gcmmidwest 98 Posted September 22, 2011 News: According to the Arizona Republic, RB Beanie Wells apparently suffered a hamstring injury in practice on Thursday, but there is no word on how serious this injury is. grab chester or am i jumping the gun...? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gcmmidwest 98 Posted September 22, 2011 the one who waits masterbaits...!!! hamstrings just don't heal over nite ...i'm grabbing him Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
montana 89 Posted September 22, 2011 Then why'd u ask? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gcmmidwest 98 Posted September 22, 2011 Then why'd u ask? it was marinating..!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ashwiggins 0 Posted September 22, 2011 injuryexpert "Limited at practice. Sources say he'll play, but will be a GTD.” Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted September 22, 2011 Fock; never rains but it pours. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kent 228 Posted September 22, 2011 Howlings is out too right? I grabbed Chester. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RunningGood 0 Posted September 22, 2011 I was thrilled with my starting RBs listed below - now I am 0-2 - and hamstrings are not helping matters. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shakespeare 0 Posted September 22, 2011 For what it's worth: "Whisenhunt won't be available to discuss Wells' injury until Friday. I don't think reporters will find out much even then. My guess? It's not a severe injury. Wells didn't have the leg wrapped as he came off the field, and he was at his locker for a portion of the media availability period." http://www.azcentral.com/members/Blog/KentSomers/142888 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cribdog 0 Posted September 22, 2011 Looks like Vick is gonna play, so dropped earlier speculation Kafka for newer speculation Chester!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
madd futher mucker 36 Posted September 22, 2011 You guys must have no waiver restrictions and not much depth to pick up Chester Taylor. Not only did Taylor show absolutely no burst last year in Chicago, but The Arizona Republic's Kent Somers believes Beanie Wells' hamstring injury is likely minor. He reported that Wells did not have his leg wrapped as he came off the field on Thursday and made himself available to the media afterward. Per Rotoworld: "Chester Tayor would probably start against the Seahawks if Wells can't play Sunday, but LaRod Stephens-Howling would also be in line for a few carries as long as his injured hand checks out. Neither would be a recommended play against a Seahawks' run defense that has been stout early on this season." IMO no real fantasy news here, other than Beanie strained his mangina again as most predicted he would. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 5,893 Posted September 22, 2011 Trade him for Foster. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
msudavedawg 5 Posted September 22, 2011 IMO no real fantasy news here, other than Beanie strained his mangina again as most predicted he would. Exactly my thought. It's desert country after all so you figure he's gonna get some sand up there once in a while. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shakespeare 0 Posted September 23, 2011 https://twitter.com/#!/BeanieWells26/status/117004854873952256 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gcmmidwest 98 Posted September 23, 2011 You guys must have no waiver restrictions and not much depth to pick up Chester Taylor. Not only did Taylor show absolutely no burst last year in Chicago, but The Arizona Republic's Kent Somers believes Beanie Wells' hamstring injury is likely minor. He reported that Wells did not have his leg wrapped as he came off the field on Thursday and made himself available to the media afterward. Per Rotoworld: "Chester Tayor would probably start against the Seahawks if Wells can't play Sunday, but LaRod Stephens-Howling would also be in line for a few carries as long as his injured hand checks out. Neither would be a recommended play against a Seahawks' run defense that has been stout early on this season." IMO no real fantasy news here, other than Beanie strained his mangina again as most predicted he would. no it's just when you got d. williams ...,knowson moreno & shonn greene for your starting backs that have scored nothing for you ...you cant help to panic...so i'm reaching a little ...!!! ok alot Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
madd futher mucker 36 Posted September 23, 2011 no it's just when you got d. williams ...,knowson moreno & shonn greene for your starting backs that have scored nothing for you ...you cant help to panic...so i'm reaching a little ...!!! ok alot Like Judge Judy used to say when women biotched about their deadbeat husbands: "You picked 'em" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JT 137 Posted September 23, 2011 Neither would be a recommended play against a Seahawks' run defense that has been stout early on this season." Wells will play...though he's always a good candidate to grab his hammy and quit in warmups...but no AZ RB is a good play vs Seattle. Run defense is the one thing they do really well. This is a division opponent, and Seattle is a team desperate for a win. Their greatest weakness, the passing game, should have it's best day of the year vs the Cardinals "defense". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cavern 70 Posted September 23, 2011 Wells will play...though he's always a good candidate to grab his hammy and quit in warmups...but no AZ RB is a good play vs Seattle. Run defense is the one thing they do really well. This is a division opponent, and Seattle is a team desperate for a win. Their greatest weakness, the passing game, should have it's best day of the year vs the Cardinals "defense". i agree with your assessment, but not with your confidence that he will play. i've never known a hamstring injury to heal this quickly. occassionally someone can feel tightness in their hamstring and know that, if they keep going, it will strain. that's the only chance here, is that all he felt was that imminent injury. otherwise, if there was an injury, i doubt he'll make it through the game Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JT 137 Posted September 23, 2011 i agree with your assessment, but not with your confidence that he will play. i've never known a hamstring injury to heal this quickly. occassionally someone can feel tightness in their hamstring and know that, if they keep going, it will strain. that's the only chance here, is that all he felt was that imminent injury. otherwise, if there was an injury, i doubt he'll make it through the game It doesn't appear to be an injury. Wells tweeted last night that he came out to "rest his wheels". All the local reports are that it's a non-issue. AZ can't afford to lose what they see as a winnable division road game. If he can walk, he'll play. But as I said, it doesn't matter. Any AZ RB is a bad play this week. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kent 228 Posted September 23, 2011 The one good thing about Chester is, he's gotta have the freshest legs in the NFL. When was the last time he had to carry a load? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skinny_Bastard 154 Posted September 23, 2011 Wells will play...though he's always a good candidate to grab his hammy and quit in warmups...but no AZ RB is a good play vs Seattle. Run defense is the one thing they do really well. This is a division opponent, and Seattle is a team desperate for a win. Their greatest weakness, the passing game, should have it's best day of the year vs the Cardinals "defense". Seattle has the 22nd racked rush D last year. They give up 118.9 rushing yard per game. In 2011, they are giving up 104... HOW THE HELL DO YOU SAY THEY DO REALLY WELL defending the run!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Durka Durka? 2 Posted September 23, 2011 Seattle has the 22nd racked rush D last year. They give up 118.9 rushing yard per game. In 2011, they are giving up 104... HOW THE HELL DO YOU SAY THEY DO REALLY WELL defending the run!!! They probably are holding opponents to a small YPC. But that doesnt matter much when the opponent always has a huge lead and therefore runs 30 times a game. Start Wells if healthy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DexterMorgan 5 Posted September 23, 2011 Any reports on if he was in practice today? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RicemanX 20 Posted September 23, 2011 Seattle has the 22nd racked rush D last year. They give up 118.9 rushing yard per game. In 2011, they are giving up 104... HOW THE HELL DO YOU SAY THEY DO REALLY WELL defending the run!!! Saying they are bad at playing the run because they give up 104 yards rushing per game this seasion is pretty damn deceiving. I watched them vs the Niners and they did a damn good job containing Frank Gore. They kept the Niners to only 2.7 ypc. I didn't watch them vs the Steelers, but the steelers ran the ball 35 times with 3.5 ypc. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
miamidolphins89 0 Posted September 23, 2011 Saying they are bad at playing the run because they give up 104 yards rushing per game this seasion is pretty damn deceiving. I watched them vs the Niners and they did a damn good job containing Frank Gore. They kept the Niners to only 2.7 ypc. I didn't watch them vs the Steelers, but the steelers ran the ball 35 times with 3.5 ypc. Ok... sounds to me like the Seahawks are a pretty good matchup for any RB. They may have a decent run defense, but their offense can't do squat and they'll be playing from behind all year. Also, when the Steelers are up 24-0, it is no secret that they are going to run the ball, and defenses don't have to worry about the pass. Players don't get fantasy points for yards per carry. Arizona may try to take advantage of a weak Seahawk secondary, but will likely play with a lead for most of this one. If Beanie is healthy, he should be in line for plenty of touches. If he gets 2.5 ypc or 5 ypc, he should still put up decent numbers and has a pretty good chance to score a TD. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RicemanX 20 Posted September 23, 2011 Im predicting 70 yards rushing, 0 TDs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Durka Durka? 2 Posted September 23, 2011 Im predicting 100 yards rushing, 2 TDs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RicemanX 20 Posted September 23, 2011 Scratch my prediction. I'm going with: 3 tackles, 2 doubles, 2 steals, 8 assists. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mont71 2 Posted September 23, 2011 the YPC allowed by seattle includes about 6 kneel downs... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
harry_hood 1 Posted September 23, 2011 Scratch my prediction. I'm going with: 3 tackles, 2 doubles, 2 steals, 8 assists. I'm really feeling an unassisted triple play. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Nice 40 Posted September 23, 2011 Im predicting 70 yards rushing, 0 TDs. Wells will get in the endzone every game Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Texas10 15 Posted September 23, 2011 Wells will get in the endzone every game Why do you have to go and make comments like that, now I'm about to bench Bradshaw for him... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cavern 70 Posted September 23, 2011 Why do you have to go and make comments like that, now I'm about to bench Bradshaw for him... don't overreact until has says he'll have the ball with him when he gets there Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JT 137 Posted September 23, 2011 Seattle has the 22nd racked rush D last year. They give up 118.9 rushing yard per game. In 2011, they are giving up 104... HOW THE HELL DO YOU SAY THEY DO REALLY WELL defending the run!!! This season they're 15th, giving up a long of 20 yds. Their ypc of 3.1 is tied for third best in the league. They've had more attempts against them than all but 4 teams. They've trailed virtually every minute while teams have ground it out against them. They held Gore to 59 yds and a 2.7 ypc in week one. Pittsburgh got way ahead way early at home and still only managed about 125 yds on the ground. Sometimes you'll find that this year is more pertinent than last year, and that a look behind the basic numbers into what's really happening in the games would be beneficial. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RicemanX 20 Posted September 23, 2011 Wells will get in the endzone every game hahah, if he finishes the season with anything more than 6 TDs, I will be shocked out of my mind. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Nice 40 Posted September 23, 2011 hahah, if he finishes the season with anything more than 6 TDs, I will be shocked out of my mind. He is a third of the way there with 14 games left? Be prepared to be shocked Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DexterMorgan 5 Posted September 23, 2011 GTD according to Wisenhunt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skinny_Bastard 154 Posted September 23, 2011 Saying they are bad at playing the run because they give up 104 yards rushing per game this seasion is pretty damn deceiving. I watched them vs the Niners and they did a damn good job containing Frank Gore. They kept the Niners to only 2.7 ypc. I didn't watch them vs the Steelers, but the steelers ran the ball 35 times with 3.5 ypc. Read what i wrote again. I didn't say they DO BAD, but to say they DO well is deceiving. This isn't even a TOP 10 rushing defense in the league. I can wager my number 1 fantasy football pick next year for anyone's 2nd rounder if Seattle finishes in the top 10 on rushing D this year. Any takers? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skinny_Bastard 154 Posted September 23, 2011 This season they're 15th, giving up a long of 20 yds. Their ypc of 3.1 is tied for third best in the league. They've had more attempts against them than all but 4 teams. They've trailed virtually every minute while teams have ground it out against them. They held Gore to 59 yds and a 2.7 ypc in week one. Pittsburgh got way ahead way early at home and still only managed about 125 yds on the ground. Sometimes you'll find that this year is more pertinent than last year, and that a look behind the basic numbers into what's really happening in the games would be beneficial. When you are ahead as much as Pitts were in that game, you can afford to STACK the box because you know Mike Tomlin won't be airing it out like Brady and corp. YAC isn't going to explain jack. We'll see at the end of the year what the numbers are. They finished 22dn overall last year. Was there any significant upgrade on D? I know their Offense is going to hell this year which means D will be on the field even more. Also, after 2 games they already given up 3 rushing TD. They're on pace to give up 24 rushing TD. That can't be good... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
