Sweetness_34 0 Posted November 6, 2009 I wish he could have had the perfect situation that he has now with GB... He could have if TT had a clue how to add weapons around him....Randy Moss, Tony Gonzalez, all those wasted draft picks that could have helped Favre (Brandon Jackson, Harrell, Aaron Rodgers etc) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sweetness_34 0 Posted November 6, 2009 I'm just happy the Packers were able to rebuild in one year... What makes you say they have finished rebuilding? 6-10 last year and the jury is still out this year (3 wins against crap teams and the next one will be Tampa...yipppeee)....fudgepackers have no OL and no D. Driver is getting old and soon should be done. No RB.....you keep dreaming that the rebuilding is over....call me when the win a SB or even go to one.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
donhaas 18 Posted November 6, 2009 He could have if TT had a clue how to add weapons around him....Randy Moss, Tony Gonzalez, all those wasted draft picks that could have helped Favre (Brandon Jackson, Harrell, Aaron Rodgers etc) Aaron Rodgers is a wasted pick?? HAHAHAHAHA You do realize that he is better than any Bears quarterback in their history, right??? HAHAHAAHAHA With your 78 quarterbacks in the last 20 years, you would jizz yourself to even be able to sniff an Aaron Rodgers talent level quarterback in the draft.... Don't be silly... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted November 6, 2009 No it is funny to see you and other fudgepacker homers (insert dumb-azz here) now telling us how Favre was over-rated when all you did before he left was suck his cack as though he was God. I love how you and the rest of the fudge packer fans have been exposed to be pure shams. Love it....enjoy watching Favre in the playoffs. I know it will make you burn.... I don't recall saying he was overrated. I see Donhaas bringing up how you all gloss over how Favre did play when he had a poor line...and how much you all said he sucked but the moment GB moves on he is now great to you all. You saying we are all shams is focking hilarious...what the hell are you? A lame alias who comes in when the Bears win and hide when they lose. Talk crap all day long but anytime you are asked about that loss the Packers gave your boys, you ignore it...just like you ignored how Cinci waxed their ass (really funny given your comments when the Bengals beat the Packers). You get your ass handed to you every time you post in a Seahawks thread.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted November 6, 2009 What makes you say they have finished rebuilding? 6-10 last year and the jury is still out this year (3 wins against crap teams and the next one will be Tampa...yipppeee)....fudgepackers have no OL and no D. Driver is getting old and soon should be done. No RB.....you keep dreaming that the rebuilding is over....call me when the win a SB or even go to one.... WHy do you always gloss over that other win? Call me when the Bears win another SB...its only been 24 years. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMoney 0 Posted November 6, 2009 Wow...you went to the game...that really makes you a fan. Im betting you cheered for the Vikings though.No, I did not go...I was there two weeks ago though. I would say someone who A. is a seahawks fan B. gloats when the Packers lose C. does nothing but complain about the Packers D. when talking about Rodgers to another Packer fan calls him "your QB" is probably not a freaking Packer fan. Some did get mad at the team...some are still attached to a QB who is no longer here...they had no problem with management before that. And some were never fans of the team before...they talked seahawks all of the time...it was all about them all the time...then Brett leaves and now here is Bmoney the Packer fan who rarely talks hawks anymore. I don't think you are a fan. why? because you like to complain and whine in these threads I guess...not sure why else you feel the need to come in here and talk nonsense. Had they acquired Brees at that point, you would have whined they were pushing Brett out the door. And you know damn well you would have. And you can keep whining about Rodgers...but Brett was not doing his magic all that much when Rodgers was drafted...nor was he doing it while retired until training camp. as for brees...no I wouldnt have..i love brees..but thanks for trying to put words in my mouth....just stay on your own side... as for the seahawks? what do I have to say again that I have already? I think Hasselbeck is all but done and Id have been happy had the packers traded favre to seattle for holmgrens last year there....the hawks havent been the same since hutch was lured away...ill talk hawks you want...but there isnt much to post about...i cringed when hass ran to the endzone in sf..and again, got hurt..season basically over... its just THE topic...its why i was passionate about it when it happened up to now...you call it whining because im not blindly just following the managements every move? i guess..call it what you want i love the sound of hearing you defeated..keep it coming!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMoney 0 Posted November 6, 2009 No, the D was not awful in 2007...I guess to you it means it was all Brett.Never mind Barnett playing poorly then getting hurt. Jenkins out. Williams gone and Harrell hurt so no depth at DT...Pickett ineffective...Hawk was not good and never sure if he was 100% healthy. Bigby has not been the same since 2007...Harris missing time, Woodson playing safety...and KGB completely done so Mike Montgomery ended up playing end quite a bit. But yes...must have all been Brett. With #4 around all of those guys would have been lights freaking out. He was not 8-3...the team was...and they won several games where his play was piss poor. But you don't really want to look at that and you know it. Brett does have it...as amazingly effective as you want to lay it out and the Packers have been bad (at least use your source of the article early in the week and not act like you made it up yourself). But I guess that is all of the differences between 13-3 and 6-10 last year right. So what was the problem the two years before that...wait, let me guess, none of that was Brett's fault either right? Doing just better than last year would not have made keeping him worth it. In the end we would have again lived through another will he or won't he come back...we would have no clue anything about Rodgers going into the final years of his contract...and despite your ridiculous opinion of Rodgers, that would not be a good thing. Who blamed 2008 on anything except Rodgers...it was a team record...everyone played a part in it. You seem to want to blame it all on him. You excuse the defense but keep trying to say the only difference was who was QB. first of all..the effective comment wasnt my own..it was in the journal..but i recycled it already..so i dont have the xact stats..but you obviously read it and its mind blowing..we need to quit acting like aarons a rookie 2 games in...he either has itr or doesnt... and for the last time...ive never ever said it was all on aaron...like your other comments, you error on this one also...hes the leader of the ship..but of course..others are to blame also.. its juts hilarious how when favre wins, its the team and not brett...and when aaron loses..its the team who let him down hahahaha...you must be napping between the 1st and 4th quarters... while its true..no one knows what bretts mystique and leadership does to the 08 packers..but based on numbers....its foolish to bet against him...had he gone to nyj and fell on his face, you can make the argument.... he was 8-3 with a new offense..you think he'd have sucked with the same offense here? haha..cmon...and qb play can help keep a D off the field..better field position etc..it isnt all just scoring points.... i guess i was alone in not being bothered over favres indecisiveness..it was the team who erred in letting the deadline be so late..id have made it much earlier with no extending it...so yeah, even though im on bretts side, id have been more strict with him... but if anyone deserved just a lil slack, as terry bradshaw said..its brett.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMoney 0 Posted November 6, 2009 Why doesn't he hold his Seahawks to such a high regard and standards as he does the Packers?Has BMoney acknowledged Favre's 29 INT's when the line was not-so good? I'm pretty sure Sweetness ejaculated on himself for every one of those receptions and came to FFToday to post that "Favre is the suckiest quarterback that ever did suck" Now Sweetness is stroking old and gray and less talented Favre's cack? Let me explain to you idiots one thing: Quarterbacks are one man out of 53 guys.... When they are surrounded by excellence, because of so many factors, they exceed well beyond their talents -- see Brady, Dilfer, Culpooper, etc. When the chips are down, when the o-line is terrible is the real test of a quarterback Rodgers: 16 TDs, 2 INTs, number one passing rating in the whole league Favre: 20 TDs, 29 INTs.....4-12 Favre was a great quarterback; take nothing away from him.... but on this Packer current team with the pathetic o-line right now.... I'd say 1-6 and Favre probably out for the season with a broken leg or separated shoulder (Favre getting hit twice as much as Rodgers if he's not just scaredly chucking the ball up like at the end of the Eagles "4th and 26" playoff game)... Worse, Rodgers would be gone and the Packers would have no future Packers made the right choice.... A Seahawks fan and a Bears fan are going to lament two losing Packer seasons in 20 years... really??? Let me repeat that.... a Seahawks fan and a Bears fan Stop being dumb.... Your pathetic teams would cream over yourselves to be able to rebuild in one year... Do you know why? Because both of your teams have been essentially rebuilding for 25 years and 35 years respectively.... Stop the nonsense... you're right...id fire a load on your moms face if the hawks had favre if rebuilding includes a super bowl apperance for each team in the last 7 years...i guess...but then im not sure what youd call whats going on here then... aarons only beaten 2 teams with winning records..good grief, man...you all act as if jesus is under center and the team is letting him down.... the qb is more than just 1 of the 53 guys....all you have to do is look at seattle with seneca compared to a healthy matt... a cassell compared to brady....favre compared to tavaris jackson etc to know that..... when u get in the huddle and need that first down...your D needs a break...they were just out on the field...can they count on aaron? could minny count on t-jax last year? does t-jax win that game vs sf? a qb brings more than just play...its belief...calm under pressure... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMoney 0 Posted November 6, 2009 Who posted in: It's an EXCITING Time to be a Seahawk Fan!BMoney 15 Who posted in: Green Bay Coach and GM BMoney 32 Seahawks combined record the last 2 years when BMoney started whining about and claiming to be a fan of the Packers 6-17. well, fock..thanks for reminding me how bad seattle sucks...whats your point? wait..they are only 4 wins off of gbs record since, and thats with seneca wallace....and you think they are wonderful....i see now thanks Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted November 6, 2009 as for brees...no I wouldnt have..i love brees..but thanks for trying to put words in my mouth....just stay on your own side... as for the seahawks? what do I have to say again that I have already? I think Hasselbeck is all but done and Id have been happy had the packers traded favre to seattle for holmgrens last year there....the hawks havent been the same since hutch was lured away...ill talk hawks you want...but there isnt much to post about...i cringed when hass ran to the endzone in sf..and again, got hurt..season basically over... its just THE topic...its why i was passionate about it when it happened up to now...you call it whining because im not blindly just following the managements every move? i guess..call it what you want i love the sound of hearing you defeated..keep it coming!! So, basically you were a hawks fan while they were winning...and rarely, if ever, said anything about the Packers...even when they were sucking for a year or two there. Now that the Seahawks suck...you come back to whining about GB because you like to? OK...thanks. All we needed to know. Hearing me defeated? You really are clueless. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMoney 0 Posted November 6, 2009 Stop being dumb.... Your pathetic teams would cream over yourselves to be able to rebuild in one year... you havent rebuilt the team..you played the bears week 1, the rams, lions and browns.... thats not rebuilding..thats called a cushy schedule.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted November 6, 2009 first of all..the effective comment wasnt my own..it was in the journal..but i recycled it already..so i dont have the xact stats..but you obviously read it and its mind blowing..we need to quit acting like aarons a rookie 2 games in...he either has itr or doesnt... and for the last time...ive never ever said it was all on aaron...like your other comments, you error on this one also...hes the leader of the ship..but of course..others are to blame also.. its juts hilarious how when favre wins, its the team and not brett...and when aaron loses..its the team who let him down hahahaha...you must be napping between the 1st and 4th quarters... while its true..no one knows what bretts mystique and leadership does to the 08 packers..but based on numbers....its foolish to bet against him...had he gone to nyj and fell on his face, you can make the argument.... he was 8-3 with a new offense..you think he'd have sucked with the same offense here? haha..cmon...and qb play can help keep a D off the field..better field position etc..it isnt all just scoring points.... i guess i was alone in not being bothered over favres indecisiveness..it was the team who erred in letting the deadline be so late..id have made it much earlier with no extending it...so yeah, even though im on bretts side, id have been more strict with him... but if anyone deserved just a lil slack, as terry bradshaw said..its brett.... He was 8-3 with a much better offensive line, running game, and defense which carried his ass in a few of those 8 wins last year. Based on his actualy numbers last year...it would not be foolish to bet against him doing crap for GB last year. So wait...you are on Brett's side...yet would have been more strict...so how long before he would have been pissed at you. One of his/his families, biggest complaints have been the earlier deadline. You might have even "pushed him out" sooner. And nobody, nowhere, in any job gets more slack because of past performance...not enough slack to be bashing your boss in the media (which Favre had done on personnel moves for a little while and then during the saga last year). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMoney 0 Posted November 6, 2009 So, basically you were a hawks fan while they were winning...and rarely, if ever, said anything about the Packers...even when they were sucking for a year or two there.Now that the Seahawks suck...you come back to whining about GB because you like to? OK...thanks. All we needed to know. Hearing me defeated? You really are clueless. you are clueless..but its cool i still cheer for seattle..am going to the game here at the end of dec...im sorry you are so obsessed with how much i post on that thread..trust be told, im annoyed with their direction and have been for ages...but it isnt an ongoing debate because there isnt a huge disagreement there... i commented on the packers more than a few times...its just that you hadnt noticed until the infamous summer rolled around.... and im not whining...i thought it was a dumb decision to do what they did..and i stand by it..so what?...everyones allowed an opinion..i am..you are..i dont consider your talk to be whining..so relax.... and yes, i cheered for brett before the game sunday..he deserved it.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted November 6, 2009 well, fock..thanks for reminding me how bad seattle sucks...whats your point? wait..they are only 4 wins off of gbs record since, and thats with seneca wallace....and you think they are wonderful....i see now thanks My point is simple. You jumped off the hawks bandwagon quick and want to claim to be a GB fan so you can keep whining about Brett freaking Favre. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
donhaas 18 Posted November 6, 2009 you're right...id fire a load on your moms face if the hawks had favre if rebuilding includes a super bowl apperance for each team in the last 7 years...i guess...but then im not sure what youd call whats going on here then... aarons only beaten 2 teams with winning records..good grief, man...you all act as if jesus is under center and the team is letting him down.... the qb is more than just 1 of the 53 guys....all you have to do is look at seattle with seneca compared to a healthy matt... a cassell compared to brady....favre compared to tavaris jackson etc to know that..... when u get in the huddle and need that first down...your D needs a break...they were just out on the field...can they count on aaron? could minny count on t-jax last year? does t-jax win that game vs sf? a qb brings more than just play...its belief...calm under pressure... You guys have each had 2 freak SB appearances over the last quarter century... otherwise you've both been mostly rebuilding.... you guys both are maybe a step above the Lions... no room to talk about anybody, not much less a great organization like the Packers. And once again, you didn't address the 29 Ints Calm under pressure? Can I make this 29 any bigger?? HAHAHAHAHAHA Throwing it up like a fraidy cat when the Eagles blitzed to end the playoff game. (No Packer in sight) 6 Ints against the Rams in same pressure situation... WTF are you talking about? Calm under pressure? Yes.... when you have all the time in the world, a great offensive line, the best RB in the game that the whole defense is keying on and a top-5 defense keeping you from having to gunsling, it's easy to be "calm under the pressure." The one time Favre got pressured, he handed Pitt 2 late scores and the game You attack Rodgers for being on pace to throw for 4400, 32 TDs and 4 INTs and the number one passer rating in the NFL But you don't attack Favre for throwing 29 INTs and leading the Pack to 4-12??? Explain yourself please. TIA Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMoney 0 Posted November 6, 2009 He was 8-3 with a much better offensive line, running game, and defense which carried his ass in a few of those 8 wins last year.Based on his actualy numbers last year...it would not be foolish to bet against him doing crap for GB last year. So wait...you are on Brett's side...yet would have been more strict...so how long before he would have been pissed at you. One of his/his families, biggest complaints have been the earlier deadline. You might have even "pushed him out" sooner. And nobody, nowhere, in any job gets more slack because of past performance...not enough slack to be bashing your boss in the media (which Favre had done on personnel moves for a little while and then during the saga last year). giving him another week..another weekend..4 more days to decide etc just created a bad situation.... he wouldnt have been that p1ssed..unlike TT..I never wouldve been in a hurry to play MY guy...Id have went for gonzales and moss, if at all possible... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMoney 0 Posted November 6, 2009 My point is simple.You jumped off the hawks bandwagon quick and want to claim to be a GB fan so you can keep whining about Brett freaking Favre. not true..i talk seattle all the time..but I love how much this season is bothering you haha....you can pull for more than 1 team, skippy..people do it... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted November 6, 2009 you are clueless..but its cool i still cheer for seattle..am going to the game here at the end of dec...im sorry you are so obsessed with how much i post on that thread..trust be told, im annoyed with their direction and have been for ages...but it isnt an ongoing debate because there isnt a huge disagreement there... i commented on the packers more than a few times...its just that you hadnt noticed until the infamous summer rolled around.... and im not whining...i thought it was a dumb decision to do what they did..and i stand by it..so what?...everyones allowed an opinion..i am..you are..i dont consider your talk to be whining..so relax.... and yes, i cheered for brett before the game sunday..he deserved it.... Not clueless...just observant. Im not obsessed...Im laughing at how big of a Hawks fan you were...now you rarely say a word about them and always whine about GB...where I don't recall you hardly ever commenting about the Packers before (unless they were playing Seattle). And yes, you are whining...you continue to whine. Yes, you are allowed your opinion...and Im allowed to mock you for how you jump off the Hawks bandwagon and challenge your opinion and challenge how a Seahawks fan is now supposedly more of a Packer fan. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted November 6, 2009 giving him another week..another weekend..4 more days to decide etc just created a bad situation.... he wouldnt have been that p1ssed..unlike TT..I never wouldve been in a hurry to play MY guy...Id have went for gonzales and moss, if at all possible... He did not want to make the decision then...why do you think he would not have been pissed:? TT did go after Gonzo and Moss. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted November 6, 2009 not true..i talk seattle all the time..but I love how much this season is bothering you haha....you can pull for more than 1 team, skippy..people do it... Which is why you have twice the posts in this thread than you do in the main Hawks thread from the offseason...and this is not even an offseason Packer fan thread...just a feeble attempt by a troll like sweetness. So...Hawks main thread...about 15 posts. A thread started to bash the Packers...BMoney is all over it bashing along. Yup...huge Packer fan you are. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
donhaas 18 Posted November 6, 2009 I slightly misconfigured the yardage, BMoney You attack Rodgers for being on pace to throw for 4572 yards, 32 TDs and 4 INTs and the number one passer rating in the NFL But you don't attack Favre for throwing 29 INTs and leading the Pack to 4-12??? Explain yourself please. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMoney 0 Posted November 6, 2009 You guys have each had 2 freak SB appearances over the last quarter century... otherwise you've both been mostly rebuilding.... you guys both are maybe a step above the Lions... no room to talk about anybody, not much less a great organization like the Packers. And once again, you didn't address the 29 Ints Calm under pressure? Can I make this 29 any bigger?? HAHAHAHAHAHA Throwing it up like a fraidy cat when the Eagles blitzed to end the playoff game. (No Packer in sight) 6 Ints against the Rams in same pressure situation... WTF are you talking about? Calm under pressure? Yes.... when you have all the time in the world, a great offensive line, the best RB in the game that the whole defense is keying on and a top-5 defense keeping you from having to gunsling, it's easy to be "calm under the pressure." The one time Favre got pressured, he handed Pitt 2 late scores and the game You attack Rodgers for being on pace to throw for 4400, 32 TDs and 4 INTs and the number one passer rating in the NFL But you don't attack Favre for throwing 29 INTs and leading the Pack to 4-12??? Explain yourself please. TIA sorry for being distracted, i was just watching the replay of sundays game again..... I have to explain myself? did you explain your comment on the packers being 1-6 if brett was here? because my goodness, theres NO way brett with his precise passing and surgically repaired arm beats the lions, rams or browns.... as for the eagles game...most would say that game was lost on 4th and 26..it shouldnt have come to OT..but since it did..yep, bad toss..same as the giants game..wrong shoulder..i was there and cussing also... the rams game? meh..i just remember that game as brett going down slinging even though it was a lost cause...wasnt that good of a team..but they made the playoffs due to an awful division..overmatched in that playoffs.. but he helped get the there, didnt he? the 29 picks...bad..yep...no one denies it...but they dont carry over stats from other years..this is 09... as for the pitt game, the last pick was flung into taylors hands..went right through him for a pick....but nice try!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMoney 0 Posted November 6, 2009 Which is why you have twice the posts in this thread than you do in the main Hawks thread from the offseason...and this is not even an offseason Packer fan thread...just a feeble attempt by a troll like sweetness.So...Hawks main thread...about 15 posts. A thread started to bash the Packers...BMoney is all over it bashing along. Yup...huge Packer fan you are. sorry..i didnt realize you are only a packer fan if you just blindly follow the organizations lead.... what..are u and don cubs fans also? thats what they do... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMoney 0 Posted November 6, 2009 He did not want to make the decision then...why do you think he would not have been pissed:? TT did go after Gonzo and Moss. half heartedly...he refused to give anything up for either.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMoney 0 Posted November 6, 2009 I slightly misconfigured the yardage, BMoney You attack Rodgers for being on pace to throw for 4572 yards, 32 TDs and 4 INTs and the number one passer rating in the NFL But you don't attack Favre for throwing 29 INTs and leading the Pack to 4-12??? Explain yourself please. sure thing, toots games vs the bears, lions, rams, and browns, not coming out of the routs til its basically over..throwing late etc....and playing catch up vs the vikes twice and the bengals... im just blessed to be around to witness the greatness that is aaron whatshisname.....if they dont retire the 12 next year, ill be p1ssed... and the 4-12 is ancient history.... 6-10 is more recent.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
donhaas 18 Posted November 6, 2009 the 29 picks...bad..yep...no one denies it...but they dont carry over stats from other years..this is 09... Bad. yep. ?? That's it... The only 2 comparable bad o-line situations Bad... yep HAHAHAHAAHAH You might as well stop talking now, BMoney... you've been exposed 4,059,382 posts about how Rodgers sucks with his 4,572, 32 TDs, and 4 INTs with a bad offensive line and one "bad....yep" about Favre's 29 INTs and 4-12 record with his bad offensive line Rodgers only in his second year; Favre was in his 13th..... 29 Thanks for playing Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted November 6, 2009 sorry..i didnt realize you are only a packer fan if you just blindly follow the organizations lead.... what..are u and don cubs fans also? thats what they do... Blindly follow? Nobody ever said you have to do that...and I don't recall anyone doing that (maybe in don's fishing attempts...but most know what he is going for). I don't question several other Packer fans fandom that question the management...I have questioned them on quite a bit. You take it to a troll like level and seem to enjoy the team losing. That and you simply never show any signs of being a fan...never did...you showed plenty of being a Hawks fan though...now, not so much on either really. Just a lot of whining and complaining. Come to think of it...are you sure you are not a woman? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remote controller 143 Posted November 6, 2009 Favre was, and still is better than Rodgers, and Rodgers is real good. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
donhaas 18 Posted November 6, 2009 Favre was, and still is better than Rodgers, and Rodgers is real good. So you blocked out that 29 INT/4-12 season? HAHAHAAH Favre is great, at his old age, at reading defenses.... With no pressure on him, the defense keyed on AP and his defense keeping him well in the lead.... he is very good.... Put him in Rodgers situation, Favre would be terrible... It would hurt my eyes to see that again at his old age...We saw it a few years ago .... 29 INT/4-12 Rodgers > Favre and since Rodgers is almost a generation younger than Favre..... Rodgers >>>>>>>>>>> Favre Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted November 6, 2009 Favre was, and still is better than Rodgers, and Rodgers is real good. Favre was...and is playing better right now. 2005, 2006, 2008? Maybe not. But Favre right now is playing better than we have seen him play in quite some time. Id venture a guess that if he had been playing like this from when TT first came on the job until 2007 he may not have been supposedly pushed out the door. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bouve-Rules 0 Posted November 6, 2009 Where are the Jet Fans in all this? Favre completely used the Jets for a season to keep the consecutive starts streak alive and then begged for his release - just like he did in Green Bay. If he really wanted to retire for the third time, why beg the Jets to release him? You can blame Ted and Mike all you want but clearly Favre was going to play for his buddies Chilly and Bevel - nothing GB could do about it. PS - thank god Packer fans boo'ed the hell out of him on Sunday. My favorite analogy on why he was boo'ed....eventually you can forgive and forget an ex-wife but not while she's making out with her new boyfriend. Exactly my sentiments. PSS - Favre has a long way to go in MN. Everything's roses now but you know the time will come when the Vikings start leaking oil. They always do!! PSSS - as far as all the Lions, Bears, Vikings, Seahawks, jumping in GB threads - just proves that they're all wanna-be's. Go Pack! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
donhaas 18 Posted November 6, 2009 PSSS - as far as all the Lions, Bears, Vikings, Seahawks, jumping in GB threads - just proves that they're all wanna-be's. Go Pack! Combined Super Bowl wins (L,B,V,S) = 1 Packer Super Bowl wins = 3 Combined winning seasons in the last two decades = 18 Packer winning seasons in the last two decades = 18 Yes, 'nuff said :pointstosky: I was going to post the video to "Hey, Jealousy" but this one is actually even more appropriate for these tools... Check out Dennis DeYoung's strange finger gun keyboard move HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remote controller 143 Posted November 6, 2009 So you blocked out that 29 INT/4-12 season? HAHAHAAH Favre is great, at his old age, at reading defenses.... With no pressure on him, the defense keyed on AP and his defense keeping him well in the lead.... he is very good.... Put him in Rodgers situation, Favre would be terrible... It would hurt my eyes to see that again at his old age...We saw it a few years ago .... 29 INT/4-12 Rodgers > Favre and since Rodgers is almost a generation younger than Favre..... Rodgers >>>>>>>>>>> Favre Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
donhaas 18 Posted November 6, 2009 You will at least admit that Rodgers is younger than Favre, won't you?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMoney 0 Posted November 6, 2009 Bad. yep. ?? That's it... The only 2 comparable bad o-line situations Bad... yep HAHAHAHAAHAH You might as well stop talking now, BMoney... you've been exposed 4,059,382 posts about how Rodgers sucks with his 4,572, 32 TDs, and 4 INTs with a bad offensive line and one "bad....yep" about Favre's 29 INTs and 4-12 record with his bad offensive line Rodgers only in his second year; Favre was in his 13th..... 29 Thanks for playing maybe this was teds problem also....relying on stats from yesteryear to make a crucial decision.... you sure seem hung up on the 4-12 season....why no mention of 13-3? or the 10 measly wins SINCE that year?....you chose to downgrade at qb because of some 4-12 season? REALLY? you and sho are riding the same horse in this discussion...thinking thats its all aarons fault...no one said it was...hes a fine player.... but the main point is....he isnt brett...hasnt been and isnt....did the power at your house go out last week? did you miss the game? you can call the vikes all world if youd like...but you didnt fear them last year...what improvement did they make from last year? oh yeah....thats right....a top flight qb....now they ARE all world... luckly for you and ted, gb has played 3 of the worst teams in the league up to this point... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMoney 0 Posted November 6, 2009 Blindly follow? Nobody ever said you have to do that...and I don't recall anyone doing that (maybe in don's fishing attempts...but most know what he is going for).I don't question several other Packer fans fandom that question the management...I have questioned them on quite a bit. You take it to a troll like level and seem to enjoy the team losing. That and you simply never show any signs of being a fan...never did...you showed plenty of being a Hawks fan though...now, not so much on either really. Just a lot of whining and complaining. Come to think of it...are you sure you are not a woman? theres a lot of useless babble in that post..even worse than normal from you....and thanks, for being obsessed about how many posts I am making in certain threads..like i said..a bit obsessed... and feel free not to make any judgments based on post count...lol...but im glad u wasted part of your day counting.... why would i be whining? brett swept gb right out the door....these are good times...better times for the packers are coming..but not til TT is gone...this weekend helps that along... youve resorted to going to the seahawks and fan angle..grasping at straws.... stay on subject, skippy....think wonderboys playing sunday? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMoney 0 Posted November 6, 2009 Favre was...and is playing better right now.2005, 2006, 2008? Maybe not. But Favre right now is playing better than we have seen him play in quite some time. Id venture a guess that if he had been playing like this from when TT first came on the job until 2007 he may not have been supposedly pushed out the door. youre coming to your senses.... favres healthier than aaron is right now...are you shocked?.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted November 7, 2009 youre coming to your senses.... favres healthier than aaron is right now...are you shocked?.... If they switched Olines...I think that would switch around right now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
donhaas 18 Posted November 7, 2009 maybe this was teds problem also....relying on stats from yesteryear to make a crucial decision.... but the main point is....he isnt brett...hasnt been and isnt....did the power at your house go out last week? did you miss the game? I think you missed the main point.... TT is not evaluating how Brett will play with an awesome o-line, the best RB in the game, a top-5 defense, great special teams, etc. He's evaluating how he's going to play with the youngest team in the league and a shabby offensive line -- running around for his life and gunslinging.... the last time Favre did that (much younger and more talented than he currently is, mind you) we had 29 INTs/4-12 record Favre hasn't all of a sudden become a much better quarterback, he has just found himself in an ideal situation. Culpepper once found himself in an ideal situation and he went for 4,717, 38 TDs, and 11..... In less than ideal situations, Culpepper is a scrub. I journeyman.... [This is a key, key point that you can't come to grips with.... Dilfer is not > Marino.... he found himself in a situation that was much better than Marino's.... he's just one of 53 guys] There's no way that Favre would be doing as good as Rodgers is with this horrendous O-line.... and that's the bottom line.... Well, that and the fact that Favre is old and has no future in this league.... That's the point. Right decision was made. While I definitely don't want to see Favre with the Vikes, I definitely also don't want to see Favre hammered to the ground 100 times, tossing up 29 Ints and our last memory of him as a Packer a dejected, broken-down 4-12 man. I also don't want to see the Packers with no future. And without a quarterback, there is no present or future. Ask Detroit. Ask Chicago. Ask Minnesota both before Brett and after Brett (which will be soon). I understand you are trolling, but I think you've had your hat sufficiently handed to you at this point HTH! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
donhaas 18 Posted November 7, 2009 Please add "Ask Seattle" to that last post, too!! HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
