We can all agree kids (under 18) shouldn’t get married right?

[TimHauck 3,283]

 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

Aren't you from the same side that says children - even under the age of 10 - should be able to change their gender with surgery and drugs because they know better? 

So why would your side NOT support this?

[TimHauck 3,283]

8 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Aren't you from the same side that says children - even under the age of 10 - should be able to change their gender with surgery and drugs because they know better? 

So why would your side NOT support this?

Nope.  My views are consistent.  I believe no surgeries until 18.

I noticed you didn’t answer the question.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

Just now, TimHauck said:

Nope.  My views are consistent.  I believe no surgeries until 18.

I noticed you didn’t answer the question.

Your views may be, but the Party you vote for says the opposite.  As long as you continue to vote for them, you support this horrible and absurd stuff. 

[TimHauck 3,283]

Just now, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Your views may be, but the Party you vote for says the opposite.  As long as you continue to vote for them, you support this horrible and absurd stuff. 

I vote for people from both parties depending on the views of the particular candidate.

[Patented Phil 1,469]

Should children be able to get abortions without parental notification?

[Patented Phil 1,469]

If the OP is really concerned about child welfare, might want to consider changing parties.

[TimHauck 3,283]

I noticed you still haven’t answered the question @EternalShinyAndChrome

[TimHauck 3,283]

Just now, Patented Phil said:

If the OP is really concerned about child welfare, might want to consider changing parties.

I don’t have a party

[TimHauck 3,283]

2 minutes ago, Patented Phil said:

Should children be able to get abortions without parental notification?

Notification? No.  Approval? Yes

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

Just now, TimHauck said:

I noticed you still haven’t answered the question @EternalShinyAndChrome

I did answer it.  You even responded to it.

[TimHauck 3,283]

Just now, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

I did answer it.  

Lol no you didn’t 

[Fireballer 2,677]

11 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

  I believe no surgeries until 18.

 

So your position has changed?  Glad to hear it.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

4 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Lol no you didn’t 

i did.  Read more closely what you responded to.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,908]

10 minutes ago, Patented Phil said:

If the OP is really concerned about child welfare, might want to consider changing parties.

He could also let them shower by themselves 

[TimHauck 3,283]

Just now, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

i did.  Read more closely what you responded to.

No you didn’t. Your implication seems to be that since some Dems support trans surgeries for minors that they would also support child marriage and thus being the opposite of them you don’t. Is that correct? If so, seems odd that most of the states banning it are democratic states

[lickin_starfish 2,001]

Ruth Bader Ginsburg said the age of consent should be 12 years old.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

8 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

No you didn’t. Your implication seems to be that since some Dems support trans surgeries for minors that they would also support child marriage and thus being the opposite of them you don’t. Is that correct? If so, seems odd that most of the states banning it are democratic states

Are you naturally dense?  or are you just playing obtuse on purpose?

23 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Your views may be, but the Party you vote for says the opposite.  As long as you continue to vote for them, you support this horrible and absurd stuff. 

Don't be a moron.  Learn to read and understand words, phrases and paragraphs properly.

[Patented Phil 1,469]

17 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Notification? No.  Approval? Yes

So you are ok with the State allowing a child to abort a fetus, but you draw the line at allowing them to get married?  

[Cdub100 3,995]

I believe we continue to push adulthood later and later. We have 25 year olds running around acting like kids. I think many young people believe they shouldn't get married and start having kids until they are 30. I think this is harmful to our society.

The point the state Rep is trying to make is the younger you are when you have the children the healthier the mother AND baby will be. A lot of people I know waited until their late 20s and 30s to have children. Many of them have problems getting pregnant. Science has shown the longer a woman waits the harder it gets.

I think 16 is okay to get married especially if the girl gets knocked up.

Liberals like tim have ZERO moral ground to stand on here. All he's doing is showing his true colors. Tim wants a world where women become wage slaves making PowerPoint never getting married and eventually getting eaten by her cats when she dies alone. And men to watch pron, live with their parents, and play video games all day. That's the end game.

Meanwhile, liberals also want abortion on demand, child mutilation sex changes, cool with schools indoctrinating and hiding information from parents, lowering the voting age to 16 and of course freaks flashing their d1cks at children in the guise of reading to them.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

2 minutes ago, Cdub100 said:

I believe we continue to push adulthood later and later. We have 25 year olds running around acting like kids. I think many young people believe they shouldn't get married and start having kids until they are 30. I think this is harmful to our society.

The point the state Rep is trying to make is the younger you are when you have the children the healthier the mother AND baby will be. A lot of people I know waited until their late 20s and 30s to have children. Many of them have problems getting pregnant. Science has shown the longer a woman waits the harder it gets.

I think 16 is okay to get married especially if the girl gets knocked up.

Liberals like tim have ZERO moral ground to stand on here. All he's doing is showing his true colors. Tim wants a world where women become wage slaves making PowerPoint never getting married and eventually getting eaten by her cats when she dies alone. And men to watch pron, live with their parents, and play video games all day. That's the end game.

Meanwhile, liberals also want abortion on demand, child mutilation sex changes, cool with schools indoctrinating and hiding information from parents, lowering the voting age to 16 and of course freaks flashing their d1cks at children in the guise of reading to them.

They really don't have a leg to stand on here.  You can't push for one and then get butthurt over the other.

[TimHauck 3,283]

2 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Are you naturally dense?  or are you just playing obtuse on purpose?

Don't be a moron.  Learn to read and understand words, phrases and paragraphs properly.

And yet Dem states are the ones banning child marriage.  Maybe you should switch parties?

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

Just now, TimHauck said:

And yet Dem states are the ones banning child marriage.  Maybe you should switch parties?

I see you didn't address that you can't read and understand words properly.  nice defelection.

Also, switch to the party that allows children to have surgeries and chemicals to change their gender, even under the age of 10?  The problem for you're not only obfuscating what's really going on here but now smearing the entire party over a position you created out of think air based upon your incorrect reading of what's happening from ONE person.

Your entire party supports child mutilation and abortions for children but somehow you want to equate  this to that.  GTFO with your fake outrage.

[TimHauck 3,283]

7 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

I see you didn't address that you can't read and understand words properly.  nice defelection.

Also, switch to the party that allows children to have surgeries and chemicals to change their gender, even under the age of 10?  The problem for you're not only obfuscating what's really going on here but now smearing the entire party over a position you created out of think air based upon your incorrect reading of what's happening from ONE person.

Your entire party supports child mutilation and abortions for children but somehow you want to equate  this to that.  GTFO with your fake outrage.

So you can smear an entire party, but the “other side” can’t, got it.  I actually understand that not everyone from the same party has all the same views.  My comment was a sarcastic response to @Patented Phil making the same suggestion.

[IGotWorms 4,062]

MAGA probably doesn’t agree. They view women as property and think their primary role should be breeding. In that sense, any years after puberty in which she’s not being a good little slave to a man are wasted.

[MDC 7,817]

I thought the other side were pedos!  

[SUXBNME 1,594]

2 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

. They view women as property and think their primary role should be breeding. 

And cooking and cleaning.  DUH

[Hardcore troubadour 15,908]

10 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

MAGA probably doesn’t agree. They view women as property and think their primary role should be breeding. In that sense, any years after puberty in which she’s not being a good little slave to a man are wasted.

No wonder you couldn’t keep yours. Soy boy 

[Ron_Artest 2,136]

32 minutes ago, Cdub100 said:

I think 16 is okay to get married especially if the girl gets knocked up.

The guy that doesn't want to mix the races also supports child rape.  Shocker.

[Ron_Artest 2,136]

We can't even agree on basic common sense anymore.

Last week it was, hey it's wrong to murder a puppy.  Nope Magas gonna defend that 

Then it was making ape noises at a black person is wrong.  Nope, Magas defend that.

Child rape and marriage, certainly wrong.  Nope, Magas defending this too.

Is there anything left?

[Hardcore troubadour 15,908]

2 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

We can't even agree on basic common sense anymore.

Last week it was, hey it's wrong to murder a puppy.  Nope Magas gonna defend that 

Then it was making ape noises at a black person is wrong.  Nope, Magas defend that.

Child rape and marriage, certainly wrong.  Nope, Magas defending this too.

Is there anything left?

If only there were a place to offer you the sanctuary you desire. 

[Patented Phil 1,469]

Fun fact - California is one of only 2 states where there is no minimum age requirement to get married.  

They tried to address the issues in 2017, but opposition came from Planned Parenthood, the Children's Law Center and the American Civil Liberties Union.

 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

1 minute ago, Patented Phil said:

Fun fact - California is one of only 2 states where there is no minimum age requirement to get married.  

They tried to address the issues in 2017, but opposition came from Planned Parenthood, the Children's Law Center and the American Civil Liberties Union.

OMG.  @TimHauck looks like an even bigger idiot now.   

Looks like his Party has supported this all along!! 

[Ron_Artest 2,136]

2 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

OMG.  @TimHauck looks like an even bigger idiot now.   

Looks like his Party has supported this all along!! 

So NOW you're against child marriage?  As long as it's not a Republican arguing against it?

[IGotWorms 4,062]

18 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

No wonder you couldn’t keep yours. Soy boy 

I’m a “soy boy” because I believe women aren’t property.

This is MAGA for you, ladies and gentlemen.

 

And by the way, go fock yourself with the personal attacks

[Engorgeous George 2,332]

To the extent that marriage is a binding civil contract I do not believe those under 18 should be allowed to enter into it unless they have first been emanciopated by a court.  If they have, fine by me.

 

To answeer the OP's question I don't think any male should get married absent binding prenuptial agreements and state laws changing on spousal support, alimony, and child support

[thegeneral 3,545]

1 hour ago, lickin_starfish said:

Ruth Bader Ginsburg said the age of consent should be 12 years old.

Some crap you read on Facebook

[MDC 7,817]

1 hour ago, IGotWorms said:

I’m a “soy boy” because I believe women aren’t property.

This is MAGA for you, ladies and gentlemen.

 

And by the way, go fock yourself with the personal attacks

Tardcore says gross sexual stuff about people’s kids too.  

[Engorgeous George 2,332]

1 minute ago, MDC said:

Tardcore says gross sexual stuff about people’s kids too.  

Well that is distasteful.

[MDC 7,817]

1 minute ago, Engorgeous George said:

Well that is distasteful.

He said my son watches porn. Who says that about a 10 y/o boy? Tardcore that’s who.