Jump to content
Patented Phil

Kyle Rittenhouse - Criminal or Hero?

Recommended Posts

Just now, jonmx said:

A hot girl had no business wearing that sexy skirt.   She wouldn't have been raped had she just stayed home. Instead she went out looking to get raped.    

pimpledoosh is too easy call out. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, jonmx said:

A hot girl had no business wearing that sexy skirt.   She wouldn't have been raped had she just stayed home. Instead she went out looking to get raped.    

Only an idiot loke Pimp would blame the attackers.   

This might rank as the dumbest thing I've seen posted on this board, but it's not surprising it came from you.

What a dumbass comparison.

🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

This might rank as the dumbest thing I've seen posted on this board, but it's not surprising it came from you.

What a dumbass comparison.

🤣

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, jonmx said:

Yes, a jury who came to a decision with a mob outside who would have burnt the courthouse down if they ruled not guilty. 

 

7 hours ago, squistion said:

Not true. :lol:

Yeah, nothing would've happened.  You really are an idiot.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, BrahmaBulls said:

Here's over 11K pieces of stupidity to entertain you

https://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/profile/45260-pimpadeaux/

 

Kyle Rittenhouse, 17, had no business dressing up like Rambo, carrying a rifle and putting himself in the middle of people who were there to commit violence and protest what he embodied. If jonmx wants a more accurate comparison to a girl asking for it because of what she's wearing, put in into a scantily clad outfit and have her attend a rapist convention.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Kyle Rittenhouse, 17, had no business dressing up like Rambo, carrying a rifle and putting himself in the middle of people who were there to commit violence and protest what he embodied. If jonmx wants a more accurate comparison to a girl asking for it because of what she's wearing, put in into a scantily clad outfit and have her attend a rapist convention.

You have no business telling Kyle what he can wear or where he can go.  You are perfectly fine with pedo male teachers crossdressing and raping kids, so your moral authority is total crap. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, jonmx said:

You have no business telling Kyle what he can wear or where he can go.  You are perfectly fine with pedo male teachers crossdressing and raping kids, so your moral authority is total crap. 

I support his right to wear and go wherever he wants, just like I support you dressing up in seal suit and jumping into a pool of great-white sharks and you being perfectly fine with your orange-boy pedo who who expresses lust for his own daughter and makes out with her in bed.

The freedom to do what one wants doesn't it make it good judgment, boyo, but you have a right to be a dumbass.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

I support his right to wear and go wherever he wants, just like I support you dressing up in seal suit and jumping into a pool of great-white sharks and you being perfectly fine with your orange-boy pedo who who expresses lust for his own daughter and makes out with her in bed.

The freedom to do what one wants doesn't it make it good judgment, boyo, but you have a right to be a dumbass.

If you really think Kyle has that right, then what the eff is your point at bringing it up.  Just because your bootlicking media says it, does not mean you have to mindless repeat it it like a good little useful idiot. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, jonmx said:

If you really think Kyle has that right, then what the eff is your point at bringing it up.  Just because your bootlicking media says it, does not mean you have to mindless repeat it it like a good little useful idiot. 

The point being that just because one has a right to do something doesn't make it good judgment, boyo. You have a right to stick your pecker in a fire-ant mound, but that doesn't make it a good idea. 

He had no business being down there with a gun. But if he saved just one trash dumpster's life ...

Just look at the way he blubbered like a little b!tch on the witness stand. He was a boy and had no business being there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, jonmx said:

If you really think Kyle has that right, then what the eff is your point at bringing it up.  Just because your bootlicking media says it, does not mean you have to mindless repeat it it like a good little useful idiot. 

this guy again, friggen bootlicker following your bootlicking media

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Pimpadeaux said:

The point being that just because one has a right to do something doesn't make it good judgment, boyo. You have a right to stick your pecker in a fire-ant mound, but that doesn't make it a good idea. 

He had no business being down there with a gun. But if he saved just one trash dumpster's life ...

Just look at the way he blubbered like a little b!tch on the witness stand. He was a boy and had no business being there.

We are not talking about judgement.   The authoritarian bastards threw Kyle in jail and accused him of murder when it was clearly an act of self-defense captured on video none the less.  We should be pissed at the abuses of citizens by an out of control government, not some kid who legally makes a bad judgment. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, jonmx said:

We are not talking about judgement.   The authoritarian bastards threw Kyle in jail and accused him of murder when it was clearly an act of self-defense captured on video none the less.  We should be pissed at the abuses of citizens by an out of control government, not some kid who legally makes a bad judgment. 

You clearly do not understand how this works. You only support police when it works within your paradigm. 

And it is a matter of judgment. A 17-year-old has no business walking into that situation with an assault rifle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

You clearly do not understand how this works. You only support police when it works within your paradigm. 

And it is a matter of judgment. A 17-year-old has no business walking into that situation with an assault rifle.

This.

He absolutely should not have done that, for a variety of reasons, perhaps the most important was a single person with a weapon entering the midst of a violent mob is a profoundly stupid move.

By all rights, the kids should be dead, once he empties his mag and goes to reload, they should have pummeled him, but in reality they were just cowards pretending to be tough.

Moreover, do we really want individuals, let alone 17 year old kids, deciding the world has arrived at a place where they are going to arm up and walk the street ready to kill? I think not.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, RLLD said:

This.

He absolutely should not have done that, for a variety of reasons, perhaps the most important was a single person with a weapon entering the midst of a violent mob is a profoundly stupid move.

By all rights, the kids should be dead, once he empties his mag and goes to reload, they should have pummeled him, but in reality they were just cowards pretending to be tough.

Moreover, do we really want individuals, let alone 17 year old kids, deciding the world has arrived at a place where they are going to arm up and walk the street ready to kill? I think not.....

Exactly. We have law enforcement to address this kind of situation. And  of course a 17-year-old boy wandering around amid a violent mob is going to draw attention. 

Sure, from a legal standpoint it was self-defense. 

But in the end, the only thing he was protecting was himself. His lack of judgment could have gotten innocent people killed as well.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Exactly. We have law enforcement to address this kind of situation. And  of course a 17-year-old boy wandering around amid a violent mob is going to draw attention. 

Sure, from a legal standpoint it was self-defense. 

But in the end, the only thing he was protecting was himself. His lack of judgment could have gotten innocent people killed as well.

 

Agree completely.   He got lucky.....this could have gone south for him and so many more.......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Moreover, do we really want individuals, let alone 17 year old kids, deciding the world has arrived at a place where they are going to arm up and walk the street ready to kill? I think not.....

Ready to defend......ready to kill in defense. Yes......that's where we are at. Until those that do wrong, those that wish harm, those that seek to be lawless.....are held responsible & shown that they will not be tolerated. Our government needs to restore the order that our Forefathers envisioned......and earn our trust again. Until then.....yes, this is where we are at.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

You clearly do not understand how this works. You only support police when it works within your paradigm. 

And it is a matter of judgment. A 17-year-old has no business walking into that situation with an assault rifle.

nailed it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Nomad99 said:

Ready to defend......ready to kill in defense. Yes......that's where we are at. Until those that do wrong, those that wish harm, those that seek to be lawless.....are held responsible & shown that they will not be tolerated. Our government needs to restore the order that our Forefathers envisioned......and earn our trust again. Until then.....yes, this is where we are at.

I am not sure we are all the way there yet, but i do agree that is where we are trending.   Sadly, the violent people are out there criminalizing the good....and when the good people fight back.....THEY are held accountable....its becoming bizzarro world

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I am not sure we are all the way there yet, but i do agree that is where we are trending.   Sadly, the violent people are out there criminalizing the good....and when the good people fight back.....THEY are held accountable....its becoming bizzarro world

Truth brother🙄

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Pimpadeaux said:

His lack of judgment could have gotten innocent people killed as well.

He's an American Hero! Unlike your Liberal Hero George Floyd. 

Rittenhouse didn't ask to be attacked, he was violently attacked and hit with a skateboard. What the hell was he supposed to do? He blew the Bluehair's hand off like anyone in their right mind would of if attacked by violent Liberals. 

It's a very novel concept, the Bluehair F'd around and found out. Had he not F'd around, he'd still have a hand. 

Blame the Bluehair, not Rittenhouse, The American Hero 🇺🇸

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Maximum Overkill said:

He's an American Hero! Unlike your Liberal Hero George Floyd. 

Rittenhouse didn't ask to be attacked, he was violently attacked and hit with a skateboard. What the hell was he supposed to do? He blew the Bluehair's hand off like anyone in their right mind would of if attacked by violent Liberals. 

It's a very novel concept, the Bluehair F'd around and found out. Had he not F'd around, he'd still have a hand. 

Blame the Bluehair, not Rittenhouse, The American Hero 🇺🇸

Notice that the left never asks or questions why the bad guys were there....only why the good guy was there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, jonmx said:

You are perfectly fine with pedo male teachers crossdressing and raping kids

You list crossdressing first, is that worse than raping kids you sick fock?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TimHauck said:

You list crossdressing first, is that worse than raping kids you sick fock?

:doh:Liberals get dumber by the minute. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Nomad99 said:

there....only why the good guy was there.

Exactly!! From page 1 in the liberal playbook

Kyle shouldn't of been there, the violent Liberals destroying private property, NO PROBLEM 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Kyle Rittenhouse, 17, had no business dressing up like Rambo, carrying a rifle and putting himself in the middle of people who were there to commit violence and protest what he embodied. If jonmx wants a more accurate comparison to a girl asking for it because of what she's wearing, put in into a scantily clad outfit and have her attend a rapist convention.

Yet a jury of his peers deemed his actions to be legal.

 

So it appears you're wrong, Rustor McFuckstor.

Again.

I won't argue what he did was dumb.  Just plain stupid.

If we locked up every stupid person in this country there wouldn't be many folks left.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, BLS said:

Yet a jury of his peers deemed his actions to be legal.

 

So it appears you're wrong, Rustor McFuckstor.

Again.

I won't argue what he did was dumb.  Just plain stupid.

If we locked up every stupid person in this country there wouldn't be many folks left.

I think you are agreeing with him more than you realize

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dude's a hero. He shoots stupid people. :dunno:

You libs may want to stay clear of him. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Exactly!! From page 1 in the liberal playbook

Kyle shouldn't of been there, the violent Liberals destroying private property, NO PROBLEM 

Not surprising you need a deluded 17-year-old who cried like a b!tch on witness stand as your first line of defense.

🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

 

 

Liberals are focking idiots. Pimpledoosh is about as smart as mdcack. So IQ around 25....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

MOMMY, THERE'S A SPINDLY KID WEARING BLACK AND RIDING A SKATEBOARD UP THE STREET! GET KYLE RITTENHOUSE! HEL'LL PROTECT US! PLEASE, MOMMY, PLEASE! HE COULD BE OUR HERO, TOO! :cry:

🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/26/2024 at 9:43 PM, Pimpadeaux said:

This might rank as the dumbest thing I've seen posted on this board, but it's not surprising it came from you.

What a dumbass comparison.

🤣

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, squistion said:

 

Must be a miserable existence having your day filled with outrage. So glad I don’t live in your world 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

Must be a miserable existence having your day filled with outrage. So glad I don’t live in your world 

Choosing to not be a liberal frees you from living a life of misery and ineptitude. 🍸

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×