Rachel Maddow defends MSNBC's refusal to air Trump's Iowa victory speech

[seafoam1 3,031]

Nuff said about the liberal media right there. 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/rachel-maddow-defends-msnbcs-refusal-air-trumps-iowa-victory-speech-not-spite

[seafoam1 3,031]

Time to start filming closed door, edited biden speeches to play instead of Trump. But continue to trash Trump's name on a daily basis.

How very North Korean of the liberals. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,446]

Unreal. Miss Russia Hoax, Covid misinformation and Trumps taxes says she won’t allow Trump to broadcast his mistruths. As she lies and says Trump is making it about immigrants, of course leaving out the illegal part. Complete hack. But she went to Oxford! 

[squistion 2,203]

6 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Nuff said about the liberal media right there. 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/rachel-maddow-defends-msnbcs-refusal-air-trumps-iowa-victory-speech-not-spite

From the link:

She explained that MSNBC and other news outlets are interested in telling the truth. 

"The reason I’m saying this is, of course, there is a reason that we and other news organizations have generally stopped giving an unfiltered, live platform to remarks by former President Trump," Maddow said. "It is not out of spite, it is not a decision that we relish, it is a decision that we regularly revisit. And, honestly, earnestly, it is not an easy decision." 

She went on to claim that airing Trump's "untrue" statements live on television hurts MSNBC's brand. "But there is a cost to us, as a news organization," Maddow said, "of knowingly broadcasting untrue things. That is a fundamental truth of our business and who we are. And so, his remarks, tonight, will not air here live. We will monitor them and let you know about any news that he makes."

[Dizkneelande 1,101]

4 minutes ago, squistion said:

From the link:

She explained that MSNBC and other news outlets are interested in telling the truth. 

"The reason I’m saying this is, of course, there is a reason that we and other news organizations have generally stopped giving an unfiltered, live platform to remarks by former President Trump," Maddow said. "It is not out of spite, it is not a decision that we relish, it is a decision that we regularly revisit. And, honestly, earnestly, it is not an easy decision." 

She went on to claim that airing Trump's "untrue" statements live on television hurts MSNBC's brand. "But there is a cost to us, as a news organization," Maddow said, "of knowingly broadcasting untrue things. That is a fundamental truth of our business and who we are. And so, his remarks, tonight, will not air here live. We will monitor them and let you know about any news that he makes."

HFS

Moscow Maddow cares about the truth. What a friggin wh0re !!

[seafoam1 3,031]

4 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

HFS

Moscow Maddow cares about the truth. What a friggin !!

"Kids in cages"  all of a sudden after Trump took them over from obama. 

Now this. 

[seafoam1 3,031]

6 minutes ago, squistion said:

From the link:

She explained that MSNBC and other news outlets are interested in telling the truth. 

"The reason I’m saying this is, of course, there is a reason that we and other news organizations have generally stopped giving an unfiltered, live platform to remarks by former President Trump," Maddow said. "It is not out of spite, it is not a decision that we relish, it is a decision that we regularly revisit. And, honestly, earnestly, it is not an easy decision." 

She went on to claim that airing Trump's "untrue" statements live on television hurts MSNBC's brand. "But there is a cost to us, as a news organization," Maddow said, "of knowingly broadcasting untrue things. That is a fundamental truth of our business and who we are. And so, his remarks, tonight, will not air here live. We will monitor them and let you know about any news that he makes."

You will nevr understand if you believe that shlt. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,446]

8 minutes ago, squistion said:

From the link:

She explained that MSNBC and other news outlets are interested in telling the truth. 

"The reason I’m saying this is, of course, there is a reason that we and other news organizations have generally stopped giving an unfiltered, live platform to remarks by former President Trump," Maddow said. "It is not out of spite, it is not a decision that we relish, it is a decision that we regularly revisit. And, honestly, earnestly, it is not an easy decision." 

She went on to claim that airing Trump's "untrue" statements live on television hurts MSNBC's brand. "But there is a cost to us, as a news organization," Maddow said, "of knowingly broadcasting untrue things. That is a fundamental truth of our business and who we are. And so, his remarks, tonight, will not air here live. We will monitor them and let you know about any news that he makes."

“We will monitor them and let you know”. Holeee Fock! They’re just saying it to thier idiots at this point. You’re too dumb to listen for yourself and figure it out. We got this for you. Stay tuned! 

[Engorgeous George 2,331]

I for one appreciate MSNBC filtering what is happening so that I don't have to think too hard for myself.  They may want to stop calling themselves "News" and go with the more truthful "Partisan Censored Information Feed" but otherwise I am good here.

[Reality 3,121]

10 minutes ago, squistion said:

From the link:

She explained that MSNBC and other news outlets are interested in telling the truth. 

"The reason I’m saying this is, of course, there is a reason that we and other news organizations have generally stopped giving an unfiltered, live platform to remarks by former President Trump," Maddow said. "It is not out of spite, it is not a decision that we relish, it is a decision that we regularly revisit. And, honestly, earnestly, it is not an easy decision." 

She went on to claim that airing Trump's "untrue" statements live on television hurts MSNBC's brand. "But there is a cost to us, as a news organization," Maddow said, "of knowingly broadcasting untrue things. That is a fundamental truth of our business and who we are. And so, his remarks, tonight, will not air here live. We will monitor them and let you know about any news that he makes."

You're ok with this?

[Engorgeous George 2,331]

I trust they will start simply summarizing what Karin Jean-Pierre meant to say rather than broadcasting what she did say when she says the administration never said or did what there is film of them saying and doing. 

[Patented Phil 1,469]

I remember as a kid reading about Pravda and the shitt they were doing and being mortified.  Now it is commonplace in the liberal media in the USA.  Goes to show you just how quickly and surreptitiously a country can be taken over by the Left.  Time for the tree of Liberty to be watered.

[seafoam1 3,031]

6 minutes ago, Reality said:

You're ok with this?

Well hey, "she explained it". Isn't that enough for you to hop on board with this media biased practice?

[Patented Phil 1,469]

3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

“We will monitor them and let you know”. Holeee Fock! They’re just saying it to thier idiots at this point. You’re too dumb to listen for yourself and figure it out. We got this for you. Stay tuned! 

Don’t bother with SquidTard.  He isn’t ignorant of the facts.  You won’t enlighten him to the errors of his ways.  He’s a hardcore Leftist, and it isn’t freedom or the truth he is after.  He wants things done his way, and in his worldview the ends always justify the means.  Which basically means he wants you and your ideas suppressed, or better yet, destroyed.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,446]

Rachel Maddow is the Sean Hannity of the left. A completely discredited cheerleader. 

[lickin_starfish 1,937]

Now we know why Smith-Mundt was "modernized".

[seafoam1 3,031]

15 minutes ago, Patented Phil said:

Don’t bother with SquidTard.  He isn’t ignorant of the facts.  You won’t enlighten him to the errors of his ways.  He’s a hardcore Leftist, and it isn’t freedom or the truth he is after.  He wants things done his way, and in his worldview the ends always justify the means.  Which basically means he wants you and your ideas suppressed, or better yet, destroyed.

He's a true blooded liberal democrat. His allegiance to the party is strong. 

[Tree of Knowledge 1,860]

Hopefully, the Trump FCC takes Deep State run media like MSNBC off the air and let’s real journalists like James O’Keefe fill that void. 

[IGotWorms 4,058]

38 minutes ago, squistion said:

From the link:

She explained that MSNBC and other news outlets are interested in telling the truth. 

"The reason I’m saying this is, of course, there is a reason that we and other news organizations have generally stopped giving an unfiltered, live platform to remarks by former President Trump," Maddow said. "It is not out of spite, it is not a decision that we relish, it is a decision that we regularly revisit. And, honestly, earnestly, it is not an easy decision." 

She went on to claim that airing Trump's "untrue" statements live on television hurts MSNBC's brand. "But there is a cost to us, as a news organization," Maddow said, "of knowingly broadcasting untrue things. That is a fundamental truth of our business and who we are. And so, his remarks, tonight, will not air here live. We will monitor them and let you know about any news that he makes."

This isn’t defensible, imo.

If you’re concerned about all the crazy ass lies coming of Trump’s mouth (and there are many), then you deal with that through “fact checking” and/or commentary. It is admittedly less than ideal but to just refuse to air a newsworthy event is by far the worse option 

[squistion 2,203]

23 minutes ago, Reality said:

You're ok with this?

Of course. With all the lies he tells in every speech; it essentially amounts to airing Trump's propaganda and affects their credibility as a news organization (you can't fact check in real time unless you use a screen crawl at the bottom and by then it is too late for most viewers). 

[IGotWorms 4,058]

20 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Rachel Maddow is the Sean Hannity of the left. A completely discredited cheerleader. 

This is true 

[Tree of Knowledge 1,860]

1 minute ago, squistion said:

Of course. With all the lies he tells in every speech; it essentially amounts to airing Trump's propaganda and affects their credibility as a news organization (you can't fact check in real time unless you use a screen crawl at the bottom and by then it is too late for most viewers). 

The inconvenient and uncomfortable truth is never a lie. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,446]

1 minute ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Hopefully, the Trump FCC takes Deep State run media like MSNBC off the air and let’s real journalists like James O’Keefe fill that void. 

O’keefe puts in the actual work and gets results. The rest of them exchange texts with their anonymous “sources” while they sit in their pajamas. That’s why they hate o’keefe. 

[RLLD 4,231]

Perhaps it is now time to start updating the Democrat Totalitarian  thread to start adding in some of their more recent manuevers.

[Reality 3,121]

3 minutes ago, squistion said:

Of course. With all the lies he tells in every speech; it essentially amounts to airing Trump's propaganda and affects their credibility as a news organization (you can't fact check in real time unless you use a screen crawl at the bottom and by then it is too late for most viewers). 

Wow, that's pretty much all I'll ever need to know about you as a person.

[squistion 2,203]

Just now, Reality said:

Wow, that's pretty much all I'll ever need to know about you as a person.

Thank you! Best post I've seen you make. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,446]

7 minutes ago, squistion said:

Of course. With all the lies he tells in every speech; it essentially amounts to airing Trump's propaganda and affects their credibility as a news organization (you can't fact check in real time unless you use a screen crawl at the bottom and by then it is too late for most viewers). 

Has anyone fact checked last nights speech for you yet? 

[seafoam1 3,031]

6 minutes ago, Reality said:

Wow, that's pretty much all I'll ever need to know about you as a person.

It's surreal that they are flat out admitting it. They feel empowered enough.to finally take their masks off and just admit they are running on a one party socialist state  campaign. They want a dictatorship in the end. 

[squistion 2,203]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Has anyone fact checked last nights speech for you yet? 

No, but if I see Daniel Dale did it for CNN, I'll post it here for you when I find it. 

[squistion 2,203]

Just now, seafoam1 said:

It's surreal that they are flat out admitting it. They feel empowered enough.to finally take their masks off and just admit they are running on a one party socialist state  campaign. They want a dictatorship in the end. 

Indeed, and Joe Biden even said that if he is reelected, he would be a dictator on Day 1...Oh, wait...

[Hardcore troubadour 15,446]

4 minutes ago, squistion said:

No, but if I see Daniel Dale did it for CNN, I'll post it here for you when I find it. 

Please do. I like to know what you people are thinking after you get told what to think. 

[seafoam1 3,031]

Job Opening: Fact Checker

Must be willing to sell your soul to the liberal democrat party and swear an oath that will bind your first born to the party and any unfaithful stray comments by you will auto sacrifice the child up to joe biden for his personal harem of children used for fondling. 

[The Real timschochet 6,774]

I think all of you should probably boycott MSNBC. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,446]

1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

I think all of you should probably boycott MSNBC. 

You  know we’re right. And it hurts you. Bang on Fox all you want. We DGAF. 

[seafoam1 3,031]

7 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I think all of you should probably boycott MSNBC. 

Or pull a liberal riot and burn it it down. 2020 riots-esque.

[jonmx 2,429]

1 hour ago, squistion said:

From the link:

She explained that MSNBC and other news outlets are interested in telling the truth. 

"The reason I’m saying this is, of course, there is a reason that we and other news organizations have generally stopped giving an unfiltered, live platform to remarks by former President Trump," Maddow said. "It is not out of spite, it is not a decision that we relish, it is a decision that we regularly revisit. And, honestly, earnestly, it is not an easy decision." 

She went on to claim that airing Trump's "untrue" statements live on television hurts MSNBC's brand. "But there is a cost to us, as a news organization," Maddow said, "of knowingly broadcasting untrue things. That is a fundamental truth of our business and who we are. And so, his remarks, tonight, will not air here live. We will monitor them and let you know about any news that he makes."

You must be the stupidest foker on the face of the earth. 

[Dizkneelande 1,101]

3 minutes ago, jonmx said:

You must be the stupidest foker on the face of the earth. 

“The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. And if all others accepted the lie, if all records told the same tale, then the lie passed into history and became truth.”

[BrahmaBulls 767]

1 hour ago, squistion said:

From the link:

She explained that MSNBC and other news outlets are interested in telling the truth. 

"The reason I’m saying this is, of course, there is a reason that we and other news organizations have generally stopped giving an unfiltered, live platform to remarks by former President Trump," Maddow said. "It is not out of spite, it is not a decision that we relish, it is a decision that we regularly revisit. And, honestly, earnestly, it is not an easy decision." 

She went on to claim that airing Trump's "untrue" statements live on television hurts MSNBC's brand. "But there is a cost to us, as a news organization," Maddow said, "of knowingly broadcasting untrue things. That is a fundamental truth of our business and who we are. And so, his remarks, tonight, will not air here live. We will monitor them and let you know about any news that he makes."

If MSNBC is about the truth, then why is stupid cuunt still on?

[The Real timschochet 6,774]

1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

You  know we’re right. And it hurts you. Bang on Fox all you want. We DGAF. 

Right about what? 
Im not a huge fan of Rachel. I can take her or leave her. She's not a deliberate liar IMO, but she’s heavily biased. She’s no journalist. 
 

MSNBC’s on-air personalities are mostly opinion makers and not journalists. There are some exceptions- I would label Andrea Mitchell a journalist for example. But mostly they discuss the news in a manner consistent with the perspective of their core base, which is liberal. I’ve never claimed otherwise. But I don’t believe they deliberately lie and the news that is reported is accurate and can be trusted. I think the same is largely true for Fox News. 

[BrahmaBulls 767]

10 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I think all of you should probably boycott MSNBC. 

You should probably boycott McDonalds you fat ass