So a person tried to assassinate Trump

[nobody 2,672]

2 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

We don't know anything.  We know he wasn't some blue haired tranny biden loving disney wokie.  Sorry that hurts your feelings.

We do know he was a registered republican gun enthusiast who was described as being right leaning by his friends.

Maybe save your BS until we know more about this monster.

We already have the biggest piece of evidence we need.  He tried to kill Trump.  

I get it though.  I did the same thing when I'm trying to stall when I know there's probably an issue.  Let's wait and get all the facts, guys.  It gives me time to circle the wagons and develop our spin.

[GutterBoy 2,899]

2 minutes ago, BrahmaBulls said:

You made the asinine comparison.  I just pointed it out to you because apparently you need help.

I was pointing that just because you think someone shouldn't be president doesn't mean you think they should be dead.  You don't think Biden shouldn't be president.  Do you think he should be dead?

[RLLD 4,230]

16 minutes ago, Strike said:

They weren't involved per se, but there is no doubt their rhetoric about Trump has an impact on a mentally fragile/extremist mind, much like encouraging someone contemplating suicide can push them over the edge.

I recall....that "rhetoric" was a key weapon in their arsenal.  They used the notion of "rhetoric" as a big reason to vilify Trump the person.   So, if it arises that someone on the left now wants to object to "rhetoric", yeah, they can absolutely go fock themselves.

[RLLD 4,230]

15 minutes ago, squistion said:

It is The Democratic Party, not the Democrat Party, but I digress.

And if they were involved, they somehow got the shooter to register as a Republican and then wear a Demolition Ranch t-shirt when he made his assassination attempt. 

Yeah, I noticed that move.  Not buying that this was some "Republican".   I also noticed the move to reroute the narrative back to Jan6th as well, among some of our liberal puppets in the media....thats not going to work either...unless the intent is to p!ss of even more conservatives.

[MDC 7,426]

1 minute ago, RLLD said:

I recall....that "rhetoric" was a key weapon in their arsenal.  They used the notion of "rhetoric" as a big reason to vilify Trump the person.   So, if it arises that someone on the left now wants to object to "rhetoric", yeah, they can absolutely go fock themselves.

I recall many of the same republicans who are now crying about rhetoric insisting that words don’t matter.

Mean tweets!  

[IndyColtsFan 325]

24 minutes ago, nobody said:

It's exactly inline.  Trump isn't trying to install himself as a dictator.  That's the exact type of talk that makes people think they need to kill him.

He's on record as saying he would expand presidential powers and limit federal-agency independence. He also is on record as saying he would go after his political enemies if elected. This was right out of the authoritarian playbook. Our system of checks and balances is in peril. Hopefully him being at the business end of how this country's extremism can manifest itself will change his paradigm and inspire him to focus on issues instead of hypercatastrophizing, misinformation, finger-pointing and vindictive threats.

It's a good sign that he has said he is rewriting his RNC speech to focus on unity instead of Biden.

I have my doubts this leopard will change his spots, but we'll see.

 

[GutterBoy 2,899]

1 minute ago, RLLD said:

Yeah, I noticed that move.  Not buying that this was some "Republican".   I also noticed the move to reroute the narrative back to Jan6th as well, among some of our liberal puppets in the media....thats not going to work either...unless the intent is to p!ss of even more conservatives.

This is the exact type of response I was afraid of from the Magas.  The magas like you that are angry and want more division.

[BrahmaBulls 763]

6 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

I was pointing that just because you think someone shouldn't be president doesn't mean you think they should be dead.  You don't think Biden shouldn't be president.  Do you think he should be dead?

If you think someone is Hitler (guy that tosses Jews in ovens) you should probably want him assassinated.  If you disagree with someone's policy then you should vote them out.  How many god damn times does someone have to explain it to you?

[Gladiators 1,987]

I recall at least one poster here who was recently hysterical about Project 2025 and how scary it is.

[GutterBoy 2,899]

13 minutes ago, BrahmaBulls said:

If you think someone is Hitler (guy that tosses Jews in ovens) you should probably want him assassinated.  If you disagree with someone's policy then you should vote them out.  How many god damn times does someone have to explain it to you?

So since I don't think that Trump tosses jews in ovens, then I don't want him assassinated, I want him to lose the election.  Don't tell me I want him murdered.

[squistion 2,201]

Meanwhile on that other site, all threads mentioning the assassination attempt have been deleted or closed by Joe. I predicted that would happen when the PSF was shut down (that even just the factual reporting of news items without any political discussion would not be allowed).

Joe closed and renamed a thread on this topic entitled The Elephant In The Room without any apparent sense of irony. 

[zsasz 369]

Amazing how some here are now whining about rhetoric as if the Right hasnt been demonizing and villifying the Left since Rush Limbaugh popped on the scene in the early 90s.  Grow up....admit that your side is as just as culpable and lets work for a better tomorrow.  Or, we can just continue to get down, James Brown,  as this mud doesn't have a bottom.  

[Strike 5,542]

3 minutes ago, squistion said:

Meanwhile on that other site, all threads mentioning the assassination attempt have been deleted or closed by Joe. I predicted that would happen when the PSF was shut down (that even just the factual reporting of news items without any political discussion would not be allowed).

Joe closed and renamed a thread on this topic entitled The Elephant In The Room without any apparent sense of irony. 

His bored.  His rules.  Sucks that you and Tim ruined it for the rest of us.

[Hawkeye21 2,399]

11 hours ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

I get what Volty was saying 100%. Basically in real time we have conspiracy after conspiracy 

People can turn everything into a conspiracy though. Having social media makes it even worse.

[RLLD 4,230]

26 minutes ago, MDC said:

I recall many of the same republicans who are now crying about rhetoric insisting that words don’t matter.

Mean tweets!  

Liberals have assured us that words are violence, that Trumps "rehetoric" results in violence, so yeah.....for liberals to step up now and laugh about it, they can absolutely go fock themselves

[supermike80 1,911]

11 minutes ago, squistion said:

Meanwhile on that other site, all threads mentioning the assassination attempt have been deleted or closed by Joe. I predicted that would happen when the PSF was shut down (that even just the factual reporting of news items without any political discussion would not be allowed).

Joe closed and renamed a thread on this topic entitled The Elephant In The Room without any apparent sense of irony. 

Well when you started reporting people for using the smiley emoji, I imagine tat was enough for Joe.  Don't blame him

[BrahmaBulls 763]

13 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

So since I don't think that Trump tosses jews in ovens, then I don't want him assassinated, I want him to lose the election.  Don't tell me I want him murdered.

I told you that you wanted Trump murdered?  God damn you're worse than Rusty.

Don't compare him to Hitler.  How difficult is that to grasp?

[Fireballer 2,642]

Do we know when he registered as GOP?

[BrahmaBulls 763]

14 minutes ago, squistion said:

Meanwhile on that other site, all threads mentioning the assassination attempt have been deleted or closed by Joe. I predicted that would happen when the PSF was shut down (that even just the factual reporting of news items without any political discussion would not be allowed).

Joe closed and renamed a thread on this topic entitled The Elephant In The Room without any apparent sense of irony. 

Go whine to Joe

[GutterBoy 2,899]

3 minutes ago, BrahmaBulls said:

I told you that you wanted Trump murdered?  God damn you're worse than Rusty.

Don't compare him to Hitler.  How difficult is that to grasp?

I didn't call him Hitler. Stop crying.

[squistion 2,201]

1 minute ago, supermike80 said:

Well when you started reporting people for using the smiley emoji, I imagine tat was enough for Joe.  Don't blame him

Joe agreed with me 100% on that, as the rolling laughing emoji was deleted for use after that. 

[BrahmaBulls 763]

1 minute ago, GutterBoy said:

I didn't call him Hitler. Stop crying.

Why did jump in the conversation in the first place?  Other than you jump into every conversation without a fundamental understanding of anything.

[BrahmaBulls 763]

2 minutes ago, squistion said:

Joe agreed with me 100% on that, as the rolling laughing emoji was deleted for use after that. 

Do you realize you're almost 70 and whining to another grown man about an emoji?  

[squistion 2,201]

5 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

Do we know when he registered as GOP?

He registered to vote as a Republican as soon as he turned 18.

[supermike80 1,911]

3 minutes ago, squistion said:

Joe agreed with me 100% on that, as the rolling laughing emoji was deleted for use after that. 

It was guys like you that couldn't stop smashing the report button that made the moderators crazy.   And you still defend it.  Imaging reporting someone for using the rolling face emoji??  Who does that?   Think Joe deleted it because you knuckleheads were REPORTING it.   Amazing

[supermike80 1,911]

1 minute ago, BrahmaBulls said:

Do you realize you're almost 70 and whining to another grown man about an emoji?  

He actually defends it.  Imaging being that triggered that you report an emoji?   Think about that for a second.   Just crazy

[Strike 5,542]

https://www.restorationbulletin.com/p/trump-derangement-syndrome-draws

[squistion 2,201]

Just now, supermike80 said:

It was guys like you that couldn't stop smashing the report button that made the moderators crazy.   And you still defend it.  Imaging reporting someone for using the rolling face emoji??  Who does that?   Think Joe deleted it because you knuckleheads were REPORTING it.   Amazing

That emoji was used to passive aggressively ridicule people (instead of insulting and calling them vulgar names, which is allowed here).

[MDC 7,426]

16 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Liberals have assured us that words are violence, that Trumps "rehetoric" results in violence, so yeah.....for liberals to step up now and laugh about it, they can absolutely go fock themselves

Conservatives have assured us that rhetoric doesn’t matter at all, so yeah … for them to cry crocodile tears over werdz now is laughable and they can suck it.

See how that works? 

[Strike 5,542]

10 minutes ago, squistion said:

Joe agreed with me 100% on that, as the rolling laughing emoji was deleted for use after that. 

Maybe it was when you started reporting everyone for using the nickname "Kappy"?  Or when you got butthurt because people put pigeons as their Avatar and whined so much Joe banned pigeons?  Seriously, do some self reflection for once.

[supermike80 1,911]

1 minute ago, squistion said:

That emoji was used to passive aggressively ridicule people (instead of insulting and calling them vulgar names, which is allowed here).

Awe...your poor feelings.   It's so sad you can get hurt like this on a message board.  It really is.  Well, you got your wish.  You and your ilk got the board shut down and now you're crying about it being gone.   More hurt feelings.   Wow.  

[supermike80 1,911]

Just now, Strike said:

Maybe it was when you started reporting everyone for using the nickname "Kappy"?  Or when you got butthurt because people out pigeons as their Avatar and whined so much Joe banned pigeons?  Seriously, do some self reflection for once.

Very very sensitive fella there.    

[squistion 2,201]

Just now, supermike80 said:

He actually defends it.  Imaging being that triggered that you report an emoji?   Think about that for a second.   Just crazy

I don't think I reported it very often (if at all) however I quoted the posts with the emoji and asked what was so funny, or what point they were trying to make. And I stated on the forum that the emoji should be deleted. 

[supermike80 1,911]

Just now, squistion said:

I don't think I reported it very often (if at all) however I quoted the posts with the emoji and asked what was so funny, or what point they were trying to make. And I stated on the forum that the emoji should be deleted. 

Now youre going to lie and say you never reported it?   Come on man.   You defended it in just a couple posts above.

What is it with guys like you and Tim that make you constantly lie?   WHY???

[squistion 2,201]

Just now, supermike80 said:

Awe...your poor feelings.   It's so sad you can get hurt like this on a message board.  It really is.  Well, you got your wish.  You and your ilk got the board shut down and now you're crying about it being gone.   More hurt feelings.   Wow.  

No we didn't get the board shut down. It was people like HT, Ramblin Wreck, Ivan (the snarky/sarcastic JC professor) who didn't want the forum established at all and kept trolling thread where serious discussion was trying to take place that got the forum closed.

[peenie 1,915]

When the Central Park Jogger kids were apprehended, news media went banging on the doors of the apartments of the parents and asked them why their children raped that woman. They quickly put together a news "townhall meeting" to discuss black violence and "wilding". Seems to me, now that we know who Thomas Matthew Crooks actually was, there is more of a sympathetic tone, we should all feel sorry for him because he was bullied. Why aren't they dragging out his parents and showing pictures of him holding a gun like they did with Trayvon Martin who killed no one? 

I'm just pointing out that if Trump's shooter had actually been a transexual like you all claimed earlier or someone of color, the news would be vilifying him. 

I'm just noting the difference of treatment. Heck, a black person who was shot or killed by a police officer is treated more harshly by the media than this guy. Think of how poorly you feel about George Floyd? He didn't shoot anyone and yet many of you feel anger towards him. 

[squistion 2,201]

Just now, supermike80 said:

Now youre going to lie and say you never reported it?   Come on man.   You defended it in just a couple posts above.

What is it with guys like you and Tim that make you constantly lie?   WHY???

No.

Reading is fundamental.

My exact words: I don't think I reported it very often (if at all)

 

[GutterBoy 2,899]

3 minutes ago, peenie said:

When the Central Park Jogger kids were apprehended, news media went banging on the doors of the apartments of the parents and asked them why their children raped that woman. They quickly put together a news "townhall meeting" to discuss black violence and "wilding". Seems to me, now that we know who Thomas Matthew Crooks actually was, there is more of a sympathetic tone, we should all feel sorry for him because he was bullied. Why aren't they dragging out his parents and showing pictures of him holding a gun like they did with Trayvon Martin who killed no one? 

I'm just pointing out that if Trump's shooter had actually been a transexual like you all claimed earlier or someone of color, the news would be vilifying him. 

I'm just noting the difference of treatment. Heck, a black person who was shot or killed by a police officer is treated more harshly by the media than this guy. Think of how poorly you feel about George Floyd? He didn't shoot anyone and yet you feel anger towards him. 

Ironically is was Trump who pushed to have the central park jogger kids executed.

[peenie 1,915]

Just now, GutterBoy said:

Ironically is was Trump who pushed to have the central park joggers kid executed.

I know, right. 

[Cdub100 3,908]

1 minute ago, peenie said:

When the Central Park Jogger kids were apprehended, news media went banging on the doors of the apartments of the parents and asked them why their children raped that woman. They quickly put together a news "townhall meeting" to discuss black violence and "wilding". Seems to me, now that we know who Thomas Matthew Crooks actually was, there is more of a sympathetic tone, we should all feel sorry for him because he was bullied. Why aren't they dragging out his parents and showing pictures of him holding a gun like they did with Trayvon Martin who killed no one? 

I'm just pointing out that if Trump's shooter had actually been a transexual like you all claimed earlier or someone of color, the news would be vilifying him. 

To answer your dumb question. He probably doesn't have a gangster photo of himself.

2. Nobody but the loony left (your side) feel sorry for him. 

3. Go bang down his parent's door, his High school and College and figure out who contributed to his liberal extremism. 

4. I don't know if they are vilifying him or not. I assume not because the media is probably mad he missed.