Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
squistion

Trump's NY Election Interference Trial - Trump is found guilty on all 34 counts

Recommended Posts

https://twitter.com/KatiePhang/status/1791136896879411684

Cross resumes.

BLANCHE: You testified earlier this morning, you were never offered a cooperation agreement with SDNY, or Mueller or this case, right?

COHEN: Correct.

BLANCHE:  Since your sentencing, once you were at Otisville you met with reps from the Manhattan DA in August of 2018? COHEN:  Correct 

BLANCHE:  Since then you have made several attempts to be released from supervised release early? 

COHEN:  Correct

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Thank you for that insight.

Unfortunately, it arises from time to time that someone really needs to be called out on the truth.  This was one of those instances.

In my analysis, he was the individual to whom I responded....but in reality....I am responding to all liberals.....

By telling us who we hate? Sorry but you’re full of crap. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, RLLD said:

No thank you.  Calling out people for what they are, what they are doing, is something I think needs to be done on occasion.  Perhaps upon reflection you sense some truth in what I have asserted.

It would be wise for ALL of use to avoid becoming the dutiful idiots for these political actors.

Oh ok. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Horseman said:

🤣🤣🤣  Read your own links man

Accessed software and one campaign finance database!  Oh boy!

Still waiting for a link where "voting machines" got hacked.  :dunno:

It was above, VR Systems, from the article.

Quote

 

In another operation, GRU officers sent spearphishing emails to election officials and executives of companies that make voting machines, the report said.

In August 2016, GRU targeted employees of a company that develops software to manage voter rolls and installed malware on the company’s network, the report said without naming the company.

“Similarly, in November 2016, the GRU sent spearphishing emails to over 120 email accounts used by Florida county officials responsible for administering the 2016 U.S. election,” the report said. “The spearphishing emails contained an attached Word document coded with malicious software (commonly referred to as a Trojan) that permitted the GRU to access the infected computer.”

The Orlando Sentinel reported last week that Volusia County was affected by the GRU attack. The paper said county officials received emails purporting to be from Tallahassee-based VR Systems, the company that likely fell victim to the attack.

 

How many times are you gonna ask the same question?  Maybe add more emojis for effect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

By telling us who we hate? Sorry but you’re full of crap. 

Quite the public service we are being provided here. And it’s free! What a deal. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, squistion said:

 

Meh, trials are hard. People have this idea from movies and TV shows that it’s all smooth and masterful, and at times it can be, but most of it is just fumbling around and confusion

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://twitter.com/KatiePhang/status/1791138838108078193

BLANCHE:  you went from being sentenced to supervised release which you are still on today? 

COHEN:  Yes  BLANCHE:  you have made several efforts to have that end early? 

COHEN: Yes BLANCHE: How many?

COHEN: 3. Could be 4. 

BLANCHE: None of those have been successful 

COHEN: No sir

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

It was above, VR Systems, from the article.

How many times are you gonna ask the same question?  Maybe add more emojis for effect.

OMG!  Email phishing schemes.  Holy fok the holy grail of all hacking attempts.  Boy they really pulled out the big guns!  🤣

Still waiting for a link where they actually hacked any "voting machines".  :dunno:

You really make a living in IT?  You couldn't possibly be this dumb, you know what hack means right?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These cohen attacks are a double edged sword. Yes he is an odious person and a well known POS liar. Should definitely point that out.

But the more and more you hammer on it it’s like, wait, didn’t Trump pick this guy as his right hand man? Why does he surround himself with two bit piece of sh1t liars and doesn’t that indicate that he’s an extreme piece of sh1t himself? (Yes, it does, and he is.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Horseman said:

OMG!  Email phishing schemes.  Holy fok the holy grail of all hacking attempts.  Boy they really pulled out the big guns!  🤣

Still waiting for a link where they actually hacked any "voting machines".  :dunno:

You really make a living in IT?  You couldn't possibly be this dumb, you know what hack means right?

 

Yes, and phishing is a widely used attack, easy to do, often successful.  You think phishing is no big deal?  You obviously don't work in IT.

The 2013 Target breach was the result of a simple phishing scheme.  Was one of the largest breaches in history.  You think it's no big deal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, GutterBoy said:

They hacked into our voting machines for fock all.

Wasn't that the claim the Mr. Pillow guy had and he was proven wrong?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://twitter.com/KatiePhang/status/1791140616170029091

Lots of questions by Blanche about Cohen’s aspirations to serve in the White House. A few too many questions about the issue.

BLANCHE:  you wanted the title of special counsel to the president? 

COHEN:  Yes 

BLANCHE: President Trump expressed some frustration that he couldn’t find a place for you in the White House?

COHEN:  that we had not come up with a role for me at the White House

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Seems like 99% of the pundits on all sides believe that Trump will not testify. Anyone here see it differently? 

Of course he will not testify. Zero percent chance.

But it does beg the question of exactly how they will mount any sort of defense. Trump would have to take the stand and say “I never focked Stormy Daniels” and “I never directed or knew that cohen was making those payments.”

Without that the evidence is essentially unchallenged. There is no contrary evidence to weigh — only the prosecution’s version.

So I don’t know how they get around that. My guess is put on some BS to claim they made a “defense” but in substance there will be very little.

Either way though, absolutely no way Trump testifies. Zero.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/grand-jury-indicts-12-russian-intelligence-officers-hacking-offenses-related-2016-election

The indictment includes 11 criminal counts:

  • Count One alleges a criminal conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States through cyber operations by the GRU that involved the staged release of stolen documents for the purpose of interfering with the 2016 president election;
  • Counts Two through Nine charge aggravated identity theft for using identification belonging to eight victims to further their computer fraud scheme;
  • Count Ten alleges a conspiracy to launder money in which the defendants laundered the equivalent of more than $95,000 by transferring the money that they used to purchase servers and to fund other costs related to their hacking activities through cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin; and
  • Count Eleven charges conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States by attempting to hack into the computers of state boards of elections, secretaries of state, and US companies that supplied software and other technology related to the administration of elections.

When are the trials ?  None of this has been proven or can be. If it’s true, what has been done about it? Libtards still buying the charade. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Seems like 99% of the pundits on all sides believe that Trump will not testify. Anyone here see it differently? 

He's be an idiot to testify.  For one thing, the prosecution hasn't proven it's case.  Second, From what's been posted the judge is going to let the prosecution go to town on him if he testifies.  In most cases it's a mistake for a defendant to testify.  In these circumstances it would be a colossal blunder.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

By telling us who we hate? Sorry but you’re full of crap. 

I can appreciate that it might be uncomfortable to hear these things, but my description is on point, and I think you know that it is......

Liberals are about virtue signaling, selling themselves as compassionate and such, its a form of currency in liberal circles and it has become mostly for show.....

You want to perceive yourself as being something apart....more moral....more virtuous...more enlightened

But you are not

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Of course he will not testify. Zero percent chance.

But it does beg the question of exactly how they will mount any sort of defense. Trump would have to take the stand and say “I never focked Stormy Daniels” and “I never directed or knew that cohen was making those payments.”

Without that the evidence is essentially unchallenged. There is no contrary evidence to weigh — only the prosecution’s version.

So I don’t know how they get around that. My guess is put on some BS to claim they made a “defense” but in substance there will be very little.

Either way though, absolutely no way Trump testifies. Zero.

You do realize that the burden of proof is on the prosecution, right?  If the prosecution doesn't prove a crime the defense doesn't need to mount a defense.  You do understand that don't you?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Wasn't that the claim the Mr. Pillow guy had and he was proven wrong?

He claimed that voting machines were hacked and votes rigged for Biden, correct.  No evidence of that at all.  There is also no evidence of rigging votes in 2016 election machines, to be clear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Strike said:

You do realize that the burden of proof is on the prosecution, right?  If the prosecution doesn't prove a crime the defense doesn't need to mount a defense.  You do understand that don't you?

Of course I understand that.

However, if all the evidence is on one side and there is no contrary evidence — not even a statement of denial under oath — then it sure seems to favor the prosecution.

So yeah, you can try going with the “the prosecution didn’t meet its burden” theory, and it may well be the only one available here, but in these circumstances and with this kind of case, the jury’s just going to be thinking “well I never even heard anyone deny any of it.” Not one thing refuted under oath or by documentary evidence. Ouch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Of course I understand that.

However, if all the evidence is on one side and there is no contrary evidence — not even a statement of denial under oath — then it sure seems to favor the prosecution.

So yeah, you can try going with the “the prosecution didn’t meet its burden” theory, and it may well be the only one available here, but in these circumstances and with this kind of case, the jury’s just going to be thinking “well I never even heard anyone deny any of it.” Not one thing refuted under oath or by documentary evidence. Ouch

Did you hear about the guy who testified in front of Congress yesterday contradicting everything Cohen testified to in this case?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://twitter.com/KatiePhang/status/1791144898281763073

BLANCHE: In December 2016, your daughter expressed it was ridiculous that [Gary] Cohn was appointed and not you?

COHEN: Correct

BLANCHE: Your daughter said Pres Trump was walking all over you?

COHEN: Yes sir.

BLANCHE: And you agreed with that at the time?

COHEN: At the time.

BLANCHE: “You also agreed with your daughter that president trump isn’t doing right by you in any way.”

COHEN: I was still waiting for the title "personal attorney"

BLANCHE: you were disappointed that after all the work, nobody including president trump offered you a position in the White House?

COHEN: that’s not accurate

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Strike said:

Did you hear about the guy who testified in front of Congress yesterday contradicting everything Cohen testified to in this case?

Sure, like I said, cohen is very easy to impeach, because he’s a lying piece of sh1t. But he was Trump’s right hand man, because Trump is also a lying piece of sh1t who surrounds himself with the same.

Some defense you got there.

Plus Cohen’s testimony is almost irrelevant, there is so much other corroborating evidence. It will come down to the documents.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Yes, and phishing is a widely used attack, easy to do, often successful.  You think phishing is no big deal?  You obviously don't work in IT.

The 2013 Target breach was the result of a simple phishing scheme.  Was one of the largest breaches in history.  You think it's no big deal.

Tony is an idiot.  Phishing is the #1 or #2 way the majority of data breaches occur.

Dude knows nothing about nothing.  Just an obsessed stalker with no IRL

https://www.thetechresource.com/2293/the-most-common-ways-companies-get-hacked-understanding-the-threat-landscape/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, IGotWorms said:

Sure, like I said, cohen is very easy to impeach, because he’s a lying piece of sh1t. But he was Trump’s right hand man, because Trump is also a lying piece of sh1t who surrounds himself with the same.

Some defense you got there.

Plus Cohen’s testimony is almost irrelevant, there is so much other corroborating evidence. It will come down to the documents.

Which is why the prosecution saved him until the end.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, IGotWorms said:

Sure, like I said, cohen is very easy to impeach, because he’s a lying piece of sh1t. But he was Trump’s right hand man, because Trump is also a lying piece of sh1t who surrounds himself with the same.

Some defense you got there.

Plus Cohen’s testimony is almost irrelevant, there is so much other corroborating evidence. It will come down to the documents.

Isn't it amazing that so many who worked for Trump in close quarters turn out to be not reliable, yet Trump himself should be considered reliable?

This is what the moron cultist want us normal people to believe.

LMFAO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://twitter.com/KatiePhang/status/1791146849887289777

We are finally moving onto a line of questioning dealing directly with the allegations in this criminal case:

BLANCHE: On Tuesday, you testified about a phone call on Oct. 24, 2016. Two days before you make a payment to HELOC, move to LLC, and wire the money to Keith Davidson?

COHEN: correct

BLANCHE: Does Mr. Schiller put the phone on speaker or hand Trump the phone for a private conversation?

COHEN: i’ve seen him do both

BLANCHE: which one was it for that call?

COHEN: I don’t know the answer, I wasn’t with him.

BLANCHE: you discussed the stormy daniels matter and the resolution, and you also discussed the conversation would be that it was resolved, that you were going to move forward and fund the deal

COHEN: Yes, sir

BLANCHE: do you have any recollection of what you said to Trump on that day

COHEN: we talked about the matter and it was resolved

BLANCHE: When you testified to the grand jury last March, did you talk about this call?

COHEN: Not that I recall

BLANCHE: Do you recall speaking about this call when you met with prosecutors before grand jury?

(OBJECTION)

BLANCHE: Do you recall ever speaking about this call?

COHEN: I don’t recall

BLANCHE: So the first time that you recalled having a phone call with president trump was on Tuesday [of this week]?

COHEN: I don’t recall when I spoke to the DA’s about that specific matter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Tony is an idiot.  Phishing is the #1 or #2 way the majority of data breaches occur.

Dude knows nothing about nothing.  Just an obsessed stalker with no IRL

https://www.thetechresource.com/2293/the-most-common-ways-companies-get-hacked-understanding-the-threat-landscape/

horsesh1t = Tony?  Never knew his real name.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, GutterBoy said:

horsesh1t = Tony?  Never knew his real name.

TonyDead from FBGs.

He was a POS there just like he is here.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, BeachGuy23 said:

TonyDead from FBGs.

He was a POS there just like he is here.

Was suspended multiple times until he was finally permabanned. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BeachGuy23 said:

TonyDead from FBGs.

He was a POS there just like he is here.

Never been to FBG, but I can confirm he is an absolute piece of sh1t.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://twitter.com/KatiePhang/status/1791149366482248181

Now: Blanche is raising his voice and asking Cohen about a series of phone calls that Cohen said were harassing and persistent that Cohen received on Oct. 22, 23, and 24th, and that Cohen actually texted Schiller on 10/24 about the harassing calls and not about the Stormy deal:

BLANCHE: You said you called Keith Schiller [on 10/24] and he passed the phone to President Trump. And you said you were going to move forward [w/the Stormy deal] and “that was a lie because you were actually talking to Mr. Schiller” about the harassing phone calls from the 14 year old.

BLANCHE: you were certain it was accurate on Tuesday when you were under oath and testifying

COHEN: Based upon the records that I reviewed and in light of everything going on i believe i spoke to mr trump about the stormy daniels matter

BLANCHE: “We are not asking for your belief. This jury does not want to hear what you think happened”

OBJECTION [by prosecution] - SUSTAINED

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://twitter.com/KatiePhang/status/1791150499950924065

BLANCHE: Mr. Cohen, you just said that you don’t recall a phone call back in 2016. That is not what you testified to on Tuesday. Tuesday, you testified that you remember the phone call.

OBJECTION [by prosecution] -SUSTAINED

And now it is time for a lunch recess. :banana:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Yes, and phishing is a widely used attack, easy to do, often successful.  You think phishing is no big deal?  You obviously don't work in IT.

The 2013 Target breach was the result of a simple phishing scheme.  Was one of the largest breaches in history.  You think it's no big deal.

They hacked our voting machines!

No they didn't.

Well they sent out phishing emails!

 

 Just take the L.  You look ridiculous.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I can appreciate that it might be uncomfortable to hear these things, but my description is on point, and I think you know that it is......

Liberals are about virtue signaling, selling themselves as compassionate and such, its a form of currency in liberal circles and it has become mostly for show.....

You want to perceive yourself as being something apart....more moral....more virtuous...more enlightened

But you are not

lol it’s not uncomfortable at all. And you’re doing it again- trying to tell me what I think and feel. 

The reason it’s not uncomfortable is because it’s wrong. I don’t hate any politicians in this country, certainly not Donald Trump. I don’t take any political positions for the purpose of virtue signaling or to impress others. I believe what I believe. Of course I can’t speak for anyone else. Unlike you I don’t try. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Horseman said:

They hacked our voting machines!

No they didn't.

Well they sent out phishing emails!

 

 Just take the L.  You look ridiculous.  

A phishing attack is a hack.  You're an idiot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Horseman said:

They hacked our voting machines!

No they didn't.

Well they sent out phishing emails!

 

 Just take the L.  You look ridiculous.  

I’m starting to feel sorry for Gutterboy. I don’t think he has much social interaction.  Comes off as very awkward. Friendless. 

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I’m starting to feel sorry for Gutterboy. I don’t think he has much social interaction.  Comes off as very awkward. Friendless. 

You have 104k posts lol.  You're the most miserable person here, and you're here all the time.  Shut the fock up old man.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, GutterBoy said:

You have 104k posts lol.  You're the most miserable person here, and you're here all the time.  Shut the fock up old man.

Whataboutism 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×