Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
craftsman

How many candy colored fentanyl pills will reach trick or treaters this year?

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Just trying to get a better understanding of your line of thinking.  It's interesting how people rationalize what is acceptable and what isn't

Just like people that are attracted to kids rationalize that even though they are attracted to them, they won't ever touch them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Shooter McGavin said:

Just like people that are attracted to kids rationalize that even though they are attracted to them, they won't ever touch them.

I'm assuming that you're offended by this scene then?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

I'm assuming that you're offended by this scene then?

 

Of course not.  First of all, it's a comedy sketch.  Second, Denise Richards was 22 there, and looks every bit of 22.

But keep trying to rationalize your attraction to underage girls.  You're doing great.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, TimHauck said:


To me, if someone sarcastically says “keep the borders open” and implying that is the cause of said problem, they don’t really mind the problem happening as long as it makes the current administration look bad (this is similar to comments I’ve made saying that Tucker seems happy about bad things happening in/to America).  But, you are certainly welcome to your opinion.  ‘Merica.

Grammie told me two wrongs don’t make a right.  You can’t read an argument that you assess as weak or invalid and expect to improve discourse by responding with thought terminating sarcasm.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, MLCKAA said:

Grammie told me two wrongs don’t make a right.  You can’t read an argument that you assess as weak or invalid and expect to improve discourse by responding with thought terminating sarcasm.

You’re right, you can’t expect to improve discourse with craftsman whose arguments are always weak and invalid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Men, real men, not woke folks and the British who we know are all pufters, but real men are hardwired to noticed secondary sex characteristics in females.  Those start showing in adolesence.  Pretending to not notice is polite, it is a societal norm, as is not acting upon it, but any man who says they do not notice is a liar or gay.  Similarly, any male more than two to three years older than the youing woman who acts upon it before the young woman reaches the age of consent is a criminal.  Shooter can assert his position all he wants but the number of his postings do not add any validity to his stance.  Rather his obession as indicated by that frequency makes me wonder if he doest protest too hard. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Engorgeous George said:

Men, real men, not woke folks and the British who we know are all pufters, but real men are hardwired to noticed secondary sex characteristics in females.  Those start showing in adolesence.  Pretending to not notice is polite, it is a societal norm, as is not acting upon it,but any man who says they do not notice is a liar or gay.  Similarly, any male mpre than two to three years older who acts upon it before the young woman reaches the age of consent is a criminal.  Shooter can assert his position all he wants but the number of his postings do not add any validity to his stance.  Rather his obession as indicated by that frequency makes me wonder if he doest protest too hard. 

OK, let me get this straight, magatard logic...

- Supporting LGBTQ rights makes you a pedo.

- Being attracted to teenage girls is normal, even manly.  Anyone who tells you they are not attracted to teenage girls is a pedo.

That's where are are now?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Shooter McGavin said:

OK, let me get this straight, magatard logic...

- Supporting LGBTQ rights makes you a pedo.

- Being attracted to teenage girls is normal, even manly.  Anyone who tells you they are not attracted to teenage girls is a pedo.

That's where are are now?

Nope, your reading comprehension skills are quite rudimentary, as is your ability to summarize.  I do suspect the only thing you ever get straight is your phallus, and then only when watching man on man 1960's Brtish porn, and then only assuming you do not have peyronies disease.

 

BTW, and not that it matters, I am a Trump detractor.  I find him venal, pueril, and juvenile.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Shooter McGavin said:

OK, let me get this straight, magatard logic...

- Supporting LGBTQ rights makes you a pedo. gay

- Being attracted to teenage girls is normal, even manly.  Anyone who tells you they are not attracted to teenage girls is a pedo. gay

That's where are are now?

I could maybe have followed your specious summary had it any internal logic or consistency as indicated by the corrections.  Still it would have been the acme of foolish buffoonary, but I could  have followed it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said:

Nope, your reading comprehension skills are quite rudimentary, as is your ability to summarize.  I do suspect the only thing you ever get straight is your phallus, and then only when watching man on man 1960's Brtish porn, and then only assuming you do not have peyronies disease.

 

BTW, and not that it matters, I am a Trump detractor.  I find him venal, pueril, and juvenile.

I just assumed that anyone that makes the argument that they are not a pedo by explaining how they are attracted to kids would probably be a Trump supporter.  My bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Shooter McGavin said:

OK, let me get this straight, magatard logic...

- Supporting LGBTQ rights makes you a pedo.

- Being attracted to teenage girls is normal, even manly.  Anyone who tells you they are not attracted to teenage girls is a pedo.

That's where are are now?

This is something straight out of the liberal's playbook. They can't handle the topic because they got pummeled from every angle, so they switch it up to them being obsessed with a completely unrelated topic and then post ad nauseum petty responses to anything that shows up just to get out of knowing they got bltchslapped for hours in the thread on the original topic. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Engorgeous George said:

I could maybe have followed your specious summary had it any internal logic oe consistency as indicated by the corrections.  Still it would have been the acme of foolish buffoonary, but I cpu;d have fopllowed it.

huh?

Maybe you missed it but here at the GC, anyone that has supported trans rights has been labeled a groomer and a pedo.  But the posts have been in English, not this "language" that you are trying to type in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, craftsman said:

This is something straight out of the liberal's playbook. They can't handle the topic because they are getting pummeled, so they switch it up to them being obsessed with a completely unrelated topic and then post ad nauseum petty responses to anything that shows up just to get out of knowing they got bltchslapped for hours in the thread on the original topic. 

You wanna switch back to all the kids that are gonna get fentanyl on Halloween?  You really wanna go there?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Shooter McGavin said:

I just assumed that anyone that makes the argument that they are not a pedo by explaining how they are attracted to kids would probably be a Trump supporter.  My bad.

Of course I never made that argument nor do I, nor most reasonable persons accept your premise which is your definition of "pedo", but you keep doing you as I presume there is some sort of catharis in your doing so which likely keeps others safe. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Shooter McGavin said:

huh?

Maybe you missed it but here at the GC, anyone that has supported trans rights has been labeled a groomer and a pedo.  But the posts have been in English, not this "language" that you are trying to type in.

Sorry.  The language in which I am typing is english, but at a grade level beyond elementary school english.  That is probably why it seems foriegn to you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Shooter McGavin said:

You wanna switch back to all the kids that are gonna get fentanyl on Halloween?  You really wanna go there?

You already got crushed by just about everyone except pimpledoosh. I get that cause you two are basically the same nutbag troll.

You are the one thinking that the DEA are made up of a bunch of "magatards". :dunno:

With Halloween near, DEA cautions parents after authorities find fentanyl disguised as Skittles and Nerds

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is encouraging parents to be cautious in light of a recent seizure in Connecticut when 15,000 fentanyl tablets were discovered concealed in packs of Skittles and Nerds. With Halloween just weeks away, a former specialist said, "This is not a drug issue, it's a mass poisoning." The organization has strongly cautioned parents to educate themselves as children go out trick or treating.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A couple of helpful aphorisms-

 

Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open one's mouth and remove all doubt.

Do not engage in a battle of wits when you come to the battle completely unarmed.

Never go in against a sicilian when death is on the line.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, craftsman said:

You already got crushed by just about everyone except pimpledoosh. I get that cause you two are basically the same nutbag troll.

You are the one thinking that the DEA are a bunch of "magatards". :dunno:

With Halloween near, DEA cautions parents after authorities find fentanyl disguised as Skittles and Nerds

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is encouraging parents to be cautious in light of a recent seizure in Connecticut when 15,000 fentanyl tablets were discovered concealed in packs of Skittles and Nerds. With Halloween just weeks away, a former specialist said, "This is not a drug issue, it's a mass poisoning." The organization has strongly cautioned parents to educate themselves as children go out trick or treating.

I’m gonna venture a guess that they were hiding fentanyl in candy boxes to try not to get caught with it (fail there I guess), not give it out to kids for Halloween.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I’m gonna venture a guess that they were hiding fentanyl in candy boxes to try not to get caught with it (fail there I guess), not give it out to kids for Halloween.

Not even that.  They are just colored pills.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I’m gonna venture a guess that they were hiding fentanyl in candy boxes to try not to get caught with it (fail there I guess), not give it out to kids for Halloween.

You a the king at venturing guesses. Get back to me when you know some facts. For now, I'll side with the DEA over you. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, craftsman said:

You a the king at venturing guesses. Get back to me when you know some facts. For now, I'll side with the DEA over you. 

The DEA didn't say anything about Halloween and Trick or Treaters you dope.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Shooter McGavin said:

The DEA didn't say anything about Halloween and Trick or Treaters you dope.

Can't read huh? Troll.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, craftsman said:

Can't read huh? Troll.

Your own article, the Halloween concern is raised by Dr Fisher, not the DEA.  It's you that can't read.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Again, what's the point of drugging and killing a bunch of small kids? Or even pre-teens/teens?  Take money away from the candy industry - no trick or treaters = lower candy sales? Prevent kids from going door to door? Outlawing trick or treating? 

 

Create a sense of mistrust and distrust towards your neighbors? 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TheNewGirl said:

Again, what's the point of drugging and killing a bunch of small kids? Or even pre-teens/teens?  Take money away from the candy industry - no trick or treaters = lower candy sales? Prevent kids from going door to door? Outlawing trick or treating? 

 

I could see one crazy person doing this because they are basically a serial killer but it seems odd for this to be a wide spread thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

Again, what's the point of drugging and killing a bunch of small kids? Or even pre-teens/teens?  Take money away from the candy industry - no trick or treaters = lower candy sales? Prevent kids from going door to door? Outlawing trick or treating? 

 

Create a sense of mistrust and distrust towards your neighbors? 

 

I think the point of these articles is to get clicks and create fear.  No smart person thinks their kid is gonna get fentanyl while trick or treating.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Shooter McGavin said:

I think the point of these articles is to get clicks and create fear.  No smart person thinks their kid is gonna get fentanyl while trick or treating.

Of course it is. 

When I was younger, it was razor blades in candy. Or LSD laced candy. 

When my kids were little it was the same thing; glass, razor blades, drugs. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

Again, what's the point of drugging and killing a bunch of small kids? Or even pre-teens/teens?  Take money away from the candy industry - no trick or treaters = lower candy sales? Prevent kids from going door to door? Outlawing trick or treating? 

 

Create a sense of mistrust and distrust towards your neighbors? 

 

Kids don't go to a gazillion different houses anymore. They either trick or treat in on their block or small neighborhood where everone knows each other, or they do like trunk or treats in church parking lots where everyone lnows each other. I live in a highly populated area and never see kids going door to door  other than what I men just mentioned. Not for years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Engorgeous George said:

Sorry.  The language in which I am typing is english, but at a grade level beyond elementary school english.  That is probably why it seems foriegn to you.

The word "English" is capitalized, Wordsworth, and foreign is the correct spelling. Also you have a comma splice.

I'll fix it up for you:

Sorry, but the language I'm typing is English but beyond elementary-school level. That probably is why it seems foreign to you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, craftsman said:

Kids don't go to a gazillion different houses anymore. They either trick or treat in on their block or small neighborhood where everone knows each other, or they do like trunk or treats in church parking lots where everyone lnows each other. I live in a highly populated area and never see kids going door to door  other than what I men just mentioned. Not for years.

So then what's the point of a neighbor that YOU know drugging your kids? 

You're kind of proving my point. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Alias Detective said:

Shooter and Craft have been trying to persuade each other for 5 hours straight!

 

bwahahahahahahaah

Not really. Glad you've been on watching. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, craftsman said:

Not really. Glad you've been on watching. 

No, really.  It would have been 9 hours if Shooter was here then.  Bwahahahahaha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Engorgeous George said:

Nope, your reading comprehension skills are quite rudimentary, as is your ability to summarize.  I do suspect the only thing you ever get straight is your phallus, and then only when watching man on man 1960's Brtish porn, and then only assuming you do not have peyronies disease.

 

BTW, and not that it matters, I am a Trump detractor.  I find him venal, puerile, and juvenile.

Given some of the posts in previous replies, I couldn't help but read that line in Jackie Chiles' voice. . .

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Alias Detective said:

No, really.  It would have been 9 hours if Shooter was here then.  Bwahahahahaha

Write what you want in your little notebook MDC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, TimHauck said:

You’re right, you can’t expect to improve discourse with craftsman whose arguments are always weak and invalid.

And there’s that counterproductive snark again.  You almost never see me engage on the political topics and I’m not weighing in here, either.  Just pointing out that the type of responses you’re putting forth only serve to stop thoughtful contemplation of the subject.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, MLCKAA said:

And there’s that counterproductive snark again.  You almost never see me engage on the political topics and I’m not weighing in here, either.  Just pointing out that the type of responses you’re putting forth only serve to stop thoughtful contemplation of the subject.

If you did engage on the political topics you’d realize that my post was accurate.  Pretty sure even the right wingers here can’t stand him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, MLCKAA said:

And there’s that counterproductive snark again.  You almost never see me engage on the political topics and I’m not weighing in here, either.  Just pointing out that the type of responses you’re putting forth only serve to stop thoughtful contemplation of the subject.

Other than the border being allowed to stay open I think the more wide spread issue is there is  fentanyl crisis. And the DEA is pointing it out all the time. The border open is a political crisis. The fentanyl is a social crisis.

It's just that many people don't care about it. :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×