Jump to content
RaiderHaters Revenge

Roe V Wade overturned!!! Leaked, SCOTUS SHOULD BE IMPEACHED

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, MDC said:

BB is right. A fetus isn’t viable until 24 weeks with major medical intervention. 

https://www.verywellfamily.com/premature-birth-and-viability-2371529

That is not the issue, a fetus is still human life starting at conception.

when a child is born and mom stops taking care of it and it dies is that murder? This child still can’t live on its own.

should a mother be able to terminate a child’s life until it is self-sufficient?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Baker Boy said:

 

when a child is born and mom stops taking care of it and it dies is that murder? 

Yes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Yes

What is the difference between that and abortion? The child cannot survive on its own, so I am confused by your logic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Baker Boy said:

That is not the issue, a fetus is still human life starting at conception.

when a child is born and mom stops taking care of it and it dies is that murder? This child still can’t live on its own.

should a mother be able to terminate a child’s life until it is self-sufficient?

You said science said he’s wrong and I agreed. A fetus isn’t viable outside the womb until 24 weeks and even then only with major medical intervention.

Your questions above don’t seem to be moral/philosophical, not scientific.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, MDC said:

You said science said he’s wrong and I agreed. A fetus isn’t viable outside the womb until 24 weeks and even then only with major medical intervention.

Your questions above don’t seem to be moral/philosophical, not scientific.

So what is the difference?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Baker Boy said:

What is the difference between that and abortion? The child cannot survive on its own, so I am confused by your logic.

Because that child is not literally attached to the mother’s body.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Because that child is not literally attached to the mother’s body.

Why does that make a difference? Who made these rules up? Link?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Baker Boy said:

Why does that make a difference? Who made these rules up? Link?

If you can’t tell the difference between something that’s inside one’s body and something that’s outside’s one’s body, I’m not sure if I can help you.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

If you can’t tell the difference between something that’s inside one’s body and something that’s outside’s one’s body, I’m not sure if I can help you.

You treat unborn children like most people treat cancer. If you don't want it, just have it cut out of you.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The savages of central and South America thought it was good to sacrifice children for the greater good too. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, TimHauck said:

If you can’t tell the difference between something that’s inside one’s body and something that’s outside’s one’s body, I’m not sure if I can help you.

What difference does it make when it comes to ending human life? If you can’t explain it……….

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Baker Boy said:

What difference does it make when it comes to ending human life? If you can’t explain it……….

Sigh.  I already did

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TimHauck said:

Sigh.  I already did

Yeah, treat the unborn child like cancer. Cut it right out of your body. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Baker Boy said:

No you didn’t, link please.

 

21 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Because that child is not literally attached to the mother’s body.

A fetus needs the mother and only the mother to survive (until ~20 weeks).  A newborn just needs someone to give it formula.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

 

A fetus needs the mother and only the mother to survive (until ~20 weeks).  A newborn just needs someone to give it formula.

And that is your justification for abortion? A mother can stop giving nourishment up to 20 weeks but after that it’s murder.  I have a problem understanding your morals and values of human life. 

and a new born needs much more than formula to keep it alive.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Baker Boy said:

And that is your justification for abortion? A mother can stop giving nourishment up to 20 weeks but after that it’s murder.  I have a problem understanding your morals and values of human life. 

and a new born needs much more than formula to keep it alive.  

Different people have different views on morality. Abortion is clearly an area with a variety of moral views, and a lot of gray areas. In my opinion, that is a great reason to make it a personal choice. Most attempts at legislating morality fail in the long run: modesty laws, prohibition, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Baker Boy thinks "morality" is "science."

This is why we can't have discussions on these things. People don't want facts, they just want "what makes them feel good."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, dogcows said:

Different people have different views on morality. Abortion is clearly an area with a variety of moral views, and a lot of gray areas. In my opinion, that is a great reason to make it a personal choice. Most attempts at legislating morality fail in the long run: modesty laws, prohibition, etc.

You can the same thing about a lot of criminal activates. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Baker Boy said:

And that is your justification for abortion? A mother can stop giving nourishment up to 20 weeks but after that it’s murder.  I have a problem understanding your morals and values of human life. 

and a new born needs much more than formula to keep it alive.  

To your first question:  yeah pretty much.  If the child can not survive without the mother, then it should still be the mother’s choice.

To your second question:  not really.  Maybe someone to wipe its butt and to watch it sleep so it doesn’t choke, but that’s about it.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, dogcows said:

Different people have different views on morality. Abortion is clearly an area with a variety of moral views, and a lot of gray areas. In my opinion, that is a great reason to make it a personal choice. Most attempts at legislating morality fail in the long run: modesty laws, prohibition, etc.

Some people think the growing child has no say though. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

To your first question:  yeah pretty much.  If the child can not survive without the mother, then it should still be the mother’s choice.

To your second question:  not really.  Maybe someone to wipe its butt and to watch it sleep so it doesn’t choke, but that’s about it.  

No it shouldn't. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

so have they even started an investigation into SCOTUS leaks? 

thats what people should be pissed about

not when or when you can't kill your baby

 

Exactly. It’s obvious a judge was involved. That’s why we got nothing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

so have they even started an investigation into SCOTUS leaks? 

thats what people should be pissed about

not when or when you can't kill your baby

 

Liberals don't get investigated thoroughly. See Hunter and Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton and the Liberal SCOTUS members and others.

Besides, the FBI will be 100% busy with Trump until he dies. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Sean Mooney said:

Your questions a few posts up.

Re-read what you wrote. 

I can’t find it. Link

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, craftsman said:

No it shouldn't. 

Wait I thought you said you don’t care what the laws are, fraud?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

Wait I thought you said you don’t care what the laws are, fraud?

I said the SC put it in the states hands. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is so amusing is that through all these gyrations to create delineations as to when the fetus is this or that we can see that everyone knows and understands that a baby is being killed.

The effort to create complicated delineations is an implicit admission. 
 

These people work hard to create morality to justify and perhaps self sooth as they know what is really happening.

I have no such hangups . If you abort a baby you are killing another human, period. And I am ok with it, if you are willing to do that then you are a selfish slut, and I prefer you NOT raise a child.

So I am good with it. Kill away!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, RLLD said:

What is so amusing is that through all these gyrations to create delineations as to when the fetus is this or that we can see that everyone knows and understands that a baby is being killed.

The effort to create complicated delineations is an implicit admission. 
 

These people work hard to create morality to justify and perhaps self sooth as they know what is really happening.

I have no such hangups . If you abort a baby you are killing another human, period. And I am ok with it, if you are willing to do that then you are a selfish slut, and I prefer you NOT raise a child.

So I am good with it. Kill away!

And if you push a woman to have one you’re not much of a man. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, craftsman said:

I said the SC put it in the states hands. 

But you think it should be murder then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

But you think it should be murder then?

It is murder. No matter what the liberals vote to do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, craftsman said:

It is murder. No matter what the liberals vote to do.

Thank you for answering.  After conception?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s a scientific fact that life begins at conception.  There is no debate. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

It’s a scientific fact that life begins at conception.  There is no debate. 

Obviously. But that means the “moral” folks can’t have unprotected sex with anyone in sight and escape culpability for their actions.

So in true leftist fashion it’s time to    create new terminology and science to fit their immediate desires

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Obviously. But that means the “moral” folks can’t have unprotected sex with anyone in sight and escape culpability for their actions.

So in true leftist fashion it’s time to    create new terminology and science to fit their immediate desires

Yup.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

It’s a scientific fact that life begins at conception.  There is no debate. 

So the folks that think mothers having abortions should be charged with murder (I know this does not include you) think that’s the case starting with conception, correct?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×