Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
RaiderHaters Revenge

MSNBC favorite joy Reid likes porn for kids

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, squistion said:

Generally the folks who view Joy Reid as a racist, view all liberals, particularly black liberals, as racist (not saying that is you).

And no, she is not a pedophile. :lol:

So then, those folks....all look alike? 🤭

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, HellToupee said:

Got a link for that?

Do you have a link for books with blowjobs being IN elementary school libraries?

Moms for Liberty is yet another hypocritical conservative group that is made up of terrible people who's own lives are anything but "moral."

And notice how conservative groups are always led by uneducated karens and Trump loving dudes who turn wrenches for a living.  Not exactly the brainpower I'd want making decisions and setting policy for a political party I supported.

But we all know that folks with just a high school degree absolutely flock to the republican party.  While folks who actually care about education and advancing this country flock to the democrat party.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Do you have a link for books with blowjobs being IN elementary school libraries?

Moms for Liberty is yet another hypocritical conservative group that is made up of terrible people who's own lives are anything but "moral."

And notice how conservative groups are always led by uneducated karens and Trump loving dudes who turn wrenches for a living.  Not exactly the brainpower I'd want making decisions and setting policy for a political party I supported.

But we all know that folks with just a high school degree absolutely flock to the republican party.  While folks who actually care about education and advancing this country flock to the democrat party.

Post a picture of your diploma 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Dizkneelande said:

Post a picture of your diploma 

Why would I do that?  Look at exit polls friend.  College educated people vote dem at an almost 75% clip.  Not saying that everyone has to be college educated but we all know that folks who are college educated are the ones who move the country forward.

For example, we're communicating right now thanks to folks with education doing science stuff. Republicans would still be tapping on wires if the country was filled with nothing but conservatives.

Do some research friend. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Why would I do that?  Look at exit polls friend.  College educated people vote dem at an almost 75% clip.  Not saying that everyone has to be college educated but we all know that folks who are college educated are the ones who move the country forward.

For example, we're communicating right now thanks to folks with education doing science stuff. Republicans would still be tapping on wires if the country was filled with nothing but conservatives.

Do some research friend. 

Since you go around and label all of us dumb put up or shut up. Let the GC collective decide who the stupid person is. You won’t post it because you went to some low level school that accepts any retard. Prove me wrong. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We’re back to it didn’t happen again? Stay in order. We’re at , as Joy Reid said, it’s a good thing.  Keep up libtards. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Dizkneelande said:

Since you go around and label all of us dumb put up or shut up. Let the GC collective decide who the stupid person is. You won’t post it because you went to some low level school that accepts any retard. Prove me wrong. 

https://www.politico.com/interactives/2022/midterm-election-house-districts-by-education/

Democrats control 77% of the U.S.'s most highly educated Congressional districts...

 
 

107 districts

...while Republicans control 64% of districts where the fewest people went to college.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry about the format above.  It's clear as day according to facts that folks who either choose or weren't smart enough to go to college overwhelmingly choose the republican party.  The opposite for those who are motivated and smart enough to attend college.

I get that you're probably embarrassed being associated with the party of the less educated, but don't let your emotions trump the facts my friend.

And you still have time to reevaluate your choices and those who you share political leanings and really give some thought as to if the people you choose to associate yourself with are the folks who will move this country's progress forward.

Good luck to you. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

https://www.politico.com/interactives/2022/midterm-election-house-districts-by-education/

Democrats control 77% of the U.S.'s most highly educated Congressional districts...

 
 

107 districts

...while Republicans control 64% of districts where the fewest people went to college.

WTF are you trying to boast about? The "highly educated" indoctrinated liberal losers who can't afford to pay their own student loans off and are crying for help from the government? 

😆

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

WTF are you trying to boast about? The "highly educated" indoctrinated liberal losers who can't afford to pay their own student loans off and are crying for help from the government? 

😆

Dude went to Coppin State and thinks he’s smart. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

https://www.politico.com/interactives/2022/midterm-election-house-districts-by-education/

Democrats control 77% of the U.S.'s most highly educated Congressional districts...

 
 

107 districts

...while Republicans control 64% of districts where the fewest people went to college.

Kids in Baltimore can barely read. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MAGAtards think kids are getting their jollies by reading about a BJ in a memoir? Just wait til they find out about Henry Miller and Charles Bukowski! :o 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Do you have a link for books with blowjobs being IN elementary school libraries?

Moms for Liberty is yet another hypocritical conservative group that is made up of terrible people who's own lives are anything but "moral."

And notice how conservative groups are always led by uneducated karens and Trump loving dudes who turn wrenches for a living.  Not exactly the brainpower I'd want making decisions and setting policy for a political party I supported.

But we all know that folks with just a high school degree absolutely flock to the republican party.  While folks who actually care about education and advancing this country flock to the democrat party.

Try reading the thread asss rot. Holy fok you are dumb. 

11 hours ago, Horseman said:

Demonstrably false. 

https://theiowastandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/6.jpg

https://www.fox4news.com/news/fort-worth-isd-removes-3-books-deemed-too-graphic-for-younger-students

Quote

"Gender Queer" is one of several highly controversial LGBTQ books Fort Worth ISD says it had in some elementary and middle school libraries.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Sorry about the format above.  

Highly educated can't even figure out fonts.  🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Horseman said:

Is this your first time talking to squis?   Come on, now the argument will be that he specifically said "seeing" and that the books being in the library isn't the same as kids seeing them.    He's probably not going to answer WTF Gender Queer was in those libraries in the first place.   

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, MDC said:

MAGAtards think kids are getting their jollies by reading about a BJ in a memoir? Just wait til they find out about Henry Miller and Charles Bukowski! :o 

No, not just reading about it you knob.   This is new territory because so much of this comes from and is in graphic novels.   Yes, I think the right goes overboard with it sometimes, but I can't imagine anybody with 1/2 a brain knowing what is in Gender Queer and not thinking that has 0 business being in school libraries.    

There has to be a mild compromise for rational adults.    Maybe the right throws the left a bone and not remove all lgbtq+ materials from a library and the left throws the right a bone and admit crap like Gender Queer and other graphic depictions of sex don't belong in the school library?  

Maher nailed another New Rules for the season opener - this country needs to vote out the crazy and get back to the rest of the 80% try to improve our country.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, BuckSwope said:

Is this your first time talking to squis?   Come on, now the argument will be that he specifically said "seeing" and that the books being in the library isn't the same as kids seeing them.    He's probably not going to answer WTF Gender Queer was in those libraries in the first place.   

I am skeptical of the accuracy of what is being reported. I seriously doubt that Gender Queer was sitting on the elementary library school shelf and that 8 year olds were able access it (as has been alleged).

When we discussed this book in another thread, the author said that it was recommended for HS students but not any younger age group. I suspect that this book and the others were not actually in the library but the titles were banned due to the right wing media hysteria about them (a preemptive strike, if you will). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, squistion said:

I am skeptical of the accuracy of what is being reported. I seriously doubt that Gender Queer was sitting on the elementary library school shelf and that 8 year olds were able access it (as has been alleged).

When we discussed this book in another thread, the author said that it was recommended for HS students but not any younger age group. I suspect that this book and the others were not actually in the library but the titles were banned due to the right wing media hysteria about them (a preemptive strike, if you will). 

Your skepticism is based on liberal lunacy. 

Stop pretending that you think you know what's going on in reality. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, squistion said:

I am skeptical of the accuracy of what is being reported. I seriously doubt that Gender Queer was sitting on the elementary library school shelf and that 8 year olds were able access it (as has been alleged).

When we discussed this book in another thread, the author said that it was recommended for HS students but not any younger age group. I suspect that this book and the others were not actually in the library but the titles were banned due to the right wing media hysteria about them (a preemptive strike, if you will). 

You think the Independent School District of Fort Worth is lying when they said they had the books on the shelves and then removed them when confronted about it?  A lie that incriminates themselves rather than just saying the books were never there if they weren't?

This ladies and gentlemen is the lengths of mental gymnastics these brain dead libs like Squidtard are willing to go to defend everything pedo/tranny/gay and black.  You don't need any further proof that his opinions aren't worth chit.  First class scum bucket.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Horseman said:

You think the Independent School District of Fort Worth is lying when they said they had the books on the shelves and then removed them when confronted about it?  A lie that incriminates themselves rather than just saying the books were never there if they weren't?

This ladies and gentlemen is the lengths of mental gymnastics these brain dead libs like Squidtard are willing to go to defend everything pedo/tranny/gay and black.  You don't need any further proof that his opinions aren't worth chit.  First class scum.  

They said the books were actually on the shelves of the elementary schools? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bottom line: If no one pushed back on this grotesque nonsense it would be rampant and easily accessible to all kids. Libtards trying to play their stupid games again. They never take things too far. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, squistion said:

They said the books were actually on the shelves of the elementary schools? 

They did.  Not going to play the retard semantics game with you.  Everyone sees through your act.  Piss into the wind.  

:thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, squistion said:

I am skeptical of the accuracy of what is being reported. I seriously doubt that Gender Queer was sitting on the elementary library school shelf and that 8 year olds were able access it (as has been alleged).

When we discussed this book in another thread, the author said that it was recommended for HS students but not any younger age group. I suspect that this book and the others were not actually in the library but the titles were banned due to the right wing media hysteria about them (a preemptive strike, if you will). 

This post is why the left is losing this battle.  You watch a whole Joy Reid interview, how about take the time to look through and read Gender Queer.   That book is as slam dunk of a case for a book that shouldn't be in any school library.   IMO the very first step for libs is to look at the easiest cases like that and be OK with them getting the boot.  Instead, you see dumb sh1t like arguing about IF they are in a library or the kids didn't actually see the book, it was just available on a shelf - that type of nonsense.   Anything just to not agree with the right on something.  

Why is it so hard just to say that book is focked up and it shouldn't be in any school libraries?   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, BuckSwope said:

No, not just reading about it you knob.   This is new territory because so much of this comes from and is in graphic novels.   Yes, I think the right goes overboard with it sometimes, but I can't imagine anybody with 1/2 a brain knowing what is in Gender Queer and not thinking that has 0 business being in school libraries.    

There has to be a mild compromise for rational adults.    Maybe the right throws the left a bone and not remove all lgbtq+ materials from a library and the left throws the right a bone and admit crap like Gender Queer and other graphic depictions of sex don't belong in the school library?  

Maher nailed another New Rules for the season opener - this country needs to vote out the crazy and get back to the rest of the 80% try to improve our country.  

If the right is concerned about kids accessing inappropriate content they can propose putting actual porn behind a firewall online. They can also not vote for an accused rapist who campaigned for baby toucher Roy Moore.

HTH!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, MDC said:

If the right is concerned about kids accessing inappropriate content they can propose putting actual porn behind a firewall online. They can also not vote for an accused rapist who campaigned for baby toucher Roy Moore.

HTH!

Or you can unless you are fine with it. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Horseman said:

They did.  Not going to play the retard semantics game with you.  Everyone sees through your act.  Piss into the wind.  

Sorry, they didn't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Horseman said:

They did.  Not going to play the retard semantics game with you.  Everyone sees through your act.  Piss into the wind.  

:thumbsup:

No reason to believe the system is lying.

These books belong nowhere close to elementary or middle school libraris.

Not sure why even high schools would have them. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, MDC said:

If the right is concerned about kids accessing inappropriate content they can propose putting actual porn behind a firewall online. They can also not vote for an accused rapist who campaigned for baby toucher Roy Moore.

HTH!

Squis level post, awesome job.   

How about you or he try to convince me?   I am not against lbqtq+ materials in general in a school library, but at least IMO there has to be some cut-off for explicit materials for all materials.   Also, IMO there is the added element that these are graphic novels, not just written word.  That should matter in the discussion.   

Hell, I will even give you HS level library we are talking about.   Why SHOULD something like Gender Queer be allowed in the library of a school?    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, HellToupee said:

She doesn’t like gay people but gets a pass 

She likes gay people and they like her.

Rachel Maddow frequently had her sub for her as host when Maddow's show was on Mon-Fri. Would Maddow have her host her show if she thought Joy Reid didn't like gay people?

And on Reid's own show she has had several openly gay folks sub for her as host when she is out, such as Jonathan Capehart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, BuckSwope said:

Squis level post, awesome job.   

How about you or he try to convince me?   I am not against lbqtq+ materials in general in a school library, but at least IMO there has to be some cut-off for explicit materials for all materials.   Also, IMO there is the added element that these are graphic novels, not just written word.  That should matter in the discussion.   

Hell, I will even give you HS level library we are talking about.   Why SHOULD something like Gender Queer be allowed in the library of a school?    

I didn’t watch the whole video because the beanie guy is an insufferable doosh. But the first example he brought up wasn’t a graphic novel it’s a memoir. 

Reasonable people can disagree about whether a book that depicts the sexual abuse of a minor has a place in schools at all. But OP tips his hand in referring to this as “porn.” Gtfo.

HTH?

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OMG, sorry -  Why should this "memoir" (which graphic pictures and on wiki's sight is a "graphic memoir") be allowed in a library of a school.   Again, squis-level post.   I didn't ask you to watch the video, but IMO you should at least know what is in the book being talked about this much.  

Yes, the OP and others go overboard by calling everything porn.  Take that up with him, I thought I was asking an easy enough question.  You say reasonable people can disagree, and I am asking you WHY you disagree.  I think it's about an easy of a case as I've seen, and you disagree - I get it.   Then why should it be allowed?     

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, it’s a memoir? Well then, get a copy for everyone! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, BuckSwope said:

OMG, sorry -  Why should this "memoir" (which graphic pictures and on wiki's sight is a "graphic memoir") be allowed in a library of a school.   Again, squis-level post.   I didn't ask you to watch the video, but IMO you should at least know what is in the book being talked about this much.  

Yes, the OP and others go overboard by calling everything porn.  Take that up with him, I thought I was asking an easy enough question.  You say reasonable people can disagree, and I am asking you WHY you disagree.  I think it's about an easy of a case as I've seen, and you disagree - I get it.   Then why should it be allowed?     

My understanding based on the wiki page and Common Sense Media (parents guide) is that All Boys Aren’t Blue describes some adult content but doesn’t include any pictures of it. You can correct me if that’s wrong though since you know so much more about it. 

Assuming that is the case, calling it “porn” is ridiculous. If the argument is that graphic written depictions of sex don’t belong in libraries I’ve got to wonder why this book from 2020 is the target but something like The Painted Bird by Jerzy Kosinski escaped notice for 50+ years? 

Time for a global book audit? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Put MDC on the Pedo watch list along with Squis, Tim and Gutter already on there.  

Are you ever ashamed that you make light of child molestation as part of a partisan game?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, MDC said:

My understanding based on the wiki page and Common Sense Media (parents guide) is that All Boys Aren’t Blue describes some adult content but doesn’t include any pictures of it. You can correct me if that’s wrong though since you know so much more about it. 

Assuming that is the case, calling it “porn” is ridiculous. If the argument is that graphic written depictions of sex don’t belong in libraries I’ve got to wonder why this book from 2020 is the target but something like The Painted Bird by Jerzy Kosinski escaped notice for 50+ years? 

Time for a global book audit? 

So what if it did? It was wrong then.   But you won’t see that they took it to another level, as they always do. So the pushback is here. Why are you against it? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Put MDC on the Pedo watch list along with Squis, Tim and Gutter already on there.  

Thanks!  I am in good company. :banana:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×