***Official Trump beat up the kamel again thread****

[IGotWorms 4,058]

1 hour ago, Hawkeye21 said:

I did not watch the debate because I have much better things to do but I did read some responses to it.  Sounds like Trump nailed it but so did Harris.  Also, Trump got destroyed and Harris got embarrassed.  Both lied, A LOT.  Trump was the only one that got fact checked.  Moderators favored Harris.

Sounds like a typical debate to me.  Everyone is a winner and a loser.  GO USA

Stupid take but I guess if you didn’t even watch it you’d have no idea??

[Hawkeye21 2,400]

1 minute ago, IGotWorms said:

Stupid take but I guess if you didn’t even watch it you’d have no idea??

It's pretty accurate actually.

[thegeneral 3,236]

3 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

She looked the part well enough, but substance wasn’t where she won this debate. She did it by spinning him up like a top, letting him go to twirl round and round like a madman, and sat there looking like “is this the guy you want? Seriously??”

And Trump could not resist, not even a little bit. Because he has absolutely no self control when his ego is at play. Pathetic. And dangerous 

Yep. Looking the part and acting the part were very important for Kamala as the “she has been in hiding” thought has been out there.

She did both. Everyone knows Trump’s act. That she easily goaded him on multiple occasions was a nice bonus. 

We’ll see what if any impact it has.

[IGotWorms 4,058]

2 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

It's pretty accurate actually.

You couldn’t know since you didn’t watch it

[MDC 7,471]

2 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

She looked the part well enough, but substance wasn’t where she won this debate. She did it by spinning him up like a top, letting him go to twirl round and round like a madman, and sat there looking like “is this the guy you want? Seriously??”

And Trump could not resist, not even a little bit. Because he has absolutely no self control when his ego is at play. Pathetic. And dangerous 

All week I kept reading about how Kamala was going to try to get under his skin. They couldn’t have telegraphed the strategy any better.

Reminds me of how the Skins OL would sometimes tell the D what play they were about to run, daring them to stop it.

Don STILL fell for it. He’s such an insecure little girl.  

[seafoam1 3,067]

kameltoe appeals to the liberals because she it on their level of intelligence. Extremely bottom of  the barrel type thinking. 

They all love the "who doesn't love a yellow school bus" story. People who are very low IQ attract each other, hence liberals loving the kameltoe. 

[purdygood 352]

4 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

You missed the subtle point. MAGA as you libtards mean it. It's literally a political slogan that you libtards tried to copy in BBB. Build back better.  

You should run on Build Back Recession because that's all you have. 

Again. I'm not a Liberal and Build Back Better is just as Dumb of a slogan as Make America Great Again.   How about this slogan... America is Great, here are some policies I would like to introduce....  but Donald has no policies other than trying to make himself richer and keep him out of prison.

[Hawkeye21 2,400]

1 minute ago, IGotWorms said:

You couldn’t know since you didn’t watch it

You know my comment was about people's opinions on the debate, right?  It wasn't MY opinion on the debate.  That is why I said I didn't even watch it.

[thegeneral 3,236]

1 minute ago, MDC said:

All week I kept reading about how Kamala was going to try to get under his skin. They couldn’t have telegraphed the strategy any better.

Reminds me of how the Skins OL would sometimes tell the D what play they were about to run, daring them to stop it.

Don STILL fell for it. He’s such an insecure little girl.  

The thing is you don’t have to set some elaborate trap. You just make fun of his crowd sizes, make sure it’s at the end of the answer, and he goes into a hissy fit. 

[seafoam1 3,067]

2 minutes ago, purdygood said:

Again. I'm not a Liberal and Build Back Better is just as Dumb of a slogan as Make America Great Again.   How about this slogan... America is Great, here are some policies I would like to introduce....  but Donald has no policies other than trying to make himself richer and keep him out of prison.

You are a liberal and have contracted TDS to a massive degree. You no longer think rationally. The sad truth is, there is no known cure. Just look at generalpimpledoosh, that is your future. 

[purdygood 352]

Just now, seafoam1 said:

You are a liberal and have contracted TDS to a massive degree. You no longer think rationally. The sad truth is, there is no known cure. 

there is no known cure.  for being in the Trump cult.

 

we agree! 

[seafoam1 3,067]

1 minute ago, purdygood said:

there is no known cure.  for being a TDS infected liberal.

 

we agree! 

[Rabbit Range 51]

Well, that was an ass kicking. Good grief, seafoam is floundering worse than normal. 

[MDC 7,471]

1 minute ago, Rabbit Range said:

Well, that was an ass kicking. Good grief, seafoam is floundering worse than normal. 

Every day is a struggle for Peefoam.  

[Tree of Knowledge 1,871]

How many aliases do some of these posters have?  

[thegeneral 3,236]

9 minutes ago, Rabbit Range said:

Well, that was an ass kicking. Good grief, seafoam is floundering worse than normal. 

Par for the course!

[thegeneral 3,236]

3 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

How many aliases do some of these posters have?  

I count 27.

[seafoam1 3,067]

10 minutes ago, MDC said:

Every day is a struggle for Peefoam.  

30 years and still struggling with this site. 

[seafoam1 3,067]

12 minutes ago, Rabbit Range said:

Well, that was an ass kicking. Good grief, seafoam is floundering worse than normal. 

Poor pimpledoosh can't keep even one alias. 

[thegeneral 3,236]

Just now, seafoam1 said:

Poor pimpledoosh can't keep even one alias. 

It’s funny you decided on Peefoam1 for your only alias.

[The Real timschochet 6,826]

Trump was asked if tariffs would increase prices. No answer. 

He was asked what a mass deportation of 20 million people would look like. No answer. 

He was asked how he would improve healthcare. No answer. 

He was asked how he would address climate change. No answer. 

He was asked how he would end the Ukraine War, as promised in 1 day. No answer. 

And yet once again this morning we are told that Kamala’s main problem is that she doesn’t lay out specifics. 
 

[purdygood 352]

Just now, The Real timschochet said:

Trump was asked if tariffs would increase prices. No answer. 

He was asked what a mass deportation of 20 million people would look like. No answer. 

He was asked how he would improve healthcare. No answer. 

He was asked how he would address climate change. No answer. 

He was asked how he would end the Ukraine War, as promised in 1 day. No answer. 

And yet once again this morning we are told that Kamala’s main problem is that she doesn’t lay out specifics. 
 

Trump has no policy.  His only position is "I'm a victim (many people are saying) so vote for me and I'll do everything perfect (perfect in a soft voice) and if I lose they cheated (they cheat in a soft voice). You know China was very unfair under my first term (very unfair in a soft voice) but they did give Ivanka and Jared Billions of dollars so they love me! The price of gas is so high (so high in a soft voice) but I will bl0w the Saudis and get them to send us so much oil (so much in a soft voice) Ukraine has been very unfair to Putin, you know me and him had secret meetings together, we are like this (fingers crossed) so I will handle that day one. Sleepy Joe..... I will handle it all, just vote for me. (weirdly hugs a flag)"

[Hardcore troubadour 15,486]

It was a debate! 

[purdygood 352]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

It was a debate! 

A debate was had! I declare a debate! Would you say,  Trump was a Master de bate r ?

[TimHauck 2,905]

1 hour ago, Horseman said:

I was just wondering if you came to your senses and deleted your posts or if a mod was trying to help you out

lol at you accusing someone else of doing this, that’s your playbook

[Horseman 2,472]

1 hour ago, Horseman said:

No thanks.  I leave the crying for the women, along with the emotion projecting and spreading lies.  And the wine coolers.

You do you though!

 

1 hour ago, thegeneral said:

You are extremely sensitive sorry to break it to you. It’s ok man. You should man up and have a couple pops on Thursday. There’s a game on even.

So which posts were deleted?

I had plenty of beers last night, and will again tonight.  I just don't get sloppy like you do.

You're still not making much sense, but, at least you're typing coherent sentences again.  

[seafoam1 3,067]

14 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

It was a debate! 

And the question is:

What should a person running for office say about previously calling another person a racist who just made her VP of the US?

[TimHauck 2,905]

2 hours ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Already been seeing this for years.  What has changed?  They are both going to tell their base what they want to hear.  There is nothing to be learned from these two.

Give me some better candidates and I'll watch.

 

2 hours ago, Hawkeye21 said:

I may vote for Trump, not sure yet.  I just know I'm not voting for Harris or a democrat.

Come on man, I really do believe you are the most centrist poster here, but it’s silly to make these two posts within minutes of each other. How are you gonna say there’s nothing to be learned from these 2 candidates and then say immediately after that you’re not sure if you’re going to vote for Trump? Especially when you’ve already said you’re definitely not voting for Harris. What more is there for you to learn that would determine whether or not you vote for Trump?

I agree there’s certainly nothing new to learn about him, and understand how you could feel the same about Harris, but personally, I thought she was still a bit of unknown as a presidential candidate. Unfortunately she didn’t show me much yesterday, and I would agree with @Horseman for once that the debate was basically a tie. 

[seafoam1 3,067]

2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

 

Come on man, I really do believe you are the most centrist poster here, but it’s silly to make these two posts within minutes of each other. How are you gonna say there’s nothing to be learned from these 2 candidates and then say immediately after that you’re not sure if you’re going to vote for Trump? Especially when you’ve already said you’re definitely not voting for Harris. What more is there for you to learn that would determine whether or not you vote for Trump?
 

I agree there’s certainly nothing new to learn about him, and understand how you could feel the same about Harris, but personally, I thought she was still a bit of unknown as a presidential candidate. Unfortunately she didn’t show me much yesterday, and I would agree with @Horseman for once that the debate was basically a tie. 

I think he means he's not sure if he's going to vote for Trump. 

[thegeneral 3,236]

28 minutes ago, Horseman said:

 

I had plenty of beers last night, and will again tonight.  I just don't get sloppy like you do.

You're still not making much sense, but, at least you're typing coherent sentences again.  

Totally sloppy

You are very butthurt. It’s unbecoming. Man up sissy!

[Hawkeye21 2,400]

3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

 

Come on man, I really do believe you are the most centrist poster here, but it’s silly to make these two posts within minutes of each other. How are you gonna say there’s nothing to be learned from these 2 candidates and then say immediately after that you’re not sure if you’re going to vote for Trump? Especially when you’ve already said you’re definitely not voting for Harris. What more is there for you to learn that would determine whether or not you vote for Trump?

I agree there’s certainly nothing new to learn about him, and understand how you could feel the same about Harris, but personally, I thought she was still a bit of unknown as a presidential candidate. Unfortunately she didn’t show me much yesterday, and I would agree with @Horseman for once that the debate was basically a tie. 

There are only three options for me; Harris, Trump or 3rd party.  A 3rd party candidate is not going to win.  I'm done with democrats in the office right now and I don't believe one bit that Harris is going to improve anything.  As much as I can't stand Trump, I thought things were better with him as President.  It's really as simple as that.

[seafoam1 3,067]

4 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

There are only three options for me; Harris, Trump or 3rd party.  A 3rd party candidate is not going to win.  I'm done with democrats in the office right now and I don't believe one bit that Harris is going to improve anything.  As much as I can't stand Trump, I thought things were better with him as President.  It's really as simple as that.

I think you are right where a lot of people are. And we ALL know, Trump is not going to destroy democracy for God's sake. 

I think I want him to win just so when his final term is over the left can just give it a rest. Liberals literally think he's going to be Hitler. 

That said, I literally think the left wants socialism. 

[TimHauck 2,905]

3 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

There are only three options for me; Harris, Trump or 3rd party.  A 3rd party candidate is not going to win.  I'm done with democrats in the office right now and I don't believe one bit that Harris is going to improve anything.  As much as I can't stand Trump, I thought things were better with him as President.  It's really as simple as that.

I get that, but how have you not decided if you’re going to vote for him yet?  What do you think will change in the next 2 months?

[Tree of Knowledge 1,871]

4 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

There are only three options for me; Harris, Trump or 3rd party.  A 3rd party candidate is not going to win.  I'm done with democrats in the office right now and I don't believe one bit that Harris is going to improve anything.  As much as I can't stand Trump, I thought things were better with him as President.  It's really as simple as that.

Welcome Aboard.  

[Hawkeye21 2,400]

Just now, TimHauck said:

I get that, but how have you not decided if you’re going to vote for him yet?  What do you think will change in the next 2 months?

I would need a 3rd party candidate to really stand out.

[seafoam1 3,067]

2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I get that, but how have you not decided if you’re going to vote for him yet?  What do you think will change in the next 2 months?

Maybe the kameltoe with come out with some form of policy. I doubt it though. We all know she's a commie. 

[Horseman 2,472]

8 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Totally sloppy

You are very butthurt. It’s unbecoming. Man up sissy!

Butthurt?  What do you mean by that?

Making fun of a drunk poster is comedy gold. 

[Hawkeye21 2,400]

I found a great clip from the debate last night.

 

[Tree of Knowledge 1,871]

Since Kamala was so successful last night, I assume she is up for a solo interview with no “earrings?”

[seafoam1 3,067]

4 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Since Kamala was so successful last night, I assume she is up for a solo interview with no “earrings?”

You won't see or hear from her again until after the election. She did her job of not falling to the ground like the last liberal candidate. Now they work their liberal election magic at the voting sites between the hours of midnight and 4am.