Boom! Disney getting canceled 🤣😅

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,106]

More liberal "winning":

 

 

Another takeaway from this is that Disney is clearly not reporting these accurately and even going so far to hide these costs to give the appearance of profitability.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,434]

Layoffs at Pixar

[RLLD 4,230]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Layoffs at Pixar

Meh, Disney will be fine, even if they make unprofitable garbage for their movies

Layoffs in this economy make sense.

[GutterBoy 2,899]

6 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Layoffs at Pixar

He's still trying...

[Hardcore troubadour 15,434]

Just now, GutterBoy said:

He's still trying...

They aren’t? 

[GutterBoy 2,899]

1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

They aren’t? 

I have no idea.  It's just funny to see you try and make your case that they are going broke after all these years of raking in billions.

[Strike 5,547]

3 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

I have no idea.  It's just funny to see you try and make your case that they are going broke after all these years of raking in billions.

Broke is a relative term.  Just ask Russ Hanneman.

[GutterBoy 2,899]

26 minutes ago, Strike said:

Broke is a relative term.  Just ask Russ Hanneman.

Russ is stuck doing PNC commercials now.  He's broke.

[TimHauck 2,876]

Speaking of Pixar, who else is pumped for Inside Out 2?

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,106]

3 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

I have no idea.  It's just funny to see you try and make your case that they are going broke after all these years of raking in billions.

WTF are you talking about?  You must be out of your mind if that's what you think!   

You haven't read are watched a godd@mn thing.  Wow, you're a fn' retard of EPIC proportions.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,106]

10 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Speaking of Pixar, who else is pumped for Inside Out 2?

Absolutely no one else. 

[TimHauck 2,876]

17 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

WTF are you talking about?  You must be out of your mind if that's what you think!   

You haven't read are watched a godd@mn thing.  Wow, you're a fn' retard of EPIC proportions.

They’ve made at least $2 billion in profit every year except 2020 for 15+ years

[GutterBoy 2,899]

26 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

WTF are you talking about?  You must be out of your mind if that's what you think!   

You haven't read are watched a godd@mn thing.  Wow, you're a fn' retard of EPIC proportions.

How much money did Disney make last year?

[Hawkeye21 2,399]

The company's direct-to-consumer business, which includes Disney+ and Hulu, posted $47 million in profit for the quarter, a sharp turnaround from its $587 million loss in the year-ago period. Revenue also showed solid growth, rising 13% to $5.64 billion.

As of March, Disney+ subscriptions were up 6% to 117 million, while Hulu subscriptions grew 1% to 50 million.

With the pandemic in the rear-view mirror, Disney's global theme parks are flying high. Revenue at its U.S. parks — Walt Disney World in Orlando and Disneyland in Anaheim, California — rose 7%, while the overseas parks reported a 29% increase. 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/disney-earnings-streaming-profit-walt-disney-world/

[edjr 6,592]

 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,434]

Washington Post. Woke. Broke. 

[edjr 6,592]

44 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Washington Post. Woke. Broke. 

Boston Herald wasn’t woke (globe was/is). they went broke long ago. newspapers are useless.

[Voltaire 5,316]

10 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Washington Post. Woke. Broke. 

The Washington Post may hemorrhage money each year but they will never go broke. It's an important mouthpiece of the corporate globalist elites, subsidized eternally by Jeff Bezos, and committed to bringing about Democracy's death in darkness.

They just experienced a shakeup at the top. One group of evil unethical interchangeable leftoid hacks replaced another group of evil unethical interchangeable leftoid hacks. Nothing will change. Lemmings in need of having their opinions made up for them can still go there to smell Jennifer Rubin's farts.

[TimHauck 2,876]

Less than a week until Inside Out 2!

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,106]

9 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

The Washington Post may hemorrhage money each year but they will never go broke. It's an important mouthpiece of the corporate globalist elites, subsidized eternally by Jeff Bezos, and committed to bringing about Democracy's death in darkness.

They just experienced a shakeup at the top. One group of evil unethical interchangeable leftoid hacks replaced another group of evil unethical interchangeable leftoid hacks. Nothing will change. Lemmings in need of inspiration can still go there to smell Jennifer Rubin's farts.

Yep.  The Marxist propaganda hasn't changed, just the authors have.

[BeachGuy23 642]

Oh look, with one movie Disney will likely recoup the losses they've suffered the last two years.

Go woke make tons of cash apparently. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,106]

5 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Oh look, with one movie Disney will likely recoup the losses they've suffered the last two years.

Go woke make tons of cash apparently. 

They'll recover over a BILLION dollars on one movie? 

GTFO you childish imp.  You know nothing of how this works.

On top of that, you dumb jack@ss, you'll notice this movie wasn't some woke horsesh#t so of course audiences loved it.  It's what we've been saying for the last 5 f'n years but peggers like you wanted to pretend losing money was the new makin' money. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,434]

11 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Oh look, with one movie Disney will likely recoup the losses they've suffered the last two years.

Go woke make tons of cash apparently. 

Wow. You are one stupid hombre. Go back in your hole. Thanks. 

[TimHauck 2,876]

Saw Inside Out 2 yesterday.  It was good.  Didn’t notice any wokeness, although posters here would probably say it was woke that some of the high school hockey players may or may not have been lesbians (no lesbian innuendo though) and that they talked about feeling anxiety

[BeachGuy23 642]

12 hours ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

They'll recover over a BILLION dollars on one movie? 

GTFO you childish imp.  You know nothing of how this works.

On top of that, you dumb jack@ss, you'll notice this movie wasn't some woke horsesh#t so of course audiences loved it.  It's what we've been saying for the last 5 f'n years but peggers like you wanted to pretend losing money was the new makin' money. 

LMFAO at a billion dollars.  god you people are idiots if you believe Disney lost a billion dollars in movies the last year or two.

This movie cost $200M.  If it makes a billion worldwide it will turn at least a half billion profit.

What happened to go woke go broke?

Oh yea, that's just some cultural outrage from moron cultist who don't realize that good movies make money and bad movies lose money.

Because you cultist are all 100% idiots.

Love this for you. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,106]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Saw Inside Out 2 yesterday.  It was good.  Didn’t notice any wokeness, although posters here would probably say it was woke that some of the high school hockey players may or may not have been lesbians (no lesbian innuendo though) and that they talked about feeling anxiety

Nope, nobody said that.  In fact, somebody said this:

12 hours ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

They'll recover over a BILLION dollars on one movie? 

GTFO you childish imp.  You know nothing of how this works.

On top of that, you dumb jack@ss, you'll notice this movie wasn't some woke horsesh#t so of course audiences loved it.  It's what we've been saying for the last 5 f'n years but peggers like you wanted to pretend losing money was the new makin' money. 

 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,106]

Just now, BeachGuy23 said:

LMFAO at billion dollars.

god you people are idiots.  

This movie cost $200M.  If it makes a billion worldwide it will turn at least a half billion profit.

What happened to go woke go broke?

Oh yea, that's just some cultural outrage from moron cultist who don't realize that good movies make money and bad movies lose money.

Because you cultist are all 100% idiots.

Love this for you. 

Like I said, you have no idea how profits work in movies.  The mere fact that you think if it makes a billion it will turn a half billion profit shows that you're so retarded, that actual retarded people call you, "that dumb f'n retard". 

Disney themselves reported they lost over a billion dollars on movies in the last year. 

[BeachGuy23 642]

2 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Like I said, you have no idea how profits work in movies.  The mere fact that you think if it makes a billion it will turn a half billion profit shows that you're so retarded, that actual retarded people call you, "that dumb f'n retard". 

Disney themselves reported they lost over a billion dollars on movies in the last year. 

You posted 175x last week at all hours of the day and night.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Incel, no-life losers gonna incel, no-life loser.

How pathetic...SMH

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,106]

7 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

You posted 175x last week at all hours of the day and night.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Incel, no-life losers gonna incel, no-life loser.

How pathetic...SMH

Ahhhh...when busted on your logic, move the goalposts and distract!  I win! 

Also, you still average almost 3x more posts per day than I do.  I average 5 posts a day, you average 13!  No amount of pretzel logic and "new" math is going to fix that for you. 

And if you think I posted a lot, you should look at your buddy Pimpadouche, GutterBoy and Timschochet for starters.  But you won't, because you think if you narrow down the window and cherry-pick the posting stats you somehow have achieved a "win".

[TimHauck 2,876]

11 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Nope, nobody said that.  In fact, somebody said this:

 

Well you also said “absolutely no one else” was excited for it, so seems like it outperformed your expectations

On 5/22/2024 at 7:44 PM, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Absolutely no one else. 

 

[BeachGuy23 642]

3 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Ahhhh...when busted on your logic, move the goalposts and distract!  I win! 

Also, you still average almost 3x more posts per day than I do.  I average 5 posts a day, you average 13!  No amount of pretzel logic and "new" math is going to fix that for you. 

And if you think I posted a lot, you should look at your buddy Pimpadouche, GutterBoy and Timschochet for starters.  But you won't, because you think if you narrow down the window and cherry-pick the posting stats you somehow have achieved a "win".

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

The jackhammer, non-stop posting, incel loser is trying to justify his 24x7 posting.

How pathetic that first you post all day every day and second that you try to justify it.

Get a life boyo.  You reek of desperation and are the 2nd most pathetic poster here next to Peafoam.

Maybe obsess a little less about glory holes and other gay stuff and obsess more on improving your clearly pathetic IRL.

Love this for you boyo. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,106]

3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Well you also said “absolutely no one else” was excited for it, so seems like it outperformed your expectations

I did and it did. 

The point is that expectations were low considering Disney's track record of the last 5 years.  The fact that it is NOT woke and did slam-bang numbers should open up some eyes on what we've been saying over the years is spot on.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,106]

BeachGhey: Disney movies have all been profitable over the last 5 years. If this movie makes a billion dollars it will profit over half a billion dollars.

ESaC:  Disney themselves reported over a billion dollar loss on their movies and also that's not how movie profits work.  You do realize that Disney doesn't actually get a billion dollars from the box office, right?

BeachGhey (moving goalposts):  You post 24/7 loser!  You have no life!

ESaC: Actually, the posting stats show you average 13 posts per day and I average 5.  That's not even disputable.

BeachGhey: Well, between 9:00 am and 9:01 am you posted twice and I didn't post anything!  You post way more than I do!! That proves you post 24/7!!!!

ESaC:  What's going on here?  I thought we were talking about Disney?

[TimHauck 2,876]

12 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

I did and it did. 

The point is that expectations were low considering Disney's track record of the last 5 years.  The fact that it is NOT woke and did slam-bang numbers should open up some eyes on what we've been saying over the years is spot on.

Weren’t you part of the crew claiming the first one was woke or not appropriate for kids or something because it talked about emotions?

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,106]

9 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Weren’t you part of the crew claiming the first one was woke or not appropriate for kids or something because it talked about emotions?

Nope.

[TimHauck 2,876]

1 hour ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Nope.

Fair enough, I honestly didn’t expect it to do all that well either but mostly just since the first didn’t seem to be all that popular, as evidenced by all the other manly men that post here and claimed to have never heard of it.

But again, I’ve acknowledged that Disney has made some sh1tty movies in recent years.  But for the most part, except for Strange World, they weren’t sh1tty because they were woke, they just weren’t good.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,106]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

Fair enough, I honestly didn’t expect it to do all that well either but mostly just since the first didn’t seem to be all that popular, as evidenced by all the other manly men that post here and claimed to have never heard of it.

But again, I’ve acknowledged that Disney has made some sh1tty movies in recent years.  But for the most part, except for Strange World, they weren’t sh1tty because they were woke, they just weren’t good.

They weren't good because they prioritized diversity and equity over story and character. I'm in full disagreement with you on that because all the movies that did terrible were all the ones that prioritized that dei s***.  That is the common denominator between all of them.

[TimHauck 2,876]

4 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

They weren't good because they prioritized diversity and equity over story and character. I'm in full disagreement with you on that because all the movies that did terrible were all the ones that prioritized that dei s***.  That is the common denominator between all of them.

So they weren’t good because they hired DEI actors like Chris Evans, got it

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,106]

34 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

So they weren’t good because they hired DEI actors like Chris Evans, got it

It's almost as if you have to make stuff up to prove your strawmen.  Or you're being intentionally obtuse.  Which one?

[TimHauck 2,876]

11 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

It's almost as if you have to make stuff up to prove your strawmen.  Or you're being intentionally obtuse.  Which one?

Was Chris Evans not the star of Lightyear?

Lightyear is exhibit A for this argument.  It was not a good movie, but not because of woke.  And Tim Allen wasn’t in it because it wasn’t a Toy Story movie, although I believe you know that unlike some of the other idiots here.