosecutions hope to somehow avoid a directed verdict.

I think it depends on your perspective. So we could assert that she lied in 2018 when she said “They tried to shove me in the MeToo box to further their own agenda. And first of all, I didn’t want to be part of that because it’s not the truth and I’m not a victim in that regard.” So at the time she was portraying things as consensual.....but then again her lawyer did also reveal that she had previsously attempted to extort Trump, but then again her lawyer is a focking liar so not sure we can trust anything that coward says.... And then recently on the stand she stated ‘There was an imbalance of power for sure.’ ‘My hands were shaking so hard.’ and she said she blacked out.......well, one of those depictions is a lie.....I think it might be the more recent one.....but who knows... I mean a porn start blacking out from sex.....yeah, not sure that adds up.... So she either lied in 2018 or she lied recently on the stand.

On the stand, she lied and told a different version of what transpired. There was no need to lie here, she did not need to make up something more seedy.....

I think she did have sex with him, I think that simply must be true. What gives me pause is this <ahem> "revised depiction" (lie) she told on the stand. Now I have to wonder what is true.....