Coronavirus - Doomsday

[Ultra Max Power 214]

4 minutes ago, League Champion said:

And the sheep shall follow. 

Yeah, I can already see the next several months playing out.  

Although the jab isn't expected to be free this year, I can already see the writing on the wall on how it's "effective" while failing to acknowledge the difference in people who can and can't afford it.  

[League Champion 1,896]

1 minute ago, Ultra Max Power said:

Yeah, I can already see the next several months playing out.  

Although the jab isn't expected to be free this year, I can already see the writing on the wall on how it's "effective" while failing to acknowledge the difference in people who can and can't afford it.  

Good luck because I'm not putting that shi1 in my body. 

[Ultra Max Power 214]

Just now, League Champion said:

Good luck because I'm not putting that shi1 in my body. 

Oh I'm not either, but its already being recommended by the Biden administration and they don't even know the details yet. 

[Ultra Max Power 214]

 

Quote

 

COVID mask mandates are returning to Hollywood, with Lionsgate being the first major studio to reinstate masking and daily testing for its Los Angeles office workers.

Lionsgate is requiring employees who physically work at its headquarters in Santa Monica to wear masks at all times when in the building, effective immediately, except when alone in an enclosed office or large open workspace. In addition, employees are required to submit to daily COVID testing and to report the results to the company, according to an internal memo obtained by Deadline.

Employees must wear “a medical grade face covering (surgical mask, KN95 or N95) when indoors except when alone in an office with the door closed, actively eating, actively drinking at their desk or workstation, or if they are the only individual present in a large open workspace,” the memo reportedly states.

 

 

[League Champion 1,896]

8 hours ago, Ultra Max Power said:

Oh I'm not either, but its already being recommended by the Biden administration and they don't even know the details yet. 

 

 

[League Champion 1,896]

 

[Baker Boy 1,688]

19 hours ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

Lockdowns and mask mandates coming. Libtards enjoy this 

Major movie studio reinstates mask mandates 'effective immediately'

Lionsgate will require masking for employees 'until further notice'

https://www.foxnews.com/media/major-movie-studio-reinstates-mask-mandates-effective-immediately

 

More than 100 schools still require students to be vaccinated in order to attend classes in person, according to No College Mandates, a group that tracks COVID-19 policies in higher education.

A smaller number of schools, including Rutgers and Georgetown, still require indoor masking.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/rutgers-still-require-covid-19-114220738.html

 

Mask mandates making a comeback as hysteria over new Covid variant grows

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2023/08/22/mask-mandates-making-a-comeback-as-hysteria-over-new-covid-variant-grows-1389013/

 

 

[Baker Boy 1,688]

Quote

The worst waste of time is to argue with a fool and fanatic who cares not about truth or reality, but only the victory of his beliefs and illusions.

 There are people who, by the more evidence we present to them, are not able to understand and others are blinded by hate and ego resentment, and all they want is to be right even if they are not.

 

 

[League Champion 1,896]

FLAKE OUT BOYOS! 

 

 

[Hawkeye21 2,382]

 

[Reality 3,099]

3 hours ago, Baker Boy said:

Major movie studio reinstates mask mandates 'effective immediately'

Lionsgate will require masking for employees 'until further notice'

https://www.foxnews.com/media/major-movie-studio-reinstates-mask-mandates-effective-immediately

 

More than 100 schools still require students to be vaccinated in order to attend classes in person, according to No College Mandates, a group that tracks COVID-19 policies in higher education.

A smaller number of schools, including Rutgers and Georgetown, still require indoor masking.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/rutgers-still-require-covid-19-114220738.html

 

Mask mandates making a comeback as hysteria over new Covid variant grows

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2023/08/22/mask-mandates-making-a-comeback-as-hysteria-over-new-covid-variant-grows-1389013/

 

 

Plandemic 2.0, engage. 

The masks stuff is hilarious, we know they didn't work, at all. 

[Fireballer 2,639]

Can all the mask defenders of 2020 go on record with an opinion now so we don’t have to rehash it when mandates come back?

[League Champion 1,896]

LIBERALS CAN'T WAIT TO VAX YOU UP!!! 

 

 

[TimHauck 2,621]

2 hours ago, Fireballer said:

Can all the mask defenders of 2020 go on record with an opinion now so we don’t have to rehash it when mandates come back?

Opinion on what?  I do think it’s possible they helped slightly in 2020 (supported by one of the only large RCT’s done on masks from Bangladesh), but probably even less effective with Omicron so mask mandates are stupid and I’m a little surprised people are actually instituting them in 2023

[Ultra Max Power 214]

Rumor: TSA will be required to wear masks by mid Sept. All airline passengers required to mask by mid Oct.

 

[Fireballer 2,639]

19 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Opinion on what?  I do think it’s possible they helped slightly in 2020 (supported by one of the only large RCT’s done on masks from Bangladesh), but probably even less effective with Omicron so mask mandates are stupid and I’m a little surprised people are actually instituting them in 2023

Bangladesh study has many holes in it.  Also, why was masking different for Omicron?

[Ultra Max Power 214]

Fear pron is right around the corner.  Media has to get the fear factor up so their biggest sponsor can make billions selling its "new" product. Then everyone in the checks and balances system turns a blind eye for a nice "unrelated" kickback.  

[League Champion 1,896]

 

[TimHauck 2,621]

1 hour ago, Fireballer said:

Bangladesh study has many holes in it.  Also, why was masking different for Omicron?

All of the few existing mask studies do. More contagious

[Fireballer 2,639]

40 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

All of the few existing mask studies do. More contagious

Define “more contagious” in the context of Omicron. And specifically, how do different types of respiratory protection play a role with a  “more contagious” variant?

[TimHauck 2,621]

4 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

Define “more contagious” in the context of Omicron.How does respiratory protection  play a role in spread with a  “more contagious” variant?

Are you denying that Omicron was more contagious, or just that masks would be even less effective against a more contagious variant?

[Fireballer 2,639]

6 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Are you denying that Omicron was more contagious, or just that masks would be even less effective against a more contagious variant?

I’m wondering why you said  masks were  less effective simply  because a variant is more contagious.  I assumed that before that could be done, a broad phrase like “more contagious” needed to be whittled down.

[TimHauck 2,621]

5 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

I’m wondering why you said  masks were  less effective simply  because a variant is more contagious.  I assumed that before that could be done, a broad phrase like “more contagious” needed to be whittled down.

If you had eyes, you could see that it was much more contagious.  Just look at the huge spike in cases even here, but even moreso in countries like Australia and New Zealand that were able to keep cases to a minimum before that.  But I’m pretty sure there were studies done proving it was more contagious as well.

[Fireballer 2,639]

9 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

If you had eyes, you could see that it was much more contagious.  Just look at the huge spike in cases even here, but even moreso in countries like Australia and New Zealand that were able to keep cases to a minimum before that.  But I’m pretty sure there were studies done proving it was more contagious as well.

I don’t disagree that it was more contagious.  But that phrase was thrown around a lot as it related mask usage.  Why, as Omicron spread, did masks become less effective?  

[TimHauck 2,621]

12 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

I don’t disagree that it was more contagious.  But that phrase was thrown around a lot as it related mask usage.  Why, as Omicron spread, did masks become less effective?  

No I don’t know all the technical definitions behind it, but I believe Omicron was more contagious because it required a lower viral load to get people sick compared to prior strains.  Thus, if masks were able to reduce viral load (even a little bit), then they would become even less effective with Omicron.

[TimHauck 2,621]

On 2/24/2023 at 12:04 PM, lod001 said:

You're level of ignorance is off the charts. The sh1t never worked. You have ZERO, nothing, nada that proves it worked. There is proof though that is it killing and causing horrible adverse reactions worldwide. You're problem is that you are simply way to stupid to understand what is happened and keep listening to garbage subhumans like Hotez. At least Tucker is on it and hopefully Musk steps up like he says he's going to. 

 

I definitely would want my wife’s gynecologist to be calling for people’s execution, not sure about you guys

 

 

 

[Reality 3,099]

On 5/14/2023 at 12:51 PM, Reality said:

So, about those masks...

https://www.city-journal.org/article/the-harm-caused-by-masks?utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=Organic_Social

 

 

 

The Harm Caused by Masks

A new study suggests that the excess carbon dioxide breathed in by mask-E evidence continues to mount that mask mandates were perhaps the worst public-health intervention in modern American history. While concluding that wearing masks “probably makes little or no difference” in preventing the spread of viruses, a recent Cochrane review also emphasized that “more attention should be paid to describing and quantifying the harms” that may come from wearing masks. A new study from Germany does just that, and it suggests that the excess carbon dioxide breathed in by mask-wearers may have substantial ill-effects on their health—and, in the case of pregnant women, their unborn children’s.

Mask-wearers breathe in greater amounts of air that should have been expelled from their bodies and released out into the open. “[A] significant rise in carbon dioxide occurring while wearing a mask is scientifically proven in many studies,” write the German authors. “Fresh air has around 0.04% CO2,” they observe, while chronic exposure at CO2 levels of 0.3 percent is “toxic.” How much CO2 do mask-wearers breathe in? The authors write that “masks bear a possible chronic exposure to low level carbon dioxide of 1.41–3.2% CO2 of the inhaled air in reliable human experiments.”

In other words, while eight times the normal level of carbon dioxide is toxic, research suggests that mask-wearers (specifically those who wear masks for more than 5 minutes at a time) are breathing in 35 to 80 times normal levels.

The German study, a scoping review of existing research, aimed “to investigate the toxicological effects of face masks in terms of CO2 rebreathing on developing life, specifically for pregnant women, children, and adolescents.” The latter two groups, of course, have been among those most frequently subjected to mask mandates in schools, despite Covid’s low levels of risk for them and the evidence that masks don’t work.

What can breathing too much carbon dioxide do to you? The authors write that “at levels between 0.05% and 0.5% CO2,” one might experience an “increased heart rate, increased blood pressure and overall increased circulation with the symptoms of headache, fatigue, difficulty concentrating, dizziness, rhinitis, and dry cough.” Rates above 0.5 percent can lead to “reduced cognitive performance, impaired decision-making and reduced speed of cognitive solutions.” Beyond 1 percent, “the harmful effects include respiratory acidosis, metabolic stress, increased blood flow and decreased exercise tolerance.” Again, mask-wearers are likely breathing in CO2 levels between 1.4 percent and 3.2 percent—well above any of these thresholds. What’s more, “Testes metabolism and cell respiration have been shown to be inhibited increasingly by rising levels of CO2.”

So, high blood pressure, reduced thinking ability, respiratory problems, and reproductive concerns are among the many possible results of effectively poisoning oneself by breathing in too much carbon dioxide.

The authors write that “it is clear that carbon dioxide rebreathing, especially when using N95 masks, is above the 0.8% CO2 limit set by the US Navy to reduce the risk of stillbirths and birth defects on submarines with female personnel who may be pregnant.” In other words, mandates have forced pregnant women to wear masks resulting in levels of CO2 inhalation that would be prohibited if they were serving on a Navy submarine.

Indeed, according to the authors, there exists “circumstantial evidence that popular mask use may be related to current observations of a significant rise of 28% to 33% in stillbirths worldwide and a reduced verbal, motor, and overall cognitive performance of two full standard deviations in scores in children born during the pandemic.” They cite recent data from Australia, which “shows that lockdown restrictions and other measures (including masks that have been mandatory in Australia), in the absence of high rates of COVID-19 disease, were associated with a significant increase in stillborn births.” Meantime, “no increased risk of stillbirths was observed in Sweden,” which famously defied the public-health cabal and went its own way in setting Covid policies.

As for countries where mask-wearing has long been common, the authors write, “Even before the pandemic, in Asia the stillbirth rates have been significantly higher” than in Eurasia, Oceania, or North Africa.

“It has to be pointed out that this data on the toxicity of carbon dioxide on reproduction has been known for 60 years,” the authors observe. For this reason, they write, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), which is part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), has CO2 threshold limits of 3 percent for 15 minutes and 0.5 percent for eight hours in workplace ambient air. Yet the CDC has been perhaps the primary pusher of masks in the United States.

Nor is increased CO2 intake the only health danger that results from wearing masks. The study focused only on CO2, but the authors note that “other noxious agents in the masks contribute to toxicological long-term effects like the inhalation of synthetic microfibers, carcinogenic compounds and volatile organic compounds.” They add that “the increased carbon dioxide content of the breathing air behind the mask may also lead to a displacement of oxygen.” Masks are also uncomfortable and unhygienic, and they profoundly compromise human social interaction.

In light of all this, it seems indefensible to mandate—or even to advise—the wearing of masks, especially among the young. The authors write, “Keeping in mind the weak antiviral mask efficacy, the general trend of forcing mask mandates even for the vulnerable subgroups is not based on sound scientific evidence and not in line with the obligation in particular to protect born or unborn children from potential harmful influences.”

Public-health officials—and the executive-branch leaders who credulously listened to them—ignored centuries of Western norms, the best medical evidence, and common sense, deciding that their own novel and evidence-free course was the one that all of society should be forced to follow. We should never again indulge such an obvious and destructive misstep.

Masks didn't work, at all, and may do more harm than good. Just a reminder.

[TimHauck 2,621]

13 minutes ago, Reality said:

Masks didn't work, at all, and may do more harm than good. Just a reminder.

The Cochrane Review concluded that the vaccines were effective (and never actually said masks were not).  Just a reminder.

[lickin_starfish 1,893]

The virus has mutated because Timmy didn't take his boosters. Just a reminder.

[Wade Garrett 155]

Of course this stormfront light forum's cultist are anti-vaxx, anti-science.

Yet you morons amazingly enough use science to post your retarded takes on the daily.

Astounding  I have to share a country with you idiots. 

[League Champion 1,896]

9 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

Of course this stormfront light forum's cultist are anti-vaxx, anti-science.

Why should I get vaxxed? I've had COVID numerous times and have NATURAL antibodies. Why would I put an untested "emergency vaccine" in me or my Kids bodies? That would be insane!! 

Tell your buddies about Science. Especially where there are 2 genders. Or that doesn't count anymore??? 

YOU'RE A HYPOCRITE PEDOCRAT SNOWFLAKE

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,239]

18 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

Of course this stormfront light forum's cultist are anti-vaxx, anti-science.

Yet you morons amazingly enough use science to post your retarded takes on the daily.

Astounding  I have to share a country with you idiots. 

which fake "vaxx" are we anti?  The one that science proved did ZERO to stop infection therefore ZERO to stop the spread?

neat vaccine

[Wade Garrett 155]

3 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

which fake "vaxx" are we anti?  The one that science proved did ZERO to stop infection therefore ZERO to stop the spread?

neat vaccine

Moron.

Ugh, the decline in covid just happened to coincide with Joe's amazing vaccine rollout...

I swear I don't know why I waste my time with you inbred, uneducated idiots...SMH

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,239]

9 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

Moron.

Ugh, the decline in covid just happened to coincide with Joe's amazing vaccine rollout...

I swear I don't know why I waste my time with you inbred, uneducated idiots...SMH

oh so getting the "vaccine" prevented you from getting covid?  Are we back to that?

glad you support the Trump jab, good for you

you probably think lockdowns are amazing too

 

 

[League Champion 1,896]

2 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

Moron.

Ugh, the decline in covid just happened to coincide with Joe's amazing vaccine rollout...

I swear I don't know why I waste my time with you inbred, uneducated idiots...SMH

Haha, you stupid Pedocrat. You did what they told you to, didn't you? You probably made your whole Family put that useless poison in their bodies!! Keep telling yourself it was the right thing to do, you have a ticking time bomb in your chest. GOOD LUCK BOYO!! 

[Wade Garrett 155]

16 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

oh so getting the "vaccine" prevented you from getting covid?  Are we back to that?

glad you support the Trump jab, good for you

you probably think lockdowns are amazing too

 

 

Moron, the vaxx was 95% effective against the OG strain.  But of course anti-science idiots like you cultist are unaware that viruses mutate (understanding this would require you tards to have IQs of at least 80).  And while the vaxx was less effective against mutated strains what it did remain extremely effective at was preventing serious illness.

Hence why the dirty, anti-vaxxers (ie cultist) died so very bigly during covid.  You morons literally killed your own voters.

SAD

[League Champion 1,896]

14 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

so very bigly

Good luck retard. But at least you did what they told you. You're a good Sheep Boyo!

[Wade Garrett 155]

7 minutes ago, League Champion said:

Good luck retard. But at least you did what they told you. You're a good Sheep Boyo!

You mad so many boomer cultist died because they're anti-science?

Yea you mad. 

[TimHauck 2,621]

56 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

which fake "vaxx" are we anti?  The one that science proved did ZERO to stop infection therefore ZERO to stop the spread?

neat vaccine

Actually science proved it was pretty effective at reducing infection before Omicron

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,239]

34 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

Moron, the vaxx was 95% effective against the OG strain.  But of course anti-science idiots like you cultist are unaware that viruses mutate (understanding this would require you tards to have IQs of at least 80).  And while the vaxx was less effective against mutated strains what it did remain extremely effective at was preventing serious illness.

Hence why the dirty, anti-vaxxers (ie cultist) died so very bigly during covid.  You morons literally killed your own voters.

SAD

ahh ok, so once you had the vaxx you couldn't get it, got it, good to know

once again you are wrong, it never prevented covid infection, and it never created immunity.

you were always ALWAYS at risk of catching the covid and spreading it