Commitment Seeking Liberal: No Masculine Men In Dating Pool Who Aren’t Conservative

[Mark Davis 339]

4 hours ago, nobody said:

Status or money?

I'm not sure why someone would want to be involved with someone who's main goal is to get money or status out of the relationship.

It's all a function of money and power on some level.  Just like men like hot women, women are drawn to power, status, or money just as they would be looks.  Guys tend to not care beyond looks.  If she's hot enough we can overlook anything, especially in our younger years.  I've been guilty of that along the way a couple of times myself.  

[Fnord 2,053]

4 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

What if they are being a baby? What if they are crying because they didn’t get their way? 

Then they go to the polls and vote for Donald Trump, America's favorite whiny crybaby.

[jerryskids 6,576]

1 hour ago, Mark Davis said:

It's all a function of money and power on some level.  Just like men like hot women, women are drawn to power, status, or money just as they would be looks.  Guys tend to not care beyond looks.  If she's hot enough we can overlook anything, especially in our younger years.  I've been guilty of that along the way a couple of times myself.  

Yup, and it's not rocket surgery, it's caveman stuff.  Women want a man who can protect (provide for) her and her children so that they can best succeed.  Men want an attractive, younger woman because "attractive" represents good birthing stock (and personality traits we prefer), and younger means more likely to survive childbirth and live long enough to raise the children.

Beta leftists don't like this, but there it is.  If they want to change it, they can convince these women who turn them down to change their minds.   

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,850]

2 hours ago, Mark Davis said:

It's all a function of money and power on some level.  Just like men like hot women, women are drawn to power, status, or money just as they would be looks.  Guys tend to not care beyond looks.  If she's hot enough we can overlook anything, especially in our younger years.  I've been guilty of that along the way a couple of times myself.  

 

33 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Yup, and it's not rocket surgery, it's caveman stuff.  Women want a man who can protect (provide for) her and her children so that they can best succeed.  Men want an attractive, younger woman because "attractive" represents good birthing stock (and personality traits we prefer), and younger means more likely to survive childbirth and live long enough to raise the children.

Beta leftists don't like this, but there it is.  If they want to change it, they can convince these women who turn them down to change their minds.   

1000% - and that's not even debatable, arguable or questionable.

The world needs strong men - it literally depends on it.  Without strong men, there is no civilization or a world to live in.  Women's biology knows this.

[RogerDodger 797]

35 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Yup, and it's not rocket surgery, it's caveman stuff.  Women want a man who can protect (provide for) her and her children so that they can best succeed.  Men want an attractive, younger woman because "attractive" represents good birthing stock (and personality traits we prefer), and younger means more likely to survive childbirth and live long enough to raise the children.

Beta leftists don't like this, but there it is.  If they want to change it, they can convince these women who turn them down to change their minds.   

[Hardcore troubadour 14,959]

Libtard men deny there is danger in the world. Because they can’t handle it. So they deny it and hope it doesn’t find them. Women recognize this.  

[GutterBoy 2,898]

2 hours ago, Mark Davis said:

It's all a function of money and power on some level.  Just like men like hot women, women are drawn to power, status, or money just as they would be looks.  Guys tend to not care beyond looks.  If she's hot enough we can overlook anything, especially in our younger years.  I've been guilty of that along the way a couple of times myself.  

We're talking about shallow ass holes, right?

[GutterBoy 2,898]

51 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Yup, and it's not rocket surgery, it's caveman stuff.  Women want a man who can protect (provide for) her and her children so that they can best succeed.  Men want an attractive, younger woman because "attractive" represents good birthing stock (and personality traits we prefer), and younger means more likely to survive childbirth and live long enough to raise the children.

Beta leftists don't like this, but there it is.  If they want to change it, they can convince these women who turn them down to change their minds.   

Well fortunately we've evolved as a species since cavemen.

[RogerDodger 797]

3 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

We're talking about shallow ass holes, right?

No, we ran Daulton off yesterday.  

[jerryskids 6,576]

2 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Well fortunately we've evolved as a species since cavemen.

Not according to the anecdotal situation in the OP.  Do you beg to differ as to what young women are looking for these days?

[RogerDodger 797]

5 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Well fortunately we've evolved as a species since cavemen.

Libs seem to think so.  Women don't want a provider falls right in line with men can have babies.  

Fortunately we know that's not true and the cutting off parts should bear that out with a reduction of queer numbers in the long run.   

[GutterBoy 2,898]

8 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Not according to the anecdotal situation in the OP.  Do you beg to differ as to what young women are looking for these days?

Alright, so let's be clear here.  It is ONE WOMAN who said she wants a guy who PAYS FOR DINNER and HOLDS DOORS OPEN and TAKES CARE OF HER.

I have no idea what young women want these days.  I have no idea of the political ideology of young men who hold doors open either.

I would assume young people are looking for more than their caveman desires these days.

[GutterBoy 2,898]

3 minutes ago, RogerDodger said:

Libs seem to think so.  Women don't want a provider falls right in line with men can have babies.  

Fortunately we know that's not true and the cutting off parts should bear that out with a reduction of queer numbers in the long run.   

TRANNIES!!!

[RogerDodger 797]

2 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

I have no idea....

You should just lead off with this. Save yourself the time.  

[Blue Horseshoe 348]

On 6/26/2023 at 8:55 AM, TheNewGirl said:

 In real life, women will say that men like this are toxic. But yet...it is what we fantasize about. Big, muscly men with beard and tattoos, who can be harsh and rough but gentle at the same time, who want to have babies with them. 

I have yet to read anyone on there fantasizing about a feminine man. 

For me, I'd much rather score with an alpha.  Throw me around and talk dirty to me. Don't talk to me about girly stuff. 

 

 

Romero was the building manager, forced again and again into all kinds of testimony and interviews in the Depp/Heard trial. 

Observe his detachment. Notice the judge at the end. She's equally offended but quietly impressed ( Her status means nothing to Romero. She's not used to that) 

In general, what I find is that many men, in private discussions, are not OK with "treating women poorly half the time" 

If you are "too nice" to a woman, she's going to either take you for granted, use you or think you are a sucker and be offended by it. However if you are "fair" to a woman, many will still complain. If you treat them bad ( which I'm not saying men should do), then still more complaints. 

Many men just aren't willing to do it. It's not within them. The requisite moodiness, withdrawal, silent treatment and casual indifference to essentially keep a relationship "regulated" 

I also believe most men don't really understand what women are saying when they talk about relationships. Women generally talk about relationships, where men can hear it, in the way that women talk to women. Because women control legal access to sex, there is no obligation to communicate in a manner that will help men in general to understand. Women only value men they find attractive, i.e. through some form of "pre-selection" model or option tree. 

If they don't find you attractive, your behavioral model really doesn't matter. I'm not saying men should be rude or brutal, but I am saying men need to understand what women say is going to be irrelevant compared to simply observing what they actually do. 

Men operate to loyalty typically with other men in close association because it's a type of social currency. It's important to be seen and act as loyal, reliable and with integrity. Men judge disloyalty very harshly. Women don't hold themselves to that standard. Society doesn't enforce that upon them. Our culture invalidates most of what men feel but almost always validates what women say on a dime. It's just how it works. I wouldn't assign fair or unfair to it, just different. So the level of "consistency" that men must operate with in regards to other men to function in society is not demanded of women. That very frustrating for a lot of men. We don't get to be moody and just casually change our minds on a whim and have society validate that pathway. Not most of the time. 

In effect, and I say this with full honesty and to no offense to you, but I generally advise men to ignore what women say. Just watch what they do. Don't expect them to communicate like men do. Don't expect consistency or even loyalty. I also advise them to be "authentic" to themselves. If you can't effectively do the "checklist" of things practically needed to manage the modern American woman in a commitment, then don't get into a relationship. And honestly, most men have opted out. But since most men are not found attractive by most women, the only real loss to women are the handful of the same select men that most women desire. 

[Wade Garrett 155]

It's quite funny reading a bunch of no education, moron, incel cultist waxing on what they believe women want.

When the last thing a woman wants is a no education, moron, incel cultist.  Well other than your sisters, cousins, and other 10 teeth max gals who hang out at monster truck rallies, demolition derbies, and gun shows.

LOLOLOLOL

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,850]

43 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

It's quite funny reading a bunch of no education, moron, incel cultist waxing on what they believe women want.

When the last thing a woman wants is a no education, moron, incel cultist.  Well other than your sisters, cousins, and other 10 teeth max gals who hang out at monster truck rallies, demolition derbies, and gun shows.

LOLOLOLOL

You think that's bad, try reading your own posts!!     

Your posts indicate you're about as desirable for women as a lobotomy.  They also indicate you know absolutely ZERO about women.  Have you even kissed one yet? 

[Wade Garrett 155]

31 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

You think that's bad, try reading your own posts!!     

Your posts indicate you're about as desirable for women as a lobotomy.  They also indicate you know absolutely ZERO about women.  Have you even kissed one yet? 

Why are you so bigly mad cultist?  You mad that your master is an orange, moron 2x indicted, silver spoon ?

I certainly don't need to front anything for you deplorable drecks.  While I would prefer if you cockroaches would scamper back into whatever sewer you crawled out of, you idiots are at least bigly fun to laugh at.  Particularly how mad y'all get when your orange master gets curbstomped yet again.

Love this for you deplorables.

[Fireballer 2,639]

1 hour ago, Wade Garrett said:

It's quite funny reading a bunch of no education, moron, incel cultist waxing on what they believe women want.

When the last thing a woman wants is a no education, moron, incel cultist.  Well other than your sisters, cousins, and other 10 teeth max gals who hang out at monster truck rallies, demolition derbies, and gun shows.

LOLOLOLOL

LMAO…I haven’t read this thread in over a week, and this dude is still butthurt throwing around insults. What a weak a$$ specimen.  

[Wade Garrett 155]

3 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

LMAO…I haven’t read this thread in over a week, and this dude is still butthurt throwing around insults. What a weak a$$ specimen.  

Man you deplorables get all butt hurt at real talk.

Is that how you idiots are able to worship Trump so thoroughly?  Because you've got zero sense of reality?

Actually never mind...LOLOLOLOLOL

[Fireballer 2,639]

8 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

Man you deplorables get all butt hurt at real talk.

Is that how you idiots are able to worship Trump so thoroughly?  Because you've got zero sense of reality?

Actually never mind...LOLOLOLOLOL

Give up boyo.  This thread is chock full of you being mad at the men that women want, because you ain’t them.  You can hurl the insults all you want, but it changes nothing.  You’re just digging a deeper hole. Literally no one takes you seriously.  You’re  the little “Hey,Spike” pup from cartoons.  Sad.

 

[Wade Garrett 155]

10 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

Give up boyo.  This thread is chock full of you being mad at the men that women want, because you ain’t them.  You can hurl the insults all you want, but it changes nothing.  You’re just digging a deeper hole. Literally no one takes you seriously.  You’re  the little “Hey,Spike” pup from cartoons.  Sad.

 

Why so mad boyo?  I get that you deplorables can't attract regular gals, but hey, you've still got your sisters and cousins!

And for lots of you you prefer to get with dudes anyway.

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[RLLD 4,143]

1 hour ago, Fireballer said:

LMAO…I haven’t read this thread in over a week, and this dude is still butthurt throwing around insults. What a weak a$$ specimen.  

Liberlism is the migration of men to become women, and I find it fascinating.

Even though women have been indoctrinated into the marxist liberalism and espouse the correct doctrines.....they still crave the benefits of a real man in their life. I feel sorry for them.

They know deep down what they need and want, but face the arbitrary walls of their cult, with liberalism trying to tell them they want and need something else. Its sorta sad. 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

So I had some free time this morning and was interested enough in this to dig a little deeper, as this thread just keeps on going with more and more MAGAs piling on about how women want a caveman to take care of them.  And I'm sure there are some that fall in this camp, but it's gotta be small, especially in the younger demographic.

I found this article. https://thehill.com/changing-america/enrichment/arts-culture/3917348-politics-are-increasingly-a-dating-dealbreaker-especially-for-women/

In this article, the author discusses how younger women are skewing liberal, and increasingly do not want MAGA men.

Quote

 

They note that women, in particular, are considering politics more when deciding who to date, are less likely to date across the political aisle and are more cautious when approaching dating than they were in the past. 

Americans as a whole say that political divisions have become a bigger obstacle to pursuing relationships of late. Eighty-six percent think it has grown more difficult to date someone who supports the opposing political party in recent years, according to a 2020 YouGov-Economist poll. 

And most Americans would be unwilling to date someone with political views different from their own, another YouGov poll found the same year.  

But that feeling was especially strong among women — and Democrats. While more than half of men said they would date someone with different views, just 35 percent of women said the same thing. And only 40 percent of Democrats said they would date across party lines, compared to 48 percent of Republicans and 49 percent of independents.   

While women have been becoming more liberal for years, the change in dating culture coincides with a major uptick in young women identifying as left-leaning amid political developments such as Trump’s election, the rise of the #MeToo movement and the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Men’s politics, meanwhile, have undergone no similar shift.

 

 

Here is another article that talks about the excess of single men.  It discusses that women now realize that they don't need men to take care of them, because they can take care of themselves.  https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/3868557-most-young-men-are-single-most-young-women-are-not/

Quote

 

More than 60 percent of young men are single, nearly twice the rate of unattached young women, signaling a larger breakdown in the social, romantic and sexual life of the American male. 

Men in their 20s are more likely than women in their 20s to be romantically uninvolved, sexually dormant, friendless and lonely. They stand at the vanguard of an epidemic of declining marriage, sexuality and relationships that afflicts all of young America.  

Societal changes that began in the Eisenhower years have eroded the patriarchy that once ruled the American home, classroom and workplace. Women now collect nearly 60 percent of bachelor’s degrees. Men still earn more, but among the youngest adults, the income gap has narrowed to $43 a week. 

Scholars say the new era of gender parity has reshaped relationship dynamics, empowering young women and, in many cases, removing young men from the equation. 

“Women don’t need to be in long-term relationships. They don’t need to be married. They’d rather go to brunch with friends than have a horrible date,” said Greg Matos, a couple and family psychologist in Los Angeles, who recently penned a viral article titled “What’s Behind the Rise of Lonely, Single Men.” 

 

And my latest article, from 2015, so its dated but likely still holds true, about how women are more educated than men these days, and they are being more selective wanting men who are of similar education and intellect. https://www.vice.com/en/article/3bj5yv/youre-single-because-there-arent-enough-men-253

 

Quote

Using his background in economics and statistics, Birger sought out an answer. The result is his recent book, Date-onomics: How Dating Became a Lopsided Numbers Game, a clever read with a sobering conclusion: There simply aren't enough college-educated men to go around. For every four college-educated women in my generation, there are three college-educated men. The result? What Birger calls a "musical chairs" of the heart: As the men pair off with partners, unpartnered straight women are left with fewer and fewer options—and millions of them are eventually left with no options at all.

 

Interesting reads, if you guys are willing to move away from your caveman theories.

[GutterBoy 2,898]

2 hours ago, RLLD said:

Liberlism is the migration of men to become women, and I find it fascinating.

Even though women have been indoctrinated into the marxist liberalism and espouse the correct doctrines.....they still crave the benefits of a real man in their life. I feel sorry for them.

They know deep down what they need and want, but face the arbitrary walls of their cult, with liberalism trying to tell them they want and need something else. Its sorta sad. 

Did you post this with a straight face?

[iam90sbaby 2,494]

Real men drive minivans and date women with funny colored hair 

[RogerDodger 797]

2 hours ago, Wade Garrett said:

Why so mad boyo?  I get that you deplorables can't attract regular gals, but hey, you've still got your sisters and cousins!

And for lots of you you prefer to get with dudes anyway.

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

It's a good thing you're already married to fatty.

Quote

Also, I'm coming up on 8 months from my ileostomy takedown surgery and my strength and stamina hasn't come close to recovering.  I've been working out for a month now and my lifts are seriously lagging where I'd normally be after taking it back up after a long layoff.  Sexy time with my super lucky (haha) wife takes so much out of me it's almost funny.

[RLLD 4,143]

8 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Did you post this with a straight face?

I absolutely did. This is one of those occasions where the dogma of your politics does not align well with simple common sense. And of course your move is to mock that which you do not understand or agree with. It's narcissism.  Others who challenge your world view are simply stupid because you are only ever "right" therefore anyone who disagree's with you is just stupid. Most people emerge from this in their early 20's, we just need to give you more time. 

[RogerDodger 797]

15 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

So I had some free time this morning and was interested enough in this to dig a little deeper, as this thread just keeps on going with more and more MAGAs piling on about how women want a caveman to take care of them.  And I'm sure there are some that fall in this camp, but it's gotta be small, especially in the younger demographic.

I found this article. https://thehill.com/changing-america/enrichment/arts-culture/3917348-politics-are-increasingly-a-dating-dealbreaker-especially-for-women/

In this article, the author discusses how younger women are skewing liberal, and increasingly do not want MAGA men.

 

Here is another article that talks about the excess of single men.  It discusses that women now realize that they don't need men to take care of them, because they can take care of themselves.  https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/3868557-most-young-men-are-single-most-young-women-are-not/

 

And my latest article, from 2015, so its dated but likely still holds true, about how women are more educated than men these days, and they are being more selective wanting men who are of similar education and intellect. https://www.vice.com/en/article/3bj5yv/youre-single-because-there-arent-enough-men-253

 

 

Interesting reads, if you guys are willing to move away from your caveman theories.

You sure do spend a lot of time shoring up your shortcomings.  

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,850]

3 hours ago, Wade Garrett said:

Why are you so bigly mad cultist?  You mad that your master is an orange, moron 2x indicted, silver spoon ?

I certainly don't need to front anything for you deplorable drecks.  While I would prefer if you cockroaches would scamper back into whatever sewer you crawled out of, you idiots are at least bigly fun to laugh at.  Particularly how mad y'all get when your orange master gets curbstomped yet again.

Love this for you deplorables.

Cultist says what?

[GutterBoy 2,898]

5 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I absolutely did. This is one of those occasions where the dogma of your politics does not align well with simple common sense. And of course your move is to mock that which you do not understand or agree with. It's narcissism.  Others who challenge your world view are simply stupid because you are only ever "right" therefore anyone who disagree's with you is just stupid. Most people emerge from this in their early 20's, we just need to give you more time. 

wow, ok.  Please explain to me how liberalism is men becoming women.  And don't even start with trans BS that is like <1% of people.

[RLLD 4,143]

5 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

wow, ok.  Please explain to me how liberalism is men becoming women.  And don't even start with trans BS that is like <1% of people.

You can start with the women in the videos, their experiences are valid and we should take them at face value. 

Beyond that we can look at the nature of "violence".  Physical violence is the traditional domain of men, whereas women expressed it using character assasination.  So where we observe men gravitating toward that character assasination we can see them simply favoring that style of violence.

And of course you are going to pretend its some laughable assertion, so lets get one step ahead of that. While there is an entire catalog of these distinctions in clinic psychology., just start with these. 

Source

Source

SOurce.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,959]

Gutterboy had some free time this morning. As opposed to every other morning. And this afternoon, I’m sure. 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

27 minutes ago, RLLD said:

You can start with the women in the videos, their experiences are valid and we should take them at face value. 

Beyond that we can look at the nature of "violence".  Physical violence is the traditional domain of men, whereas women expressed it using character assasination.  So where we observe men gravitating toward that character assasination we can see them simply favoring that style of violence.

And of course you are going to pretend its some laughable assertion, so lets get one step ahead of that. While there is an entire catalog of these distinctions in clinic psychology., just start with these. 

Source

Source

SOurce.

women in what videos?  Are you talking about the one woman that was posted in this thread who says she can't find a guy who is willing to pay for dinner that's not conservative?  OK.  Taking this at face value, any person that extrapolates this to "liberalism is turning men into women" is not a serious person.  So no, don't even try it.

OK next, you;re asserting that men use physical violence whereas women use character assassination as violence.  OK, that's odd, but whatever.  And you're saying that men are now using character assassination more, thus migrating to women.  Again odd take, but OK.  I'll just throw out there that the man that does the most character assassination in the modern world today is Donald Trump, the leader of the conservative party.  So if you're trying to say this is liberalism, you couldn't be more wrong.

Then you provided 3 sources that have nothing to do with the point you are failing to make.

Differences in female and male involvement in lethal violence in Russia - huh?  Nothing to do with character assassination

Women, avoid character assassination - An article about how women should stop doing this but no mention of how liberal men are now doing this as the migrate to liberalism.

A Review of Research on Women’s Use of Violence With Male Intimate Partners - How women physically injure men, which contradicts the point you're failing to make.

 

You would have been better off just saying your original post was tongue in cheek.  This charade is just exposing you for the clown you are.  Have a great day/

[RogerDodger 797]

14 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

women in what videos?  Are you talking about the one woman that was posted in this thread who says she can't find a guy who is willing to pay for dinner that's not conservative?  OK.  Taking this at face value, any person that extrapolates this to "liberalism is turning men into women" is not a serious person.  So no, don't even try it.

OK next, you;re asserting that men use physical violence whereas women use character assassination as violence.  OK, that's odd, but whatever.  And you're saying that men are now using character assassination more, thus migrating to women.  Again odd take, but OK.  I'll just throw out there that the man that does the most character assassination in the modern world today is Donald Trump, the leader of the conservative party.  So if you're trying to say this is liberalism, you couldn't be more wrong.

Then you provided 3 sources that have nothing to do with the point you are failing to make.

Differences in female and male involvement in lethal violence in Russia - huh?  Nothing to do with character assassination

Women, avoid character assassination - An article about how women should stop doing this but no mention of how liberal men are now doing this as the migrate to liberalism.

A Review of Research on Women’s Use of Violence With Male Intimate Partners - How women physically injure men, which contradicts the point you're failing to make.

 

You would have been better off just saying your original post was tongue in cheek.  This charade is just exposing you for the clown you are.  Have a great day/

The best part is you trying to explain what other people meant in their post.

 

  

[RLLD 4,143]

31 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

women in what videos?  Are you talking about the one woman that was posted in this thread who says she can't find a guy who is willing to pay for dinner that's not conservative?  OK.  Taking this at face value, any person that extrapolates this to "liberalism is turning men into women" is not a serious person.  So no, don't even try it.

OK next, you;re asserting that men use physical violence whereas women use character assassination as violence.  OK, that's odd, but whatever.  And you're saying that men are now using character assassination more, thus migrating to women.  Again odd take, but OK.  I'll just throw out there that the man that does the most character assassination in the modern world today is Donald Trump, the leader of the conservative party.  So if you're trying to say this is liberalism, you couldn't be more wrong.

Then you provided 3 sources that have nothing to do with the point you are failing to make.

Differences in female and male involvement in lethal violence in Russia - huh?  Nothing to do with character assassination

Women, avoid character assassination - An article about how women should stop doing this but no mention of how liberal men are now doing this as the migrate to liberalism.

A Review of Research on Women’s Use of Violence With Male Intimate Partners - How women physically injure men, which contradicts the point you're failing to make.

 

You would have been better off just saying your original post was tongue in cheek.  This charade is just exposing you for the clown you are.  Have a great day/

women in what videos?  Are you talking about the one woman that was posted in this thread who says she can't find a guy who is willing to pay for dinner that's not conservative?  OK.  Taking this at face value, any person that extrapolates this to "liberalism is turning men into women" is not a serious person.  So no, don't even try it.

I will "try it", but thank you for the advice. The anecdotal is part of this thread. I point to it and offer some explanation for it. If you want to not speak to it, as posted, then feel free to just ignore it I suppose. For those who want to talk about it, we will be "trying it" 

OK next, you;re asserting that men use physical violence whereas women use character assassination as violence.  OK, that's odd, but whatever.  And you're saying that men are now using character assassination more, thus migrating to women.  Again odd take, but OK.  I'll just throw out there that the man that does the most character assassination in the modern world today is Donald Trump, the leader of the conservative party.  So if you're trying to say this is liberalism, you couldn't be more wrong.

Not odd given the context of the thread and the video.  The woman is lamenting that she actually desires male traits, but seems to find them more often in conservative vs liberal men, while not an absolute, it bears recognition. Now, feel tree to trot out your political heroes and villains, as your religion mandates, I will ignore the reference as it has no merit. Liberalism and the female sense of self are absolutely linked and its obvious.

 

Then you provided 3 sources that have nothing to do with the point you are failing to make.

Incorrect, they support both my assertion of male-centric physical violence as well as the clinical assessment of female character assasination, again....not MY assertion so much as clinical psychology. Though it is likely true that any evidence presented to you will not increase your understanding or awareness due to the constrants of liberalism as a religion.

 

Differences in female and male involvement in lethal violence in Russia - huh?  Nothing to do with character assassination

Now this one was a curious response.  You seem to want to devalue the hard work of researchers because "russia". I am willing to work with this, all I need is to know what countries are valid for research(in your opinion) so we can dispense with the source denigration and get back to the topic. Since this is simply human naturem, we can certainly locate similar studies for any locale.

 

Women, avoid character assassination - An article about how women should stop doing this but no mention of how liberal men are now doing this as the migrate to liberalism.

Which makes sense when you think about it. right? My point was that character assasination is a female trait, and where men use it they are honoring that trait. And circling back to the origin of my post....that the liberal woman was lamenting the lack of male traits.....if you stop for a moment the connection should click for you....

 

A Review of Research on Women’s Use of Violence With Male Intimate Partners - How women physically injure men, which contradicts the point you're failing to make.

I never used an absolute, simply the clinial view of where the trait is common, as noted.  So can women be violent? Of course....but that is typiccally a behavior trait more commonly associated with men.

 

You would have been better off just saying your original post was tongue in cheek.  This charade is just exposing you for the clown you are.  Have a great day/

Thank you for your advice. I still prefer to think a little more deeply than you seem to want to here on this topic.  Please do enjoy your day as well

[Hardcore troubadour 14,959]

Things sure have changed. MDC spent part of his twenties and thirties here whining he couldn’t find a girl.  

[RogerDodger 797]

Thinking deeply, or at all really, isn't a Gutterboy trait.  

[Wade Garrett 155]

Here's an idea cultist.  Put your profile up on a dating app and broadcast that you're a conservative, maybe wear one of your MAGA hats.

Then do the same thing and say you're a liberal.

Not that you repulsive, no education, inbred deplorables would get much activity regardless, but the MAGA profile will have tumbleweeds blowing around it.

Being a MAGAtard on a dating app means you're for a lot of lonely nights or you just use grinder like our good, homo friend Roger/Horsesass.

Enjoy that assplay Roger/Horsesass!

SAD

[RogerDodger 797]

2 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

Here's an idea cultist.  Put your profile up on a dating app and broadcast that you're a conservative, maybe wear one of your MAGA hats.

Then do the same thing and say you're a liberal.

Not that you repulsive, no education, inbred deplorables would get much activity regardless, but the MAGA profile will have tumbleweeds blowing around it.

Being a MAGAtard on a dating app means you're for a lot of lonely nights or you just use grinder like our good, homo friend Roger/Horsesass.

Enjoy that assplay Roger/Horsesass!

SAD

Says the guy whose waste goes from his small intestine directly to is anus.