thegeneral 3,618 Posted 3 hours ago Just now, Tree of Knowledge said: Let the man celebrate his victory. It would piss anyone off to continue to deal with nut jobs that buy every blatant falsehood that has been debunked a hundred times Debunked This is great schtick. If it’s a hoax let them talk about it. If it’s the Clinton’s that are guilty why does he give a fock? None of you will ever answer: do you want the stuff released? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,618 Posted 3 hours ago 3 minutes ago, BrahmaBulls said: Sure. They should have been release a year ago. How many focking times are you guys going to ask? There you go. Would someone who is actively blocking this seem guilty to you? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 663 Posted 3 hours ago 9 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said: You guys are digging up such old debunked garbage, Trump was probably 25 at the time. Roughly 50. But it’s not about the age difference. And you already know I said that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Meglamaniac 793 Posted 3 hours ago 4 minutes ago, thegeneral said: There you go. Would someone who is actively blocking this seem guilty to you? You're getting dangerously close to TimHack level with these questions Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 2,239 Posted 3 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Meglamaniac said: You're getting dangerously close to TimHack level with these questions Once he also starts tagging people the transformation will be complete 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,618 Posted 3 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Meglamaniac said: You're getting dangerously close to TimHack level with these questions Really? Seems pretty obvious to me. Just release the info. If someone were blocking it they appear guilty - especially so when we know they are in say emails like we just saw. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BrahmaBulls 934 Posted 3 hours ago 12 minutes ago, thegeneral said: There you go. Would someone who is actively blocking this seem guilty to you? Agree with Megla you sound like ShoHauck now. Yes anyone blocking this is likely guilty or part of a cover-up. That includes Trump and this team but also includes Biden and last administration. There's a reason they didn't release anything either. I know this is the latest boner pill for you to go after Trump but be careful what you wish for I guess. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 663 Posted 3 hours ago 18 minutes ago, Strike said: So apparently a Republican offered a motion to release all the Epstein files immediately. The Dems blocked it. Hmmmmmm............. The Speaker Pro Tempore (R) did it on his own ruling. I take it Mike Johnson didn’t want to do it himself. There was nothing wrong with the ruling, apparently it’s a real thing. Bad rule (leadership of both parties must agree to a unanimous consent vote apparently) but it exists. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Meglamaniac 793 Posted 3 hours ago 3 minutes ago, thegeneral said: Really? Seems pretty obvious to me. Just release the info. If someone were blocking it they appear guilty - especially so when we know they are in say emails like we just saw. Everyone gets it, continuing to pester posters for an answer is a bad look Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
supermike80 2,092 Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, dogcows said: Good point. There is no “getting him” because the MAGA cultists will never abandon their leader. Can we please just skip to the kool-aid? You doofuses with this. No one on the left wanted Biden out, even when he was clearly not fit. Ya all stood there and lied lied lied. this isn't just a MAGA thing..Its a partisan thing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,618 Posted 3 hours ago Just now, BrahmaBulls said: Agree with Megla you sound like ShoHauck now. Yes anyone blocking this is likely guilty or part of a cover-up. That includes Trump and this team but also includes Biden and last administration. There's a reason they didn't release anything either. I know this is the latest boner pill for you to go after Trump but be careful what you wish for I guess. Sure if Biden blocked stuff or whoever then they look guilty. I don’t recall this ever being brought up like it is now. You don’t find things like this birthday card, or Epstein discussing Trump with his lawyer, to be suspicious? There is a procedure to release the stuff now that is being blocked by Congress, republicans in Congress. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,618 Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, Meglamaniac said: Everyone gets it, continuing to pester posters for an answer is a bad look Just answer the questions. It’s that easy. Instead we get crap about the Clintons, about the deep state, about how Biden should have done it, videos of Joe Biden, etc. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
supermike80 2,092 Posted 3 hours ago 24 minutes ago, thegeneral said: Don going on about this is a hoax to distract from the shutdown. I’d think he’d welcome people talking about this if he were innocent, and as @jonmx says it’s really the Clintons that are guilty, no? Would also distract from poor economic data that keeps coming up every day. Dead ass BS. This blew up RIGHT after the dems decided to stop shutting don the government. this is a distraction from their failures. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Meglamaniac 793 Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, thegeneral said: Just answer the questions. It’s that easy. Instead we get crap about the Clintons, about the deep state, about how Biden should have done it, videos of Joe Biden, etc. sigh, OK 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
supermike80 2,092 Posted 3 hours ago 6 minutes ago, BrahmaBulls said: Agree with Megla you sound like ShoHauck now. Yes anyone blocking this is likely guilty or part of a cover-up. That includes Trump and this team but also includes Biden and last administration. There's a reason they didn't release anything either. I know this is the latest boner pill for you to go after Trump but be careful what you wish for I guess. These simpletons and TDS infected can ONLY deduce that Trump must be involved. they cant fathom that there are super uber powerful people in this country....more powerful that even Trump, who are fighting this and pulling strings to keep fighting it. If that wasn't true, this would have been released prior to the election. Especially if Trump was involved. The dems tried everything they could think of to stop him....and they wouldn't release this info? God. Simple minds man. Some just have no idea how power really works 2 2 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 663 Posted 3 hours ago The discharge petition has been awaiting final signatures for some time. The House could have been conducting business in a myriad of ways including that but Johnson closed it down altogether. When Grijalva was elected she was the final vote, that could’ve happened weeks ago. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,249 Posted 3 hours ago 33 minutes ago, Strike said: So apparently a Republican offered a motion to release all the Epstein files immediately. The Dems blocked it. Hmmmmmm............. Where did you hear that? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 7,486 Posted 3 hours ago 35 minutes ago, Strike said: So apparently a Republican offered a motion to release all the Epstein files immediately. The Dems blocked it. Hmmmmmm............. lol that’s not at all what happened. https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-loyalist-unveiled-own-epstein-153642927.html It was a Republican who shot him down for being out of order. Later he claimed that Democrats verbally tried to stop it, but there is no evidence for this; he is lying just as you are lying here. Not surprised you didn’t provide a link (though it once again demonstrates your hypocrisy as you are the #1 guy here for demanding links from others and calling them liars if they’re not produced.) 4 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 663 Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, Ron_Artest said: Where did you hear that? Rep. Tim Burchett claimed it in a social media post. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,439 Posted 3 hours ago 5 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said: lol that’s not at all what happened. https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-loyalist-unveiled-own-epstein-153642927.html It was a Republican who shot him down for being out of order. Later he claimed that Democrats verbally tried to stop it, but there is no evidence for this; he is lying just as you are lying here. Not surprised you didn’t provide a link (though it once again demonstrates your hypocrisy as you are the #1 guy here for demanding links from others and calling them liars if they’re not produced.) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,618 Posted 3 hours ago 17 minutes ago, supermike80 said: These simpletons and TDS infected can ONLY deduce that Trump must be involved. they cant fathom that there are super uber powerful people in this country....more powerful that even Trump, who are fighting this and pulling strings to keep fighting it. If that wasn't true, this would have been released prior to the election. Especially if Trump was involved. The dems tried everything they could think of to stop him....and they wouldn't release this info? God. Simple minds man. Some just have no idea how power really works Why wouldn’t this stuff that has come out in the past few days have been released earlier? It is certainly damaging to Trump. It makes him look guilty. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BrahmaBulls 934 Posted 3 hours ago 7 minutes ago, thegeneral said: Why wouldn’t this stuff that has come out in the past few days have been released earlier? It is certainly damaging to Trump. It makes him look guilty. Why would a child rape coverup been okay for you for months but now must be released because of a picture of a Trump? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 3,432 Posted 2 hours ago 14 hours ago, Tree of Knowledge said: Democrat Party needs divert attention from the Schumer Shutdown abomination so they dig up this debunked conspiracy theory for their base. Sad. This is the best strategy they can come up with. And they still think the whole world doesn't see through it all. There is zero intelligence in that party and their voter base. They are simply all human sized liberal gnats. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,618 Posted 2 hours ago 7 minutes ago, BrahmaBulls said: Why would a child rape coverup been okay for you for months but now must be released because of a picture of a Trump? Of course not. If I was aware of Congress, or the deep state, or Biden actively blocking the release of info I would think that was messed up. Are you aware of this ever occurring in say Congress like it is now Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,314 Posted 2 hours ago 46 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said: lol that’s not at all what happened. https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-loyalist-unveiled-own-epstein-153642927.html It was a Republican who shot him down for being out of order. Later he claimed that Democrats verbally tried to stop it, but there is no evidence for this; he is lying just as you are lying here. Not surprised you didn’t provide a link (though it once again demonstrates your hypocrisy as you are the #1 guy here for demanding links from others and calling them liars if they’re not produced.) A different poster already showed the link to Burchett’s claim. I also think this line in your link is particularly notable: Through unanimous consent, lawmakers are not required to go on the record in a roll call vote. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
supermike80 2,092 Posted 2 hours ago 42 minutes ago, thegeneral said: Why wouldn’t this stuff that has come out in the past few days have been released earlier? It is certainly damaging to Trump. It makes him look guilty. You must have not read my post. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 663 Posted 2 hours ago It is interesting that some Republicans said they would vote for release but wouldn’t sign the discharge petition (including Burchett). Maybe they thought they could do that through unanimous consent. If they vote on the record they can either invite Trump’s wrath or their constituents’. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,618 Posted 2 hours ago 13 minutes ago, supermike80 said: You must have not read my post. The one about super powerful people? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
supermike80 2,092 Posted 2 hours ago 11 minutes ago, thegeneral said: The one about super powerful people? That's the one Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 2,239 Posted 1 hour ago WTF ” Jeffrey Epstein received an email from Emirati billionaire Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem in 2011, subjected "smart shoes." Ahmed bin Sulayem advises Epstein he can assist with providing shoes with GPS integration to track "kids" and clients. Epstein responds with "thanks, great idea." Ahmed bin Sulayem is the CEO of the logistical giant DP World, which has ties to the Emirati military industrial complex.” 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,618 Posted 1 hour ago 6 minutes ago, supermike80 said: That's the one I don’t understand why “they” would choose to release this info now. This info about Trump keeps coming out in dribs and drabs while he is fighting to block its release. Just release it all and be done with it. When it comes out the line is that it’s fake, or it’s to distract, etc. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,249 Posted 1 hour ago 4 minutes ago, thegeneral said: I don’t understand why “they” would choose to release this info now. This info about Trump keeps coming out in dribs and drabs while he is fighting to block its release. Just release it all and be done with it. When it comes out the line is that it’s fake, or it’s to distract, etc. These emails were handed over to congress by the epstein estate after the subpoena'd them this summer. We don't know when they got them, might have been recently. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
avoiding injuries 1,652 Posted 1 hour ago 3 hours ago, thegeneral said: This is just stupid shet they say when they know he’s guilty of stuff. Yeah Prez’s get over on people. Big shock. What is it that you really actually want here? I can tell you with certainty, you’re not going to get it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,618 Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, Ron_Artest said: These emails were handed over to congress by the epstein estate after the subpoena'd them this summer. We don't know when they got them, might have been recently. To me it’s pretty clear that Don doesn’t want any of this stuff out because it’s embarrassing at the very least. He’s lied about his relationship with Epstein. Would anyone be surprised if he banged some 17 year old that Epstein set up for him? Of course not. I don’t think this occurred or anything to that level but there’s no excusing that he fights so hard to stop it getting out and it makes him look guilty as hell. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,618 Posted 1 hour ago 6 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said: What is it that you really actually want here? I can tell you with certainty, you’re not going to get it. Release the stuff they have. Stop blocking it. Anyone that actually answers when asked this question - should they release the info they have - says the same thing. Yes they should. Or they choose to ignore it, start talking about some whatabout stuff, post videos of Biden, etc. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 3,432 Posted 1 hour ago 11 minutes ago, thegeneral said: Release the stuff they have. Stop blocking it. Why didn't you say this when your master creepy joe had his hands on these fictional files? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 7,486 Posted 1 hour ago 22 minutes ago, thegeneral said: post videos of Biden, etc. I for one would like to see the video of Biden hugging young children. Do you have access to that? 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,618 Posted 1 hour ago 10 minutes ago, seafoam1 said: Why didn't you say this when your master creepy joe had his hands on these fictional files? @avoiding injuries case in point To this I would have been for this being released. I was unaware of it being blocked by Congress or Biden. Are you aware of this being done like it is now? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 3,432 Posted 1 hour ago 5 minutes ago, thegeneral said: @avoiding injuries case in point To this I would have been for this being released. I was unaware of it being blocked by Congress or Biden. Are you aware of this being done like it is now? You are considering it blocked because all of a sudden liberals are crying about it. Now that creepy Joe is gone for good why are you libtards crying now instead of before? Are you this dumb? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,618 Posted 1 hour ago Just now, seafoam1 said: You are considering it blocked because all of a sudden liberals are crying about it. Now that creepy Joe is gone for good why are you libtards crying now instead of before? Are you this dumb? I would have been asking for anything to be released that the government had. I have answered this question to you many times. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites