Gaetz withdraws: Pam Bondi is selected.

[IGotWorms 4,058]

3 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Is making stuff up and arguing against that routine for you?  Seems like it.  

What am I making up?

That you guys control all three branches of government?

Jeez, you’d think you’d be happy about it. Not running scared. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,099]

Just now, IGotWorms said:

What am I making up?

That you guys control all three branches of government?

Jeez, you’d think you’d be happy about it. Not running scared. 

Yeah, see, making things up.  No one is running scared but you're so desperate from the 312-226 shellacking you got you're reaching for anything at this point.

Thanks for proving my assertion.

[IGotWorms 4,058]

Just now, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Yeah, see, making things up.  No one is running scared but you're so desperate from the 312-226 shellacking you got you're reaching for anything at this point.

Thanks for proving my assertion.

I am most certainly not making up that you control the presidency and the senate. If you wanted Gaetz to be AG, he’d be AG. There is literally no one that could stop you.

Then on top of that you’ve got the house and the courts too.

You can do whatever the fock you want.

EXCEPT, blame anyone else for the outcome. And that’s what has you running scared.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,099]

3 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

I am most certainly not making up that you control the presidency and the senate. If you wanted Gaetz to be AG, he’d be AG. There is literally no one that could stop you.

Then on top of that you’ve got the house and the courts too.

You can do whatever the fock you want.

EXCEPT, blame anyone else for the outcome. And that’s what has you running scared.

You see, you did it again.  You argued against something I never said and then doubled down on it.  

I said NO one is running scared - even highlighted it in my post, dumb@ss.  Are you really that much of a retard?  

[IGotWorms 4,058]

3 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

You see, you did it again.  You argued against something I never said and then doubled down on it.  

I said NO one is running scared - even highlighted it in my post, dumb@ss.  Are you really that much of a retard?  

So why the effort to cast about and find someone else to blame for Gaetz? It was your pick and it was your choice not to proceed. It’s all on you — every bit of it

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,099]

6 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

So why the effort to cast about and find someone else to blame for Gaetz? It was your pick and it was your choice not to proceed. It’s all on you — every bit of it

Huh?  My pick?  My choice not to proceed?  WTF are you even talking about?  Gaetz stepped down himself.

You're so desperate you're just making stuff up.  Thanks - ONCE AGAIN - for proving my point.

[Horseman 2,456]

14 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

So why the effort to cast about and find someone else to blame for Gaetz? It was your pick and it was your choice not to proceed. It’s all on you — every bit of it

L

7 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Huh?  My pick?  My choice not to proceed?  WTF are you even talking about?  Gaetz stepped down himself.

You're so desperate you're just making stuff up.  Thanks - ONCE AGAIN - for proving my point.

W

[Horseman 2,456]

On 11/21/2024 at 6:25 PM, thegeneral said:

Getting the last word is kind of how the convo works on an old school message board.

[Horseman 2,456]

2 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

The crying from some of the a-holes, dirtbags and puzzies around here the last few weeks has been a delight to see.  Keep it coming losers 

Hilarious 

47

[shorepatrol 1,870]

47 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

 

You can do whatever the fock you want.

 

Ya. MAGA

[BarneyFife 34]

1 hour ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

You see, you did it again.  You argued against something I never said and then doubled down on it.  

I said NO one is running scared - even highlighted it in my post, dumb@ss.  Are you really that much of a retard?  

Yes he is.

[RLLD 4,230]

Pam Bondi is 4th ex-Donald Trump defense lawyer chosen for Justice Department

As I predicted, they would not tear into her as they will do to the white men.   Her gender offers a measure of protection.

So instead they turn to the "loyalty" tactic.  This tactic is odd in that of course every President tries to find people who will help implement policy and has some political alignment.  I surmise the lie here is that they will elevate loyalty to Trump over country.

I think this is an odd tactic in that there is no evidence this will be true. I submit we would need something that supports the notion. For example, if Bondi allowed the DOJ to run roughshod over political opponents, with prosecutions against those political opponents that abuse the legal system in novel ways....y'know, maybe take a law designed for a certain use, and malign it against political opponents in shadowy ways....I think we all know what that looks like. 

[Maximum Overkill 1,988]

10 hours ago, IGotWorms said:

It was your pick 

It's obvious that Worms has gotten extremely irritable and Woker after his Girl Kamala got curb stomped by MAGA! 

Worms used to be one of the more grounded Dems, now he's full on Whoopie Goldberg.  

[Patented Phil 1,469]

16 hours ago, Voltaire said:

You heard of her longer than five seconds ago?

Yes.  She’s been a regular on Fox News for about 10 years.  And she was Trump’s lawyer during his impeachment trial.  She’s smart, tough, and easy on the eyes.

[IGotWorms 4,058]

1 hour ago, RLLD said:

Pam Bondi is 4th ex-Donald Trump defense lawyer chosen for Justice Department

As I predicted, they would not tear into her as they will do to the white men.   Her gender offers a measure of protection.

So instead they turn to the "loyalty" tactic.  This tactic is odd in that of course every President tries to find people who will help implement policy and has some political alignment.  I surmise the lie here is that they will elevate loyalty to Trump over country.

I think this is an odd tactic in that there is no evidence this will be true. I submit we would need something that supports the notion. For example, if Bondi allowed the DOJ to run roughshod over political opponents, with prosecutions against those political opponents that abuse the legal system in novel ways....y'know, maybe take a law designed for a certain use, and malign it against political opponents in shadowy ways....I think we all know what that looks like. 

Who is “they”?

You do know republicans control the entirety of government now, right?

They can do whatever the fock they want and nobody can stop them, your nutjob persecution complex notwithstanding

[Voltaire 5,316]

21 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Who is “they”?

You do know republicans control the entirety of government now, right?

They can do whatever the fock they want and nobody can stop them, your nutjob persecution complex notwithstanding

'They' are the forces of evil in the country. You can easily tell who "they" are because as 'they' age, as the corruption sets in, and what remans of 'their' humanity/ soul is drained from 'them', "they' all morph into looking more and more like Michael Moore.

By way of contrast, Pam Bondi is 59.

[jonmx 2,429]

8 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Who is “they”?

You do know republicans control the entirety of government now, right?

They can do whatever the fock they want and nobody can stop them, your nutjob persecution complex notwithstanding

 

Not entirely.  The 4 million unelected bureaucrats are a large body which largely opposes Trump's agenda.   Technically Trump is over this but this body is entrenched in power.  Trump is the first president who is going to try to take on this beast.  This is one of the reasons there has been very little difference between Rs and Ds because President's are often overwhelmed and handcuffed by the massive bureaucracies.

[Maximum Overkill 1,988]

Genius move, she's perfect for Trumps dismantling of the corrupt Democrat justice system. 

Democrats are scared to death of what's about to come  

[IGotWorms 4,058]

25 minutes ago, jonmx said:

 

Not entirely.  The 4 million unelected bureaucrats are a large body which largely opposes Trump's agenda.   Technically Trump is over this but this body is entrenched in power.  Trump is the first president who is going to try to take on this beast.  This is one of the reasons there has been very little difference between Rs and Ds because President's are often overwhelmed and handcuffed by the massive bureaucracies.

Ahh yes, the “deep state” conspiracy

Which is silly enough, but also entirely inapplicable here. Bureaucrats don’t pick the AG — the president does, and the senate confirms.

Which are, you know, both controlled by Trump/MAGA.

Such a pathetic and desperate attempt to point the finger elsewhere. Why don’t you guys man up and stop with the bullsh1t?

[squistion 2,197]

https://x.com/kylegriffin1/status/1860348903251447935

The special election to fill Matt Gaetz's congressional seat will take place on… April Fool's Day 2025. 

[Voltaire 5,316]

Just now, IGotWorms said:

Ahh yes, the “deep state” conspiracy

Conspiracy or no, there is a perceived conspiracy that exists and across agencies, we'll see much of upheaval of the federal regulatory state early next year.

[IGotWorms 4,058]

Just now, Voltaire said:

Conspiracy or no, there is a perceived conspiracy that exists and across agencies, we'll see much of upheaval of the federal regulatory state early next year.

Which has absolutely nothing to do with who is AG and how they are selected

[jonmx 2,429]

24 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Ahh yes, the “deep state” conspiracy

Which is silly enough, but also entirely inapplicable here. Bureaucrats don’t pick the AG — the president does, and the senate confirms.

Which are, you know, both controlled by Trump/MAGA.

Such a pathetic and desperate attempt to point the finger elsewhere. Why don’t you guys man up and stop with the bullsh1t?

You are such a retard.  There are 4 million people entrenched in power which has grow exponentially for more than six decades.  A president comes in and has to make thousands of appointments with very little insight into how these agencies operate.  These agencies operate with zero accountability to anyone.  You are a fuking retard if you don't see how these agencies have become corrupt.  

[Hardcore troubadour 15,421]

14 minutes ago, jonmx said:

You are such a retard.  There are 4 million people entrenched in power which has grow exponentially for more than six decades.  A president comes in and has to make thousands of appointments with very little insight into how these agencies operate.  These agencies operate with zero accountability to anyone.  You are a fuking retard if you don't see how these agencies have become corrupt.  

They cry  fascism and then get upset at the prospect of less government.  Highly educated. 

[MDC 7,408]

32 minutes ago, jonmx said:

You are such a retard.  There are 4 million people entrenched in power which has grow exponentially for more than six decades.  A president comes in and has to make thousands of appointments with very little insight into how these agencies operate.  These agencies operate with zero accountability to anyone.  You are a fuking retard if you don't see how these agencies have become corrupt.  

There’s nothing stopping Trump now. He’s going to eliminate the Deep State, balance the budget, cut government spending, replace the ACA with something great, deport all the illegals and lower prices. 

Right?

[jonmx 2,429]

14 minutes ago, MDC said:

There’s nothing stopping Trump now. He’s going to eliminate the Deep State, balance the budget, cut government spending, replace the ACA with something great, deport all the illegals and lower prices. 

Right?

 

Debt-based currency guarantees we will always be in debt (and every other country).  Balancing the budget can only be done on a temporary basis as overall debt inherently grows exponentially by design of our flawed and corrupt federal reserve sysyem. 

Government will get cut for the first time in generations.   Elimination of the deep state will be a massive fight.  They will take a chunk out of the deep state, but unless they structurally redo the entire executive branch and provides oversight and accountability to these agencies, the corruption, waste and abuse will return. 

[Voltaire 5,316]

10 minutes ago, MDC said:

There’s nothing stopping Trump now. He’s going to eliminate the Deep State, balance the budget, cut government spending, replace the ACA with something great, deport all the illegals and lower prices. 

Right?

The ACA is likely to survive, I hadn't heard that as a campaign issue at all.

Sadly, I don't see either party as having any interest in balancing the budget; that went out the window when W got sworn in. I cannot explain how the magical fairy dust has that kept the boat afloat for 50 years continues to keep working; being this stupid for this long should have worse consequences.

For the rest of it though, the impending 2025 reforms look to be the best chance we will have in our lifetime.

[MDC 7,408]

47 minutes ago, jonmx said:

 

Debt-based currency guarantees we will always be in debt (and every other country).  Balancing the budget can only be done on a temporary basis as overall debt inherently grows exponentially by design of our flawed and corrupt federal reserve sysyem. 

Government will get cut for the first time in generations.   Elimination of the deep state will be a massive fight.  They will take a chunk out of the deep state, but unless they structurally redo the entire executive branch and provides oversight and accountability to these agencies, the corruption, waste and abuse will return. 

When 4 years pass and virtually none of Trump’s agenda comes to pass, you will no doubt have all your excuses lined up.  

[Maximum Overkill 1,988]

It's amazing how the political landscape has shifted almost overnight. Even MSNBC is about to rebrand. 

Weren't the Democrats for less government not long ago? Didn't Obama deport 5 million illegal immigrants? 

They're only anti-Trump because their hollow Woke leaders tell them to. 

[Maximum Overkill 1,988]

2 minutes ago, MDC said:

When 4 years pass and virtually none of Trump’s agenda comes to pass, you will no doubt have all your excuses lined up.  

So what's your excuse for Biden's trainwreck of a Presidency?  Don't have one? 

[MDC 7,408]

7 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

So what's your excuse for Biden's trainwreck of a Presidency?  Don't have one? 

No, because I didn’t vote for him!  

[Maximum Overkill 1,988]

2 minutes ago, MDC said:

No, because I didn’t vote for him!  

Sure you didn't. There's not a soul in here who believes your bullshizz. You've defended the old Man at every turn  

[Maximum Overkill 1,988]

 

 

[jonmx 2,429]

32 minutes ago, MDC said:

When 4 years pass and virtually none of Trump’s agenda comes to pass, you will no doubt have all your excuses lined up.  

 

When you are proven wrong will you man up.  You will be the one backpeddling.  

[Maximum Overkill 1,988]

9 minutes ago, jonmx said:

 

When you are proven wrong will you man up.  You will be the one backpeddling.  

He's a hardcore Pedocrat. There's no way he'll admit that he was wrong. He won't even admit that he's a Kamala voter  

[IGotWorms 4,058]

2 hours ago, jonmx said:

You are such a retard.  There are 4 million people entrenched in power which has grow exponentially for more than six decades.  A president comes in and has to make thousands of appointments with very little insight into how these agencies operate.  These agencies operate with zero accountability to anyone.  You are a fuking retard if you don't see how these agencies have become corrupt.  

Again, your crybaby b1tching here bears absolutely no relevance to the appointment of Trump’s AG. He picks her, Republican senate confirms. Period. Nobody else to blame or complain about or spin wild conspiracy theories over

[thegeneral 3,208]

George Soros ex-money guy in at Treasury

[IGotWorms 4,058]

1 hour ago, MDC said:

There’s nothing stopping Trump now. He’s going to eliminate the Deep State, balance the budget, cut government spending, replace the ACA with something great, deport all the illegals and lower prices. 

Right?

[The Real timschochet 6,761]

I won’t complain about Bondi if she starts firing people left and right. That’s fine, it’s her prerogative (and Trump’s). If they want to crack down on what conservatives call “the deep state”, no problem, we’ll see how that goes. 

If they start attempting to prosecute innocent people based on “retribution” or because Trump regards them as enemies, I’ll have a huge problem with that and hopefully so will most people. But until that happens I’m good.  

[IGotWorms 4,058]

1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

I won’t complain about Bondi if she starts firing people left and right. That’s fine, it’s her prerogative (and Trump’s). If they want to crack down on what conservatives call “the deep state”, no problem, we’ll see how that goes. 

If they start attempting to prosecute innocent people based on “retribution” or because Trump regards them as enemies, I’ll have a huge problem with that and hopefully so will most people. But until that happens I’m good.  

Well even the latter part, the precedent has been set with the charges against Trump and others. Stupid focking Democrats screwed that up bad, like everything. Either do it or don’t, but instead they half-assed it and tried to sorta do it without actually doing it. Kvnts