drobeski 3,061 Posted December 26, 2017 Like I said, I'm about the only fan here who can be level headed about this. The Patriots have never negatively impacted my team about anything important. The call should have stood based on the clear and obvious standard set by the NFL.the giants are like the patriots little brother, on very rare occasions they let you play in the game and even let you win but for the most part you're on the side admiring big bro, wishing to get in, and hoping one day to be just like him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,087 Posted December 26, 2017 Instant Replays original intent was to keep obvious, awful, calls from happening. The ones that 99% of people look at and can plainly see was a blown call from deciding games. The calls where even the opposing fans sheepishly laugh off because they know it. Thats why they gave each team two replays. Then they added it to all scores, then in the last two minutes, then all turnovers. 1/3 of the plays are focking reviewable it seems now. To the point where now on one angle the tip of the ball moved!@&$! I saw it, it moved!?@&$ It annoying as hell. The system is broken. Weve gone away from the original intent of having a way to overturn major fockups. To watching if a toe snipped a blade of grass. Ugh. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Patriotsfatboy1 1,432 Posted December 26, 2017 Instant Replays original intent was to keep obvious, awful, calls from happening. The ones that 99% of people look at and can plainly see was a blown call from deciding games. He calls where even the opposing fans sheepishly laugh off because they know it. Thats why they gave each team two replays. Then they added it to all scores, then in the last two minutes, then turnovers. 1/3 of the plays are focking reviewable it seems. To the point where now on one angle the tip of the ball moved!@&$! I saw it, it moved!?@&$ It annoying as hell. The system is broken. Weve gone away from the original intent of having a way to overturn major fockups. To watching if a toe snipped a blade of grass. Ugh. Interesting point. The original intent is up for debate, but if we only wanted to avoid moron calls, then this is not working. They are also avoiding calls where initial view (happening in a split second by a flawed human) was wrong. Maybe a recheck is warranted. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,686 Posted December 26, 2017 simple fix No more frame by frame,, slow-mo BS if they can't see it by watching it at regular speed, the call stands. Fock off with this bullshit already #notmynfl Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vuduchile 1,941 Posted December 26, 2017 simple fix No more frame by frame,, slow-mo BS if they can't see it by watching it at regular speed, the call stands. Fock off with this bullshit already #notmynfl Amen. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 2,711 Posted December 26, 2017 simple fix No more frame by frame,, slow-mo BS if they can't see it by watching it at regular speed, the call stands. Fock off with this bullshit already #notmynfl Spot on brother, spot focking on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Patriotsfatboy1 1,432 Posted December 26, 2017 simple fix No more frame by frame,, slow-mo BS if they can't see it by watching it at regular speed, the call stands. Fock off with this bullshit already #notmynfl That is not a bad idea at all. They just need to figure out if the goal is to get every call right based on the letter of the rules or whether they want to make sure that they don't make a mistake caused by human error. I think that the latter is fine if they can keep the game moving because, no matter what they do, they are going to have 50% of the people complaining on each call. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gladiators 1,911 Posted December 26, 2017 simple fix No more frame by frame,, slow-mo BS if they can't see it by watching it at regular speed, the call stands. Fock off with this bullshit already #notmynfl Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gladiators 1,911 Posted December 26, 2017 That is not a bad idea at all. They just need to figure out if the goal is to get every call right based on the letter of the rules or whether they want to make sure that they don't make a mistake caused by human error. I think that the latter is fine if they can keep the game moving because, no matter what they do, they are going to have 50% of the people complaining on each call. I agree with Ed's post. I don't want blatant fock ups, but I also don't want it getting to the point where they're looking at every play to determine if there may have been holding on an o-lineman. Gotta keep the game moving. I'm really surprised how often the officials get the calls right with how fast the game is. Based on the accuracy of the call on the field and how many times the calls end up standing or being confirmed, I'd be fine with getting rid of replay. Since that won't happen, I'd like it used exactly how Ed suggested. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,922 Posted December 26, 2017 That is not a bad idea at all. They just need to figure out if the goal is to get every call right based on the letter of the rules or whether they want to make sure that they don't make a mistake caused by human error. I think that the latter is fine if they can keep the game moving because, no matter what they do, they are going to have 50% of the people complaining on each call. There are a lot more than 50 pct of the people complaining. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,686 Posted December 26, 2017 I agree with Ed's post. I don't want blatant fock ups, but I also don't want it getting to the point where they're looking at every play to determine if there may have been holding on an o-lineman. Gotta keep the game moving. I'm really surprised how often the officials get the calls right with how fast the game is. Based on the accuracy of the call on the field and how many times the calls end up standing or being confirmed, I'd be fine with getting rid of replay. Since that won't happen, I'd like it used exactly how Ed suggested. The whole reason replay was put in was for major fockups, that cost teams. it was not put in to spend 5 minutes watching frame by frame. Think how many legendary plays over the year would have probably been over turned if watched frame by frame. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted December 26, 2017 There are a lot more than 50 pct of the people complaining.envy is a powerful emotion Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,922 Posted December 26, 2017 envy is a powerful emotion The Dez catch/not catch was BS too, and lots of people said so. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,686 Posted December 26, 2017 The Dez catch/not catch was BS too, and lots of people said so. 100% Megatron too There was no conclusive evidence to overturn the Benjamin TD. I believe there was on the James one 2 weeks ago Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted December 26, 2017 The Dez catch/not catch was BS too, and lots of people said so.whatever you say lil bro Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,922 Posted December 26, 2017 whatever you say lil bro 18-1. The sequel wasn't as dramatic, but it was funnier. My favorite line was " it's like throwing into a Forrest". Classic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cruzer 1,993 Posted December 27, 2017 simple fix No more frame by frame,, slow-mo BS Never considered this - but it's brilliant. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,686 Posted December 27, 2017 Never considered this - but it's brilliant. Instant replay should be there to prevent a Don Dinkinger type fock up. Also, remember when the refs only had 90 seconds to look at a replay and then it shut off. Or get this the coach actually had to challenge a play? how often do coaches throw a challenge flag? Used to be 2 per game. Raise it to 2 per half and NO MORE AUTOMATIC CHALLENGES! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 2,711 Posted December 27, 2017 https://deadspin.com/even-an-official-didnt-know-why-kelvin-benjamins-touchd-1821599612 Even An Official Didn't Know Why Kelvin Benjamin's Touchdown Was Overturned Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Patriotsfatboy1 1,432 Posted December 27, 2017 https://deadspin.com/even-an-official-didnt-know-why-kelvin-benjamins-touchd-1821599612 So, the official that did not see the slo-mo replay didn't know why it was overturned by the two officials who did? Shocking. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 2,711 Posted December 27, 2017 So, the official that did not see the slo-mo replay didn't know why it was overturned by the two officials who did? Shocking. Oh, I keep forgetting that there are still people who think the overturn was the correct call. My bad. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tanatastic 2,061 Posted December 27, 2017 That’s a catch, the toe was grazing the grass as the possession clicked in. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,686 Posted December 27, 2017 That’s a catch, the toe was grazing the grass as the possession clicked in. That's the thing with instant replay, especially here. 100 people and 50 say one thing, 50 say the other Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted December 27, 2017 Meh, give him the charity catch, big woop pats beat them anyway, you know that, let's not pretend they dont. Just stop Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,922 Posted December 27, 2017 Meh, give him the charity catch, big woop pats beat them anyway, you know that, let's not pretend they dont. Just stop While this is true , the issue here is the NFL diking up the whole replay process. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted December 27, 2017 While this is true , the issue here is the NFL diking up the whole replay process.send a letter Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted December 27, 2017 I'm happy for Harrison, a great player like that gets to join the greatest franchise in the history of sports. Lucky bastard, he must be pumped. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,922 Posted December 27, 2017 send a letter You would have to cut down a whole forest worth of trees to get enough paper to get through to Goodell. He can't see the forest for the trees. Forests are hard to throw through. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,922 Posted December 27, 2017 I'm happy for Harrison, a great player like that gets to join the greatest franchise in the history of sports. Lucky bastard, he must be pumped. The Yankees signed him? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted December 27, 2017 You would have to cut down a whole forest worth of trees to get enough paper to get through to Goodell. He can't see the forest for the trees. Forests are hard to throw through.don't worry they'll change another rule to stop the pats and give a binky to the reality crybabies of the world. Wont matter, they'll overcome like they always do. This has been proven time and time again . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,922 Posted December 27, 2017 don't worry they'll change another rule to stop the pats and give a binky to the reality crybabies of the world. Wont matter, they'll overcome like they always do. This has been proven time and time again . I feel for the other 30 teams though. You can't blame them for being frustrated. I often wonder what it's like. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted December 27, 2017 I feel for the other 30 teams though. You can't blame them for being frustrated. I often wonder what it's like.your math is off Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,922 Posted December 27, 2017 your math is off Your memory is way off. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted December 27, 2017 Your memory is way off.2 more Lombardis will have that effect, yours seem to be stuck way in the past. You might want to have that looked at. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,686 Posted December 27, 2017 2 mire Lombardis will have that effect, yours seem to be stuck way in the past. You might want to have that looked at. the equivalent of Trent Dilfer at QB. Can't fight luck Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,922 Posted December 27, 2017 the equivalent of Trent Dilfer at QB. Can't fight luck Rams vs Patriots? 145 yards? Trent Dilfer was better than that. Lol. Eli had more yards than that in the fourth quarter. You lose. 18-2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,686 Posted December 27, 2017 you're deflecting again, what next? OBAMA Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,922 Posted December 27, 2017 you're deflecting again, what next? OBAMA You brought Dilfer into it. 18-3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted December 27, 2017 Rams vs Patriots? 145 yards? Trent Dilfer was better than that. Lol. Eli had more yards than that in the fourth quarter. You lose. 18-2 how about stats from the last 2 ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,922 Posted December 27, 2017 how about stats from the last 2 ? The ones where the other coach blew it? Yeah, I'm sure his stats were fine. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites