Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
jerryskids

YouTube to censor "controversial" videos?

Recommended Posts

Watch before it is taken down:

 

 

I know, I know, the mainstream media is unbiased and all. :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Damn, it's just a matter of time before they delete my homemade video called Schindler's Lisp.

 

It's cool wiff, your side isn't controversial, nothing to worry about for you. :thumbsup:

 

Until that changes...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If that video of me in my red skivvies wasn't taken down, nothing should be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Watch before it is taken down:

 

 

I know, I know, the mainstream media is unbiased and all. :rolleyes:

 

 

18,392 likes and 92 dislikes

 

That has to be some record.

 

Thank for Jerry. I have a new person to watch on the YT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What the fock? This is sad. The internet of today is going to make the internet of tomorrow seem like the wild wild west once they start over censoring everything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

18,392 likes and 92 dislikes

 

That has to be some record.

 

Thank for Jerry. I have a new person to watch on the YT

 

YW. He has an acerbic wit that would fit right in here at the Geek Club. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

YW. He has an acerbic wit that would fit right in here at the Geek Club. :D

 

Why does it matter what part of the world he is from? :mad:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Why does it matter what part of the world he is from? :mad:

I think that means he's worked in the circus. ya dummy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that means he's worked in the circus. ya dummy.

 

:first:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was unaware that FB now qualifies as "media." :mellow:

 

if you think a good deal of the population under 30 doesn't get 90% of their "media" from facebook, you're fooling yourself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

if you think a good deal of the population under 30 doesn't get 90% of their "media" from facebook, you're fooling yourself.

 

FB still isn't the media. HTH.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

if you think a good deal of the population under 30 doesn't get 90% of their "media" from facebook, you're fooling yourself.

There is a story where a West Point grad published a blank 100 page book on Amazon and advertised on FB, a blank book became a best seller, a prank about Annapolis that seemed to put some money in his pocket

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

FB still isn't the media. HTH.

 

:rolleyes:

 

no media posts stories on FB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Watson is big 9/11 truther/birther/conspiracy wingnut and Alex Jones flunky, so yeah he probably would fit right in here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

:rolleyes:

 

no media posts stories on FB.

 

 

Facebook is a social media platform. I think their recent policy of excluding "fake news" is dumb, but they're not the news media and they're not under any obligation to remain impartial on what they post there. If you don't like it go use MySpace.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

people think posting stories they find elsewhere qualifies as media now

 

FFToday is now Media

 

That's just sad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Facebook is a social media platform. I think their recent policy of excluding "fake news" is dumb, but they're not the news media and they're not under any obligation to remain impartial on what they post there. If you don't like it go use MySpace.

 

where did I say anything of the sort?

 

try harder

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

where did I say anything of the sort?

 

try harder

 

You just implied that FB is supposed to be impartial because people get their news there. Nobody knows WTF point you were trying to make except you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

You just implied that FB is supposed to be impartial because people get their news there. Nobody knows WTF point you were trying to make except you.

 

if they were taking down articles with a republican slant, you'd have a different take. odd.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

if they were taking down articles with a republican slant, you'd have a different take. odd.

 

I think FB's policy is stupid and wrong, but it is not evidence of the biased mainstream media. FB is not a news organization.

 

You are way out of your lane ed, stick to TMZ or Deadspin gossip.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Watson is big 9/11 truther/birther/conspiracy wingnut and Alex Jones flunky, so yeah he probably would fit right in here.

That certainly isnt shocking given those who applaud such stuff here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It's cool wiff, your side isn't controversial, nothing to worry about for you. :thumbsup:

 

Until that changes...

 

"1st they came for........"

 

:thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

"1st they came for........"

 

:thumbsup:

 

Lol. They didn't come for anyone. They are a for-profit private entity with every right to police the content on their site however they see fit. Even calling this "censor(ship)" is really dumb, since, as already mentioned, there are many other sites that will gladly post the videos that youtube might choose to reject.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×