Magnificent Bastard 191 Posted March 19, 2015 Well, Trump isn't coming back for apprentice, and he's formed an exploratory committee for 2016. Gonna need a female clown, Bachmann? They have Ben Carson, so 9,9,9 isn't needed. Those will be some hairdo's up on that stage with Trump and Rand Paul. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gocolts 300 Posted March 19, 2015 Trump has NO shot at he GOP nomination. He focked it up the other day by demanding that the Pope and Vatican release Jesus' Birth Certificate. He has already alienated half the base, and he has not even declared yet. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,387 Posted March 19, 2015 It's really wide open for the GOP field this year. Hard to make sense of it. Walker seems to have some momentum right now as does Jeb. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BunnysBastatrds 2,534 Posted March 19, 2015 Clown Car? Like the one with big floppy ears who did his act in front of the country that relied on bumper sticker quotes and a box of fear did? Follow what works. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SUXBNME 1,582 Posted March 19, 2015 Clown Car? Like the one with big floppy ears who did his act in front of the country that relied on bumper sticker quotes and a box of fear did? Follow what works. What about the one who looks like a chimpanzee? http://img4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110813100328/uncyclopedia/images/0/0f/George_W_Bush_Monkey.jpg Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BunnysBastatrds 2,534 Posted March 19, 2015 What about the one who looks like a chimpanzee? http://img4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110813100328/uncyclopedia/images/0/0f/George_W_Bush_Monkey.jpg One claps and is amusing. The other one claps and is also. Combined, they fawked an entire generation. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magnificent Bastard 191 Posted March 19, 2015 One claps and is amusing. The other one claps and is also. Combined, they fawked an entire generation. Oh please. The generation that buys 600 phones and takes pictures of their dinner is fawked? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BunnysBastatrds 2,534 Posted March 19, 2015 Oh please. The generation that buys 600 phones and takes pictures of their dinner is fawked? The generation that realizes that they inherited a 16 trillion dollar debt is has no other options but to pay our freight is going to wake up and understand quickly how we fawked them pretty quickly. Are they dumb? Yes! Are they Fawking stoopid? I don't think so. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magnificent Bastard 191 Posted March 19, 2015 The generation that realizes that they inherited a 16 trillion dollar debt is has no other options but to pay our freight is going to wake up and understand quickly how we fawked them pretty quickly. Are they dumb? Yes! Are they Fawking stoopid? I don't think so. Yeah well, going to two wars and not funding them is a good way to get a defecit and that's on your guys. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,387 Posted March 19, 2015 Yeah well, going to two wars and not funding them is a good way to get a defecit and that's on your guys. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ One of the biggest reasons I am no longer a Republican. The Clinton impeachment had me questioning if I belonged, this slammed the door completely on the national party. I do still vote mostly Republican on state level- especially 2014. For Michigan Governor, Attorney General, and Secretary of State this past election, I votes straight GOP and none was a close decision, all were easy. I also voted for all the GOP-endorsed state Supreme Court justices. But not US Senate. I voted for the Dem Gary Peters and early indications are he's great on balanced budget issues and cooerating with GOP collegues. The GOP had ran a real focking embarassing twit that hid from the media for US Senate so it was an easy choice. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted March 19, 2015 What about the one who looks like a chimpanzee? http://img4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110813100328/uncyclopedia/images/0/0f/George_W_Bush_Monkey.jpg wrong dude troll! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,387 Posted March 19, 2015 http://www.urban75.org/useless/bush.html http://www.sockandawe.com/ Some games Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,387 Posted March 19, 2015 Towards the end of his presidency, Bush finally started getting the respect he deserved. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted March 19, 2015 http://www.urban75.org/useless/bush.html http://www.sockandawe.com/ Some games which msnbc retard hooked you up with those Rachel Maddow or Al Sharpton? They create all your thoughts so its safe to assume, no ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,650 Posted March 19, 2015 I feel like the door is so wide open for a sane Republican right now to run on a platform of fiscal responsibility, a realist foreign policy and social moderation ... and yet I have no hope at all that this type of candidate could get out of the GOP primary. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,387 Posted March 19, 2015 which msnbc retard hooked you up with those Rachel Maddow or Al Sharpton? They create all your thoughts so its safe to assume, no ? We've gone over this before. The reason the accusation sticks to you that you get you opinions formed for you by your masters is that in 13 years of dozens and dozens of issues in thousands of posts, there has never been a millimeter of daylight between your opinion and official far right extreme Republican dogma on even one single issue in any post ever. Never once have you demonstrated a shred of independent thought or critical thinking skills. Even laughable ridiculous crap like birtherism sucks your gullible dumb ass in. Meanwhile,the reason that doesn't stick to anybody else is that everybody else does. Even the most far left poster here -worms IMO- had broken from liberal left talking points on a number of occasions over the years including just this week in the Hillary email thread. As for myself, I consider myself more conservative than liberal actually and agree with Boehner and post as such more frequently than Obummer on domestic issues by a ratio of about 3:2. In 2014, I Just got done voting a sweep of all five state level Michigan GOP offices: governor, attorney general, secretary of state, and the two nonpartisan state Supreme Court justices endorsed by the GOP. So you can't accuse a one else of being a blind lemming because none of us are. Instead, if you don't like the label, Try turning on your brain for once, think about things, see if there's anything your brain masters feed you that tastes like crap and show a speck of independent thought. In your retard club, folks get kicked out for not obeying Rush or whoever's every command. You are afraid of being kicked out. But the price of that blind devotion around here is being treated like a special needs moron on the issues. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 19, 2015 I feel like the door is so wide open for a sane Republican right now to run on a platform of fiscal responsibility, a realist foreign policy and social moderation ... and yet I have no hope at all that this type of candidate could get out of the GOP primary. This. They have a great opportunity to win the Presidency in 2016, but they'll fock it up by electing someone who's pro-life or against gay marriage. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 19, 2015 We've gone over this before. The reason the accusation sticks to you that you get you opinions formed for you by your masters is that in 13 years of dozens and dozens of issues in thousands of posts, there has never been a millimeter of daylight between your opinion and official far right extreme Republican dogma on even one single issue in any post ever. Never once have you demonstrated a shred of independent thought or critical thinking skills. Even laughable ridiculous crap like birtherism sucks your gullible dumb ass in. Meanwhile,the reason that doesn't stick to anybody else is that everybody else does. Even the most far left poster here -worms IMO- had broken from liberal left talking points on a number of occasions over the years including just this week in the Hillary email thread. As for myself, I consider myself more conservative than liberal actually and agree with Boehner and post as such more frequently than Obummer on domestic issues by a ratio of about 3:2. In 2014, I Just got done voting a sweep of all five state level Michigan GOP offices: governor, attorney general, secretary of state, and the two nonpartisan state Supreme Court justices endorsed by the GOP. So you can't accuse a one else of being a blind lemming because none of us are. Instead, if you don't like the label, Try turning on your brain for once, think about things, see if there's anything your brain masters feed you that tastes like crap and show a speck of independent thought. In your retard club, folks get kicked out for not obeying Rush or whoever's every command. You are afraid of being kicked out. But the price of that blind devotion around here is being treated like a special needs moron on the issues. This might be the best post of the year. This is the difference between the board liberals and the board conservatives. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted March 19, 2015 Ouch...id say that will leave a mark...but it will either be met with silence, rolling eyes, or just plain denial. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,793 Posted March 19, 2015 We've seen this pathology in the GOP before. A significant percentage of the idiots who are on this bored represnet the same types that vote in the GOP. One of the biggest reasons Obummer won was because (and this is very provable) Limbaugh, Fox and Co all railed against McSame as being "Too moderate". - All the way up until the fact that he won the nomination. Then, they couldn't backstroke fast enough. As a result of that (and BTW, I know this by memory), SEVEN MILLION self-identified Republicans decided not to vote - at all. They hated Obummer, but hated McSame and Palin just as much. You can look up the numbers. And, while we're doing history, McSame was virtually tied with Obummer at the primaries- until two weeks after Palin was revealed. HUGE initial bump - until she spoke. And even the most ardent Republicans (Kristorl, Richardson, etc.) couldn't stomach her. Again, you short memmoried dumb focks. It wasn't that the Democrats won, so much as the GOP gave up. With the loss of Romney, we're looking at the same thing all over again. Seriusly? Jeb Bush is the GOP front runner? Please, for the love of Christ, come up with somebody, ANYbody who can beat Cankles. This shoud have been the easiest GD pre-election in the history of Amurican politics. And the GOP is still throwing feces at the glass. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magnificent Bastard 191 Posted March 19, 2015 Yes, it would be a cake walk for the GOP, except for the fact that the country is doing a lot better since a Democrat has been in charge. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 19, 2015 Ouch...id say that will leave a mark...but it will either be met with silence, rolling eyes, or just plain denial.Looks like it's being met with crickets and tumbleweeds Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,387 Posted March 19, 2015 We've seen this pathology in the GOP before. A significant percentage of the idiots who are on this bored represnet the same types that vote in the GOP. One of the biggest reasons Obummer won was because (and this is very provable) Limbaugh, Fox and Co all railed against McSame as being "Too moderate". - All the way up until the fact that he won the nomination. Then, they couldn't backstroke fast enough. As a result of that (and BTW, I know this by memory), SEVEN MILLION self-identified Republicans decided not to vote - at all. They hated Obummer, but hated McSame and Palin just as much. You can look up the numbers. And, while we're doing history, McSame was virtually tied with Obummer at the primaries- until two weeks after Palin was revealed. HUGE initial bump - until she spoke. And even the most ardent Republicans (Kristorl, Richardson, etc.) couldn't stomach her. Again, you short memmoried dumb focks. It wasn't that the Democrats won, so much as the GOP gave up. With the loss of Romney, we're looking at the same thing all over again. Seriusly? Jeb Bush is the GOP front runner? Please, for the love of Christ, come up with somebody, ANYbody who can beat Cankles. This shoud have been the easiest GD pre-election in the history of Amurican politics. And the GOP is still throwing feces at the glass. I'd really admired McCain and voted for him in the GOP primary in 2000. And that admiration was still around come 2008. Now I'd had an intensely burning hated his foreign policy and that was a huge issue for me in 2008 but otherwise he was cool. Gradually, he started drifting away and distancing himself from his previous positions and it was making me nervous. From leaning McCain in the Spring I was leaning Obummer in the Summer. When Palin came along, I'd felt he'd fully allowed himself to sell out and I locked in to Obummer at that point. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted March 19, 2015 This. They have a great opportunity to win the Presidency in 2016, but they'll fock it up by electing someone who's pro-life or against gay marriage. neither of those issues should matter to an adult male Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phillybear 366 Posted March 19, 2015 We've gone over this before. The reason the accusation sticks to you that you get you opinions formed for you by your masters is that in 13 years of dozens and dozens of issues in thousands of posts, there has never been a millimeter of daylight between your opinion and official far right extreme Republican dogma on even one single issue in any post ever. Never once have you demonstrated a shred of independent thought or critical thinking skills. Even laughable ridiculous crap like birtherism sucks your gullible dumb ass in. Meanwhile,the reason that doesn't stick to anybody else is that everybody else does. Even the most far left poster here -worms IMO- had broken from liberal left talking points on a number of occasions over the years including just this week in the Hillary email thread. As for myself, I consider myself more conservative than liberal actually and agree with Boehner and post as such more frequently than Obummer on domestic issues by a ratio of about 3:2. In 2014, I Just got done voting a sweep of all five state level Michigan GOP offices: governor, attorney general, secretary of state, and the two nonpartisan state Supreme Court justices endorsed by the GOP. So you can't accuse a one else of being a blind lemming because none of us are. Instead, if you don't like the label, Try turning on your brain for once, think about things, see if there's anything your brain masters feed you that tastes like crap and show a speck of independent thought. In your retard club, folks get kicked out for not obeying Rush or whoever's every command. You are afraid of being kicked out. But the price of that blind devotion around here is being treated like a special needs moron on the issues. Get a job, you dirty hippie. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,387 Posted March 19, 2015 Get a job, you dirty hippie. Well, I do turn down job offers all the time but the reason for this is I'm already employed. Even the two times I got fired, I had a job the next day. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted March 19, 2015 We've gone over this before. The reason the accusation sticks to you that you get you opinions formed for you by your masters is that in 13 years of dozens and dozens of issues in thousands of posts, there has never been a millimeter of daylight between your opinion and official far right extreme Republican dogma on even one single issue in any post ever. Never once have you demonstrated a shred of independent thought or critical thinking skills. Even laughable ridiculous crap like birtherism sucks your gullible dumb ass in. Meanwhile,the reason that doesn't stick to anybody else is that everybody else does. Even the most far left poster here -worms IMO- had broken from liberal left talking points on a number of occasions over the years including just this week in the Hillary email thread. As for myself, I consider myself more conservative than liberal actually and agree with Boehner and post as such more frequently than Obummer on domestic issues by a ratio of about 3:2. In 2014, I Just got done voting a sweep of all five state level Michigan GOP offices: governor, attorney general, secretary of state, and the two nonpartisan state Supreme Court justices endorsed by the GOP. So you can't accuse a one else of being a blind lemming because none of us are. Instead, if you don't like the label, Try turning on your brain for once, think about things, see if there's anything your brain masters feed you that tastes like crap and show a speck of independent thought. In your retard club, folks get kicked out for not obeying Rush or whoever's every command. You are afraid of being kicked out. But the price of that blind devotion around here is being treated like a special needs moron on the issues. what a pile of nonsense Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
patweisers44 861 Posted March 19, 2015 I feel like the door is so wide open for a sane Republican right now to run on a platform of fiscal responsibility, a realist foreign policy and social moderation ... and yet I have no hope at all that this type of candidate could get out of the GOP primary. This post nails it. Any Republican that can even lean towards the middle on these issues would blow Hillary Clinton out of the water. The sad part is that the party is so focked up they will either a) never find this person; or b)the party will splinter further and destroy any chance of unseating the Democratic White House. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 19, 2015 neither of those issues should matter to an adult maleUnfortunately for you and your party, personal freedoms are not considered irrelevant to a huge number of voters. hth Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,793 Posted March 19, 2015 I'd really admired McCain and voted for him in the GOP primary in 2000. And that admiration was still around come 2008. Now I'd had an intensely burning hated his foreign policy and that was a huge issue for me in 2008 but otherwise he was cool. Gradually, he started drifting away and distancing himself from his previous positions and it was making me nervous. From leaning McCain in the Spring I was leaning Obummer in the Summer. When Palin came along, I'd felt he'd fully allowed himself to sell out and I locked in to Obummer at that point. I've said consistently that if the same McCain would have run his 2000 campaign against Obummer like he did Bush, he's win by a landslide. Unfortunately, his kunt of a wife and his campaign adviser (who was sleeping with her) talked him into a whole 'nother category. At this point, he's too old and p'wipped to be electable. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,387 Posted March 19, 2015 neither of those issues should matter to an adult maleThey don't matter to me. And while I realize they do matter to other people, I'm like you - at a loss to figure out why. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted March 19, 2015 They don't matter to me. And while I realize they do matter to other people, like you, I'm at a loss to figure out why.fake outrage garners votes from the dumbest, proven in the last 2 presidential elections. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phillybear 366 Posted March 19, 2015 Unfortunately for you and your party, personal freedoms are not considered irrelevant to a huge number of voters. hth You mean stuff like gun control, Obamacare, and censorship? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 19, 2015 You mean stuff like gun control, Obamacare, and censorship?censorship? wtf are you talking about? How is that a democratic issue? As for gun control, Has Obama (or any other Democratic President) said he wanted to ban all guns? And your sh!tty party had a chance to offer up a plan to fix our horrible health care system and drew a blank. Oh well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frank M 181 Posted March 19, 2015 I'd really admired McCain and voted for him in the GOP primary in 2000. And that admiration was still around come 2008. Now I'd had an intensely burning hated his foreign policy and that was a huge issue for me in 2008 but otherwise he was cool. Gradually, he started drifting away and distancing himself from his previous positions and it was making me nervous. From leaning McCain in the Spring I was leaning Obummer in the Summer. When Palin came along, I'd felt he'd fully allowed himself to sell out and I locked in to Obummer at that point. +1 I am convinced that if McCain was the nominee in 2000 and won the election, this country would be in a much better place fiscally and foreign-policy wise. Obama would never have been considered as a candidate and we wouldn't have had the rise of the extreme right that we have seen. We may not even have had the rise of all of these extreme Islamic groups as well because we likely would never have gone into Iraq in the first place. The world would be in a better place right now had McCain been elected president in 2000. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,793 Posted March 19, 2015 The world would be in a better place right now had McCain been elected president in 2000. Thank Limblob, RP and crew for that not coming true. Should we actually have believe Bush's "I don't want our boys halfway around the world nation-building." Focking idiot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 19, 2015 +1 I am convinced that if McCain was the nominee in 2000 and won the election, this country would be in a much better place fiscally and foreign-policy wise. Obama would never have been considered as a candidate and we wouldn't have had the rise of the extreme right that we have seen. We may not even have had the rise of all of these extreme Islamic groups as well because we likely would never have gone into Iraq in the first place. The world would be in a better place right now had McCain been elected president in 2000. I disagree. He's a radical, war monger. We'd have way more enemies. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frank M 181 Posted March 19, 2015 I disagree. He's a radical, war monger. We'd have way more enemies. I don't think so. Just as Reagan had Iran quaking in their boots, McCain would have had other countries toeing the line. And the McCain of 2000 wouldn't have been swayed by his advisors like Bush was. He had a backbone then. By 2008, he was so desperate to become President that he turned into the rest of them, doing and saying whatever it took, including the nail in the coffin, Sarah Palin. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,793 Posted March 19, 2015 I don't think so. Just as Reagan had Iran quaking in their boots, McCain would have had other countries toeing the line. And the McCain of 2000 wouldn't have been swayed by his advisors like Bush was. He had a backbone then. By 2008, he was so desperate to become President that he turned into the rest of them, doing and saying whatever it took, including the nail in the coffin, Sarah Palin. Agree, a zillion percent. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites