Does Trump Pardon Roger Stone?

[RLLD 4,230]

1 minute ago, IGotWorms said:

Agreed

LMFAO.....that one is WAYYYY over now, already been shown to be a Deomcrat-driven lie, and people might go to jail for it....but hold on to that if you must I guess....

[IGotWorms 4,058]

13 minutes ago, RLLD said:

LMFAO.....that one is WAYYYY over now, already been shown to be a Deomcrat-driven lie, and people might go to jail for it....but hold on to that if you must I guess....

Shown how? Convictions after jury trials? Multiple people pleading guilty to having committed crimes in connection with the scheme? The 400 page mueller report and all corroborating evidence?

[TimmySmith 2,782]

2 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Shown how? Convictions after jury trials? Multiple people pleading guilty to having committed crimes in connection with the scheme? The 400 page mueller report and all corroborating evidence?

What crimes were committed in connection with the "scheme"?   

[MDC 7,426]

50 minutes ago, RLLD said:

OK, well then, welcome to the United States government...I guess.....long and rich tradition.

You mean the drain the swamp / Law and Order guy is just like every other POTUS??

GTFO.  

[IGotWorms 4,058]

26 minutes ago, TimmySmith said:

What crimes were committed in connection with the "scheme"?   

Well certainly all the ones folks plead guilty to and were convicted of. Obstruction of justice as well, mueller felt sitting president couldn’t be indicted for that which I believe is bullsh1t. And personally I think there was a huge focking mountain of evidence to charge conspiracy, but for some reason I’ll never understand mueller chose to soft pedal that.

[drobeski 3,061]

30 minutes ago, TimmySmith said:

What crimes were committed in connection with the "scheme"?   

None 

He still doesn't get that the scheme was Mueller and the investigation itself..  

[posty 2,700]

Last time I checked the President can pardon whomever he pretty much wants... 

[TBayXXXVII 2,545]

3 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Well certainly all the ones folks plead guilty to and were convicted of. Obstruction of justice as well, mueller felt sitting president couldn’t be indicted for that which I believe is bullsh1t. And personally I think there was a huge focking mountain of evidence to charge conspiracy, but for some reason I’ll never understand mueller chose to soft pedal that.

Because the source of that "evidence" was fabricated and if it went to trial, it would have been found out.  It's in the Democrats' best interest that Trump wasn't impeached for this because they can always pretend that it was true.  As proof, they have to hoodwinked.  If Trump were impeached and there were deep digging investigations and it was found that not only were the Clinton's behind everything, that Obama and Biden were involved, it would all but guarantee Trump's re-election.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,430]

20 hours ago, MDC said:

Process crime. Doesn’t count if you’re wealthy and/or connected.

So Trump has only pardoned wealthy and connected people? Don’t let facts get in the way of a trolling, right? What a sad little man. 

[IGotWorms 4,058]

9 minutes ago, posty said:

Last time I checked the President can pardon whomever he pretty much wants... 

Barr said in his own confirmation hearing that it’d be obstruction of justice if linked to investigation against president.

[RLLD 4,230]

21 minutes ago, MDC said:

You mean the drain the swamp / Law and Order guy is just like every other POTUS??

GTFO.  

I do, the prior three presidents might be among the most corrupt we have ever seen, Trump is something of a breath of fresh air despite his flaws.

[MDC 7,426]

31 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I do, the prior three presidents might be among the most corrupt we have ever seen, Trump is something of a breath of fresh air despite his flaws.

Wow  

[TimmySmith 2,782]

49 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Well certainly all the ones folks plead guilty to and were convicted of. Obstruction of justice as well, mueller felt sitting president couldn’t be indicted for that which I believe is bullsh1t. And personally I think there was a huge focking mountain of evidence to charge conspiracy, but for some reason I’ll never understand mueller chose to soft pedal that.

Nope, they were all crimes either in connection with the investigation or federal crimes that had nothing to do with Trump.  None had anything to do with any scheme.  The fakest of lawyers would know that.  Mueller had nothing he could prove in any court.  

[drobeski 3,061]

4 minutes ago, MDC said:

Wow  

So uninformed.  By choice ?

[Masshole 642]

53 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Well certainly all the ones folks plead guilty to and were convicted of. Obstruction of justice as well, mueller felt sitting president couldn’t be indicted for that which I believe is bullsh1t. And personally I think there was a huge focking mountain of evidence to charge conspiracy, but for some reason I’ll never understand mueller chose to soft pedal that.

What????    Worms, I think you missed the memo.   Mueller himself said in the report that they found no evidence of collusion between the campaign and the Russians.    EVERYTHING that has come out since then has confirmed and reinforced that.   

ON second thought, just keep being you man.    It only helps when you guys continue to act like the Russian thing had any basis.    It just shows you have no interest in anything other than a political agenda.    The convictions have nothing to do with Russian collusion.    I know you know that but you choose to pretend like you don't.    You are "fake news", sir.  

[IGotWorms 4,058]

13 minutes ago, Masshole said:

What????    Worms, I think you missed the memo.   Mueller himself said in the report that they found no evidence of collusion between the campaign and the Russians.    EVERYTHING that has come out since then has confirmed and reinforced that.   

ON second thought, just keep being you man.    It only helps when you guys continue to act like the Russian thing had any basis.    It just shows you have no interest in anything other than a political agenda.    The convictions have nothing to do with Russian collusion.    I know you know that but you choose to pretend like you don't.    You are "fake news", sir.  

Um no, Mueller didn’t say that at all. First of all “collusion” isn’t the legal term, conspiracy is, and mueller went out of his way to say that. Then he laid out many instances where Trump campaign  understood Russia would interfere for his benefit and Trump campaign welcomed that interference. Hell trump said so himself on national tv (“Russia, if you’re listening...”) Mueller did NOT say there wasn’t evidence and in fact there was a sh1t ton of it. Mueller thought it wasn’t enough to indict, though, which is ridiculous as many MANY people have been indicted on far less. He wanted the smoking gun email, testimony etc but you rarely have that. Circumstantial evidence makes most cases.

PLUS the reason you don’t have smoking gun is the many instances of obstruction of justice mueller detailed in his report. But he thought he couldn’t indict a sitting president, which is official policy of DOJ but dumb.

I’d recommend reading the actual report. It’s clear all you know is from the bullsh1t spin from Barr, Fox News, OAN etc.

[Masshole 642]

You had a chance at a coherent response.   You were close but you blew it with the "Hell trump said so himself on national tv (“Russia, if you’re listening...”)" .    To try and make that into that Trump was actually trying to get Russia to do something is laughable beyond belief.    That you have to throw that in there shows how weak you know your argument is.   

Can you let me know where you posted your frustration with the Clinton campaign for using Fusion GPS to solicit Russian agitprop to use in a political campaign?   Because that is 100% factual and wasn't someone just making a joke about it.    If you are torqued off about Trump making a joke about it, you must be ballistic about that, right?

[IGotWorms 4,058]

8 minutes ago, Masshole said:

You had a chance at a coherent response.   You were close but you blew it with the "Hell trump said so himself on national tv (“Russia, if you’re listening...”)" .    To try and make that into that Trump was actually trying to get Russia to do something is laughable beyond belief.    That you have to throw that in there shows how weak you know your argument is.   

Can you let me know where you posted your frustration with the Clinton campaign for using Fusion GPS to solicit Russian agitprop to use in a political campaign?   Because that is 100% factual and wasn't someone just making a joke about it.    It you are torqued off about Trump making a joke about it, you must be ballistic about that, right?

Laughable? It was straight from the horses mouth! For everyone to see and hear!

Basically you’ve got a murder suspect saying yeah I hate that focker and I’d love to see him dead. Then he is killed. Doesn’t automatically mean you did it, but boy do you have some fockin explaining to do!

[Hardcore troubadour 15,430]

1 minute ago, IGotWorms said:

Laughable? It was straight from the horses mouth! For everyone to see and hear!

Basically you’ve got a murder suspect saying yeah I hate that focker and I’d love to see him die. Then he does die. Doesn’t mean you did it, but boy do you have some fockin explaining to do!

The insignificant minutia they cling to. Yeah, he was serious when he said that. 

[IGotWorms 4,058]

Focker looks straight in the camera and says do it! Jesus Christ 

[IGotWorms 4,058]

2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

The insignificant minutia they cling to. Yeah, he was serious when he said that. 

Yeah sure it was a joke. Even though he then did it again with Ukraine and China.

You must be the most gullible man alive. All Trumpers are, really.

[Masshole 642]

29 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Focker looks straight in the camera and says do it! Jesus Christ 

I tire of the subject.  All I'll say to add to this is that if Trump was really doing what you are accusing him of - he would pick a public rally as his method of communicating to the Russians what he wants them to do?     Wouldn't he be putting chalk marks on telephone poles or some other non-traceable way to communicate with Russia?    I mean come on, really?   

You guys have to pick one; either Trump is a moron or he's a stealth double agent leading a life of intrigue.   There ain't a lot of overlap between those two positions.  

[TimmySmith 2,782]

Mueller had Trump egging on the Russians.  He had the Russians going after Hillary.  But he nothing, because there was nothing linking the two.  And not for lack of trying to link them.  Hillary paid for Steele's nonsense in an effort to try to link them and she couldn't.  Because there was nothing.  And trying to link Mueller's indictments to Trump is lefty hack stuff, as is saying that Mueller's investigation made money.  It was a waste of time and money.  

[IGotWorms 4,058]

Just now, Masshole said:

I tire of the subject.  All I'll say to add to this is that if Trump was really doing what you are accusing him of - he would pick a public rally as his method of communicating to the Russians what he wants them to do?     Wouldn't he be putting chalk marks on telephone poles or some other non-traceable way to communicate with Russia?    I mean come on, really?   

You guys have to pick one; either Trump is a moron or he's a stealth double agent leading a life of intrigue.   They're ain't a lot of overlap between those two positions.  

He’s a terrible president but no dummy. He did it publicly so that he could claim he had nothing to hide. In fact that was one of their key defenses.

[Reality 3,121]

[Masshole 642]

2 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

He’s a terrible president but no dummy. He did it publicly so that he could claim he had nothing to hide. In fact that was one of their key defenses.

Duly noted - Worms thinks that Donald J Trump is one of the smartest presidents ever to hold the office.    One who is playing 3D chess and is 3 steps ahead of everyone else.   Trump is so keenly attuned to our political system and ways to manipulate it that he's making defensive moves before anyone even knows what's happening.

I gotta give it to you Worms, you really have a lot of respect for the guy's intelligence.   I didn't even vote for the guy and am only behind him now largely due to those who are aligned against him.   But you???   You have an appreciation of Trump and respect for his intellect that borders on obsessive.    You may want to dial that back a little bit.    I don't think he's that smart.  

[drobeski 3,061]

33 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

He’s a terrible president but no dummy. He did it publicly so that he could claim he had nothing to hide. In fact that was one of their key defenses.

stop 

[MDC 7,426]

Another hilarious time capsule.  

[Hardcore troubadour 15,430]

Damn I won this thread. Bigly

[Maximum Overkill 1,988]

23 hours ago, MDC said:

Another hilarious time capsule.  

Look at you, digging up 4 year old threads  

[MDC 7,426]

17 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Look at you, digging up 4 year old threads  

You’d be interested if it was tranny related.  

[jbycho 754]

48 minutes ago, MDC said:

You’d be interested if it was tranny related.  

You would masturbate if it was tranny related. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,430]

2 minutes ago, jbycho said:

You would masturbate if it was tranny related. 

It’s funny because his wife is fat! 

[jbycho 754]

3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

It’s funny because his wife is fat! 

And you can be damn sure she rules the roost. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,430]

5 minutes ago, jbycho said:

And you can be damn sure she rules the roost. 

Hell yeah. MDC was renting a room off of Craigslist when he met her. She had a house. No joke! You can look it up Jack! 

[jbycho 754]

4 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Hell yeah. MDC was renting a room off of Craigslist when he met her. She had a house. No joke! You can look it up Jack! 

Ouch.  He's indebted to the fattie. Life over. 

[MDC 7,426]

Hardcore can’t get it up for his wife without boner pills ever since her rough pregnancy at age 40. Either she’s gross or he’s low T. Probably some of both.  

[Hardcore troubadour 15,430]

[Hardcore troubadour 15,430]

3 hours ago, MDC said:

Hardcore can’t get it up for his wife without boner pills ever since her rough pregnancy at age 40. Either she’s gross or he’s low T. Probably some of both.  

8 years ago. Not that I GAF. Just pointing out this punks antics.