January 6th

[League Champion 1,896]

14 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

lost

 

 

[Fnord 2,054]

1 hour ago, League Champion said:

 

 

Just engaging in your patented Twitter trolling, or do you actually believe this?

[Hardcore troubadour 14,960]

They know Trump got 75 million legit votes. They know Biden didn’t get 81 million legit votes. If they didn’t know that, they would want Trump to be the nominee. 

[thegeneral 2,939]

5 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

They know Trump got 75 million legit votes. They know Biden didn’t get 81 million legit votes. If they didn’t know that, they would want Trump to be the nominee. 

No fake votes for Trump all for Biden

You guys are too much. 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,243]

2 hours ago, IGotWorms said:

This is all really bad for Trump. He was briefed on the fake electors plot  

 

https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/13/politics/trump-2020-oval-office-fake-electors-recordings

every state always has 2 sets of electors but MMMKAY

 

[IGotWorms 4,057]

9 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

every state always has 2 sets of electors but MMMKAY

 

Link?

And absolute  at your being a supposed independent

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,243]

44 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Link?

And absolute  at your being a supposed independent

yah I know facts make me on the right I get it

https://www.archives.gov/electoral-college/electors#who-selects

Who selects the electors?

Choosing each State's electors is a two-part process. First, the political parties in each State choose slates of potential electors sometime before the general election. Second, during the general election, the voters in each State select their State's electors by casting their ballots.

every state, every year has republican and democrat electors determined

also I have never claimed to be an independent

centrist or libertarian (small L) is how I identify

 

[IGotWorms 4,057]

18 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

yah I know facts make me on the right I get it

https://www.archives.gov/electoral-college/electors#who-selects

Who selects the electors?

Choosing each State's electors is a two-part process. First, the political parties in each State choose slates of potential electors sometime before the general election. Second, during the general election, the voters in each State select their State's electors by casting their ballots.

every state, every year has republican and democrat electors determined

also I have never claimed to be an independent

centrist or libertarian (small L) is how I identify

 

Yeah I understand the primary process. That’s not what we’re talking about here

You are not even remotely a centrist, and in my experience 90% or so-called libertarians are just more extreme republicans.

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,243]

5 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Yeah I understand the primary process. That’s not what we’re talking about here

You are not even remotely a centrist, and in my experience 90% or so-called libertarians are just more extreme republicans.

ahh yes extreme, pro gay, pro abortion, anti-war, anti-govt

again I have challenged you time and again to show me how my beliefs align with either side completely and you fail, thats what makes me centrist

as far as the primary process, once again all I have stated is that every state selects 2 sets of electors every single election.  THEY ARE NOT FAKE ELECTORS

there is precedence set that during a challenge of an election (which is constitutionally protected) pending a court outcome both sets of electors may be sent to congress and picked by the vice president (Hawaii 1960) 

this whole fake electors thing is more made up media leftist hysteria

 

[IGotWorms 4,057]

13 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

ahh yes extreme, pro gay, pro abortion, anti-war, anti-govt

again I have challenged you time and again to show me how my beliefs align with either side completely and you fail, thats what makes me centrist

as far as the primary process, once again all I have stated is that every state selects 2 sets of electors every single election.  THEY ARE NOT FAKE ELECTORS

there is precedence set that during a challenge of an election (which is constitutionally protected) pending a court outcome both sets of electors may be sent to congress and picked by the vice president (Hawaii 1960) 

this whole fake electors thing is more made up media leftist hysteria

 

Nope, false. You select electors for your primary according to party rules. Following the primary you select electors according to the outcome of the election. You don’t get to select new, FAKE electors at that point, which is what the Trump campaign did with the knowledge and blessing of Trump himself.

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,243]

6 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Nope, false. You select electors for your primary according to party rules. Following the primary you select electors according to the outcome of the election. You don’t get to select new, FAKE electors at that point, which is what the Trump campaign did with the knowledge and blessing of Trump himself.

both parties from each state can send its electors regardless

the vice president can choose whoever he wants, which seems dumb

once again though, when a court challenge is issued thats why you submit both sets of electors

its not this big ole issue like you libtards want to think

and yep Trump saying go ahead and send alternative is once again part of the system that is allowed

but of course its not now cause TRUMP!!!! TDS activated

just like challenging elections was perfectly fine until trump as well

 

[Dozer FBG 324]

2 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

They know Trump got 75 million legit votes. They know Biden didn’t get 81 million legit votes. If they didn’t know that, they would want Trump to be the nominee. 

Come on man… let’s stop doing this. It’s just not true.

If you don’t accept the results of a free and fair election, you stand against democracy.

If you stand against democracy you stand against America.

Its gotta start with you, gb. 

[IGotWorms 4,057]

13 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

both parties from each state can send its electors regardless

the vice president can choose whoever he wants, which seems dumb

once again though, when a court challenge is issued thats why you submit both sets of electors

its not this big ole issue like you libtards want to think

and yep Trump saying go ahead and send alternative is once again part of the system that is allowed

but of course its not now cause TRUMP!!!! TDS activated

just like challenging elections was perfectly fine until trump as well

 

This is false and you are conflating the primary and general election processes, which are very different for obvious reasons. Sending slates of electors is that do not comport with the certified outcome of each states’ voting results in the general election is fraudulent.

[IGotWorms 4,057]

4 minutes ago, Dozer FBG said:

Come on man… let’s stop doing this. It’s just not true.

If you don’t accept the results of a free and fair election, you stand against democracy.

If you stand against democracy you stand against America.

Its gotta start with you, gb. 

HT is a b1tch who won’t even stand by his nutty conspiracy sh1t. When you force him to the mat on it his claim is Biden received almost 81 million votes but not exactly 81 million votes, though still more than Trump and technically enough to win the election

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,243]

38 minutes ago, Dozer FBG said:

Come on man… let’s stop doing this. It’s just not true.

If you don’t accept the results of a free and fair election, you stand against democracy.

If you stand against democracy you stand against America.

Its gotta start with you, gb. 

 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,960]

2 hours ago, Dozer FBG said:

Come on man… let’s stop doing this. It’s just not true.

If you don’t accept the results of a free and fair election, you stand against democracy.

If you stand against democracy you stand against America.

Its gotta start with you, gb. 

I think I have accepted it. I didn’t storm the capital. I am questioning it. That ok with you? I learned it from Hillary. 

[seafoam1 2,804]

2 hours ago, IGotWorms said:

HT is a b1tch who won’t even stand by his nutty conspiracy sh1t. When you force him to the mat on it his claim is Biden received almost 81 million votes but not exactly 81 million votes, though still more than Trump and technically enough to win the election

 Another liberal trying to prove online to the world that he's "smart" (because he can't do that with the people he knows in person).

TDS must hurt.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,960]

2 hours ago, IGotWorms said:

HT is a b1tch who won’t even stand by his nutty conspiracy sh1t. When you force him to the mat on it his claim is Biden received almost 81 million votes but not exactly 81 million votes, though still more than Trump and technically enough to win the election

Don’t twist it. My claim is there was a lot of fraud. And it was rigged. That’s all. Never said Biden didn’t have enough to win. Their lies and propaganda worked with the help of the letter agencies, who are supposed to be apolitical. They rigged it for Biden. Maybe he did win, but I question it.  But I accept he won. What choice do I have? 

[Dozer FBG 324]

The 2020 election was not rigged. 
 

It wasn’t.

Repeating that the 2020 election was rigged is repeating a lie.

Trumps lie. 
 

When Trump says that the 2020 election was rigged, he’s not simply incorrect in his opinion. He is lying. He knows he lost. He knows it wasn’t rigged.

You want to vote for him again? Fine. But you are voting for a guy who lost, fair and square… to Joe Biden.

[Reality 3,104]

6 minutes ago, Dozer FBG said:

The 2020 election was not rigged. 
 

It wasn’t.

Repeating that the 2020 election was rigged is repeating a lie.

Trumps lie. 
 

When Trump says that the 2020 election was rigged, he’s not simply incorrect in his opinion. He is lying. He knows he lost. He knows it wasn’t rigged.

You want to vote for him again? Fine. But you are voting for a guy who lost, fair and square… to Joe Biden.

Weird.

 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,960]

26 minutes ago, Dozer FBG said:

The 2020 election was not rigged. 
 

It wasn’t.

Repeating that the 2020 election was rigged is repeating a lie.

Trumps lie. 
 

When Trump says that the 2020 election was rigged, he’s not simply incorrect in his opinion. He is lying. He knows he lost. He knows it wasn’t rigged.

You want to vote for him again? Fine. But you are voting for a guy who lost, fair and square… to Joe Biden.

Oh yeah? Who was it that said the laptop wasn’t Hunters, but a Russian hit job? How come Pennsylvania changed its voting rules, which they had no right to do? That was fair and square? 

[IGotWorms 4,057]

2 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Don’t twist it. My claim is there was a lot of fraud. And it was rigged. That’s all. Never said Biden didn’t have enough to win. Their lies and propaganda worked with the help of the letter agencies, who are supposed to be apolitical. They rigged it for Biden. Maybe he did win, but I question it.  But I accept he won. What choice do I have? 

lol, that’s exactly what I said

[IGotWorms 4,057]

48 minutes ago, Reality said:

Weird.

 

Who gives a fock about Stacey Abrams?

[Reality 3,104]

8 hours ago, IGotWorms said:

Who gives a fock about Stacey Abrams?

It's a video, not a picture dumb dumb. Try pressing play, it's directly related to the poster's comment I quoted. Do you know how the Internet works?

I forget how incredibly stupid some of you are... That's my bad. 

[MDC 7,149]

I think we can all agree that Trump and Abrams are both undignified sour grapes tiitty babies who’ve been filling their diapers for years.  

[Reality 3,104]

18 minutes ago, MDC said:

I think we can all agree that Trump and virtually the entire Democrat party are both undignified sour grapes tiitty babies who’ve been filling their diapers for years.  

Fixed, another dumb dumb who can't press play.

[MDC 7,149]

4 minutes ago, Reality said:

Fixed, another dumb dumb who can't press play.

I could but I just don’t give a fock.  

[Reality 3,104]

3 minutes ago, MDC said:

I could but I just don’t give a fock.  

Yet, you replied. 

[MDC 7,149]

11 minutes ago, Reality said:

Yet, you replied. 

I don’t need to watch a video to know that Abrams, Hillary, Trump etc. are undignified diaper filling bottle sucking tiitty babies.  

[Hardcore troubadour 14,960]

16 minutes ago, Reality said:

Yet, you replied. 

Moth to a flame. 

[League Champion 1,896]

29 minutes ago, MDC said:

I don’t need to watch a video to know that Abrams, Hillary, Trump etc. are undignified diaper filling bottle sucking tiitty babies.  

You're definitely not wrong. 

[IGotWorms 4,057]

2 hours ago, MDC said:

I think we can all agree that Trump and Abrams are both undignified sour grapes tiitty babies who’ve been filling their diapers for years.  

There you go.

Too bad @Hardcore troubadour and his echo chamber @Reality are too focking stupid to get it  

[The Real timschochet 6,448]

2 hours ago, MDC said:

I don’t need to watch a video to know that Abrams, Hillary, Trump etc. are undignified diaper filling bottle sucking tiitty babies.  

Yes but there is a significant difference. Donald Trump broke the law attempting to fight the results of the election. And he did this many times. And he incited a riot. That is why he’s going to end up in prison over this. All Abrams and Hillary did was whine. They didn’t commit any crimes. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,960]

13 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

There you go.

Too bad @Hardcore troubadour and his echo chamber @Reality are too focking stupid to get it  

Only Hillary and Libtards are allowed to question elections and call a president illegitimate. 

[MDC 7,149]

23 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Yes but there is a significant difference. Donald Trump broke the law attempting to fight the results of the election. And he did this many times. And he incited a riot. That is why he’s going to end up in prison over this. All Abrams and Hillary did was whine. They didn’t commit any crimes. 

The big difference at the GC is that nobody goes to bat for Hillary, Kamala or Abrams. But several GC tiitty babies are still filling their Pampers over Trump 3 years later.

Sad!  

[Reality 3,104]

36 minutes ago, MDC said:

The big difference at the GC is that nobody goes to bat for Hillary, Kamala or Abrams. But several GC tiitty babies are still filling their Pampers over Trump 3 years later.

Sad!  

Yes, only a big deal when Trump does it and liberal d-bags get butt hurt when you point out their hypocrisy.

Got it. Thanks man.

[IGotWorms 4,057]

I don’t give a fock about Abrams. Why would I?

Hilary sucked and I’m glad she lost, though I wish it had been to someone else. She never should’ve been the nominee. That said, I do believe Trump sought and received Russia’s help in winning that election. However, it couldn’t be proven and so he was not charged for that. Hilary didn’t do anything except complain.

The difference is in 2020, Trump tried to commit election fraud and attempted to overthrow the government. That’s a bit more than just complaining, and I do believe it will be proven.

But I’m sure that’ll all fall on deaf ears and the MAGAtards will continue with their sad little bullsh1t  

[Hardcore troubadour 14,960]

1 minute ago, IGotWorms said:

I don’t give a fock about Abrams. Why would I?

Hilary sucked and I’m glad she lost, though I wish it had been to someone else. She never should’ve been the nominee. That said, I do believe Trump sought and received Russia’s help in winning that election. However, it couldn’t be proven and so he was not charged for that. Hilary didn’t do anything except complain.

The difference is in 2020, Trump tried to commit election fraud and attempted to overthrow the government. That’s a bit more than just complaining, and I do believe it will be proven.

But I’m sure that’ll all fall on deaf ears and the MAGAtards will continue with their sad little bullsh1t  

Why would Putin want to help Trump? What would be his motive? 

[IGotWorms 4,057]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Why would Putin want to help Trump? What would be his motive? 

He hated and feared Hilary Clinton and knew she would be a hawk with NATO, whereas Trump was a very useful stooge who tried to destroy NATO

[MDC 7,149]

6 minutes ago, Reality said:

Yes, only a big deal when Trump does it and liberal d-bags get butt hurt when you point out their hypocrisy.

Got it. Thanks man.

It would be hypocritical for someone who insisted Hillary, Abrams, Kamala etc. got robbed to criticize Trump. But all the sour grapes diaper filling tiitty babies at the GC are MAGAtards.

Sad but true.