Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

[Hardcore troubadour 14,919]

2 hours ago, RLLD said:

Will Kamala mimic Hillary and spend the next decade denying she lost?

She don’t feel no ways tired 

[Horseman 2,353]

Watching the stream from PA. At halftime Trump is winning 3 commercials to 1.  It's like Harris isn't even trying. What happened to all that money she supposedly raised.  

Kamala getting hammered on the border and trans surgeries for felons.  Trump winning PA.  

[Horseman 2,353]

Oh, there's one. Project 2025.  JFC. 

[MLCKAA 540]

I saw a Kamala ad today that said Trump wants a national abortion ban.  

[TrailGuy 552]

9 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Watching the stream from PA. At halftime Trump is winning 3 commercials to 1.  It's like Harris isn't even trying. What happened to all that money she supposedly raised.  

Kamala getting hammered on the border and trans surgeries for felons.  Trump winning PA.  

Well I guess that settles it.  Nancy saw 3 trump commercials to one Harris commercial.

[Horseman 2,353]

1 minute ago, TrailGuy said:

Well I guess that settles it.  Nancy saw 3 trump commercials to one Harris commercial.

If you don't think it's smart for her to advertise more in PA then I don't know what to say. Everyday it's like you're trying to find something dumber to say.  

[thegeneral 2,889]

Mean Joe knows what’s up

 

[Sean Mooney 1,937]

Trump got Antonio Brown and Leveon Bell

 

Harris got Jerome Bettis, Mean Joe Greene, and Franco Harris.

 

So one person got legit legends to the Yinzers and the other got the mayors of crazy town. 

[Sean Mooney 1,937]

4 hours ago, RLLD said:

Will Kamala mimic Hillary and spend the next decade denying she lost?

Can you link to all the times Hillary complained about losing?

Can you link to all the times Trump complained he didn't win big enough?

TIA

[TrailGuy 552]

11 minutes ago, Horseman said:

If you don't think it's smart for her to advertise more in PA then I don't know what to say. Everyday it's like you're trying to find something dumber to say.  

Pea brain doesn't know how to read.

Of course it's smart for her to advertise more than trump and that exactly what she's doing.

Receipt: https://mediaproject.wesleyan.edu/releases-101024/

She has more ads in both Pittsburgh and Philadelphia.

I'm laughing at you Nancy because you watched an hour of a PA stream, counted the ads, and conclude that Trump will win based on that.

The best part you don't have the mental capacity to understand how dumb you truly are.

[Reality 3,092]

6 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Trump got Antonio Brown and Leveon Bell

 

Harris got Jerome Bettis, Mean Joe Greene, and Franco Harris.

 

So one person got legit legends to the Yinzers and the other got the mayors of crazy town. 

Makes sense, considering Harris is dead.

[Reality 3,092]

3 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

Pea brain doesn't know how to read.

Of course it's smart for her to advertise more than trump and that exactly what she's doing.

Receipt: https://mediaproject.wesleyan.edu/releases-101024/

She has more ads in both Pittsburgh and Philadelphia.

I'm laughing at you Nancy because you watched an hour of a PA stream, counted the ads, and concludes that Trump will win based on that.

The best part you don't have the mental capacity to understand how dumb you truly are.

Is it working? Polls suggest it isn't.

[Horseman 2,353]

31 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

Pea brain doesn't know how to read.

Of course it's smart for her to advertise more than trump and that exactly what she's doing.

Receipt: https://mediaproject.wesleyan.edu/releases-101024/

She has more ads in both Pittsburgh and Philadelphia.

I'm laughing at you Nancy because you watched an hour of a PA stream, counted the ads, and conclude that Trump will win based on that.

The best part you don't have the mental capacity to understand how dumb you truly are.

You can't distinguish the difference between SNF and your news, The View. 

[TimHauck 2,602]

Maybe Harris knows most Steelers fans don’t actually live in Pennsylvania

[Horseman 2,353]

The best part was when Channel 11 broke in for their 30 second update. Except it wasn't a break in the action.  The Steelers are running a play while Channel 11 is advertising a Trump interview about what Americans really care about.  

[Horseman 2,353]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Maybe Harris knows most Steelers fans don’t actually live in Pennsylvania

Holy chit metal helmet!   

It's not Steeler fans she's trying to win over, it's PENNSYLVANIA .  

[TimHauck 2,602]

3 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Holy chit metal helmet!   

It's not Steeler fans she's trying to win over, it's PENNSYLVANIA .  

And aren’t you talking about the number of commercials you saw…during the Steelers game?

Still waiting on those discord screenshots, liar.

[Horseman 2,353]

5 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

And aren’t you talking about the number of commercials you saw…during the Steelers game?

Still waiting on those discord screenshots, liar.

From the local PA broadcast dumbass!

HFS

Loosen the chin strap!

[Horseman 2,353]

It's over. 

 

 

[TimHauck 2,602]

42 minutes ago, Horseman said:

From the local PA broadcast dumbass!

HFS

Loosen the chin strap!

My initial comment was somewhat tongue in cheek, but what I was getting at is that if many of their fans don’t live in Pennsylvania, then there may not be all that many people watching the game in Pennsylvania.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,919]

2 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Maybe Harris knows most Steelers fans don’t actually live in Pennsylvania

🪖

[Hardcore troubadour 14,919]

3 hours ago, Reality said:

Makes sense, considering Harris is dead.

Mooney! What a dolt! 

[Sean Mooney 1,937]

9 hours ago, Reality said:

Makes sense, considering Harris is dead.

His family spoke up for him.

Read the news once in a while instead of being a sh!t sipping idiot. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,919]

1 minute ago, Sean Mooney said:

His family spoke up for him.

Read the news once in a while instead of being a sh!t sipping idiot. 

Holy shitt.

[Sean Mooney 1,937]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Holy shitt.

Is this where you are going to whine because I comment back to you on a message board when you address me?

[Sean Mooney 1,937]

To quote a fantasy football segment on an old podcast: "News or Noise"?

Quote

 

Just by looking at the polls, you wouldn’t know Election Day is 16 days away.

That’s because there really aren’t any new polls — or at least, many reliable ones. And it’s making it hard to discern just how close is the race between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump.

The weekend is passing without a single high-quality public poll — nationally or in any of the battleground states — released on either Saturday or Sunday. Nothing from The New York Times and its high-profile partnership with Siena College. Crickets from all five broadcast and cable news networks’ Sunday shows.

It’s a striking lack of data in the third-to-last weekend before Election Day.

Polling has become markedly more expensive over the past two decades, while media outlets’ budgets are increasingly strained. So it’s not surprising that the polls that typically populate the Sunday morning public-affairs shows or the Sunday papers have become rarer.

Still, the dearth of public polling is especially acute in the swing states. It’s Oct. 20, and there are only three polls conducted entirely this month with rigorous methodology in the most critical state, Pennsylvania. In Wisconsin, it’s only one high-quality poll this month. There are only two in Michigan. There’s no doubt that there are fewer polls conducted with the rigor needed to capture harder-to-reach voters — and with the corresponding high price tag.

What’s less clear is whether — if you’re looking at poll aggregators like RealClearPolitics, FiveThirtyEight or Nate Silver’s Silver Bulletin — it’s distorting the public’s view of the races. Yes, some of the lower-quality polls are either explicitly conducted by Republicans or have looser ties to the GOP. But analysts who’ve re-run the numbers to exclude those surveys as a thought exercise have found it has little effect on the averages — even as the polls typically regarded as more rigorous or independent generally show stronger results for Harris.

In 2016, it was some of those lower-quality polls that either relied on convenience samples or were operating from a right-leaning perspective that correctly picked up on a hidden Trump advantage. But in 2022, to use the most recent election, they found the illusion of a red wave that never materialized — and it was the more expensive polls conducted for traditional media outlets and academic institutions that nailed the midterms.

For now, it seems like many of the pollsters with the most established track records are taking an uncharacteristic break in advance of their final polls over the last two weeks of the race.

 

 

[RLLD 4,143]

9 hours ago, Sean Mooney said:

Can you link to all the times Hillary complained about losing?

Can you link to all the times Trump complained he didn't win big enough?

TIA

You find the Trump stuff, I am not your admin, but since you are too lazy to research a topic you pretend to care about..... I will provide some links....and you can then pretend "oh, thats diiiifereentttt...."

 

Clinton Link

Clinton Link

Clinton Link

https://gop.com/video/hypocrites-3-minutes-of-democrats-calling-elections-stolen-illegitimate-and-not-fair/

[Sean Mooney 1,937]

10 minutes ago, RLLD said:

You find the Trump stuff, I am not your admin, but since you are too lazy to research a topic you pretend to care about..... I will provide some links....and you can then pretend "oh, thats diiiifereentttt...."

 

Clinton Link

Clinton Link

Clinton Link

https://gop.com/video/hypocrites-3-minutes-of-democrats-calling-elections-stolen-illegitimate-and-not-fair/

 

All 3 of those Clinton links are referencing the same interview. And yes- she is stupid for claiming that. So it's not "different" It's idiotic. Now are you willing to call out Trump as being idiotic for the same thing?

Trump before the 2016 election:

https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37673797

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/17/us/politics/donald-trump-election-rigging.html

The Trump complaint timeline- in regards to 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022 elections, the 2012 election, and the Emmys:

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/timeline-donald-trumps-election-denial-claims-republican-politicians/story?id=89168408

Election Denialism article:

https://www.cato.org/commentary/yes-democrats-have-called-some-elections-illegitimate-gop-election-denialism-far-worse

Trump tries to sue Hillary over 2016 election

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/mar/24/trump-hillary-clinton-russia-lawsuit-2016-election

Trump saying he won the popular vote in a landslide in 2016 after you deduct all the illegal ballots:

https://www.npr.org/2016/11/27/503506026/trump-makes-unfounded-claim-that-millions-voted-illegally-for-clinton

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/01/trump-continues-to-attack-rigged-elections/580030/

 

 

 

 

[TimHauck 2,602]

18 minutes ago, RLLD said:

You find the Trump stuff, I am not your admin, but since you are too lazy to research a topic you pretend to care about..... I will provide some links....and you can then pretend "oh, thats diiiifereentttt...."

 

Clinton Link

Clinton Link

Clinton Link

https://gop.com/video/hypocrites-3-minutes-of-democrats-calling-elections-stolen-illegitimate-and-not-fair/

Can’t read the first link.

In the video in the second link (which is also what the third link is about) she says she lost:

It’s like applying for a job and getting 66 million letters of recommendation and losing to a corrupt human tornado

 

Only other comment from her in the 4th link is saying it was “stolen.”  Yes it’s sour grapes but it’s not saying she actually won.

[RLLD 4,143]

Just now, Sean Mooney said:

 

All 3 of those Clinton links are referencing the same interview. And yes- she is stupid for claiming that. So it's not "different" It's idiotic. Now are you willing to call out Trump as being idiotic for the same thing?

Trump before the 2016 election:

https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37673797

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/17/us/politics/donald-trump-election-rigging.html

The Trump complaint timeline- in regards to 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022 elections, the 2012 election, and the Emmys:

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/timeline-donald-trumps-election-denial-claims-republican-politicians/story?id=89168408

Election Denialism article:

https://www.cato.org/commentary/yes-democrats-have-called-some-elections-illegitimate-gop-election-denialism-far-worse

Trump tries to sue Hillary over 2016 election

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/mar/24/trump-hillary-clinton-russia-lawsuit-2016-election

Trump saying he won the popular vote in a landslide in 2016 after you deduct all the illegal ballots:

https://www.npr.org/2016/11/27/503506026/trump-makes-unfounded-claim-that-millions-voted-illegally-for-clinton

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/01/trump-continues-to-attack-rigged-elections/580030/

 

 

 

 

She did it in multiple interviews, and I do not care how often nor when it was stated.  Pretending that somehow "but Trump is worse" is not going to work here.....using something the Democrats did and then suggesting "but Republicans are worse" is just not acceptable.

[RLLD 4,143]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

Can’t read the first link.

In the video in the second link (which is also what the third link is about) she says she lost:

It’s like applying for a job and getting 66 million letters of recommendation and losing to a corrupt human tornado

 

Only other comment from her in the 4th link is saying it was “stolen.”  Yes it’s sour grapes but it’s not saying she actually won.

She did the same thing.   It was wrong when she did it and it was wrong when Trump did it, it was wrong when Abrams did it

But, setting that aside, I only speak to it to highlight the inclination to allow it or decry it based on political party instead of the action itself.

Pretending it matters....in any way.....at all....to start with is sorta immature.

[TimHauck 2,602]

4 minutes ago, RLLD said:

She did it in multiple interviews, and I do not care how often nor when it was stated.  Pretending that somehow "but Trump is worse" is not going to work here.....using something the Democrats did and then suggesting "but Republicans are worse" is just not acceptable.

Did Democrats say that people breaking into the Capitol building was a “day of love”?

[Horseman 2,353]

RLLD against two dolts with a combined IQ that doesn't reach triple digits.  

[avoiding injuries 1,505]

If Commala was able to get Franco Harris to support her, I have no choice but to change my vote to the democrats. 

[RLLD 4,143]

4 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Did Democrats say that people breaking into the Capitol building was a “day of love”?

Doubt it, and dont care.  Its irrelevant. And I really want to emphasize this point.  Trying to make it relevant was not bad political strategy, but it had a shelf life.  This continued effort to hold up its relevance is just falling flat. 

[Sean Mooney 1,937]

Just now, RLLD said:

She did it in multiple interviews, and I do not care how often nor when it was stated.  Pretending that somehow "but Trump is worse" is not going to work here.....using something the Democrats did and then suggesting "but Republicans are worse" is just not acceptable.

Then show the "multiple interviews". Again- you shared 3 links which are referencing the same interview. 

The second link is the CBS interview as posted on YouTube by CBS Sunday morning- 5 years ago

The first link reads

Quote

"Hillary Clinton dismissed President Trump as an “illegitimate president” and suggested that “he knows” that he stole the 2016 presidential election in a CBS News interview to be aired Sunday."

The third link reads: "

Quote

 

 Hillary Clinton, also believed that she had been cheated out of the election. From the Washington Post, in 2019:

Hillary Clinton dismissed President Trump as an “illegitimate president” and suggested that “he knows” that he stole the 2016 presidential election in a CBS News interview to be aired Sunday.

 

 

3 articles that reference the same interview is one example, not 3..

 

HTH

[lickin_starfish 1,889]

It's gonna be too big to rig. 

https://scrd.app/199OKQpLWT/

[Sean Mooney 1,937]

Bringing Hillary into the debate, being asked about Trump then (because that is the references election she is denying) and then pretending that "it is irrelevant about the election denying." is some idiotic garbage being spewed. 

[RLLD 4,143]

1 minute ago, Sean Mooney said:

Then show the "multiple interviews". Again- you shared 3 links which are referencing the same interview. 

The second link is the CBS interview as posted on YouTube by CBS Sunday morning- 5 years ago

The first link reads

The third link reads: "

 

3 articles that reference the same interview is one example, not 3..

 

HTH

Here is what I surmise you are missing.  No one cares.  No one cares that Hillary did it, no one cares that Trump did it.   Well, there are going to be folks who care I guess, who use it for some internal thing they need.  But most people just arent going to care......you are trying to me "fetch" a word, and its a failed tactic.  So do I really care that Trump or Hillary said such things, of course not, when you are an adult you worry about things that matter......not such excrement as this

All that said, if your move here is "yeah, but Trump is worse...."  THAT is just really sorta sad, it does not look well for you

[Sean Mooney 1,937]

1 minute ago, RLLD said:

Here is what I surmise you are missing.  No one cares.  No one cares that Hillary did it, no one cares that Trump did it.   Well, there are going to be folks who care I guess, who use it for some internal thing they need.  But most people just arent going to care......you are trying to me "fetch" a word, and its a failed tactic.  So do I really care that Trump or Hillary said such things, of course not, when you are an adult you worry about things that matter......not such excrement as this

All that said, if your move here is "yeah, but Trump is worse...."  THAT is just really sorta sad, it does not look well for you

You brought up Hillary and denying the 2016 election. I pointed out Trump has his own history of that and even complained that he didn't win the 2016 election big enough. And now you are crying because you're evidence easily had some holes punched in it. I will rightly assume too that your thoughts on this are because once again you refuse to criticize Trump for things.

Complaining about losing a "rigged election" is idiotic- whether it is Hillary or Donald doing it. But I'm not going to pretend like one side does it and one doesn't.