Tony Romo

[NewbieJr 541]

You said it twice - "when healthy". Yeah, and if my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle. The problem is, he's consistently NOT healthy.

 

Well, obviously, when not-healthy, I'd put Romo over him.

I thought we were talking a bout a healthy Romo against a healthy McNabb.

 

My bad.

[49ers_suck 0]

And what do you base this on? How would you know this? You have been wrong about everything Cowboy related all year, why would we believe you now. You are nothing but a big blow hard with nothing but "Man Love" for Tony Romo to back it up.

Now you show your lack of knowledge about football in general. The g-mens D did beat the Cowboys. Don't you think the defense has something to do with miscues? Are you saying if the Giants had stayed in NY they would have won anyway? I saw that game and the Giants beat the Cowboys. They are the better team and are the best team in the NFC right now. Man up, I'm not a Giant's fan but at least I can admit when my team gets beat by a better team.

good ol phurfur. Romo was a top 3 QB for most of the year. i'm predicting he continues to progress next season.

 

man love? he's the QB of my favorite team, is that man love? whatever. just because Cowboys fans defend their QB from the the numerous haters it's called man love. shut up with that crap.

 

did you watch the Cowboys v. Giants?? maybe it's you who has the lack of football knowledge. the Cowboys should have won the game. they didnt' execute, thats the bottomline. did the giants play a good game, sure. should they have won, no, not if the Cowboys make at least one of the numerous plays they should have. thats all im sayin. if you wanna be an assshole and attack some more, bring it on!

[NewbieJr 541]

good ol phurfur. Romo was a top 3 QB for most of the year. i'm predicting he continues to progress next season.

 

man love? he's the QB of my favorite team, is that man love? whatever. just because Cowboys fans defend their QB from the the numerous haters it's called man love. shut up with that crap.

 

did you watch the Cowboys v. Giants?? maybe it's you who has the lack of football knowledge. the Cowboys should have won the game. they didnt' execute, thats the bottomline. did the giants play a good game, sure. should they have won, no, not if the Cowboys make at least one of the numerous plays they should have. thats all im sayin. if you wanna be an assshole and attack some more, bring it on!

Without Owens, Romo is a mid-tier QB. Even with Owens, teams seemed to have figured him out after a fast start this year.

[49ers_suck 0]

Without Owens, Romo is a mid-tier QB. Even with Owens, teams seemed to have figured him out after a fast start this year.

thats your opinion, and i dont agree.

 

you guys like to think that Romo has been "figured out" that he's just average without TO. i know you are trying to sound smart, but if you watched all the games this year you'd know that the above statement is wrong. the guy has the ability to be a top tier QB. will he do it? no one know. but i like his chances.

 

give him a couple more years. if he continues to peter out at the end of the season, then i'll say time to move on.

 

the problem with todays fans is too much knee jerk reaction, not enough patience. it happens in FF all the time as well. the flavor of the week crap.

[Eagles Green 34]

thats your opinion, and i dont agree.

 

you guys like to think that Romo has been "figured out" that he's just average without TO. i know you are trying to sound smart, but if you watched all the games this year you'd know that the above statement is wrong. the guy has the ability to be a top tier QB. will he do it? no one know. but i like his chances.

 

give him a couple more years. if he continues to peter out at the end of the season, then i'll say time to move on.

 

the problem with todays fans is too much knee jerk reaction, not enough patience. it happens in FF all the time as well. the flavor of the week crap.

Here's a question for you, answer honestly if you can.

 

If you had one playoff game to win, which NFC East QB would you chose to lead that team?

[49ers_suck 0]

Here's a question for you, answer honestly if you can.

 

If you had one playoff game to win, which NFC East QB would you chose to lead that team?

tough question. right now, i'd have to choose eli(i just puked in my mouth a little). but i think over the next few yrs Romo will emerge as one of the top few QBs in the league. and if he doesnt then whatever, the Cowboys move on. but you haters have to admit that he has the talent. and he can come from behind and lead his team to victory. and he has a short memory. the ingredients are there.

[The Hood 9]

The reason for the discrepancy is your taking season totals, I'm not. I'm talking about Garcia's 6 game 4-2 streak (including his losses) immediately following McNabb's 6 game 3-3 streak (including his wins). Garcia had 2 regular season games where he was below 65% - and one of them was when he came off the bench. Mcnabb - whether you take his first six games (5 games under 65%) or his last six games (6 games under 65%) is still consistently less accurate - and teams know that.

 

Your boy at his best with the same team against one of the worst teams in the league (DET) had a lower completion percentage than Garcia did against one of the best (Indy). How do you explain that?

 

Did you just not read the original post on this - even after I asked you to again? Comp % isn't the only factor, obviously. Now you're just being deliberately obtuse. As i pointed out, The Eagles beat the Fins when your pathetic boy could only put together a 27% passing completion against arguably the worst team in the decade. Can you explain, if Mcnabb is so great, could only complete every fourth pass against the worst team of the decade?

 

I've done the explaining, you've done the ignoring. So answer my questions above and below. Explain to me why it McNabb's back-ups have repeatedly done far better than him with the same resources? You obviously don't like my answer, but you & the other apologists bullshiit is worthless - "They stepped up for the back-ups!" If you say they changed the play-calling, if it was so successful, why wouldn't they do that for McNabb too?

 

You have no problem comparing Garcia v. Mcnabb when they're on two entirely different teams, but have real issues with doing so when they're on the SAME team? Just living in denial now? How is it that the DETMER's for pete sake can do better than McNabb with the same resources? Is it all about a "lack of playmakers" then too?

McNabb is not my boy and I actually agree with some of your statements about him. I just asked why Garcia with just about the same numbers was so much better than McNabb like you said. You've spent a lot of time describing the WCO and only picking the McNabb games before he got hurt because they work for you. For the season McNabb and Garcia, like I posted, had pretty equal stats. No big comp % difference. Don't really see how you've proven why one was 5-4 the other 4-1 in complete games they played unless maybe its some other factors.

 

edit - And back in 2002 Feeley was much worse than McNabb in Comp %, TD to int, whatever. Why if not the rest of the team stepping up did the Eagles win more often?

 

Your boy at his best with the same team against one of the worst teams in the league (DET) had a lower completion percentage than Garcia did against one of the best (Indy). How do you explain that?

Since you have no idea what you're talking about I can't. Eagles didn't play (DET) last year they played them this year (80% comp for McNabb). His worst comp % game was 46.2 in 2006 and they won big that game. Garcia's best game against Indy they got blown out by 21 which does not do your comp % arguement any good.

[GhostofMeanMachine99 1]

i agree w/parts of this - dallas got beat and we seemed unispired if nothing else. but dallas was able and did run the ball - often right down the giants throats. mb3 had like 80 yards in the first 1.5 quarters of the game - as a team dallas ended up with 154 yards rushing. the giants ended up with 90, actually it was the giants that had trouble running the ball. in fact, the giants were only able to accumulate 57 yards of offense in the entire 2nd half. unfortunately for us our special teams coverage sucked and that gave the giants a very short field on the 38 to push it in for a score. turns out that was all they needed. in reality, dallas dominated practically every statistical catagory in the game, cept the scoreboard of course - which is all that really matters. romo was not exactly sharp - but he did have fasano drop a td pass, had crayton drop a huge pass and had TO drop one too.

 

Dallas dominated between the 20's.

 

The reason why I feel that they got beat was simply because the Giants were better prepared for the game. Dallas clearly was not because of the mistakes they made.

 

Preparedness is a big part of the game. Gameplan has a big impact on the game. Coaching has an impact. That's the point I'm trying to make.

[GhostofMeanMachine99 1]

The funny thing is, people keep saying that "the Eagles didn't want to pay Garcia starting QB money". Truth is, it was never about money. Feeley got a 3 year deal for $7mil.+ Garcia's got a 2 year for five. More than that, the Eagles never even made Garcia an offer of any kind. They wanted to go with the younger Feeley. So basically, they just made a bad choice. Feeley's never going to be as good as Garcia. The Eagles paid for it. They're at the bottom of the division while Garcia took a 4-12 team to the playoffs.

 

My belief is that Reid's man-crush on McNabb had more to do with it than anything. You're right on the QB controversy. By keeping the obviously inferior Feeley around, there's no controversy.

 

I do agree that McNabb shouldn't have played this year and that, if he's ever going to be good again, it may be next year. This type of injury ain't quite right until the 2nd year. Should have given Garcia the reigns, signed him to a two-year deal, drafted Kolb and cut Garcia if Mcnabb did well next year. The thing is, there's no guarantee that McNabb doesn't get hurt again next year. With a QB that's spent half his seasons missing games, you need to spend that extra on a quality back-up.

 

It was about money and here's why. Feeley's a younger player, with more tread on the tires, and that's why he got the 3 year deal. Garcia did get an offer from the Eagles (a chitty one at that), however the Eagles did not want to sink money into a QB with alot less tread on the tires.

 

In hindsight, sure the Eagles should have kept Garcia. He could have held the fort down until McNabb was really ready to go. In the long run, it would have been to the detriment of the team to bring Garcia back (for the reasons I stated previously).

 

I do agree with you that Reid does have a man-crush on McNabb. One only has to look at the gameplans and playcalling to see how much both change when McNabb's in there (compared to the 50/50 run-pass ratio when a back-up is in). I disagree with you on the quality back-up statement. Feeley is more than capable and has shown to be a very capable back-up QB.

 

McNabb looked like the #5 of old as the season went on, which directly translated to the overall team play and, more importantly, victories at the end of the season. And if you want to look at the injuries, the broken ankle was the only real injury he suffered during real gameplay. The abdominal injury he suffered on a late hit against Atlanta, and the knee was a freakish injury he suffered when getting pushed while running out of bounds.

 

With that said, no way I think he's soft nor brittle, just a bit of bad luck. No way in Hades you can predict that kind of stuff is going to happen.

 

If that was the case, guys like Terry Allen and Fred Taylor would have had very short careers.

[Phurfur 70]

good ol phurfur. Romo was a top 3 QB for most of the year. i'm predicting he continues to progress next season.

 

man love? he's the QB of my favorite team, is that man love? whatever. just because Cowboys fans defend their QB from the the numerous haters it's called man love. shut up with that crap.

 

did you watch the Cowboys v. Giants?? maybe it's you who has the lack of football knowledge. the Cowboys should have won the game. they didnt' execute, thats the bottomline. did the giants play a good game, sure. should they have won, no, not if the Cowboys make at least one of the numerous plays they should have. thats all im sayin. if you wanna be an assshole and attack some more, bring it on!

 

 

Your homer eyes are so big you can't see the truth. This is one of the dumbest statements I have ever seen posted. Do you realize you could say this of every losing team. If you can't make the plays you should make you are not better, that is what makes you loser. So because the Giants made the plays they should have they are the lesser team and didn't deserve to win.

I don't understand your reasoning.

 

tough question. right now, i'd have to choose eli(i just puked in my mouth a little). but i think over the next few yrs Romo will emerge as one of the top few QBs in the league. and if he doesnt then whatever, the Cowboys move on. but you haters have to admit that he has the talent. and he can come from behind and lead his team to victory. and he has a short memory. the ingredients are there.

 

Yes, he has proven he can do this against non play-off caliber teams and with allot of luck. He also proved he couldn't do it in the play-offs.

[49ers_suck 0]

Your homer eyes are so big you can't see the truth. This is one of the dumbest statements I have ever seen posted. Do you realize you could say this of every losing team. If you can't make the plays you should make you are not better, that is what makes you loser. So because the Giants made the plays they should have they are the lesser team and didn't deserve to win.

I don't understand your reasoning.

Yes, he has proven he can do this against non play-off caliber teams and with allot of luck. He also proved he couldn't do it in the play-offs.

you need to chill out. you sound like an angry little man.

 

Dallas dominated time of possession, converted on many a 3rd down, etc... i dont understand why you cant understand what i'm trying to say. but since you cant, you just call me an idiot. NOT EVERY LOSS IS THE SAME! there is a big difference between how the Cowboys lost to the giants, vs. how the seahawks lost to GB. you follow? with all the dropped passes, drive killing penalties, blah, blah, blah, the Cowboys still had a chance to win on the last drive.

 

you're trying to read too much into what i'm saying. i'm a very disappointed Cowboys fan, breaking down where my team went wrong. you are an assshole who likes to try to discredit everything i say. get a life.

[Phurfur 70]

you need to chill out. you sound like an angry little man.

 

Dallas dominated time of possession, converted on many a 3rd down, etc... i dont understand why you cant understand what i'm trying to say. but since you cant, you just call me an idiot. NOT EVERY LOSS IS THE SAME! there is a big difference between how the Cowboys lost to the giants, vs. how the seahawks lost to GB. you follow? with all the dropped passes, drive killing penalties, blah, blah, blah, the Cowboys still had a chance to win on the last drive.

 

you're trying to read too much into what i'm saying. i'm a very disappointed Cowboys fan, breaking down where my team went wrong. you are an assshole who likes to try to discredit everything i say. get a life.

 

You are a disappointed Cowboy fan because your expectations were unrealistic. We've been hearing about the Cowboys going back to the SB since they hired Bill Parcells as HC. You need to wake up and see it isn't that easy. If I were a Cowboy fan I would be concerned that my team lost to all three division opponents the last time they played rather than plan for another SB let down next year. I have a life, you need to stop living yours through a football team.

[49ers_suck 0]

You are a disappointed Cowboy fan because your expectations were unrealistic. We've been hearing about the Cowboys going back to the SB since they hired Bill Parcells as HC. You need to wake up and see it isn't that easy. If I were a Cowboy fan I would be concerned that my team lost to all three division opponents the last time they played rather than plan for another SB let down next year. I have a life, you need to stop living yours through a football team.

never said it was easy. the enitire statement above is ridiculous. you're just throwing shitt out there. you think i'm not concerned about losing to those crappy teams? of course i am, doosh.

[wiffleball 4,788]

It was about money and here's why. Feeley's a younger player, with more tread on the tires, and that's why he got the 3 year deal. Garcia did get an offer from the Eagles (a chitty one at that), however the Eagles did not want to sink money into a QB with alot less tread on the tires.

 

That's news to Jeff Garcia that he got an offer: http://sports.aol.com/fanhouse/category/nf...ven-make-offer/

 

Everything I've read, The Eagles gave an offer to Feeley and had Garcia twisting in the wind. Hard to be entirely about money if you never even give Garcia an offer.

 

Regardless, worked out pretty great for Garcia and not so great for the Eagles.

[NewbieJr 541]

That's news to Jeff Garcia that he got an offer: http://sports.aol.com/fanhouse/category/nf...ven-make-offer/

 

Everything I've read, The Eagles gave an offer to Feeley and had Garcia twisting in the wind. Hard to be entirely about money if you never even give Garcia an offer.

 

Regardless, worked out pretty great for Garcia and not so great for the Eagles.

I'm glad that things worked out for Garcia, but I wouldn't say that things didn't work out for the Eagles. They realized that it would be rough this year, with McNabb starting the season 7 months removed from knee surgery. I'm sure they would have liked to pull out another win or two and maybe sneak in on a wildcard, but I'm quite sure the front office is pleased with what it seen in the last month of the season, which just so happens to coincide with McNabb's knee getting healthier.

[BMoney 0]

romo...2nd best qb in the division from sept-nov....

 

 

romo....dead last from dec-jan...when he folds up like a tent...

[49ers_suck 0]

romo...2nd best qb in the division from sept-nov....

romo....dead last from dec-jan...when he folds up like a tent...

see you next year. Romo will keep improving.

 

just curious, who was better than him sept-nov.?

[listen2me 23 1,831]

see you next year. Romo will keep improving.

 

just curious, who was better than him sept-nov.?

 

The real question is......when will the Cowboys win another playoff game?

[Pimptaddy 0]

The real question is......when will the Cowboys win another playoff game?

 

The real question is....when will the Eagles win a Superbowl?

[listen2me 23 1,831]

The real question is....when will the Eagles win a Superbowl?

 

I'm not sure, and don't really care

 

THis thread however is about Romo and Dallas

[Pimptaddy 0]

I'm not sure, and don't really care

 

THis thread however is about Romo and Dallas

 

 

The thread title is biased! Romo is either the 1st or 2nd best QB in the division. His only competition now is Eli and I consider them 1a and 1b now.

[Phurfur 70]

The thread title is biased! Romo is either the 1st or 2nd best QB in the division. His only competition now is Eli and I consider them 1a and 1b now.

 

 

How many games do you think Romo would have won if he played for Philly or Wash? Do you think he would have had a chance at bring the NYG to the SB? Of course not, because he played on the better team (according to Cowboy fans) and couldn't get it done. To put Romo in the same class with Eli is ridiculous! A great QB takes over and leads his team in crunch time. He does not argue with the officials, take sacks when he could throw the ball away, throw the ball away while standing in the pocket under no pressure, and waste time running a two minute drill. You guys just don't get it.

 

You act like Romo is there already and he is not. I put Romo and Campbell equal with each other right now.

 

1. Eli

2. McNabb

3. Romo/Campbell

[49ers_suck 0]

How many games do you think Romo would have won if he played for Philly or Wash? Do you think he would have had a chance at bring the NYG to the SB? Of course not, because he played on the better team (according to Cowboy fans) and couldn't get it done. To put Romo in the same class with Eli is ridiculous! A great QB takes over and leads his team in crunch time. He does not argue with the officials, take sacks when he could throw the ball away, throw the ball away while standing in the pocket under no pressure, and waste time running a two minute drill. You guys just don't get it.

 

You act like Romo is there already and he is not. I put Romo and Campbell equal with each other right now.

 

1. Eli

2. McNabb

3. Romo/Campbell

 

you are an idiot, plain and simple. you think you've got it all figured out. eli sucked very badly at times this year. i expect him to go back to his suckiness anytime. probably in the SB. how can you have such a short memory? all the sudden eli is a stud?

 

Romo has shown flashes of brilliance, and he has had some bad games. the "he's nothing without TO" crowd is misinformed. that is a bandwagon assessment imo.

 

he's not there yet. i've never said that he was there. i get excited when he does good, and i'm gonna talk about it. for a lot of the season he was playing at a very high level. he didnt get it done in the playoffs. but his coaches and teammates take just as much of the blame, if not more, for the Cowboys failure in the divisional.

 

i understand it takes a few yrs for most QB's to settle into being successful in the NFL. imo, he is on his way. do you honestly think he's going to regress next season?

[NewbieJr 541]

you are an idiot, plain and simple. you think you've got it all figured out. eli sucked very badly at times this year. i expect him to go back to his suckiness anytime. probably in the SB. how can you have such a short memory? all the sudden eli is a stud?

 

 

 

i understand it takes a few yrs for most QB's to settle into being successful in the NFL. imo, he is on his way. do you honestly think he's going to regress next season?

1. Manning had some bad games early on. He improved as the season went on. That's the way it's supposed to be with a young QB.

 

2. Yes, I feel Romo may regress next year. He sure seemed to as the season went on this year. If T.O. were to retire, Romo would not be any better than Campbell. Do I think Romo sucks? No, not at all. I just think he is a mid-tier QB with some potential. I like the way he can throw off-balance and on the run. However, if he doesn't learn to play when the pressure is on, it's possible he won't ever elevate to a top ten QB.

[listen2me 23 1,831]

1. Eli

2a McNabb

2b Romo

3. Collins

4. Campbell

[Phurfur 70]

you are an idiot, plain and simple. you think you've got it all figured out. eli sucked very badly at times this year. i expect him to go back to his suckiness anytime. probably in the SB. how can you have such a short memory? all the sudden eli is a stud?

 

Romo has shown flashes of brilliance, and he has had some bad games. the "he's nothing without TO" crowd is misinformed. that is a bandwagon assessment imo.

 

he's not there yet. i've never said that he was there. i get excited when he does good, and i'm gonna talk about it. for a lot of the season he was playing at a very high level. he didnt get it done in the playoffs. but his coaches and teammates take just as much of the blame, if not more, for the Cowboys failure in the divisional.

 

i understand it takes a few yrs for most QB's to settle into being successful in the NFL. imo, he is on his way. do you honestly think he's going to regress next season?

 

And you wonder why I say you have "Man Love" for Romo when you make statements like this. I'll bet you have his Fathead on the ceiling of your bedroom.

 

Why don't you answer my questions instead of babbling. I will ask you again

 

How many games do you think Romo would have won if he played for Philly or Wash? Do you think he would have had a chance at bringing the NYG to the SB?

 

This tread is about the best QBs in the division today! Do you remember

[Eagles Green 34]

Romo has shown flashes of brilliance

So did Jeff George.

 

It's not his talents that are in question. It's his lack of leadership, lack of preperation, and ability to play at a high level late in the season and into the payoffs. Yeah, I'll probably take him for a game in October. But come playoff time (Or to Tony, Cancun time) he has come up VERY short.

[49ers_suck 0]

1. Manning had some bad games early on. He improved as the season went on. That's the way it's supposed to be with a young QB.

 

2. Yes, I feel Romo may regress next year. He sure seemed to as the season went on this year. If T.O. were to retire, Romo would not be any better than Campbell. Do I think Romo sucks? No, not at all. I just think he is a mid-tier QB with some potential. I like the way he can throw off-balance and on the run. However, if he doesn't learn to play when the pressure is on, it's possible he won't ever elevate to a top ten QB.

 

 

Romo has plenty of growing to do. 1st he needs to get rid of the focking ball sometimes! that favresque gunslinger mentality comes out sometimes, and it gets him in trouble.

 

eli is the best QB in the NFC East RIGHT NOW. but i dont think he has that distinction for long. eli is a decent game manager if he doesnt revert to crappy eli. i'm not sayin he's gonna pull a grossman, but.............all i'm tryin to say is, you guys who say Romo folds up late in the season, if you can get that trend from his limited time as a starter, you gotta be waitin for eli to take a huge dump, right?

[Phurfur 70]

Romo has plenty of growing to do. 1st he needs to get rid of the focking ball sometimes! that favresque gunslinger mentality comes out sometimes, and it gets him in trouble.

 

eli is the best QB in the NFC East RIGHT NOW. but i dont think he has that distinction for long. eli is a decent game manager if he doesnt revert to crappy eli. i'm not sayin he's gonna pull a grossman, but.............all i'm tryin to say is, you guys who say Romo folds up late in the season, if you can get that trend from his limited time as a starter, you gotta be waitin for eli to take a huge dump, right?

 

You keep avoiding my questions, I think if you answer them it will clarify your position. I will answer them to let you know where I stand.

 

How many games do you think Romo would have won if he played for Philly or Wash?

I think he would be in the 6-8 win range.

 

Do you think he would have had a chance at bringing the NYG to the SB?

No, this is ridiculous unless you feel the NYG are head and shoulders better than Dallas.

[BMoney 0]

see you next year. Romo will keep improving.

 

just curious, who was better than him sept-nov.?

 

 

eli, who didnt have the luxury of 11 pro bowl players....

 

after dec? everyone was better than romo...

[GhostofMeanMachine99 1]

That's news to Jeff Garcia that he got an offer: http://sports.aol.com/fanhouse/category/nf...ven-make-offer/

 

Everything I've read, The Eagles gave an offer to Feeley and had Garcia twisting in the wind. Hard to be entirely about money if you never even give Garcia an offer.

 

Regardless, worked out pretty great for Garcia and not so great for the Eagles.

 

The Eagles contacted Garcia's agent and told him they wanted to do a contract before the March 2nd, the first day of free agency. The agent informed the Eagles that they wanted to test the free agent waters, however the Eagles were free to offer a contract to him before the deadline. They declined and decided to resign Feeley.

 

http://cbs.sportsline.com/nfl/story/10021468/rss

 

You can look at it anyway you want. Some could say the Eagles rescued Garcia's career, and for that, Garcia in return tells them that he's gonna test the FA market, however the team can make an offer if they'd like.

 

Sure, it's the agent's job to maximize what he can get for his client, but where does gratitude and loyalty factor into the equation?

 

My interpretation? The Eagles wanted Garcia to resign but on the cheap. When his agent told them he wanted to test the FA market, they pretty much said FU to him, resigned AJ, and let him go on his merry way.

 

You have the organization saying one thing, the agent and player saying another, and the media putting the whole thing under the microscope. At this point and time who really gives a shizit. Neither team is still playing, the Eagles didn't make the playoffs, Tampa did but Garcia was horrible.

 

For the Eagles, the future looks bright because #5 showed us at the end of the year that he's back. Hopefully he remains healthy.

[Pimptaddy 0]

How many games do you think Romo would have won if he played for Philly or Wash? Do you think he would have had a chance at bring the NYG to the SB? Of course not, because he played on the better team (according to Cowboy fans) and couldn't get it done. To put Romo in the same class with Eli is ridiculous! A great QB takes over and leads his team in crunch time. He does not argue with the officials, take sacks when he could throw the ball away, throw the ball away while standing in the pocket under no pressure, and waste time running a two minute drill. You guys just don't get it.

 

You act like Romo is there already and he is not. I put Romo and Campbell equal with each other right now.

 

1. Eli

2. McNabb

3. Romo/Campbell

 

 

1) Romo

2) Eli

3) McChoke

4) Cambell

 

America's Team owns you!

[49ers_suck 0]

You keep avoiding my questions, I think if you answer them it will clarify your position. I will answer them to let you know where I stand.

 

How many games do you think Romo would have won if he played for Philly or Wash?

I think he would be in the 6-8 win range.

 

Do you think he would have had a chance at bringing the NYG to the SB?

No, this is ridiculous unless you feel the NYG are head and shoulders better than Dallas.

these are stupid hypothetical questions. nobody knows what Romo would have done with the giants or skins. so why even go there? the giants success is not 100% due to eli and the Cowboys failure is not 100% due to Romo.

 

 

this is a futile argument because you've already decided that Romo isn't very good.

 

 

if you dont think that a good majority of the Cowboys wins are directly attributed to Romo's play, you are high. Romo played at a much higher level than any QB in the NFC East for most of the season. he faltered, along with his team, at the end. i'll keep saying that i think he progresses next season, and you can keep coming up with ways to call me an idiot. i dont care.

[Eagles Green 34]

1) Romo

2) Eli

3) McChoke

4) Cambell

 

America's Team owns you!

McChoke?

 

Give me a call when Romo doesn't choke and actually wins a playoff game.

[Phurfur 70]

these are stupid hypothetical questions. nobody knows what Romo would have done with the giants or skins. so why even go there?

 

 

Everything you predict about Romo is hypothetical. All your scenarios about the outcome of the Giants game (if they had made the plays they should have, if Crayton hadn't dropped that pass, etc.) are hypothetical. Nobody knows what Romo will do next year so why go there? You are full of hypothetical answers when they suit you so why stop now. We should call you Mr. Hypothetical.

[Gepetto 1,294]

 

 

2007 Passer Rating: Romo 97.4, McNabb 89.9, Jason Campbell 77.6, Eli Manning73.9

 

2007 Pass Completion Percentage: Romo 64.4%, McNabb 61.5%, Jason Campbell 60.0%, Eli Manning 56.1%

 

2007 Passing Yards per Game: Romo 263.2, McNabb 237.4, Eli Manning 208.5, Jason Campbell 207.7

 

2007 Passing Yards per Attempt: Tony Romo 8.1, McNabb 7.0, Jason Campbell 6.5, Eli Manning 6.3

 

Now shut the fock up you idiots! Tony Romo

[49ers_suck 0]

Everything you predict about Romo is hypothetical. All your scenarios about the outcome of the Giants game (if they had made the plays they should have, if Crayton hadn't dropped that pass, etc.) are hypothetical. Nobody knows what Romo will do next year so why go there? You are full of hypothetical answers when they suit you so why stop now. We should call you Mr. Hypothetical.

theres a HUGE difference in predicting what a player on a certain will do vs. putting that player on another team and predicting the outcome.

[Phurfur 70]

theres a HUGE difference in predicting what a player on a certain will do vs. putting that player on another team and predicting the outcome.

 

 

OK Mr. Hypothetical! They are both predictions, are you saying you can only predict what Romo will do with the Cowboys?

[Eagles Green 34]

2007 Passer Rating: Romo 97.4, McNabb 89.9, Jason Campbell 77.6, Eli Manning73.9

 

2007 Pass Completion Percentage: Romo 64.4%, McNabb 61.5%, Jason Campbell 60.0%, Eli Manning 56.1%

 

2007 Passing Yards per Game: Romo 263.2, McNabb 237.4, Eli Manning 208.5, Jason Campbell 207.7

 

2007 Passing Yards per Attempt: Tony Romo 8.1, McNabb 7.0, Jason Campbell 6.5, Eli Manning 6.3

 

Now shut the fock up you idiots! Tony Romo

How about comparing all of their playoff stats?

[Joey Gladstone 33]

11 Cowboy Pro Bowlers

 

Silly Cowboy fans and their multiple ballots.