Elon says that Trump is in the Epstein files.

[thegeneral 3,395]

3 minutes ago, squistion said:

 

Lol

[Horseman 2,683]

54 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Good summary of the (horrific) contents of the Epstein birthday book.

No it isn't.  The Atlantic is hot garbage.  

For fok sake it's only a couple hundred pages half of which are photographs.  

Why is it seemingly impossible for you (or anyone else) to read it and form your own opinion?  

[Horseman 2,683]

1 hour ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Just out of curiosity what is your view of the picture & inscription in the book suggesting Epstein gave (sold) a girl to Trump? (WSJ).

Open question to any as well. There hasn’t been much discussion of this second reference to Trump in the birthday book.

You think they used the giant golf tournament checks to buy girls?  

[jerryskids 6,960]

2 hours ago, Ron_Artest said:

Jerrys explanation was Trump's admin wrote it and then trump signed it without looking at it.

The level of depravity of trump supporters to cover up child rape is astounding 

 

2 hours ago, Sean Mooney said:

Trump is simultaneously the smartest man alive and signing things like Joe Biden was accused of.

Deep disconnect

I'm not sure I can compete with the combined borg stupidity in this thread.  We've got Gutter acting indignant about the most likely scenario with the letter, not to mention the collective hive mentality of THE LETTER IS ALL THE MOST IMPORTANTEST$#@!, no good answer about why Biden, Harris, or whoever was running the country didn't leak anything about the bad orange man, Saints added to the list of people who engage with me without reading what I say, and now we have Sean equating signing a birthday card to autopenning executive orders.

I'm out for now anyway, you all keep up the MSDNC's good work.  Git him for that card!

[Ron_Artest 1,861]

1. Lose the argument

2. Accuse you having TDS

3. Run away

[Meglamaniac 711]

Did they get him yet?

[Horseman 2,683]

News Flash for all the weaklings that's never reached management level:  BOSS's sign all sorts of things without reading them.   They certainly don't make their own birthday/christmas/thank you cards.  You don't get to be a BOSS by doing stay at home mom stuff. They have staff for that.  

[Fnord 2,374]

12 minutes ago, Horseman said:

News Flash for all the weaklings that's never reached management level:  BOSS's sign all sorts of things without reading them.   They certainly don't make their own birthday/christmas/thank you cards.  You don't get to be a BOSS by doing stay at home mom stuff. They have staff for that.  

I'm a BOSS. I can't say for certain, not being involved in this sort of debauchery, but I think the last thing I'd wanna do as a BOSS is have a subordinate type up a lewd letter potentially implicating myself with felonious pedophilia.

I bet you were real popular with your female staff.

[thegeneral 3,395]

1 hour ago, Horseman said:

News Flash for all the weaklings that's never reached management level:  BOSS's sign all sorts of things without reading them.   They certainly don't make their own birthday/christmas/thank you cards.  You don't get to be a BOSS by doing stay at home mom stuff. They have staff for that.  

He says he didn’t sign this and it’s a fake.

[thegeneral 3,395]

2 hours ago, Horseman said:

You think they used the giant golf tournament checks to buy girls?  

He just used em to pay off the hoars he banged!

[SaintsInDome2006 489]

2 hours ago, Horseman said:

You think they used the giant golf tournament checks to buy girls?  

They were making light of suggesting Epstein sold a girl to Trump for $22K. The pic was taken at Maralago. Very specific & debaucherous joke with a very specific number if just a joke.

[Sean Mooney 2,018]

2 hours ago, jerryskids said:

 

I'm not sure I can compete with the combined borg stupidity in this thread.  We've got Gutter acting indignant about the most likely scenario with the letter, not to mention the collective hive mentality of THE LETTER IS ALL THE MOST IMPORTANTEST$#@!, no good answer about why Biden, Harris, or whoever was running the country didn't leak anything about the bad orange man, Saints added to the list of people who engage with me without reading what I say, and now we have Sean equating signing a birthday card to autopenning executive orders.

I'm out for now anyway, you all keep up the MSDNC's good work.  Git him for that card!

Stop making stupid ass arguments then. That would solve a lot of your issues you want to grieve

[SaintsInDome2006 489]

Ghislaine Maxwell ‘worked with Epstein to smear Virginia Giuffre’

[jerryskids 6,960]

1 hour ago, Sean Mooney said:

Stop making stupid ass arguments then. That would solve a lot of your issues you want to grieve

My arguments were fine.  Quite good, actually.  Tell us again how signing a birthday card is the same as enacting federal law, that's a great argument.   

[SaintsInDome2006 489]

UK Ambassador to the US, Lord Mendelson, has been forced to resign due to Epstein revelations.

[Horseman 2,683]

3 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

UK Ambassador to the US, Lord Mendelson, has been forced to resign due to Epstein revelations.

He should have dissolved their friendship (including the emails) after it came to light Epstein was a pedophile, like Trump did. 

[thegeneral 3,395]

1 minute ago, Horseman said:

He should have dissolved their friendship (including the emails) after it came to light Epstein was a pedophile, like Trump did. 

Trump got pissed because the guy stole his employee from his spa. Remember he told us that?

[seafoam1 3,248]

Just now, thegeneral said:

Trump got pissed because the guy stole his employee from his spa. Remember he told us that?

Peegen here has been in a headspin for months now. 

[SaintsInDome2006 489]

1 minute ago, Horseman said:

He should have dissolved their friendship (including the emails) after it came to light Epstein was a pedophile, like Trump did. 

Yeah that went on quite a while for many. FYI that Bloomberg article has info on communications with Clinton & his aide Doug Band. It’s certainly other people besides Trump.

[TimHauck 3,128]

8 hours ago, jerryskids said:

 

I'm not sure I can compete with the combined borg stupidity in this thread.  We've got Gutter acting indignant about the most likely scenario with the letter, not to mention the collective hive mentality of THE LETTER IS ALL THE MOST IMPORTANTEST$#@!, no good answer about why Biden, Harris, or whoever was running the country didn't leak anything about the bad orange man, Saints added to the list of people who engage with me without reading what I say, and now we have Sean equating signing a birthday card to autopenning executive orders.

I'm out for now anyway, you all keep up the MSDNC's good work.  Git him for that card!

OK Trump wasn’t implicated in the files.  Why would he and multiple cabinet members say they were going to release them only to change their mind?

[thegeneral 3,395]

24 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

OK Trump wasn’t implicated in the files.  Why would he and multiple cabinet members say they were going to release them only to change their mind?

No one gives a good answer to this. I don’t expect one now

[jerryskids 6,960]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

OK Trump wasn’t implicated in the files.  Why would he and multiple cabinet members say they were going to release them only to change their mind?

 

57 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

No one gives a good answer to this. I don’t expect one now

I already answered this:

22 hours ago, jerryskids said:

Not maybe, yes. Don't be a chicken shiot, man up to your unbiased moderate ways and resolve the Team Biden dilemma.  In fact I think you were the weak sauce guy I mentioned, although I don't recall for sure.

The rational answer for not releasing "the rest" is that any names would instantly have their lives ruined without the data being vetted or them having their day in court (which is why grand jury testimony is by default sealed).  Add to that, a lot of those names are likely hella powerful and influential.

I'd ask you to take an L here, but you'll just refuse to, and probably bump your Strike thread for the 3rd time today.  Because you are much better at trying to dish out L's than you are accepting your own.

HTH

To answer your followup of "but why did they say they would?!" the likely answer was that they got there thinking they would, but through combinations of legal and other advice, they didn't.  And yes, "other" likely includes "you don't want to piss off these people."

This isn't a whataboutism, but I always respected Obama for not closing Gitmo.  Remember how he was going to close it on day 1?  Yeah, he never did.  The rational explanation was that he got into office and was privy to the reasons it was still being used, reasons that you don't learn as a candidate.  

I'm tagging @SaintsInDome2006in hopes that he reads it and doesn't engage with me again without reading what I wrote.  I'd tag Gutter as well, but he is a hopeless cause.

[thegeneral 3,395]

4 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

 

I already answered this:

To answer your followup of "but why did they say they would?!" the likely answer was that they got there thinking they would, but through combinations of legal and other advice, they didn't.  And yes, "other" likely includes "you don't want to piss off these people."

This isn't a whataboutism, but I always respected Obama for not closing Gitmo.  Remember how he was going to close it on day 1?  Yeah, he never did.  The rational explanation was that he got into office and was privy to the reasons it was still being used, reasons that you don't learn as a candidate.  

I'm tagging @SaintsInDome2006in hopes that he reads it and doesn't engage with me again without reading what I wrote.  I'd tag Gutter as well, but he is a hopeless cause.

This isn’t an adequate reason to me. How long do they need to vet this and didn’t they do this already and have now stopped the investigation?

 

[Ron_Artest 1,861]

Just now, thegeneral said:

This isn’t an adequate reason to me. How long do they need to vet this and didn’t they do this already and have now stopped the investigation?

 

He'll say anything to rationalize supporting a child rapist.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,709]

They thought the pee tape was real. 

[TimHauck 3,128]

47 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

 

I already answered this:

To answer your followup of "but why did they say they would?!" the likely answer was that they got there thinking they would, but through combinations of legal and other advice, they didn't.  And yes, "other" likely includes "you don't want to piss off these people."

This isn't a whataboutism, but I always respected Obama for not closing Gitmo.  Remember how he was going to close it on day 1?  Yeah, he never did.  The rational explanation was that he got into office and was privy to the reasons it was still being used, reasons that you don't learn as a candidate.  

I'm tagging @SaintsInDome2006in hopes that he reads it and doesn't engage with me again without reading what I wrote.  I'd tag Gutter as well, but he is a hopeless cause.

It doesn’t take a lawyer for someone to realize releasing the Epstein list would ruin lives, lol

[thegeneral 3,395]

32 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

They thought the pee tape was real. 

The jury is still out!

[jerryskids 6,960]

54 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

This isn’t an adequate reason to me. How long do they need to vet this and didn’t they do this already and have now stopped the investigation?

 

This response shows a complete non-understanding of everything I said.  Congrats.   

[jerryskids 6,960]

55 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

He'll say anything to rationalize supporting a child rapist.

This tard keeps saying I support a child rapist.  I'll remember it when you cry that your bagina hurts from similar accusations.

  The funny thing is that he thinks I've drunk the red koolaid.  Yet his entire position is "well, uhh, Trump is a pedo, so obviously he did everything the MSM spoon feeds me.  Derp."  You've contributed nothing to this discussion with me other than 70 IQ level regurgitation of your talking points.

[thegeneral 3,395]

3 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

This response shows a complete non-understanding of everything I said.  Congrats.   

“The rational answer for not releasing "the rest" is that any names would instantly have their lives ruined without the data being vetted or them having their day in court (which is why grand jury testimony is by default sealed).  Add to that, a lot of those names are likely hella powerful and influential.”

What is this? 

[jerryskids 6,960]

20 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

It doesn’t take a lawyer for someone to realize releasing the Epstein list would ruin lives, lol

Another dope, lol.  lol, are you 12?  

It might take a lawyer to point out that powerful people will sue the crap out of people and/or the government for publicizing unsubstantiated testimony.

Maybe you should go post some DropDeadStupid or Reuters Hamas tweet about how Israel sucks.

[Horseman 2,683]

1 hour ago, jerryskids said:

 

I already answered this:

To answer your followup of "but why did they say they would?!" the likely answer was that they got there thinking they would, but through combinations of legal and other advice, they didn't.  And yes, "other" likely includes "you don't want to piss off these people."

This isn't a whataboutism, but I always respected Obama for not closing Gitmo.  Remember how he was going to close it on day 1?  Yeah, he never did.  The rational explanation was that he got into office and was privy to the reasons it was still being used, reasons that you don't learn as a candidate.  

I'm tagging @SaintsInDome2006in hopes that he reads it and doesn't engage with me again without reading what I wrote.  I'd tag Gutter as well, but he is a hopeless cause.

And when they forced him to scale down Gitmo he just started killing them with drones instead.

And the weaklings got all worked up about 11 of them on a boat Trump sank.

[Horseman 2,683]

7 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

This tard keeps saying I support a child rapist.  I'll remember it when you cry that your bagina hurts from similar accusations.

  The funny thing is that he thinks I've drunk the red koolaid.  Yet his entire position is "well, uhh, Trump is a pedo, so obviously he did everything the MSM spoon feeds me.  Derp."  You've contributed nothing to this discussion with me other than 70 IQ level regurgitation of your talking points.

It's sad what TDS has reduced him to.  You wouldn't lump him in with TimHauck a couple years ago. 

[TimHauck 3,128]

4 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Another dope, lol.  lol, are you 12?  

It might take a lawyer to point out that powerful people will sue the crap out of people and/or the government for publicizing unsubstantiated testimony.

Maybe you should go post some DropDeadStupid or Reuters Hamas tweet about how Israel sucks.

You just used an emoji.  Are you 12?

Trump’s probably up there for being a party to the most lawsuits in US history, I don’t think anyone needs to tell him when he might get sued.

[Ron_Artest 1,861]

27 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

This tard keeps saying I support a child rapist.  I'll remember it when you cry that your bagina hurts from similar accusations.

  The funny thing is that he thinks I've drunk the red koolaid.  Yet his entire position is "well, uhh, Trump is a pedo, so obviously he did everything the MSM spoon feeds me.  Derp."  You've contributed nothing to this discussion with me other than 70 IQ level regurgitation of your talking points.

Idiot, he was best friends with Epstein for decades.  It's well documented.  He's an accused sexual assaulter, dozens of times.  He said he would release the files, didn't.  He's blocking Congress from subpoena the DOJ for the files.  He wrote the page in the book.  We saw the pic of him "buying" a girl from Epstein.  He calls it all a hoax, hasn't thought about meeting with the victims. It doesn't take an MIT grad to see that Trump is covering up this whole thing.  We have pages and pages of threads going over all this.

All you've done is offer excuses for Trump.  It's sad, but thats who you are now.  I mean, you said that his admin made that birthday page and he signed it without reading it.  How dumb is that?  Trump isn't even saying that.  He's just saying it's fake.  My God man, open your focking eyes.

[Horseman 2,683]

12 hours ago, Horseman said:

You think they used the giant golf tournament checks to buy girls?  

Bump. 

[jerryskids 6,960]

31 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

“The rational answer for not releasing "the rest" is that any names would instantly have their lives ruined without the data being vetted or them having their day in court (which is why grand jury testimony is by default sealed).  Add to that, a lot of those names are likely hella powerful and influential.”

What is this? 

I've made the mistake of re-engaging on this.  Last comment and I'm done.

Walk me through another situation where the government collected testimony, determined not to prosecute, then released the data they collected anyway.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,709]

5 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

Idiot, he was best friends with Epstein for decades.  It's well documented.  He's an accused sexual assaulter, dozens of times.  He said he would release the files, didn't.  He's blocking Congress from subpoena the DOJ for the files.  He wrote the page in the book.  We saw the pic of him "buying" a girl from Epstein.  He calls it all a hoax, hasn't thought about meeting with the victims. It doesn't take an MIT grad to see that Trump is covering up this whole thing.  We have pages and pages of threads going over all this.

All you've done is offer excuses for Trump.  It's sad, but thats who you are now.  I mean, you said that his admin made that birthday page and he signed it without reading it.  How dumb is that?  Trump isn't even saying that.  He's just saying it's fake.  My God man, open your focking eyes.

When did they stop being “best” friends?  BTW, adult men using that term are gayeee

[TimHauck 3,128]

4 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I've made the mistake of re-engaging on this.  Last comment and I'm done.

Walk me through another situation where the government collected testimony, determined not to prosecute, then released the data they collected anyway.

Ethics committee investigation into Matt Gaetz?

[Horseman 2,683]

3 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

I mean, you said that his admin made that birthday page and he signed it without reading it.  How dumb is that?  Trump isn't even saying that.  He's just saying it's fake.  My God man, open your focking eyes.

I guarantee you he didn't make it. You think he's and idiot and all of a sudden he can center type like that. 

You have no clue how being in charge works.  Admin get the cards, come in and tell you to sign, leave.  As you're signing and making a thousand other decisions.  Oh fok, never mind, you work from home, non-essential. Zero clue worker bee.  

I'd say he likey singed it, 90%.  Read it, no way. 10%  Remember it, absolutely not 0%  

Occam's Razor  

Is he an idiot for trying to say it's fake. Yes.

Is he a pedo for saying it's fake. No.