Report: Cowboys WR Glenn done for season

[JoeBoxers43 0]

ESPN's Matt Mosley reports Terry Glenn will miss the season due to complications in his recovery from arthroscopic knee surgery.

A member of the organization told Mosley, who used to cover the Cowboys, that Glenn is indeed lost for the season. An article saying so was posted on Dallas' team site Thursday, but pulled when owner Jerry Jones decided to hold off on making the announcement formally. Jones said in a revised story that Glenn would miss "at least two weeks." Sep. 7 - 11:52 am etSource: ESPN.com

 

pick up crayton in any league u can

 

link

[Phurfur 70]

Only very small leagues should have Crayton on waivers. He was drafted in all four of my leagues.

[Guest _my_2_cents_]

Anyone who listened to me back when Glenn had the scope can thank me now. I told y'all to grab Crayton a month ago. You're welcome.

[JoeBoxers43 0]

ye he was drafted in 2 out of my 3 leagues...but i picked him in the 3rd

[Belushi 9]

Grabbed Glenn and Crayton in one league. Sorry for Glenn, but glad my flyer on Crayton could turn out to be a decent WR3. It's a dynasty league and I signed Crayton long-term. If he performs, I wonder if this could be the end of the road for Glenn.

[jocstrap 8]

Anyone who listened to me bach when Glenn had the scope can thank me now. I told y'all to grab Crayton a month ago. You're welcome.

 

 

This is huge, I was listening 2cents, just didn't act

[Jarvis Basnight 119]

haha. the shark move now is to go get terry glenn if you're in a keeper league. listen to me now. thank me later. haha

[Jarvis Basnight 119]

don't know much about crayton. is he legit? much falloff without the veteran glenn on the field?

 

 

interested romo owner

[FreddieMercury 0]

OK, I need some advice from people smarter than me:

 

Crayton's on my WW, but I already have TO on my team (my other receivers are Marques Colston, Reggie Brown, Bernard Berrian, and Greg Jennings). I could drop Jennings for Crayton, but is it a problem to have a team's #1 and #2 receivers on the same fantasy team? Is this a good idea?

[Jeremy 0]

He's on my waiver wire. Better than Jennings or Marshall?

[Smashmouth 0]

RTS is saying ESPN says that Glenn will only miss the first 2 weeks. Somebody is wrong.

[Guest _my_2_cents_]

RTS is saying ESPN says that Glenn will only miss the first 2 weeks. Somebody is wrong.

 

CBS also reporting 2 weeks.

 

Still makes him a good play.

[A Dido Brother 0]

is it a problem to have a team's #1 and #2 receivers on the same fantasy team? Is this a good idea?

 

I dunno, would you want Harrison and Wayne or Chad Johnson and Housh on the same team?

 

Seriously, though, the only problem with having the same team's receivers on your team is with the bye. Other than that, just evaluate the talent level/opportunity the same way.

[Jules 0]

There's a another thread on this, I think it was reported mistakenly that he was out for the season and then corrected to say he will be out at least 2 weeks.

[Schontak 0]

OK, I need some advice from people smarter than me:

 

Crayton's on my WW, but I already have TO on my team (my other receivers are Marques Colston, Reggie Brown, Bernard Berrian, and Greg Jennings). I could drop Jennings for Crayton, but is it a problem to have a team's #1 and #2 receivers on the same fantasy team? Is this a good idea?

 

This is a gross overstatement I know, and sarcasm very much intended but.... would you carry Harrison and Wayne?

 

Sarcasm aside, it's less about carrying a teams #1 & 2 and more about the quality of the player on your bench. If I were you I'd be less concerned about wether I have T.O. and Crayton and be more concerned with whether T.O. & Crayton or T.O. & Jennings is a stronger team.

 

Don't be concerned with depth on a specific team when you are stocking your bench, take the player with the most overall potential. IMO, Crayton is the better option here for you over Jennings.

[Guest Mikeock]

Anyone who listened to me back when Glenn had the scope can thank me now. I told y'all to grab Crayton a month ago. You're welcome.

 

 

Big Deal....Its a YOUNG BUM replacing an OLDER BUM..

 

If you get excited about starting Patrick Creighton than your team must really BLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW

[Thornton Melon 622]

I'm in a 10 team league that starts 2 WRs, and we have only 5 bench players. 41 WRs were drafted, and Crayton ain't one of 'em. He's got to contend with T.O., and Romo hasn't proven anything to me yet. I had him as a top 60 WR going in. Glenn gone might make him top 40. I've got Glenn and I'm not grabbing Crayton yet, but I might. Then again, I've got that luxury...

[Day Old Doughnut 0]

Big Deal....Its a YOUNG BUM replacing an OLDER BUM..

 

If you get excited about starting Patrick Creighton than your team must really BLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW

 

First of all, it's Crayton. Second of all, if you know anything about fantasy football it's about picking up the gems that get opportunities to start. Crayton has that opportunity for at least a game. No where did anyone say they were relying on Crayton, rather it's nice to have him on your roster for the potential. Most people that paid attention drafted him late in the game and now the rewards could be huge.

 

Next time, think before you post. It might help you in the long run.

[TK0001 99]

Big Deal....Its a YOUNG BUM replacing an OLDER BUM..

 

If you get excited about starting Patrick Creighton than your team must really BLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW

 

Bloow? :headscratch:

[Guest Mikeock]

First of all, it's Crayton. Second of all, if you know anything about fantasy football it's about picking up the gems that get opportunities to start. Crayton has that opportunity for at least a game. No where did anyone say they were relying on Crayton, rather it's nice to have him on your roster for the potential. Most people that paid attention drafted him late in the game and now the rewards could be huge.

 

Next time, think before you post. It might help you in the long run.

 

 

You say Tomatoe,I say Tomato ,either way you slice it Crayon is No " Gem"... I love clowns like you .Guys that bragged that "I picked up So & So this week,hes gonna be a stud !! " If you really knew what you were doing you would have drafted these BUMS in the first place. Guys like Colston and MJD last year, dont go bragging that you beat the next dooof to the waiver wire because some old bum with bad knees is out for the year

[surferskin 30]

she's done for the year?

[Day Old Doughnut 0]

You say Tomatoe,I say Tomato ,either way you slice it Crayon is No " Gem"... I love clowns like you .Guys that bragged that "I picked up So & So this week,hes gonna be a stud !! " If you really knew what you were doing you would have drafted these BUMS in the first place. Guys like Colston and MJD last year, dont go bragging that you beat the next dooof to the waiver wire because some old bum with bad knees is out for the year

 

I did draft him because he does have potential to be a nice #3, especially if Glenn is gone for an extended period of time. He could be a nice #2 if things work out for him, but that's a huge IF. He's on a team where the offensive is very productive and he could be a beneficiary to some very nice stats. So, to refute your yet again weak argument I did draft him, so I guess that makes me smart. Again THINK before you post.

[Phurfur 70]

You say Tomatoe,I say Tomato ,either way you slice it Crayon is No " Gem"... I love clowns like you .Guys that bragged that "I picked up So & So this week,hes gonna be a stud !! " If you really knew what you were doing you would have drafted these BUMS in the first place. Guys like Colston and MJD last year, dont go bragging that you beat the next dooof to the waiver wire because some old bum with bad knees is out for the year

 

Getting a starter on a high powered offense off the WW adds nice depth to your team. What is your problem with that? Actually Crayton was drafted in all four of my leagues but if he is there I am sure he is better than your last round pick.

[Day Old Doughnut 0]

Getting a starter on a high powered offense off the WW adds nice depth to your team. What is your problem with that? Actually Crayton was drafted in all four of my leagues but if he is there I am sure he is better than your last round pick.

 

Don't confuse him with actual facts and common sense. That must really frustrate him...

[joemax_60613 0]

So I liked the question: TO & Crayton or TO & Jennings. What do people think? I drafted Crayton with an eye on Glenn's aging knees, but is he a better WR3 than Jennings? Isn't Jennings a little dinged up himself?

 

To me it's almost a coin flip.

[abhall 0]

So I liked the question: TO & Crayton or TO & Jennings. What do people think? I drafted Crayton with an eye on Glenn's aging knees, but is he a better WR3 than Jennings? Isn't Jennings a little dinged up himself?

 

To me it's almost a coin flip.

 

I'd take Crayton now ahead of Jennings.

 

- Jennings didn't have a good camp/preaseason, James Jones has been chasing him as the #2

- Crayton is on a better offense

[Jeremy 0]

How good is Crayton? I have to confess I don't know much about him. He was behind Glenn on the depth chart, so I assume he's not quite as good as Glenn.

[sirensong 111]

spagnola is reporting 2 weeks for glenn, NOT the season.

 

if you're looking at crayton, he is a quick posession receiver with good red zone skills from the slot, but hasn't faced a lot of quality CBs. essentially, he is unproven as a starter, but has good potential. keep that in mind for your starting lineups.

[Gepetto 1,371]

You say Tomatoe,I say Tomato ,either way you slice it Crayon is No " Gem"... I love clowns like you .Guys that bragged that "I picked up So & So this week,hes gonna be a stud !! " If you really knew what you were doing you would have drafted these BUMS in the first place. Guys like Colston and MJD last year, dont go bragging that you beat the next dooof to the waiver wire because some old bum with bad knees is out for the year

 

What color is he?

[Texansfan 0]

You say Tomatoe,I say Tomato ,either way you slice it Crayon is No " Gem"... I love clowns like you .Guys that bragged that "I picked up So & So this week,hes gonna be a stud !! " If you really knew what you were doing you would have drafted these BUMS in the first place. Guys like Colston and MJD last year, dont go bragging that you beat the next dooof to the waiver wire because some old bum with bad knees is out for the year

 

I wonder how many people said this about a no name named Marques Colston last year.... a 7th round rookie WR who fell into the #2 WR spot behind Joe Horn last year...

[surferskin 30]

What color is he?

indigo maybe.

[DBZFan2K 0]

I nearly drafted the guy too last weekend. Talk about a near-death experience.

[G-in O-town 0]

Getting a starter on a high powered offense off the WW adds nice depth to your team. What is your problem with that? Actually Crayton was drafted in all four of my leagues but if he is there I am sure he is better than your last round pick.

 

 

My last pick was Toomer...Crayton better then Toomer????

[cyclone24 1,913]

AWESOME!!!

 

 

Picked up Crayton Wednesday when i heard Glenn was missing practice.

[nikreM 0]

Sam Hurd has been named the starter.

 

 

 

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/foot...n.ap/index.html

[FreddieMercury 0]

Sam Hurd has been named the starter.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/foot...n.ap/index.html

 

Your link is bad, and there's nothing about this on SI's football page -- just the AP story about Glenn from earlier today.

 

Can someone else please confirm/deny this?

[waliguy 0]

Patrick Crayton: Moves Into Starting Role

 

RotoWire.com Staff - RotoWire.com

Friday, September 7, 2007

Update: With news that Terry Glenn will miss at least the first two weeks of the season, Crayton is expected to assume the role opposite Terrell Owens in the Cowboys' starting lineup, the Fort Worth Star-Telegram reports.

[larrymcirish 0]

she's done for the year?

 

earlier this a.m., i emailed my son (who has glenn) & told him teresa was screwing up my qb & to dump her ass. that was with the 2 week info. i just left him a message on crayton. good info, guys.

[49ers_suck 0]

Big Deal....Its a YOUNG BUM replacing an OLDER BUM..

 

If you get excited about starting Patrick Creighton than your team must really BLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW

 

you are a douche.

[GobbleDog 997]

Patrick Crayton: Moves Into Starting Role

 

RotoWire.com Staff - RotoWire.com

Friday, September 7, 2007

Update: With news that Terry Glenn will miss at least the first two weeks of the season, Crayton is expected to assume the role opposite Terrell Owens in the Cowboys' starting lineup, the Fort Worth Star-Telegram reports.

 

If this is the latest update, then someone needs to edit this thread.