Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Mike Honcho

Maine’s top election official removes Trump from 2024 primary ballot

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, zsasz said:

So the party that was gearing up to send alternate slates of electors to the 2020 election certification now have a problem with election shenanigans?  Noone's ever accused a Trumper of being not being a hypocrite.  

Exactly, that's why this is so amusing.  They're fine sending uncle Cletus into the capitol to stop a certification, they're fine with "finding" extra votes, but this is a threat to democracy 🤣🤣🤣

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting article from last night’s news

Apparently, the Secretary of State is not an attorney and used You Tube to investigate the matter.  She has lots of Biden stuff on her social media.  Heavy partisan.  

It begs the question what happens when the dots are connected that it is the Fascist Anti-Democracy Biden Regime that is pushing for Trump to be forced off the ballot?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, zsasz said:

I didn't like the alternate elector end around theory....I don't like this Maine lady.  I'd imagine there aren't many Trumpers who can say that.  It's us in the Center that always have to put up with both sides BS.  

So you’re against the constitution and for authoritarian rule. Got it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Ron_Artest said:

Exactly, that's why this is so amusing.  They're fine sending uncle Cletus into the capitol to stop a certification, they're fine with "finding" extra votes, but this is a threat to democracy 🤣🤣🤣

No one was trying to find “extra” votes. They were trying to find illegitimate ones. Big difference, and what’s the problem with that? 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, zsasz said:

I didn't like the alternate elector end around theory....I don't like this Maine lady.  I'd imagine there aren't many Trumpers who can say that.  It's us in the Center that always have to put up with both sides BS.  

😆

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

No one was trying to find “extra” votes. They were trying to find illegitimate ones. Big difference, and what’s the problem with that? 

Your leaders own words shnookums. 🤣🤣🤣

Cuck for Trump 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As I said before, I hope the supreme court chimes in soon and puts an end to this.

It's only fueling the MAGAturds conspiracy theories about the deep state and Biden rigging the election.  Clownzo is fundraising off all this.  Any slight to him and he frames the narrative for MAGAturd money and support.

He's gonna lose anyway, might as well do it without all the bellyaching 🤣🤣🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

Your leaders own words shnookums. 🤣🤣🤣

Cuck for Trump 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

 

Wow you’re stupid. Find illegal ones.  But have fun with your lie. You need them. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Ron_Artest said:

Um, you posted that the challenge was from a bipartisan group, and then you say I can't read. 🤣🤣🤣

Um, a bipartisan group challenged it, but a single person decided not to put him on the ballot as a result of that challenge.  RIF, Rusty.  RIF.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

Um, a bipartisan group challenged it, but a single person decided not to put him on the ballot as a result of that challenge.  RIF, Rusty.  RIF.

And if the bipartisan group never challenged it, he'd still be on the ballot.  Seek help Jerry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Strike said:

No.  While unlikely you never know how a given state might vote, especially right now.  But that doesn't even matter.  Taking away those people's right to vote violates a fundamental tenet of our republic.  I find it funny that people like you are ok with this but as soon as conservatives want to enact voter ID laws to ensure the integrity of an election you scream "RACISM!!!!" and that we're taking away people's right to vote.  This would impact a much larger portion of our electorate than voter ID laws.  But here we are......

Stop with the “people like you are OK with this”. I’m not OK with this, and I’ve posted that several times now. All I’m saying is that I doubt it would affect the outcome. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Stop with the “people like you are OK with this”. I’m not OK with this, and I’ve posted that several times now. All I’m saying is that I doubt it would affect the outcome. 

It's straight out of the fascist playbook.  Debase your enemy, group them all into one position, label them, vilify them, lie, attack.  It's the same thing the leftists do.  He's become what he once hated, incapable of honest conversation, incapable of individual thought or expressing humanity.  A true immature troglodyte.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to love  when someone that is appointed to their position and not a lawyer makes profound legal decisions on their own with the help of YouTube. Nice country we have here. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

 Nice country we have here. 

It's the greatest country on Earth and real patriots know this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

It's straight out of the fascist playbook.  Debase your enemy, group them all into one position, label them, vilify them, lie, attack.  It's the same thing the leftists do.  He's become what he once hated, incapable of honest conversation, incapable of individual thought or expressing humanity.  A true immature troglodyte.

are you looking in the mirror as you type this out

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

It's the greatest country on Earth and real patriots know this.

That’s because the rest of the world sucks. I don’t judge us against our inferiors. I just us against our own success, that’s what winners do.  Things were better here before. No denying it. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

Stop with the “people like you are OK with this”. I’m not OK with this, and I’ve posted that several times now. All I’m saying is that I doubt it would affect the outcome. 

and Jerry post a specific reason you're wrong, and I notice you haven't addressed that.  What a shock!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

No one was trying to find “extra” votes. They were trying to find illegitimate ones. Big difference, and what’s the problem with that? 

“All I want to do is this: I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have. Because we won this state, and flipping the state is a great testament to the country," Trump said. "I only need 11,000 votes. Fellas, I need 11,000 votes. Give me a break."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

“All I want to do is this: I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have. Because we won this state, and flipping the state is a great testament to the country," Trump said. "I only need 11,000 votes. Fellas, I need 11,000 votes. Give me a break."

MAGAturds have no problem with this.  Sad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Ron_Artest said:

It's straight out of the fascist playbook.  Debase your enemy, group them all into one position, label them, vilify them, lie, attack.  It's the same thing the leftists do.  He's become what he once hated, incapable of honest conversation, incapable of individual thought or expressing humanity.  A true immature troglodyte.

It’s like Boyo forgot this ever happened. TRUMP!!!

SAD!!!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

“All I want to do is this: I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have. Because we won this state, and flipping the state is a great testament to the country," Trump said. "I only need 11,000 votes. Fellas, I need 11,000 votes. Give me a break."

Another very fine people situation.  You like being lied to.  Bleach! 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Another very fine people situation.  You like being lied to.  Bleach! 

Sure clownzo! 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The bleach thing is hilarious. Dummy talking out of his asss gets made fun of. Trump nuthuggers race to justify the stupidity. The next day he says he was just being sarcastic with the mean press 😂😂

Trump then gets sad and stops doing his daily pressers comedy hour. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, thegeneral said:

 Dummy talking out of his asss gets made fun of.

Good for you. Finally you have self awareness. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a magatard, I'd love to see Trump not be involved 2024.  I like his immigration policy, and I think he's okay for the economy, but not as good as everyone thinks.  

He's too focused on short term wins.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Peefoam being Peefoam 😂

pimpledoosh being pimpledoosh.

What's up with you overpriced egg theory? 😆

You know. The whole thinking things are better cause they cost more. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

pimpledoosh being pimpledoosh.

What's up with you overpriced egg theory? 😆

You know. The whole thinking things are better cause they cost more. 

You pay whatever the fock you want to for eggs ballsack 😂

 

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

You pay whatever the fock you want to for eggs ballsack 😂

 

Imagine going to a different store just to save $1.50 on eggs.

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

You pay whatever the fock you want to for eggs ballsack 😂

 

You keep paying people who are ripping you off all you want ballsack. 😆

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Strike said:

and Jerry post a specific reason you're wrong, and I notice you haven't addressed that.  What a shock!!!

His specific reason (that Maine isn’t winner take all) is also irrelevant, because the difference isn’t going to be less than 5 electoral votes. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

His specific reason (that Maine isn’t winner take all) is also irrelevant, because the difference isn’t going to be less than 5 electoral votes. 

Care to provide your analysis which proves this?

Regardless, it potentially impacts the distribution of electoral votes, which would disenfranchise the voters of Maine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Care to provide your analysis which proves this?

Regardless, it potentially impacts the distribution of electoral votes, which would disenfranchise the voters of Maine.

1. Sure. Maine has 4 electoral votes. So for Maine’s electoral split to matter nationwide, the electoral count difference would have to be two electoral votes or less. That occurred exactly once in our history, in 1876. Given the amount of states which are currently firmly in the red and blue column, it’s almost statistically impossible that this will occur again. 
 

2. That’s a separate issue and I happen to agree with you to a point- see below. But my argument is not that this wouldn’t be unfair, only that it’s extremely unlikely that it would change the ultimate outcome. 

3. It’s wrong, IMO, to remove Trump from the ballot because he hasn’t been charged with insurrection, much less found guilty, and that’s what the 14th Amendment requires. But those who argue that it’s undemocratic and would disenfranchise voters are missing the point. We have restrictions in place already: nobody can run for a third term, you have to be over 35, you have to be a natural born citizen, etc. All of these restrictions are undemocratic and yet we have them. The 14th Amendment clause in question is just another restriction and it’s a good one I believe to have. It’s just inapplicable in this instance. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Soros, ACLU, and the thoroughly discredited SPLC. And YouTube. Yeah, this twat doesn’t have an agenda and take her orders from elsewhere. And she wonders why she’s getting threats. Well, she says she is. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Soros, ACLU, and the thoroughly discredited SPLC. And YouTube. Yeah, this twat doesn’t have an agenda and take her orders from elsewhere. And she wonders why she’s getting threats. Well, she says she is. 

Of course she is.  It's a standard tactic in the liberal playbook: do something illegal, unsavory or undemocratic and to take the focus off of that simply SAY you're getting death threats.  Now not only do you get sympathy from the biased media, all the focus is now "OMG!  All those people that are threatening her are evil" headlines 24/7 and not on the illegal sh#t you just did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

3. It’s wrong, IMO, to remove Trump from the ballot because he hasn’t been charged with insurrection, much less found guilty, and that’s what the 14th Amendment requires. But those who argue that it’s undemocratic and would disenfranchise voters are missing the point. We have restrictions in place already: nobody can run for a third term, you have to be over 35, you have to be a natural born citizen, etc. All of these restrictions are undemocratic and yet we have them. The 14th Amendment clause in question is just another restriction and it’s a good one I believe to have. It’s just inapplicable in this instance. 

Then you should never complain about voter ID ever again.  But you will because you're a hypocrite.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Of course she is.  It's a standard tactic in the liberal playbook: do something illegal, unsavory or undemocratic and to take the focus off of that simply SAY you're getting death threats.  Now not only do you get sympathy from the biased media, all the focus is now "OMG!  All those people that are threatening her are evil" headlines 24/7 and not on the illegal sh#t you just did.

Exactly. Tough shitt. Comes with the territory. It’s not like she’s a Supreme Court justice and people are protesting at her house. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Of course she is.  It's a standard tactic in the liberal playbook: do something illegal, unsavory or undemocratic and to take the focus off of that simply SAY you're getting death threats.  Now not only do you get sympathy from the biased media, all the focus is now "OMG!  All those people that are threatening her are evil" headlines 24/7 and not on the illegal sh#t you just did.

You think the death threats are fake? 🤣🤣🤣

In this thread, Stryker Ryker threatened to murder anyone that did this in his state.  The threats are real.  MAGAturds are dangerous.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×