Another Import Success Story *Minnesota*

[easilyscan 858]

https://www.keyc.com/2025/04/22/bca-potential-mass-casualty-event-stopped-with-arrest-st-peter-man/

[Hardcore troubadour 14,923]

A Somali I assume? 

[squistion 1,946]

34 minutes ago, easilyscan said:

Profiling works. Who Knew ?

https://www.keyc.com/2025/04/22/bca-potential-mass-casualty-event-stopped-with-arrest-st-peter-man/

Where was the profiling? He was arrested because he shoplifted over $2,100 worth of merchandise and threatened store employees.

[jbycho 585]

Winning..

[avoiding injuries 1,506]

We got giraffes out here planning mass killings? SMH 

[easilyscan 858]

54 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

A Somali I assume? 

Mohamed Adan Mohamed

I believe you assumed correctly. 

[easilyscan 858]

50 minutes ago, squistion said:

Where was the profiling? He was arrested because he shoplifted over $2,100 worth of merchandise and threatened store employees.

You're right, profiling played no role. It's just that when I saw the picture/story, it reminded me of an incident in the same area from 2021. The city was so wracked with white guilt, they actually considered not posting the picture of a suspect because he was black.

https://www.imagebam.com/view/ME11EX7Y

[jerryskids 6,558]

35 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said:

We got giraffes out here planning mass killings? SMH 

Quote

MANKATO, Minn. (KEYC) - Court documents show a St. Peter man may have been planning a mass casualty event before he was arrested by local law enforcement.

Not killings.  "Casualty."  Can't offend the Somali voting bloc.  Rest assured that if the guy's name was Cletus, we'd be calling it "killings" or "terrorism".

What is a mass casualty event, anyway?  Sounds like a Boy Scout first aid competition.  "Use your neckerchief to create an ankle splint!"  

[easilyscan 858]

1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

Not killings.  "Casualty."  Can't offend the Somali voting bloc.  Rest assured that if the guy's name was Cletus, we'd be calling it "killings" or "terrorism".

What is a mass casualty event, anyway?  Sounds like a Boy Scout first aid competition.  "Use your neckerchief to create an ankle splint!"  

I suppose mass casualty event, replaced something like 'killing spree' to make people feel better. Similar to someone going hungry, replaced with 'food insecurity'

It's all rather pathetic. 

 

[Mungwater 593]

Yay!  This bored rules

[iam90sbaby 2,472]

Imagine turning one of the better states imo into Somali brown town 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,923]

2 hours ago, easilyscan said:

Mohamed Adan Mohamed

I believe you assumed correctly. 

Don’t even have to look. Thanks Obama. POS. 

[easilyscan 858]

2 hours ago, iam90sbaby said:

Imagine turning one of the better states imo into Somali brown town 

The worst part of it is that the State will never come clean about the financial impact of so many of them ending up here. If anyone isn't familiar with Minnesota, & doubts how many are here, @ one point, HBO was planning to do a documentary about St Paul titled little Mogadishu for fock sakes.

 

It's not that we didn't try.

By the spring of 2017, enough people had voiced concerns about the fiscal impact, that Members of the Legislative Audit Commission were directed to examine the extent to which data are (or are not) available to analyze the fiscal impact of refugee resettlement. It was around this time that then governor Mark Dayton, was quoted as saying "if you don't like it, find another state" 

In March 2018, they released the results. 
We found that anyone seeking to estimate this fiscal impact would face significant limitations. There is no comprehensive source of data that identifies which Minnesotans are current or former refugees. Except for human services agencies, most public agencies do not ask about the immigration status of the people they serve. In addition, the data on immigration status collected by human services agencies when determining individuals’ eligibility for various programs has some important limitations.

The absence of comprehensive data to estimate the fiscal impact of refugee resettlement does not have an obvious solution. Most public agencies have no particular need to know the immigration status of the people they serve, and the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act limits the collection of individual data to “that necessary for the administration and management of programs.”

Translation: the state has set it up in such a way that we'll never know the true financial impact.

This is obviously by design.

 

 

 

[iam90sbaby 2,472]

13 minutes ago, easilyscan said:

The worst part of it is that the State will never come clean about the financial impact of so many of them ending up here. If anyone isn't familiar with Minnesota, & doubts how many are here, @ one point, HBO was planning to do a documentary about St Paul titled little Mogadishu for fock sakes.

 

It's not that we didn't try.

By the spring of 2017, enough people had voiced concerns about the fiscal impact, that Members of the Legislative Audit Commission were directed to examine the extent to which data are (or are not) available to analyze the fiscal impact of refugee resettlement. It was around this time that then governor Mark Dayton, was quoted as saying "if you don't like it, find another state" 

In March 2018, they released the results. 
We found that anyone seeking to estimate this fiscal impact would face significant limitations. There is no comprehensive source of data that identifies which Minnesotans are current or former refugees. Except for human services agencies, most public agencies do not ask about the immigration status of the people they serve. In addition, the data on immigration status collected by human services agencies when determining individuals’ eligibility for various programs has some important limitations.

The absence of comprehensive data to estimate the fiscal impact of refugee resettlement does not have an obvious solution. Most public agencies have no particular need to know the immigration status of the people they serve, and the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act limits the collection of individual data to “that necessary for the administration and management of programs.”

Translation: the state has set it up in such a way that we'll never know the true financial impact.

This is obviously by design.

 

 

 

I think the cultural impact is far more devastating 

[SaintsInDome2006 377]

6 hours ago, easilyscan said:

https://www.keyc.com/2025/04/22/bca-potential-mass-casualty-event-stopped-with-arrest-st-peter-man/

>told employees at the store he had an A-R style rifle<
 

Color me shocked.