Sho Nuff 720 Posted March 31, 2014 Everyone knows it's the Diebold machines. Only the idiots who would have claimed that... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted March 31, 2014 This thread isn't about fraud, snot bubbles. Rocky was a fraud Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted March 31, 2014 Im shocked snuffy hasnt called out hack worms for posting such a hack thread using a known hack bias source as his ammo. Kinda hackish not to call out the hackness of this thread. Dontcha think, hack ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,486 Posted March 31, 2014 Im shocked snuffy hasnt called out hack worms for posting such a hack thread using a known hack bias source as his ammo. Kinda hackish not to call out the hackness of this thread. Dontcha think, hack ? tilt! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,566 Posted March 31, 2014 I have no problem requiring people to show ID to vote. Voting is a cornerstone of democracy. We should take every precaution possible to mitigate fraud and abuse of the voting process. As long as every vote is verifiable I don't care how or when they are cast. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted March 31, 2014 I have no problem requiring people to show ID to vote. Voting is a cornerstone of democracy. We should take every precaution possible to mitigate fraud and abuse of the voting process. As long as every vote is verifiable I don't care how or when they are cast.thats racist Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mungwater 597 Posted March 31, 2014 I have no problem requiring people to show ID to vote. Voting is a cornerstone of democracy. We should take every precaution possible to mitigate fraud and abuse of the voting process. As long as every vote is verifiable I don't care how or when they are cast. I don't understand how anyone can be against that, what I always loved is when people say it will disenfranchise the voters, what the hell does that mean? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,566 Posted March 31, 2014 I don't understand how anyone can be against that, what I always loved is when people say it will disenfranchise the voters, what the hell does that mean?Exactly. How is making sure every vote is legit going to turn people away from the voting booth? It makes no sense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,254 Posted March 31, 2014 Not their first, or worst, attempt to mitigate the fact that they continue to align to a diminishing group of voters. Some time ago there was a Republic effort to promote legistlation, I think it was in Va, that people should get extra votes for owning land etc.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 31, 2014 Not their first, or worst, attempt to mitigate the fact that they continue to align to a diminishing group of voters. Some time ago there was a Republic effort to promote legistlation, I think it was in Va, that people should get extra votes for owning land etc.... This is it in a nutshell. The Repubs and the wealth in this country are eliminating the middle class and creating HUGE divides in earnings. They have no problem giving themselves huge raises and bonuses while laying off as many people as possible and limiting raises to everyone else. The perfect plan....except for one pesky thing...elections. These damn downtrodden lowlives still get the same amount of votes as Mr. CEO. And that keeps getting those damn Democrats elected. Boofuckinghoo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phillybear 366 Posted March 31, 2014 I don't understand how anyone can be against that, what I always loved is when people say it will disenfranchise the voters, what the hell does that mean? :ChipChipperson: Tsss. Tsss. That's like when you like talk bad about a sports team or sumptin'. Tsss. Tsss. :ChipChipperson: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 31, 2014 I don't understand how anyone can be against that, what I always loved is when people say it will disenfranchise the voters, what the hell does that mean? If you're talking about the voter ID thing, I don't believe I've seen many fighting against that. It's the eliminating weekends and other time narrowing attempts that reeks of desperation on the Republican's part. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mungwater 597 Posted March 31, 2014 :ChipChipperson: Tsss. Tsss. That's like when you like talk bad about a sports team or sumptin'. Tsss. Tsss. :ChipChipperson: You even copy chip? You really need to find your own style instead of copying everything jimmy does Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phillybear 366 Posted March 31, 2014 You even copy chip? You really need to find your own style instead of copying everything jimmy does It was an homage, I referenced the source, and I knew you'd get the reference. Mission accomplished. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,254 Posted March 31, 2014 This is it in a nutshell. The Repubs and the wealth in this country are eliminating the middle class and creating HUGE divides in earnings. They have no problem giving themselves huge raises and bonuses while laying off as many people as possible and limiting raises to everyone else. The perfect plan....except for one pesky thing...elections. These damn downtrodden lowlives still get the same amount of votes as Mr. CEO. And that keeps getting those damn Democrats elected. Boofuckinghoo Exactly. If instead of masturbating to their extravagant salaries and bonuses they spread some of that money to the employee's they effectively expand the Republican voter base. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted March 31, 2014 Im shocked snuffy hasnt called out hack worms for posting such a hack thread using a known hack bias source as his ammo. Kinda hackish not to call out the hackness of this thread. Dontcha think, hack ? Its hackish to discuss poor laws set forth by the republicans now? Interesting. BTW...do you think voting hours should be limited? If so, why? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted March 31, 2014 Its hackish to discuss poor laws set forth by the republicans now? Interesting. BTW...do you think voting hours should be limited? If so, why? yes to prevent laqueefa and her type from voting more than once per election. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mungwater 597 Posted March 31, 2014 This is it in a nutshell. The Repubs and the wealth in this country are eliminating the middle class and creating HUGE divides in earnings. They have no problem giving themselves huge raises and bonuses while laying off as many people as possible and limiting raises to everyone else. The perfect plan....except for one pesky thing...elections. These damn downtrodden lowlives still get the same amount of votes as Mr. CEO. And that keeps getting those damn Democrats elected. Boofuckinghoo http://www.chron.com/news/article/Party-of-the-rich-In-Congress-it-s-the-Democrats-5363121.php?cmpid=hpts Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted March 31, 2014 yes to prevent laqueefa and her type from voting more than once per election. Yeah...no hack there...you just keep hanging on to the person claiming they voted that many times...it seems to be all you have. How will limiting voting hours prevent such a thing? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted March 31, 2014 Yeah...no hack there...you just keep hanging on to the person claiming they voted that many times...it seems to be all you have. How will limiting voting hours prevent such a thing? shell need time to spend her ebt points, having her vote 12 times will reduce this time and thats bad for the economy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phurfur 70 Posted March 31, 2014 More stupid lefty logic: Open borders Cradle to grave entitlements No check of citizenship to vote Yes, this will end well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crackattack 520 Posted March 31, 2014 Voter ID=great Trying to stop voter fraud=great Limiting times people can vote=suspect. Like I said earlier. People can try to adjust to the rules/laws and vote out these lawmakers. It is what it is. Do I think they should shrink voting times...no. This will affect republicans also, to think working middle class republicans or even poor republicans won't have troubles with this would be incorrect and just plain biased. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted March 31, 2014 shell need time to spend her ebt points, having her vote 12 times will reduce this time and thats bad for the economy. So, you can't actually answer the question. Pretty typical...again, there is a reason I call you a hack, and you prove it every single day on this board. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted March 31, 2014 More stupid lefty logic: Open borders Cradle to grave entitlements No check of citizenship to vote Yes, this will end well. Why do you all keep getting hung up on the ID part that people don't seem to be arguing against in this topic? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted March 31, 2014 Voter ID=great Trying to stop voter fraud=great Limiting times people can vote=suspect. Like I said earlier. People can try to adjust to the rules/laws and vote out these lawmakers. It is what it is. Do I think they should shrink voting times...no. This will affect republicans also, to think working middle class republicans or even poor republicans won't have troubles with this would be incorrect and just plain biased. Thats because you are a reasonable person...unlike the hacks in here who keep bringing up only voter ID...or the person who claimed they voted 6 times. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crackattack 520 Posted March 31, 2014 Thats because you are a reasonable person...unlike the hacks in here who keep bringing up only voter ID...or the person who claimed they voted 6 times. Blindly fallowing party lines is extremely bad. I think we have a handful of so called republicans, that probably walk in to vote and pull straight ticket. I think those type of voters are just as bad as uninformed voters. It goes to the lefties that do it too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,566 Posted March 31, 2014 LA MESA, Calif. - A local couple called 10News concerned after they received an envelope from the state's Obamacare website, Covered California. Inside was a letter discussing voter registration and a registration card pre-marked with an "x" in the box next to Democratic Party. The couple – who did not want their identity revealed – received the letter and voter registration card from their health insurance provider Covered California, the state-run agency that implements President Obama's Affordable Care Act. They have lived in La Mesa for years and they have always been registered to vote Republican. Now, they are perplexed as to how the voter registration card pre-marked Democrat ended up in their mailbox. “I'm an old guy and I never would have noticed it, except I have an accountant that notices every dot and dash on a piece of paper as a wife,” said the man who received the mailer. Covered California began mailing out voter signup cards to nearly 4 million enrollees last week after being threatened with a lawsuit by voting rights groups. But that does not explain the pre-filled out voter registration card. “It's a waste of money because there's an awful lot of people who are going to get this that are already registered and they don't need to. I can see that, but I can't see putting x on the form before it's given to me in a little bitty box that nobody's really going to notice,” said the recipient of the mailer. 10News shared what was sent with Covered California. Spokeswoman Anne Gonzales stated, "We are mailing voter registration material. However, the application forms come directly from the Secretary of State's office, with no fields pre-marked. The individual should contact the Secretary of State, which takes these violations of election law extremely seriously, and they will investigate, using the unique serial number." The couple says they did reach out to the Secretary of State’s office and could not get a hold of anyone. They also say they reached out to the San Diego County Registrar of Voters, which told them to contact Covered California. http://www.10news.com/news/local-couple-upset-after-receiving-pre-marked-voter-registration-card-from-covered-california-03282014 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted March 31, 2014 http://www.10news.com/news/local-couple-upset-after-receiving-pre-marked-voter-registration-card-from-covered-california-03282014 Hacks ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crackattack 520 Posted March 31, 2014 Google republican voter fraud and you'll find plenty of links. I just did. It's amazing both parties cheat, lie, steal. I'm shocked to learn this. Shocked I say!! Eta: one goes as far as saying the right does it more then the left. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Googballz 39 Posted March 31, 2014 Google republican voter fraud and you'll find plenty of links. I just did. It's amazing both parties cheat, lie, steal. I'm shocked to learn this. Shocked I say!! Eta: one goes as far as saying the right does it more then the left. Only one party is pushing legislation to address the issue. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,058 Posted March 31, 2014 You know, it doesn't surprise me that a political party--any political party--would stoop pretty focking low to win elections. I wasn't born yesterday. But actively trying to prevent people from exercising their most basic democratic right to choose their representatives? Isn't ANYTHING sacred anymore? For shame Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crackattack 520 Posted March 31, 2014 Only one party is pushing legislation to address the issue. I know. What's your point. I said fixing voter fraud is great. So what's the point of all these links to democrats and voting fraud? Do people not want to admit that both sides do it? Republicans are just as bad. A woman in Virginia had 36 counts of voter fraud and over 4000 unaccounted voters. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Googballz 39 Posted March 31, 2014 Hey kid, you are trying to hard to hide this as a fishing expedition. I understand the immediate drumming you took forced your hand, but this is a poor effort on your part. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Googballz 39 Posted March 31, 2014 I know. What's your point. That one party recognizes the problem and is trying to fix it, and the other party is opposing any fixes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phurfur 70 Posted March 31, 2014 Google republican voter fraud and you'll find plenty of links. I just did. It's amazing both parties cheat, lie, steal. I'm shocked to learn this. Shocked I say!! Eta: one goes as far as saying the right does it more then the left. Vote Libertarian Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,058 Posted March 31, 2014 Voter ID=great Trying to stop voter fraud=great Limiting times people can vote=suspect. Like I said earlier. People can try to adjust to the rules/laws and vote out these lawmakers. It is what it is. Do I think they should shrink voting times...no. This will affect republicans also, to think working middle class republicans or even poor republicans won't have troubles with this would be incorrect and just plain biased. So you can see that some of these laws are "suspect." I appreciate that. But let me ask you this: if some of them are "suspect" in that they're clearly aimed at putting up roadblocks for people exercising their right to vote, can you really trust the intent behind other seemingly-rational voter ID laws? Clearly certain politicians will do anything to suppress the vote that may be unfavorable to them, and that INCLUDES the use of voter ID laws. Not to mention that voter ID laws are supposedly intended to fix a problem that doesn't actually exist. In-person vote fraud is almost completely nonexistent. So again, if the problem isn't real then what is the MOTIVE behind these laws? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 31, 2014 Hey kid, you are trying to hard to hide this as a fishing expedition. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,058 Posted March 31, 2014 My advice is to ignore that particular troll. It's well-established that, much like his predecessor handle, he brings nothing whatsoever to the table. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,566 Posted March 31, 2014 I know. What's your point. I said fixing voter fraud is great. So what's the point of all these links to democrats and voting fraud? Do people not want to admit that both sides do it? Republicans are just as bad. A woman in Virginia voted, I think 36 times, to make sure newt Gingrich got put on parties presidential ticket. I didn't google "democrat voter fraud". I actually happened upon that article this morning and thought it applied to this thread, albeit in a round about way. If there is voter registration fraud, you can bet there is actual voter fraud. Anything we can do to eliminate said fraud should be considered in my opinion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites