Jump to content
tubby_mcgee

Have we talked about the Epstein Island list?

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, The Psychic Observer said:

Because they are deciding if he should be above the law or not.  If we all agree that he should not, then the court has nothing to decide.  Why is it even a question?

Supreme Court should not have accepted certiorari.

They did it just to help him delay :thumbsdown:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, The Psychic Observer said:

Because they are deciding if he should be above the law or not.  If we all agree that he should not, then the court has nothing to decide.  Why is it even a question?

Ask the prosecutor. He’s the one that sent it to scotus. There seems to be a question. 

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Supreme Court should not have accepted certiorari.

They did it just to help him delay :thumbsdown:

It was Smith that sent it there. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets all find out who made visits to Pedo Island.

Libs: Trump was seen at a party with Epstein once, not on Pedo Island!

Libs are so stupid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

It was Smith that sent it there. 

Pretty misleading claim there.

It was months ago that Smith asked the Supreme Court to leapfrog the court of appeals and decide the issue immediately. You know, to save time.

But they declined that request.

So here we are months later and now it’s in front of the Supreme Court because Trump lost in the court of appeals and appealed from there.

Supreme Court knows there’s no way this case gets tried before the election now. And that was by design 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Pretty misleading claim there.

It was months ago that Smith asked the Supreme Court to leapfrog the court of appeals and decide the issue immediately. You know, to save time.

Bur they declined that request.

So here we are months later and now it’s in front of the Supreme Court because Trump lost in the court of appeals and appealed from there.

Supreme Court knows there’s no way this case gets tried before the election now. And that was by design 

So letting a case play out in the lower courts is now some sign of chicanery? Ok. What if e wry prosecutor just wanted to skip over that part of the process? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

So letting a case play out in the lower courts is now some sign of chicanery? Ok. What if e wry prosecutor just wanted to skip over that part of the process? 

Caught in a lie and now you pivot. I ain’t playing your bullsh1t games today :nono:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Caught in a lie and now you pivot. I ain’t playing your bullsh1t games today :nono:

What’s the lie? Holy shitt. You’re our very own Olberman.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/29/2024 at 2:02 PM, IGotWorms said:

Pretty misleading claim there.

It was months ago that Smith asked the Supreme Court to leapfrog the court of appeals and decide the issue immediately. You know, to save time.

But they declined that request.

So here we are months later and now it’s in front of the Supreme Court because Trump lost in the court of appeals and appealed from there.

Supreme Court knows there’s no way this case gets tried before the election now. And that was by design 

Or they adhered to their standard practice of not taking matters up which are not yet ripe.  As a lawyer you would understand the ripeness doctrine, no?

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said:

Or they adhered to their standard practice of not taking matters up which are not yet ripe.  As a lawyer you would understand the ripeness doctrine, no?

Works is a loyal cultist liberal first, lawyer second 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Everytime this gets bumped I think there is news on the Epstein list.  The Diddy List will be released long before Epstein.  Gay rapers going to have to take one for the team. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Everytime this gets bumped I think there is news on the Epstein list.  The Diddy List will be released long before Epstein.  Gay rapers going to have to take one for the team. 

That list will never be shown, too many high profile names on both sides of the ledger.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

That list will never be shown, too many high profile names on both sides of the ledger.

I doubt we see either one.  Diddy might have fewer political powerbrokers and he seemed more reckless.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

 

 

Nice follow you have there:

 

“Pro-Democracy. Anti-Fascism. Gay AF. The @GOP is a fascist Nazi cult. If you like my tweets, subscribe to my newsletter!”

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

 

Well now, if true, this the first thing to come forward showing something that Trump did that actually was horrible.

Its hard to imagine after blowing artificially generated Jussie Smollet-type smoke constantly, Trump-haters may have found a real fire.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Voltaire said:

Well now, if true, this the first thing to come forward showing something that Trump did that actually was horrible.

It’s hard to imagine after blowing artificially generated Jussie Smollet-type smoke constantly, Trump-haters may have found a real fire.

You’re so stupid. 💯🤡

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

You’re so stupid. 💯🤡

You're arguing that being on Epstein's flight log list is insignificant?

Actually, I shouldn't have put a question mark there. That IS what you're doing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

You're arguing that being on Epstein's flight log list is insignificant?

Actually, I shouldn't have put a question mark there. That IS what you're doing.

You could be right this time and still be a stupid SOB. But you’re not. You’re such a craven needbag in search of credibility. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

You could be right this time and still be a stupid SOB. But you’re not. You’re such a craven needbag in search of credibility. 

I'm not right or wrong because I don't know. Gutterboy has lied to/misled us so many times that his credibility is dubious. He automatically and uncritically believes whatever any sh*tbag that wants to smear Trump posts on the internet. Lie? Not a lie? He is going to parrot it regardless.

That doesn't mean its a lie.

If Trump's name really is on the flight logs... its a horrible twist in the presidential race but he's going to have to own it.

We'll see how this plays out.

Also, for anyone not aware of HT's venom towards me, HT is pissed at me because I believe Rusty when he accused HT of breaking Geek Club conduct ethics. There was a time in this forarm when we all knew each other and didn't dox each other of fock with people. Rusty is/was/remains one of the people most vulnerable for putting himself out there. Rusty accused HT of that and it sure looked to me that Rusty had a valid reason to be concerned. HT has never forgiven me for believing Rusty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Voltaire said:

Gutterboy has lied to/misled us so many times that his credibility is dubious. He automatically and uncritically believes whatever any sh*tbag that wants to smear Trump posts on the internet. Lie? Not a lie? He is going to parrot it regardless.

Untrue.  I don't lie and my credibility is stellar.  Just because you don't like what I post doesn't mean it's not true.

As with everyone, feel free to dispute anything I post and I'm happy to have an intelligent mature debate.  Unfortunately too many people here to down the name calling insult route but I try to ignore them.

This however is true.  Trump is on the Epstein flight logs.  Is that proof he focked kids, no, but it's another data point in a data lake that heavily supports the theory that Trump is a creep with a questionable past.  Would not be a shock if any of the other allegations (ie child sexual assault) were true.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Notice how he backpeddles on Epstein release, saying it's phony, because he knows he's in it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Biden’s sycophants are getting desperate as they face the reality of a Trump landslide.  Epstein!!!!  Let’s never forget it was Trump that brought him down. It was Trump that started to shed light and tear down the vast pedophilia network the left is running. If they had not stolen the 2020 election he not only would have saved millions of unborn he would have saved thousands upon thousands of the born from these ghouls.  
 

Podesta/Clinton Plans foiled by Trump in 2016

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

 

This however is true.  Trump is on the Epstein flight logs. 

I can’t find any confirmation of this. Do you have a legitimate source? I’m not much into social media as a source for anything. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Biden’s sycophants are getting desperate as they face the reality of a Trump landslide.  Epstein!!!!  Let’s never forget it was Trump that brought him down. It was Trump that started to shed light and tear down the vast pedophilia network the left is running. If they had not stolen the 2020 election he not only would have saved millions of unborn he would have saved thousands upon thousands of the born from these ghouls.  
 

Podesta/Clinton Plans foiled by Trump in 2016

 

 

Is that Benny Hill? ( Van Dyke is unmistakable)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Biden’s sycophants are getting desperate as they face the reality of a Trump landslide.  Epstein!!!!  Let’s never forget it was Trump that brought him down. It was Trump that started to shed light and tear down the vast pedophilia network the left is running. If they had not stolen the 2020 election he not only would have saved millions of unborn he would have saved thousands upon thousands of the born from these ghouls.  
 

Podesta/Clinton Plans foiled by Trump in 2016

 

 

Seems the nut house is missing a pistachio.  

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

Is that Benny Hill? ( Van Dyke is unmistakable)

Yes.  Also, Hillary Rodham Clinton and William Jefferson Clinton in uncredited roles according to many people.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

Yep. 

He's a great, first rate talent at catching children. Too bad he has so little aptitude catching women in bikinis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mike Honcho said:

Seems the nut house is missing a pistachio.  

Posts like that is why I have him on ignore. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Voltaire said:

He's a great, first rate talent at catching children. Too bad he has so little aptitude catching women in bikinis.

No Benny Hill isn’t the Child Catcher. He’s the dude who warns the kids about the child catcher. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

118 pages of hand written notes? 
 

Not what I’m looking for. I have no idea if that’s accurate. What I want is an article, from the Washington Post or the New York Times or CNN, etc, then I’ll believe it. 

Im not trying to defend Trump. You know what I think of him. But if your assertion was true I imagine it would be a pretty big headline somewhere. There isn’t one. Until there is I don’t believe it, sorry. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

118 pages of hand written notes? 
 

Not what I’m looking for. I have no idea if that’s accurate. What I want is an article, from the Washington Post or the New York Times or CNN, etc, then I’ll believe it. 

Im not trying to defend Trump. You know what I think of him. But if your assertion was true I imagine it would be a pretty big headline somewhere. There isn’t one. Until there is I don’t believe it, sorry. 

Either of these do it for ya?

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-bill-clinton-prince-andrew-multiple-trips-jeffrey-epstein-plane-ghislaine-maxwell-1661513

https://www.thedailybeast.com/new-jeffrey-epstein-flight-log-at-ghislaine-maxwell-trials-shows-presidents-senators-and-celebs

https://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-jeffrey-epstein-flight-logs-unsealed-2019-8

It doesn't prove that he assaulted kids.

This came up because yesterday Don Jr posted that Trump isn't on the flight logs, but he got fact checked, because he is.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×