Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
itsbigmoni

This political madness has to stop - Woman kicked in the head by a guy

Recommended Posts

Look, you hom0 lib... she had a 14-inch bloody hunting knife in her hand and had killed 3 people already (or so I read in Maritime Sentry)... Hom0sexuals, as we all know, have superpowers when they are angry and are the ultimate killing machines... she needed to be put down and put down hard.

 

She's half of the Ambiguously Gay Duo. She does have superpowers. We should thank Carl and his Clan for protecting all of us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

is that what you say when you rough up your woman--she deserved it? scratch that, i'm sure you don't have a woman--and if you ever did she could probably kick your ass anyway.

 

:blink:

 

sorry, my bad. i think next time.

 

FTFY.

 

oh, and the problem with your little theory is that once SHE WAS DETAINED (if you will--in other words, "disarmed" lol) she was still getting her head stepped on by billy bob and the accosting only stopped when someone intervened--otherwise the inbred pot-bellied fock was going to do even more.

 

She was stepped on - and on her shoulder; not her head - while she was being detained. Quit whining about someone who was not cleared trying to bumrush a candidate getting treated harshly. She wasn't hurt; this was no big deal - and she deserved the treatment she received.

 

And swampdog: if you can't kick my @ss, how could a woman? :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

LOL.

 

Not convictions, hits. Wow. Dude, even though you're obtuse, you usually bring valid points. But using hits as proof? You're better than that. Use hits to prove me wrong. And i wouldnt' be surprised if there are more dems convicted than repubs. I don't think it'll be anything more than a 60-40 split either way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:blink:

 

 

 

FTFY.

 

 

 

She was stepped on - and on her shoulder; not her head - while she was being detained. Quit whining about someone who was not cleared trying to bumrush a candidate getting treated harshly. She wasn't hurt; this was no big deal - and she deserved the treatment she received.

 

And swampdog: if you can't kick my @ss, how could a woman? :lol:

 

I use to think you're on ok poster. Someone fun to go back and forth with. But the fact you're justifying the dudes actions is pathetic and proves you're just a partisan hack. Its mind boggling how some people can justify anything their party does.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL.

 

Not convictions, hits. Wow. Dude, even though you're obtuse, you usually bring valid points. But using hits as proof? You're better than that. Use hits to prove me wrong. And i wouldnt' be surprised if there are more dems convicted than repubs. I don't think it'll be anything more than a 60-40 split either way.

 

Um...hits are a great indication of the number of stories which exist about a topic. Since this topic is closely reflected by the links that I posted, I don't know how you could object.

 

It's plain as day that the Democrat Party is the party which is knee-deep in voter fraud; not the other way around. ACORN representatives have been convicted across the country for it.

 

There is no such parallel for Republican party operatives - sorry.

 

If you think there is a 60-40 split, you'll have to establish that. I don't buy your claim simply because you claimed it - that's why I posted just how many hits to convictions from each party exist. You - doubtless - won't wade into those links because you know what they'll show.

 

And as for thinking I'm a reasonable poster who makes good points? :lol:

 

Yes - that's why you've been disagreeing with me on every point. Sure, bigmoni: you used to love me, but you don't anymore. You'll pardon me while I call BS, won't you? :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use to think you're on ok poster. Someone fun to go back and forth with. But the fact you're justifying the dudes actions is pathetic and proves you're just a partisan hack. Its mind boggling how some people can justify anything their party does.

 

BTW: not to pile on by pointing out yet another thing about which you're wrong, but I'm not a Tea Party member.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Back during the 2000 Presidential campaign, I saw a woman holding a sign that said, "Gore's A Frickin Bore!!" She was standing outside of a hotel where Gore was hosting a fundraiser. She was just standind there holding the sign. Two of Gores men approached the lady and attempted to take her sign. She refused and began fighting with them. One of the men grabbed her arms and was violently shaking her while the other was holding her by the neck. She never let go of the sign and the two gave up when they were alerted that the media was filming them. The incident never made it on the news even though all three networks were there and were filming. She told the police what happend but they couldn't find or identify who the two men were. Gores people weren't cooperating.

 

Would that piss you off if you saw that? Would you try and help?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BTW: not to pile on by pointing out yet another thing about which you're wrong, but I'm not a Tea Party member.

 

Umm, never said you were.

 

Also, no, stories do not mean anything. You can have 10,000 bloggers talking about the same incident. I dont need a hits to convictions ratio. I just know you wont post actual convictions because it doesn't help your cause.

 

You're point is like saying, whoever has the highest rating, is always right. Transformers 2 is one of the greatest movies ever!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They could have more easily escorted her away. Even though what they did wasn't that bad really. I'm not down with anykind of violence if not absolutely needed. However why the hell was this broad wearing a wig and trying so hard to get close to a candidate with somekind of fake "award"? What did she expect would happen? Dumb all around.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use to think you're on ok poster. Someone fun to go back and forth with. But the fact you're justifying the dudes actions is pathetic and proves you're just a partisan hack. Its mind boggling how some people can justify anything their party does.

 

It's not surprising. To actually say that dude was wrong is to somehow admit the other side is right.....which is stupid. The guy was wrong....end of story.

 

And so was Little Miss Innocent :rolleyes: When you go to an event for the sole purpose of making a point, don't be surprised when things get out of hand. If you're going to play with fire, don't b!tch when you get burned. Sure, Toby Keith was out of line pumping his Keds on her head, but she's an idiot with an axe to grind and has to resort to gimmicks to get her point across.

 

She's dumb and righteous. Dude with the size tens is dumb and impulsive. It's really a non-issue....so let's quit making it one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Back during the 2000 Presidential campaign, I saw a woman holding a sign that said, "Gore's A Frickin Bore!!" She was standing outside of a hotel where Gore was hosting a fundraiser. She was just standind there holding the sign. Two of Gores men approached the lady and attempted to take her sign. She refused and began fighting with them. One of the men grabbed her arms and was violently shaking her while the other was holding her by the neck. She never let go of the sign and the two gave up when they were alerted that the media was filming them. The incident never made it on the news even though all three networks were there and were filming. She told the police what happend but they couldn't find or identify who the two men were. Gores people weren't cooperating.

 

Would that piss you off if you saw that? Would you try and help?

 

yes, it would piss me off. yes, i would try to help her. i'm not understanding how these actions are somehow right depending on the politics involved? no one is saying that. they're wrong all the time, no matter what the politics.

 

the idiots here who can't bring themselves to admit what happened to this woman was wrong look (as someone pointed out) partisan hacks. retarded ones at that.

 

i mean, we've got one of you people here who won't even admit she her head stepped on--despite the video evidence.

 

that's just beyond focked up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As with most things related to politics, both sides were/are wrong.

 

Those of you defending this dumb biatch are just as dumb as the those of you who are defending the guy stepping on her head.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

i mean, we've got one of you people here who won't even admit she her head stepped on--despite the video evidence.

 

 

 

"You people" Care to explain yourself on that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As with most things related to politics, both sides were/are wrong.

 

Those of you defending this dumb biatch are just as dumb as the those of you who are defending the guy stepping on her head.

 

Bingo.

I agree with pulling her away, detaining her and keeping her away from the candidate.

The moron who stepped on her head was idiotic.

She was idiotic.

Swampy is still idiotic.

But not shockingly he is again keeping himself to the geek club these days with the Lions sucking again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bingo.

I agree with pulling her away, detaining her and keeping her away from the candidate.

The moron who stepped on her head was idiotic.

She was idiotic.

Swampy is still idiotic.

But not shockingly he is again keeping himself to the geek club these days with the Lions sucking again.

you mean still

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Umm, never said you were.

 

Um...yes you did. This was your post:

 

I use to think you're on ok poster. Someone fun to go back and forth with. But the fact you're justifying the dudes actions is pathetic and proves you're just a partisan hack. Its mind boggling how some people can justify anything their party does.

 

That post was directed at me, and since this story was about Tea Party activity, claiming that I justify anything "their party" does is claiming that I am a Tea Party member. I am not.

 

If you want to convey something else, use more precise language in your posts.

 

Also, no, stories do not mean anything. You can have 10,000 bloggers talking about the same incident. I dont need a hits to convictions ratio. I just know you wont post actual convictions because it doesn't help your cause.

 

Huh? The hell it won't - and I already did. I posted every story about both Democratic and Republican operative convictions wrt Voter Fraud - you just didn't want to hear it.

 

Here are more specific hits for ACORN convictions for Voter Fraud. If you think you can counter that with your asserted ratio of 40/60, you are welcome to try.

 

In fact, I'll place a bet, bigmoni: let's see if you live up to your handle: $1000 if you can post 10 documentable convictions for voter fraud by Republicans for every 15 convictions I can post for Democrat voter fraud. $1000 - and as you can see by where I live, I can afford it.

 

Are you going to put your moni where your mouth is?

 

You're point is like saying, whoever has the highest rating, is always right. Transformers 2 is one of the greatest movies ever!!!!

 

Huh?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally saw the video. Good Lord. I'd fill up a pillow case with soup cans and pulverize her skull. Are all dykes this stupid and needy? No wonder they get rejected by men their whole life.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Link

 

Yea yea, the link is biased and it keeps saying Rand Paul supporters. To me, thats not an issue. The bigger thing is one guy held a woman down while another kicked/stepped on her head, over a disagreement on politics. Thats disturbing in many ways. Whether its tea partiers or commies, they need to speak out when their own supporters do dumb sh1t like this.

 

No commentary about the other side of this, which would assert that if you want to stop the insanity, how about you criticize this bull dyke NOW member for actually disrupting a Tea Party rally with her antagonistic bullsh!t? Did she actually go into that charade not expecting to pay a price, as well as being additionally stupid about provoking the reaction that would be appropriate for a terrorist/assassin?

 

Nope. This biotch got what was coming to her. In fact, I'm guessing she relied on the common decency of people found in those rallies - which, in another place and circumstance, would have resulted in her death.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No commentary about the other side of this, which would assert that if you want to stop the insanity, how about you criticize this bull dyke NOW member for actually disrupting a Tea Party rally with her antagonistic bullsh!t? Did she actually go into that charade not expecting to pay a price, as well as being additionally stupid about provoking the reaction that would be appropriate for a terrorist/assassin?

 

Nope. This biotch got what was coming to her. In fact, I'm guessing she relied on the common decency of people found in those rallies - which, in another place and circumstance, would have resulted in her death.

 

Exercise your right to free speech and you deserve a beatdown - got it. :cheers:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Exercise your right to free speech and you deserve a beatdown - got it. :cheers:

If they only had some black panthers there to maintain the peace.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they only had some black panthers there to maintain the peace.

 

Because Black Panthers exist, this woman deserves to get a beatdown by Rand Paul's proud defenders of the Constitution - gotcha. :cheers:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because Black Panthers exist, this woman deserves to get a beatdown by Rand Paul's proud defenders of the Constitution - gotcha. :cheers:

No because she went there in disguise to attempt an assault on a candidate she did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No because she went there in disguise to attempt an assault on a candidate she did.

 

Trying to get her picture taken with Rand Paul = assault and she deserves to get kicked in the head, excellent point. :cheers:

 

By the way, the guy who kicked her was fired from Paul's campaign. I wonder why they didn't give him a medal for foiling that attempted assault? :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trying to get her picture taken with Rand Paul = assault and she deserves to get kicked in the head, excellent point. :cheers:

 

By the way, the guy who kicked her was fired from Paul's campaign. I wonder why they didn't give him a medal for foiling that attempted assault? :dunno:

If he was a democrat and her a republican he would have gotten a job in the white house.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If he was a democrat and her a republican he would have gotten a job in the white house.

 

Because you don't like Democrats and think they're corrupt it's OK to kick a woman in the head while she's being held down - yet another excellent point from Professor Drobeski. :cheers:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because you don't like Democrats and think they're corrupt it's OK to kick a woman in the head while she's being held down - yet another excellent point from Professor Drobeski. :cheers:

Yes when they are in disguise trying to get at a candidate with unknown intent. Yes yes yes....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes when they are in disguise trying to get at a candidate with unknown intent. Yes yes yes....

 

Then I wonder why Rand Paul's campaign fired that guy? Where's his medal of honor for taking out a potential assassin? :rolleyes:

 

Sorry drob, it is never acceptable for a guy to step on a woman's head while she's being restrained. Real men and grown-ups know this. :cheers:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Then I wonder why Rand Paul's campaign fired that guy? Where's his medal of honor for taking out a potential assassin? :rolleyes:

 

Sorry drob, it is never acceptable for a guy to step on a woman's head while she's being restrained. Real men and grown-ups know this. :cheers:

Absolutely, it was a symbolically moronic move. The reality is that it is a non issue. She wasn't injured.

 

This broad has been arrested several times for out of control demonstrations. She has a long rap sheet. Which begs the question as to what the threat really is when a repeat criminal dresses in disguise and attempts access at a public figure.

 

 

She should have been immediately tazed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Then I wonder why Rand Paul's campaign fired that guy? Where's his medal of honor for taking out a potential assassin? :rolleyes:

 

Sorry drob, it is never acceptable for a guy to step on a woman's head while she's being restrained. Real men and grown-ups know this. :cheers:

The only way anyone was gonna know that was a woman was to pull her pants down.

Also she has a history of this nonsense....also look at this.

http://www.breitbart.tv/video-proof-left-wing-activist-lied-about-events-leading-up-to-incident-at-rand-rally/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Then I wonder why Rand Paul's campaign fired that guy? Where's his medal of honor for taking out a potential assassin? :rolleyes:

 

Sorry drob, it is never acceptable for a guy to step on a woman's head while she's being restrained. Real men and grown-ups know this. :cheers:

Besides guys that listen to duran duran and wear eyeliner really have no business defining real men.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Exercise your right to free speech and you deserve a beatdown - got it. :cheers:

 

Please explain how the "right to free speech" has no limitations. Do you require examples of such limitations so that you can withdraw your claim?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only way anyone was gonna know that was a woman was to pull her pants down.

Also she has a history of this nonsense....also look at this.

http://www.breitbart.tv/video-proof-left-wing-activist-lied-about-events-leading-up-to-incident-at-rand-rally/

 

I know she had a history of this nonsense but there is NO excuse under any circumstances to kick someone in the head while they're down, and that's why Rand Paul's campaign fired this joker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please explain how the "right to free speech" has no limitations. Do you require examples of such limitations so that you can withdraw your claim?

 

I never made that claim, Mensa Pilot. :cheers:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

but there is NO excuse under any circumstances to kick someone in the head while they're down

 

Fock you, fockstick. No true Philadelphia citizen would ever type out something so pussie, you pussie. Go drink a gallon of man yogurt and do some jumping jacks so you can enjoy the taste over and over again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I never made that claim, Mensa Pilot. :cheers:

 

Sure you did, MDC: you claimed a defense of this woman's treatment was her right to exercise free speech. You didn't put any qualifiers on such a right, even though obvious qualifiers exist - including accepting responsibility for the consequences of the exercise of such a purported right.

 

In this case, there is no right to disrupt a gathering of this type, just as there is no right for me to barge into a wedding and start screaming, claiming it is my right to free speech to do so.

 

You just don't seem able to acknowledge that, and preferred sophistry and bumper sticker slogans.

 

wtf is Mensa Pilot?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure you did, MDC: you claimed a defense of this woman's treatment was her right to exercise free speech.

 

No, I didn't. In fact I did the opposite and said her treatment was indefensible regardless of what she said. She should've been removed from the event, forcibly if necessary. There was no reason for that guy to then step on her head while she was being restrained.

 

That's why Rand Paul's campaign fired him. :cheers:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I didn't. In fact I did the opposite and said her treatment was indefensible regardless of what she said. She should've been removed from the event, forcibly if necessary. There was no reason for that guy to then step on her head while she was being restrained.

 

That's why Rand Paul's campaign fired him. :cheers:

I think its indefensible that saboteurs are allowed free reign to disrupt the rightful gathering of people. She had no business there, if she doesn't support Paul, she can voice that dissent at the voting booth.

 

Attempting to take the process into her own hands is wrong and should be duly punished.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Teaparty jerks. They beat up women and handicapped people. This country is in big trouble if these whackos takeover.

Funny I couldn't find your thread from 2008 condemning your lefty wacko buddies:

 

The protest march had been billed by the organizers (Coalition to March on the RNC and End the War) as likely to attract 50,000 participants. Estimates from observers suggest the actual turnout was more like 5,000 to 10,000. A good thing, considering the unpleasant turn which the gathering took very quickly. The mainstream media has largely downplayed the level of violence which took place on Monday, hesitant to admit that it was a full-blown riot. But reports from bloggers and other sources paint a very ugly picture.

 

Everything started out as planned, with participants marching and waving signs in the 90 degree heat through downtown St. Paul. As the march began to wind down the violence began, with one group setting up a human chain in the middle of the highway off-ramp servicing the downtown area around the convention center. As buses bearing delegates were brought to a standstill, protesters threw bricks, rocks, bottles and bags of concrete on them from an overpass, breaking windows and terrorizing the passengers, including prominent blogger Gateway Pundit. A video interview with some of the victims is available.

 

Some protesters set up roadblocks to keep the police from interfering, while about 200 black-clad and masked anarchists smashed windows in local stores and a bank, tipped over newspaper boxes, lit a dumpster on fire and pushed it into a police car and flipped heavy concrete garbage bins onto the sidewalk, and scattered bent nails and other makeshift caltrops to puncture the tires of cars entering the area. Some of these actions were attributed to Funk the War, a militant offshoot of Students for a Democratic Society.

 

 

 

Read more: http://blogcritics.org/politics/article/peace-protesters-riot-at-the-gop/#ixzz13ajUDrTg

:thumbsdown:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think its indefensible that saboteurs are allowed free reign to disrupt the rightful gathering of people. She had no business there, if she doesn't support Paul, she can voice that dissent at the voting booth.

 

Attempting to take the process into her own hands is wrong and should be duly punished.

 

Whether she had any right to attend, I don't know. I don't know whether she was required to sign a loyalty oath of some kind or if this event was open to the public. I've already said she should've been escorted, forcibly if necessary.

 

But it is indefensible to step on her head while she's being restrained. Rand Paul knows it and that's why he fired that guy from his campaign. Apparently you guys are so partisan that you'll defend goons who assault defenseless women.

 

That reveals nothing about the tea party or Paul but it says a LOT about guys like you and MensaMind. :cheers:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×