kutulu 1,659 Posted June 2, 2014 Now I Know Alf Isnt Appr Guy But I Like Him Alot here. nice pick Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dehaven123 31 Posted June 2, 2014 Delay has Andre Ellington as his #1 RB. Good luck with that. When you need a RB I like Dez and Alshon. shots fired! shots fired! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dehaven123 31 Posted June 2, 2014 shots fired! shots fired! u know no one trades with me anyways. all i get is moz's shitty offers every wk. he's still tryn to sell me girl micheal as lynch's 'handcuff'. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WhiteWonder 2,681 Posted June 2, 2014 ellington is 1 of 2 other players i was considering when i took Vereen. as i privately told delay, I feel i know what im getting from Vereen. a fairly set role in the passing game with the possibility of an expanded role in the run game. Ellington has all the promise in the world but a less clear picture of role / how he can handle a bigger workload. very well might have grabbed ellington is vereen was off the board. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 2,136 Posted June 2, 2014 Well the two players I really wanted are gone. I thought at least one would fall for sure. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WhiteWonder 2,681 Posted June 2, 2014 Well the two players I really wanted are gone. I thought at least one would fall for sure. thats when u know its time to pop a defense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dehaven123 31 Posted June 2, 2014 ellington is 1 of 2 other players i was considering when i took Vereen. as i privately told delay, I feel i know what im getting from Vereen. a fairly set role in the passing game with the possibility of an expanded role in the run game. Ellington has all the promise in the world but a less clear picture of role / how he can handle a bigger workload. very well might have grabbed ellington is vereen was off the board. i swing for the fences. my track record says im good. i trust me some me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gepetto 1,297 Posted June 2, 2014 ellington is 1 of 2 other players i was considering when i took Vereen. as i privately told delay, I feel i know what im getting from Vereen. a fairly set role in the passing game with the possibility of an expanded role in the run game. Ellington has all the promise in the world but a less clear picture of role / how he can handle a bigger workload. very well might have grabbed ellington is vereen was off the board. You might need to trade for a RB #2 as well. I had Vereen way down my list. We'll see. I actually like Vereen and Ellington's talent, but worry about their slight frames and workload they will be given. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 2,136 Posted June 2, 2014 Gambling on Percy... again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Moz 69 Posted June 2, 2014 Good pick Bunny -- I was torn between Morris and Sankey . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dehaven123 31 Posted June 2, 2014 You might need to trade for a RB #2 as well. I had Vereen way down my list. We'll see. I actually like Vereen and Ellington's talent, but worry about their slight frames and workload they will be given. so u like their talent. got it. u worry about their workload. got it. both these guys are in line for a jump. we'll see how high. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BunnysBastatrds 2,321 Posted June 2, 2014 Now I Know Alf Isnt Appr Guy But I Like Him Alot here. I was hoping he'd fall to me. I could have kept him with a second round transistion tag. I would have been very happy with that outcome. Also, the rules don't show that RB gets PPR's. Rushing .1- per yard 6- TD from 49 yards or less 8- TD from 50 yards or more 2- 2 pt conversion -1 - per fumble lost Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WhiteWonder 2,681 Posted June 2, 2014 You might need to trade for a RB #2 as well. I had Vereen way down my list. We'll see. I actually like Vereen and Ellington's talent, but worry about their slight frames and workload they will be given. Vereen is the same size as guys like McCoy and Charles. im not saying he can handle the same workload, i didn't draft him thinking he would. 100 rush attempts is fine. he had like 40 last year and was #11 in ppg. also i don't care much about a 2nd back. as stated before im barely playing for this season Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dehaven123 31 Posted June 2, 2014 Vereen is the same size as guys like McCoy and Charles. im not saying he can handle the same workload, i didn't draft him thinking he would. 100 rush attempts is fine. he had like 40 last year and was #11 in ppg. also i don't care much about a 2nd back. as stated before im barely playing for this season and we can start 1RB in our format. 5 wide baby. tons of WR value still out there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WhiteWonder 2,681 Posted June 2, 2014 Sankey was the 3rd guy i was between. Vereen, Ellington, Sankey. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dehaven123 31 Posted June 2, 2014 Vereen is the same size as guys like McCoy and Charles. im not saying he can handle the same workload, i didn't draft him thinking he would. 100 rush attempts is fine. he had like 40 last year and was #11 in ppg. also i don't care much about a 2nd back. as stated before im barely playing for this season and we can start 1RB in our format. warrick dunn! lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dehaven123 31 Posted June 2, 2014 Sankey was the 3rd guy i was between. Vereen, Ellington, Sankey. sankey is a good pick. maybe a bit early, just a bit. but a good pick. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 2,136 Posted June 2, 2014 Vereen is the same size as guys like McCoy and Charles. im not saying he can handle the same workload, i didn't draft him thinking he would. 100 rush attempts is fine. he had like 40 last year and was #11 in ppg. also i don't care much about a 2nd back. as stated before im barely playing for this season and we can start 1RB in our format. Yeah but rbs dont get points per reception. A bit risky imo. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dehaven123 31 Posted June 2, 2014 Yeah but rbs dont get points per reception. A bit risky imo. im sure ur being funny. but just in case ur not, its a moz typo. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WhiteWonder 2,681 Posted June 2, 2014 Yeah but rbs dont get points per reception. A bit risky imo. but they do. unless the rule was changed from last season in which case no one told me..... and i quit Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 2,136 Posted June 2, 2014 I was drafting with the assumption they werent, because that is the way it is stated in the rules. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dehaven123 31 Posted June 2, 2014 I was drafting with the assumption they werent, because that is the way it is stated in the rules. lol i like ur style. ur gonna fit in just fine in my book. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WhiteWonder 2,681 Posted June 2, 2014 I was drafting with the assumption they werent, because that is the way it is stated in the rules. ahh i see. the rules here on this forum? I think you are interpreting "rushing" scoring to mean 'RB' scoring. i believe it means rushing, regardless of position. where receiving is receiving regardless of position. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dehaven123 31 Posted June 2, 2014 I was drafting with the assumption they werent, because that is the way it is stated in the rules. reboot reboot Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 2,136 Posted June 2, 2014 Ok its broke down into rushing and receiving. I was thinking running backs and receivers. Oh well. Still wouldnt have drafted much different. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dehaven123 31 Posted June 2, 2014 Ok its broke down into rushing and receiving. I was thinking running backs and receivers. Oh well. Still wouldnt have drafted much different. u were serious. even funnier. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WhiteWonder 2,681 Posted June 2, 2014 Ok its broke down into rushing and receiving. I was thinking running backs and receivers. Oh well. Still wouldnt have drafted much different. yeah i mean julio was still one of the top options there Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Meglamaniac 385 Posted June 2, 2014 Rushing is not limited to RBS much the same way receiving is not limited to WRs Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WhiteWonder 2,681 Posted June 2, 2014 what a windfall for kutulu. getting to keep ball and mccoy for the cost of the last pick in the 4th. getting the first pick... i would have taken DT i think but either way. if you told me i could start a fantasy team with McCoy, Ball, DThomas and still have 2nd and 3rd rounds picks, id jizz my pants. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Moz 69 Posted June 2, 2014 I was hoping he'd fall to me. I could have kept him with a second round transistion tag. I would have been very happy with that outcome. Also, the rules don't show that RB gets PPR's. Rushing .1- per yard 6- TD from 49 yards or less 8- TD from 50 yards or more 2- 2 pt conversion -1 - per fumble lost It is PPR for everyone -- sorry I will go back and add if not there Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MTSkiBum 1,620 Posted June 2, 2014 sankey is a good pick. maybe a bit early, just a bit. but a good pick. Sankey was a great pick. I strongly debated him with my early 2nd round pick. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dehaven123 31 Posted June 2, 2014 Sankey was a great pick. I strongly debated him with my early 2nd round pick. wow that've surprised me a little. no harm in liking a guy enough to spend that kind of pick on him tho. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 2,136 Posted June 2, 2014 Rushing is not limited to RBS much the same way receiving is not limited to WRs Yeah i just read it wrong. scoring rules arent usually broken down like that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WhiteWonder 2,681 Posted June 2, 2014 in truth i probably would have drafted Sankey ahead of Ellington if i didn't go vereen. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WhiteWonder 2,681 Posted June 2, 2014 Yeah i just read it wrong. scoring rules arent usually broken down like that. i actually like it better... just having it neatly as Passing, Rushing, Receiving. less stuff to write out than having to cover what happens when a RB throws a pass or a receiver runs the ball, etc. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Moz 69 Posted June 2, 2014 Bell Morris Marsha Marsha Marsha D Train I got 2 solid "RB 2"'s I got two solid top 5 WR's Something tells me I might regret not taking Foster though Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 2,136 Posted June 2, 2014 Bell Morris Marsha Marsha Marsha D Train I got 2 solid "RB 2"'s I got two solid top 5 WR's Something tells me I might regret not taking Foster though I don't think you're going to feel the same way by the end of the year. I just don't like that he hurt his back and had surgery. I also get the feeling he isn't as dedicated to his profession as other rbs are. I can see him taking a little off his game so he can collect a few more checks and then retire. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kutulu 1,659 Posted June 2, 2014 just got home...will catch up and pick shortly. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Moz 69 Posted June 2, 2014 due to the free keeper there is only 17 rounds of "drafting this year Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kutulu 1,659 Posted June 2, 2014 "catch up" = taking a big dump Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
