Twitter adopts 'poison pill' to prevent Elon Musk takeover

[Djgb13 2,339]

6 minutes ago, nobody said:

Okay.  Elon Musk is a douche.  But Jason Kint is a fūcking dooooooooooouche.

If it's not fixed within the hour...

Elons response  

Also an explanation 

 

 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,290]

I’m sorry, but if you’re on the same side of an issue of behavior as Keith Olberman, you gotta rethink your position.  Right? 

[Djgb13 2,339]

14 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I’m sorry, but if you’re on the same side of an issue of behavior as Keith Olberman, you gotta rethink your position.  Right? 

You’d think right? But people on the left aren’t exactly know for their intelligence or common sense 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,290]

Just now, Djgb13 said:

You’d think right? But people on the left aren’t exactly know for their intelligence or common sense 

Aren’t there certain people that when  they get involved you don’t jump to their side? Like Alex Jones. I don’t care if he said 99 things I agreed with. If he’s touting something, I dismiss it or at least assume he’s the dik in the controversy. He’s earned it. So has KO. I think they are both the same and  proceed accordingly. Not Libtards. They don’t care what company they keep. 

[TimHauck 2,754]

Some of those journalists were rightfully suspended.  But I’m not convinced they all were, unless maybe linking to a news article is also against the policy which would be sh1tty.

However, he did a poll asking when they should be reinstated and the winner was “now,” so surprise surprise, more hypocrisy from Musk as he obviously hasn’t reinstated them yet.

[Djgb13 2,339]

23 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Aren’t there certain people that when  they get involved you don’t jump to their side? Like Alex Jones. I don’t care if he said 99 things I agreed with. If he’s touting something, I dismiss it or at least assume he’s the dik in the controversy. He’s earned it. So has KO. I think they are both the same and  proceed accordingly. Not Libtards. They don’t care what company they keep. 

Yep. Like agreeing with Hitler on something 

[Strike 5,459]

Twitter files Part 6:

 

[Strike 5,459]

7 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

 

However, he did a poll asking when they should be reinstated and the winner was “now,” so surprise surprise, more hypocrisy from Musk as he obviously hasn’t reinstated them yet.

You talking about the first poll or the 2nd?  And, as far as I can tell, he never said he was bound by EITHER poll. 

[TimHauck 2,754]

1 minute ago, Strike said:

You talking about the first poll or the 2nd?

Both 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,050]

2 minutes ago, Strike said:

Twitter files Part 6:

 

This will be ignored by the media as well.  Because, of course, they were actively involved.  They're as dirty as Twitter execs were.

[Strike 5,459]

3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Both 

I don't have a Twitter account.  I can see the results from the first poll but not the 2nd.  Is the 2nd one closed?   I assume my not seeing results means it's still open.  In either case, can you show me the tweet where Musk says he will honor the results from either poll?  Otherwise, I don't see the hypocrisy you're whining about.

[Reality 3,121]

6 minutes ago, Strike said:

Twitter files Part 6:

 

When the FBI told Twitter to jump, Twitter asked how high. Pretty incredible.

[TimHauck 2,754]

Wait all these emails are from November 2022.  Remind me who owned Twitter then?

[Hardcore troubadour 15,290]

1 minute ago, Reality said:

When the FBI told Twitter to jump, Twitter asked how high. Pretty incredible.

Uh-oh. Seeing as the libtard morons here refuse to put two and two together they may finally get hit with the truth and look stupid again. Same losers that thought the school board in Loudon county wasn’t in on the cover up.  

[Strike 5,459]

17 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Some of those journalists were rightfully suspended.  But I’m not convinced they all were, unless maybe linking to a news article is also against the policy which would be sh1tty.

ROFLMAO.  The total of suspended accounts is what, 7?  One is the ElonJet guy.  That suspension was fair.  Of the others you acknowledge "some" of them are legit.  So, you're making a big stink and calling him a hypocrite over what, 2 or 3 accounts?  Dude, get over it.

[Djgb13 2,339]

12 minutes ago, Strike said:

Twitter files Part 6:

 

You still got idiots here who are more focused on Elon banning accounts for doxxing and creating safety issues for his family. 

[Reality 3,121]

1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Uh-oh. Seeing as the libtard morons here refuse to put two and two together they may finally get hit with the truth and look stupid again. Same losers that thought the school board in Loudon county wasn’t in on the cover up.  

Yup, sit back and let these folks expose themselves. Pull back the curtain, let everybody see, rinse & repeat.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,290]

Musk shut down Alex Jones - good. Musk shuts down Keith Olberman- also good. I think Musk has a good feel for these things and from what I’ve seen with him shutting down the kid stuff I’ll trust him until he shows me different.  

[TimHauck 2,754]

1 minute ago, Strike said:

ROFLMAO.  The total of suspended accounts is what, 7?  One is the ElonJet guy.  That suspension was fair.  Of the others you acknowledge "some" of them are legit.  So, you're making a big stink and calling him a hypocrite over what, 2 or 3 accounts?  Dude, get over it.

It was not fair to ban an account that hadn’t tweeted since the policy was changed.

And of course for the millionth (in b4 @Horseman joke) time, what really made him a hypocrite was specifically saying he would NOT ban elonjet despite acknowledging the risks, then doing it anyway.
 

[TimHauck 2,754]

13 minutes ago, Strike said:

I don't have a Twitter account.  I can see the results from the first poll but not the 2nd.  Is the 2nd one closed?   I assume my not seeing results means it's still open.  In either case, can you show me the tweet where Musk says he will honor the results from either poll?  Otherwise, I don't see the hypocrisy you're whining about.

Sorry I was wrong.  It says 6 hours left.  But it’s 59-41, I think it can be conceded.

[Strike 5,459]

2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

It was not fair to ban an account that hadn’t tweeted since the policy was changed.

And of course for the millionth (in b4 @Horseman joke) time, what really made him a hypocrite was specifically saying he would NOT ban elonjet despite acknowledging the risks, then doing it anyway.
 

Twitter has an appeals process where anyone can appeal if they think they have been suspended unfairly.  I suggest any of the 2 reports you think were unfairly suspended take  advantage of that process as centrists told conservatives to do for the last 5 years whenever their accounts were suspended.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,290]

A man taking measures to protect his family and the only ones affected by it are a bunch of pampered a-holes is not up for criticism. MYOB. His family, his Twitter, his call. 

[Djgb13 2,339]

15 minutes ago, Strike said:

Twitter has an appeals process where anyone can appeal if they think they have been suspended unfairly.  I suggest any of the 2 reports you think were unfairly suspended take  advantage of that process as centrists told conservatives to do for the last 5 years whenever their accounts were suspended.

It’s only “unfair” if the person banned votes D. Otherwise, they just tell them to eat Sh1t. Now that the shoe is on the other foot they can’t STAND it. Even still, Musk is doing things FAIRLY and not skewed to one side. THAT alone makes him 1000 times better than anybody of Twitter before 

[Strike 5,459]

21 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Sorry I was wrong.  It says 6 hours left.  But it’s 59-41, I think it can be conceded.

You ignored the following in your reply:

Quote

In either case, can you show me the tweet where Musk says he will honor the results from either poll?  Otherwise, I don't see the hypocrisy you're whining about.

I wonder why......

[Strike 5,459]

23 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Sorry I was wrong.  It says 6 hours left.  But it’s 59-41, I think it can be conceded.

What's new? 

[TimHauck 2,754]

3 minutes ago, Strike said:

You ignored the following in your reply:

I wonder why......

I bet he will do it actually 

[Strike 5,459]

3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I bet he will do it actually 

He might.  That's not the point.  You said he was a hypocrite for not having already done so, despite:

1)  The 2nd poll not even being closed yet.

2)  Unless you show me otherwise, which I've asked for at least twice now, he never committed to using the poll results to decide whether to restore the accounts. 

Basically, it looks like you're just whining again.

[RLLD 4,203]

Watching the conversation essentially "flip" is fascinating.

Whereas not long ago people decrying Twitter were mostly conservative, and the position of leftists was "too bad" or "just setup your own version", now.....we have conservatives saying too bad, and its just Twitter policy and they can just get the account back after the suspension....and leftists now getting a taste of what it was like to have your voice quieted are up in arms....

Tellingly, in raising the alarm over these journalists....those who now object are implicitly acknowledging that what was happening before was wrong....

[Hardcore troubadour 15,290]

15 minutes ago, Strike said:

What's new? 

[TimHauck 2,754]

10 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Watching the conversation essentially "flip" is fascinating.

Whereas not long ago people decrying Twitter were mostly conservative, and the position of leftists was "too bad" or "just setup your own version", now.....we have conservatives saying too bad, and its just Twitter policy and they can just get the account back after the suspension....and leftists now getting a taste of what it was like to have your voice quieted are up in arms....

Tellingly, in raising the alarm over these journalists....those who now object are implicitly acknowledging that what was happening before was wrong....

Good lord you people are missing the point.  We’re not defending the old twitter.  But new twitter specific said they wouldn’t do things like this, yet they are.  So I could flip your argument right back on you:

The GC: Twitter is banning conservatives!! This is an outrage!!

Also the GC: Twitter is banning lib journalists!!  This is awesome!!

[Strike 5,459]

2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Good lord you people are missing the point.  We’re not defending the old twitter.  But new twitter specific said they wouldn’t do things like this, yet they are.  So I could flip your argument right back on you:

The GC: Twitter is banning conservatives!! This is an outrage!!

Also the GC: Twitter is banning lib journalists!!  This is awesome!!

You yourself admitted some of the journalists deserved to be suspended.  The total is like SIX.  Let me repeat:  SIX.  There are still THOUSANDS of lib journalists posting on twitter, and some of them I've even heard of as opposed to these nobodies.  Just stop dude. 

[RLLD 4,203]

5 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Good lord you people are missing the point.  We’re not defending the old twitter.  But new twitter specific said they wouldn’t do things like this, yet they are.  So I could flip your argument right back on you:

The GC: Twitter is banning conservatives!! This is an outrage!!

Also the GC: Twitter is banning lib journalists!!  This is awesome!!

You lose the ability to object if you do it, or allow it to be done.

I just wish there was this concern when Twitter was doing it before, and lying that they were not....

[TimHauck 2,754]

14 minutes ago, RLLD said:

You lose the ability to object if you do it, or allow it to be done.

I just wish there was this concern when Twitter was doing it before, and lying that they were not....

So why are you allowed to object then but not now?

[Hardcore troubadour 15,290]

15 minutes ago, RLLD said:

You lose the ability to object if you do it, or allow it to be done.

I just wish there was this concern when Twitter was doing it before, and lying that they were not....

Yup. It was a conspiracy theory. Then it was ok, it’s a private company. Then it was good, because conservatives say all the feelings hurters. 

[TimHauck 2,754]

20 minutes ago, Strike said:

You yourself admitted some of the journalists deserved to be suspended.  The total is like SIX.  Let me repeat:  SIX.  There are still THOUSANDS of lib journalists posting on twitter, and some of them I've even heard of as opposed to these nobodies.  Just stop dude. 

That comment was more just to show the hypocrisy of the GC.  But the journalists are pretty low on the totem pole (maybe not even on there at all) of why Musk is a hypocrite IMO.

[RLLD 4,203]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

So why are you allowed to object then but not now?

I objected to the silencing of people then, and I still do, in the instance of "doxxing" yeah we can shut that down no matter where it is happening.

It would be wrong for Musk to silence them for saying something negative about him, and i would be in full opposition to that. But putting his location out there, yeah, i know very well why someone would do that.  The only thing missing is the liberal maneuver to also encourage their shock troops to get after him in public...

[Djgb13 2,339]

24 minutes ago, RLLD said:

You lose the ability to object if you do it, or allow it to be done.

I just wish there was this concern when Twitter was doing it before, and lying that they were not....

Of course dumbass Tim wasn’t concerned then. He only gets concerned when it affects his slave masters and the ppl telling him what to think

[Strike 5,459]

Keith Olbermann is using an Alias on Twitter and railing on Musk.  Now that is specifically against Twitter's TOS and pretty much always has been.  Is it ok if Musk dumps both his accounts Timmay? 

[TimHauck 2,754]

Just now, Strike said:

Keith Olbermann is using an Alias on Twitter and railing on Musk.  Now that is specifically against Twitter's TOS and pretty much always has been.  Is it ok if Musk dumps both his accounts Timmay? 

Yes

[TBayXXXVII 2,528]

So wait... wait... WAAAAIIITTTTTTT!!!!!  Liberals are upset because they're getting banned/suspended from Twitter because they don't like the censoring?

 

G.T.F.O.!!!!